Professional Documents
Culture Documents
02 - Made Novita Dwi Lestari-Isu Terkini Pariwisata
02 - Made Novita Dwi Lestari-Isu Terkini Pariwisata
e. The methodology
The major goal of this research is to assess the economic impact of EMAS (Eco-
Management and Audit Scheme) on hotel costs. To do this, it is critical to
establish the certification's market worth. The researchers use the hedonic
pricing model to address this. The propensity score-matching approach is used
before estimating the hedonic model to account for the non-random selection of
certain types of tourism hotels that seek certification.
To reduce the bias caused by self-selection, propensity score matching is used.
To investigate the influence of certification on hotel costs, the same hotels must
be observed with and without EMAS certification. This, however, is not a viable
option. By balancing the characteristics of hotels in the treatment and control
groups, matching approaches give an appropriate solution to this challenge.
These non-parametric techniques are useful for improving causal inferences in
observational investigations.
g. The conclusions
The tourist sector is presently facing a huge problem in terms of sustainability.
Institutions and social actors are launching a variety of initiatives to encourage
sustainable tourism. One such endeavour entails the implementation of optional
sustainable certificates for lodging businesses. These certifications first
appeared in the mid-1990s with the twin goal of minimizing environmental
harm and giving firms with a competitive edge. Certification is chosen by
lodging operators when the financial benefits surpass the price of getting it. As
a result, determining the economic impact of this sustainability strategy is
critical.
This study contributes to the area by calculating the price premium that
customers are prepared to pay for EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit
Scheme), a voluntary sustainable certification. The hedonic pricing approach is
used to do this while simultaneously accounting for self-selection bias.
However, our data show that sustainable certification has no substantial
influence on lodging pricing. This implies that firms are unable to recuperate
their certification expenditure through increased pricing, diminishing the
program's usefulness as an environmental policy tool.
The extant literature offers two major explanations for this result. According to
the first argument, simply having a sustainable certification is inadequate to
produce a good economic impact for enterprises. Other steps, in addition to
certification, must be adopted to support the growth of sustainable tourism.
These steps can be implemented by a variety of parties, including the certifying
organization itself, local governments striving to improve the region's
environmental quality, or other groups participating in the tourist business.
Thus, for the policy to be economically beneficial to enterprises while also
serving as an effective environmental policy instrument, a mixture of tactics
known as policy mixes must be used.
The second explanation is concerned with the sort of tourist that the island
draws. It shows that the island's visitors, particularly foreigners, may have a low
level of commitment to sustainability. While studies have revealed that
sustainable certifications such as the Blue Flag have an economic impact on
local travellers, Cerqua discovered that there appears to be little influence on
foreign tourists. Tourists from Anglo-Saxon and German countries may behave
differently toward sustainable tourism inside their own countries than while
traveling to Mediterranean sites. They may value sustainability when traveling
within the country but not necessarily when visiting Mediterranean nations.
First, the paper discusses how the certification program pushes tourist enterprises to
embrace environmentally friendly activities. It establishes certain requirements and
criteria that firms must achieve to be certified. This leads to better environmental
management, conservation activities, and cultural heritage preservation, all of which
benefit the destinations and people involved. Second, about improving reputation and
consumer trust. The certification program establishes a legitimate and well-known
symbol for sustainable tourism. Businesses that earn certification get a competitive
advantage by demonstrating their commitment to environmentally friendly operations.
Third, This article investigates the certification program's economic impact. It implies
that sustainable tourism accreditation might boost economic growth by recruiting eco-
conscious travellers. These visitors are more likely to spend money on local goods,
services, and experiences, which benefits local communities and economies. The
fourth is participation of Stakeholders. The execution of a sustainable tourism
certification program needs participation of many stakeholders. The article underlines
the necessity of collaboration among tourist enterprises, government agencies, local
communities, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This cooperation
encourages information exchange, capacity building, and the formation of partnerships
to accomplish sustainable objectives. It also encourages stakeholders to feel a sense of
ownership and responsibility, which leads to long-term commitment and ongoing
development in sustainable practices. The last one is monitoring and evaluation. It
underlines the importance of appropriate monitoring and evaluation methods for
assessing the efficacy and consequences of sustainable tourism efforts. This data-driven
strategy helps policymakers, investors, and other stakeholders identify areas for
development, measure progress, and illustrate the benefit of sustainable tourism.