Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dean LR Notes
Dean LR Notes
OBLIGATIONS
Natural Obligations .............................................. 57
PRESCRIPTION ...................................................... 57
TRUSTS ..................................................................... 60
AND Page | 1
Disclaimer:
The contents of this reviewer were not purely
Q: What is the import of studying Articles 37-
based on Dean LR’s verbatim discussion. Some
discussions on different commentaries and 47 of the Civil Code in the study of Obligations
reviewers were included to fill the gaps in the
and Contracts?
discussions.
Use at your own peril! Good luck! A: Juridical relation arising from an obligation be it
2 or more-person Art. 37-47 lays down the classes
Dean LR Notes 2021
of persons who can be parties of a contract.
PRELIMINARY MATTERS ..................................... 1 Juridical persons are obliged to follow the law in
Nature and Effect of Obligations .......................... 4 Art. 37-39 defines what is juridical capacity and
Philippine Usury Law ........................................... 17 capacity to act, in relation to obligation and
Classifications Of Obligations ............................. 22 contracts, it states certain restrictions which may
Modes of Extinguishment of Obligations .......... 33 limit to an extent those capacity to act that are
CONTRACTS............................................................ 39 considered restricted.
Essential Elements of a Contract......................... 41
There also expounds certain modifying
Forms...................................................................... 42
circumstances of capacity to act which limits their
Reformation ........................................................... 44
capacity to enter to a contract.
Interpretation of Contracts ................................... 45
Defective Contracts ............................................... 46 Put it short, said provisions speak of the parties
Matrix of Defective Contracts .......................... 52 (persons) in Obligations and Contracts, and their
capacity to enter into such legal relations and also Q: When you attend a baby shower and bring
circumstances which limit or modifies such a gift, is the baby being conceived capacitated
capacity. to accept your gift?
Q: When you buy from Jollibee, who do you A: YES. The donation given to a conceived child Page | 2
transact with? The cashier or Jollibee itself? is considered valid. There is a juridical relationship
created between the guest who intends to donate
A: You may transact with Jollibee because he may
an object to a fetus which is still being conceived.
enter legal relations for being a juridical person.
There is a contract of donation but the problem is
He may sue and be sued.
not yet born Art. 40 is very clear birth determines
Juridical relationship arising from an obligation, personality unless or until you are born you are not
means juridical necessity arises from two yet a natural person. Only upon birth you are
persons where one is required to give, to do considered a natural person. By analogy if talking
and not to do. about juridical person, definitely a juridical person
has not any physical existence the birth of juridical
KINDS OF JURIDICAL PERSONS
person it commences upon the time that a cert of
1. Public Juridical Person – includes registration is issued but it is referring to a private
government agencies and bodies. person but on public person at the time a charter
2. Private Juridical Person is enacted by Congress or Senate.
a. Private Corporation – Inception is
RH law is opposed by the church as the hospitals
from the grant of its certificate of
would legalize giving contraceptives. POV of
incorporation from the SEC.
church fetus is already a natural person but civil law
Governed by the Corporation Code
has different position that a child should be born
and the Civil Code.
to be considered as natural person as a general rule.
b. Partnership – Inception is from the
ART. 40 but a conceived child shall be considered
meeting of the minds of the partners
born for all the purposes favorable to it. Which is
and is governed by the terms and
mandatory “shall”. A conceived child shall be
conditions of the partnership, akin to a
considered natural person for all the purposes
contract.
favorable to it. The fetus is not always given a
presumptive/ provisional personality as it would
only be given upon the presence of the condition
that there is an act favorable to the fetus. If there (NOTA BENE: Definitions of the words
is none the mother would still need to wait for the immediately below were taken from the LR Notes
birth of the baby to have the provisional or for Property.)
presumptive personality.
Accession - Article 440 of the Civil Code, Page | 3
In the baby shower the donation is intended to the accessions are the fruits of a thing or additions to
fetus which is favorable for that to be valid there or improvements upon a thing or the principal. It
should be a recipient. Donation is perfected upon is not a mode of acquiring ownership for it is
the acceptance of the donee reaches the knowledge simply an extension of ownership over a thing to
of the donor. In this case the fetus cannot accept whatever is incorporated thereto naturally or
the donation so in this case it is accepted by the artificially, with or without human labor.
mother but then, the personality given to the fetus
Accessory - Accessories are ornaments to add
is only provisional for the donation to be perfectly
beauty and may be removed without causing injury.
valid the baby should comply in the requirement in
They are things joined to, or included with the
Art. 41.
principal for the latter’s embellishment,
Donation was often use to a church or charitable completion, or better use.
institution but in the point of view of civil law,
Ordinary Expenses - Ordinary expenses are
donation is the act of liberality anything that is
those which arise due to the ordinary wear and tear,
a gift is a donation.
shouldered by the person enjoying the possession
Q: Why do you have a cause of action against of the property.
Jollibee if your food was served with a foreign
Extraordinary Expenses - Extraordinary
element?
expenses are those which are equivalent to
A: Because the contract of sale in the transaction necessary expense, owner will be responsible.
requires that diligence be exercised as they have a
Necessary Expenses - Necessary expenses refer
duty to serve quality food.. This is why the waiter
to those expenses which without it the thing will
or manager will apologize to you and tell you
physically deteriorate or perish.
‘palitan ko nalang po sir’. Because they are aware that
such breach gives you a cause of action against Usual Expenses - Useful expenses refer to those
them. which increase the productivity or raise the value
of the thing.
OBLIGATIONS
Nature and Effect of Obligations
destruction to itself. Those are property which fall
under the enumeration provided in Article 415 of SUBJECTS OF AN OBLIGATION
the Civil Code.
1. Active (Creditor/Obligee) - one who
Movable Property - Movable or Personal demands the fulfillment of an obligation
property are those which can be transferred from 2. Passive (Debtor/Obligor) - one who has
one place to another. the duty to fulfill an obligation.
Consumable Property – According to Article 418 Q: During Holy Week, you have the duty to
of the Civil Code, consumable property refers to fast and observe abstinence, may the Church
those movables which cannot be used in a manner penalize you in case of non-observance?
appropriate to their nature without their being
A: NO. The said obligation is of moral character
consumed.
and does not fall within the enumerations of Art.
Non-Consummable Property – According to 1157 of the Civil Code which treats of the sources
Article 418 are all other movable properties which of obligations.
do not require consumption in usage.
Juridical necessity means that the obligation
Fungible Property – Fungible property are those must be fulfilled, non-fulfillment would lead to
property that can be replaced by another property legal sanctions enforceable against the breach.
of the same kind or quality. These are replaceable
Juridical Necessity is important because in every
by equal quantity either by agreement or by nature.
obligation that needs to be delivered is binding
enforced to the obligor and obligee that is governed by precepts of such law or
regulated and protected by the law. provision. (Art. 1158).
2. Contracts – Law between parties.
Personal vs. Moral Obligation
Stipulations (as long as not contrary to law, Page | 5
In Personal obligation there is a thing that need to public order, public policy, morals, and
be done or not to be done which can result to custom) shall be the governing law. Must
sanction as moral obligation would not have a be complied with in good faith (Art. 1159).
binding effect as it does not have a particular law 3. Quasi-Contracts – governed by Chap. 1,
that enforce it. Title XVII of the Civil Code. (Art. 1160)
4. Acts or Omissions Punished by Law
i.e. You cannot be sued in court for not
(delicts) – Governed by penal laws subject
going to church (moral obligation) as it is
to the provisions of Art.2177 and other
not considered as a juridical necessity.
pertinent provisions on Human Relations
and Title XVIII of the Civil Code. (Art.
1161)
PRESTATIONS (OBJECTS OF
5. Quasi-delicts – Governed by Chap. 2,
OBLIGATIONS) – the method or mode by
Title XVII of the Civil Code and Special
which an obligation is to be satisfied.
Laws. (Art. 1162)
1. To Give – Real Obligation
Q: Can you file an independent civil action
2. To Do – Positive Personal Obligation
without filing any reservation?
3. Not to Do – Negative Personal Obligation
A: YES. An independent civil action may still be
VINCULUM JURIS (Juridical Tie / Efficient
filed regardless of the lack of the reservation
Cause) - It is that which binds or connects the
requirement so long as it is still within the
parties to the obligation. (De Leon) In other words,
prescriptive period. This is especially true in cases
it is the legal relation between the debtor and the
of liabilities falling under quasi-delicts. Under
creditor (or obligor and obligee).
Section 1 of the present Rule 111, what is "deemed
SOURCES OF OBLIGATION (Art. 1157) instituted" with the criminal action is only the
action to recover civil liability arising from the
1. Law – Not presumed. Must be expressly
crime or ex-delicto. Reservation is only required
stated in the Code or special laws and is
for liabilities falling under delicts.
NOTE: All the other civil actions under Articles Q: If the accused died, is the civil liability
32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil Code are no longer arising from the crime committed
"deemed instituted," and may be filed separately extinguished?
and prosecuted independently even without any
A: YES. According to Sec. 4 of Rule 111 of the Page | 6
reservation in the criminal action. The failure to
Rules of Court, the death of the accused after
make a reservation in the criminal action is not a
arraignment and during the pendency of the case
waiver of the right to file a separate and
extinguishes the liability ex delicto as the civil
independent civil action based on the
liability arising therein is dependent on the criminal
abovementioned provisions of the Civil Code.
action. However, those other liabilities arising from
Since the reservation requirement sought to
the crime which are instituted as independent civil
prevent double claims for damages, it may already
action shall be enforceable upon the estate of the
be dispensed with because Art. 2177 of the Civil
deceased accused. (See ruling in PEOPLE v.
Code specifically prohibits double claims for civil
BAYOTAS)
liabilities.
NOTE: The pronouncements of the Court in
GR: Civil case is deemed instituted in a
People v. Sendaydiego.
criminal case.
PEOPLE v. SENDAYDIEGO
XPN: As provided in Rule 111 of Sec.1 of
The civil liability was allowed to survive
the Rules of Court had lay down:
although it was clear that such claim thereon was
1. It is automatic that the Civil liability is exclusively dependent on the criminal action
already attached to the criminal case is that already extinguished.
you already waived (if the civil case is filed The claim of complainant Province of
ahead of the criminal case) Pangasinan for the civil liability survived
2. There is a waiver to file a civil case. Sendaydiego because his death occurred after
3. There is a reservation to file a civil action final judgment was rendered by the Court of
to the delict that is committed. First Instance of Pangasinan, which convicted
him of three complex crimes of malversation
But if the source is law, contract, quasi-contract
through falsification and ordered him to
and quasi-delict you can file a civil action without a
indemnify the Province in the total sum of
reservation.
P61,048.23 (should be P57,048.23).
The civil action for the civil liability is deemed Q: Why can the estate be sued in place of a
impliedly instituted with the criminal action in deceased who has an unsatisfied obligation?
the absence of express waiver or its reservation
A: Under the regime of the Civil Code and before
in a separate action (Sec. 1, Rule 111 of the Rules
the enactment of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Page | 7
of Court). The civil action for the civil liability is
heirs of a deceased person were considered in
separate and distinct from the criminal action
contemplation of law as the continuation of his
(People and Manuel vs. Coloma, 105 Phil. 1287; Roa
personality by virtue of the provision of article 661
vs. De la Cruz, 107 Phil. 8).
of the first Code that the heirs succeed to all the
When the action is for the recovery of money
rights and obligations of the decedent by the mere
and the defendant dies before final judgment in
fact of his death. It was so held by this Court
the Court of First Instance, it shall be dismissed
in Barrios vs. Dolor, 2 Phil., 44, 46. However, after
to be prosecuted in the manner especially
the enactment of the Code of Civil Procedure,
provided in Rule 87 of the Rules of Court (Sec.
article 661 of the Civil Code was abrogated, as held
21, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court).
in Suiliong & Co. vs. Chio-Taysan, 12 Phil., 13, 22. In
The implication is that, if the defendant dies
that case, as well as in many others decided by this
after a money judgment had been rendered
Court after the innovations introduced by the
against him by the Court of First Instance, the
Code of Civil Procedure in the matter of estates of
action survives him. It may be continued on
deceased persons, it has been the constant doctrine
appeal (Torrijos vs. Court of Appeals, L-40336,
that it is the estate or the mass of property, rights
October 24, 1975; 67 SCRA 394).
and assets left by the decedent, instead of the heirs
The accountable public officer may still be civilly
directly, that becomes vested and charged with his
liable for the funds improperly disbursed
rights and obligations which survive after his
although he has no criminal liability (U.S. vs.
demise.
Elvina, 24 Phil. 230; Philippine National Bank vs.
Tugab, 66 Phil. 583). The heirs were formerly considered as the
continuation of the decedent's personality simply
by legal fiction, for they might not have been flesh
and blood — the reason was one in the nature of a
legal exigency derived from the principle that the
heirs succeeded to the rights and obligations of the
decedent. Under the present legal system, such
rights and obligations as survive after death have to which the civil liability may arise did not
be exercised and fulfilled only by the estate of the exist.
deceased. And if the same legal fiction were not • IF ACQUITTAL IS BASED ON
indulged, there would be no juridical basis for the REASONABLE DOUBT – Page | 8
estate, represented by the executor or NO. In this case, mere preponderance of
administrator, to exercise those rights and to fulfill evidence will suffice.
those obligations of the deceased. The reason and
NOTE: Liability of a 3rd person who did not
purpose for indulging the fiction is identical and
commit the act, the act was committed by a 3rd
the same in both cases. This is why according to
person but they had the control or supervision by
the Supreme Court of Indiana in Billings vs.
that 3rd person called vicarious liability. The
State, supra, citing 2 Rapalje & L. Dictionary, 954,
ground for liability is the negligence of selection of
among the artificial persons recognized by law
a good driver.
figures "a collection of property to which the law
attributes the capacity of having rights and duties",
as for instance, the estate of a bankrupt or deceased
Quasi-Contracts - Certain lawful, voluntary and
person. (LIMJOCO V. ESTATE OF PEDRO
unilateral acts give rise to the juridical relation of
FRAGANTE)
quasi-contract to the end that no one shall be
unjustly enriched or benefited at the expense of
another. (Art. 2142)
Q: If the criminal case is dismissed, is the civil
liability from that case extinguished? KINDS OF QUASI-CONTRACTS
also the case where one performed labor charge of the agency or management of the
for another, or assumed to pay a debt for business or property of another, without
which he was not bound, or relinquished a any power from the latter, is obliged to
right or released a debt, under the continue the same until the termination of Page | 9
impression that he was legally bound to do the affair and its incidents, or to require the
so. person concerned to substitute him, if the
owner is in a position to do so.
ELEMENTS:
XPNS to the applicability of
(1) payment is made when there exists no
Negotiorum Gestio:
binding relation between the payor, who
has no duty to pay, and the person who (1) When the property or business is not
received the payment; and (2) the payment neglected or abandoned;
is made through mistake, and not through
liberality or some other cause. (2) If in fact the manager has been tacitly
i.e. If you happen to find a authorized by the owner.
PhP1000 lying on the floor, you
Q: What is the effect of a negotiorum gestio?
have the duty to return it. In the
Philippines, the rule is you have to A: The owner shall be liable for the improvements
surrender it to the proper to his property or any damage that incurs to the
authorities and the latter should voluntary agent or manager.
publish its founding. Should there
i.e. In the Philippines Jericho Rosales
be no claimants after the proper
always volunteers for rescues during
period has elapsed, you have the
typhoon. Whatever happens to Jericho
right to demand it.
Rosales during such endeavor, his heirs
REASON: Claiming ownership of
shall be compensated.
it when there is no right to it, leads
to unjust enrichment.
A: YES. You have the right to recover. This case INDETERMINATE OR GENERIC
falls under solutio indebiti which provides that that THING - is the opposite of determinate or
which is collected without the right to demand it specific thing; that is, generic or indeterminate
and was delivered through mistake, should be thing is not particularly designated or physically Page | 10
returned. segregated from all others of the same class. It
means that a thing cannot be specifically
determined from things of the same class. The
DEGREES OF DILIGENCE thing can be replaced by another thing that is of the
same quality.
1. Extraordinary Diligence (ex: common
carriage)
2. Slight Diligence
Q: What is the significance in distinguishing
3. Diligence of a good father of the family
whether the thing is determinate or generic in
relation to Oblicon?
Q; Why does the law require “diligence of a
A: Art. 1262 states that the loss of a determinate
good father of the family” as the basis of
thing through a fortuitous event extinguishes the
diligence, are mothers not diligent?
obligation. Meaning that the thing is lost without
A: Diligence of a good father of a family simply the fault of the debtor. This is the general rule. But
means ordinary care. Just like a father of a family, when it comes to Indeterminate thing, such loss of
it is a care that an average person would do in the thing does not extinguish the obligation (genus
taking care of his property. nunquam perit).
a. the cause of the breach of the By nature, pertains to things that are at risk. (i.e.,
obligation must be independent of the obligation consists of transport of flammable
the will of the debtor; substances; if the truck explodes causing damage
b. the event must be either to property, the one responsible cannot invoke Page | 11
unforeseeable or unavoidable; immunity from liability arising from a fortuitous
c. the event must be such as to render event.)
it impossible for the debtor to
Q: What are the obligations of someone
fulfill his obligation in a normal
obliged to give a determinate thing?
manner; and
d. the debtor must be free from any A:
participation in, or aggravation of
I. To take good care of the thing with the
the injury to the creditor
diligence of a good father of a family.
GR: No one should be liable for a
Diligence of a good father of a family means an
fortuitous event.
ordinary care. Just like a father of a family, it is a
XPNs: care that an average person would do in taking care
of his property.
(1) law provides, or
II. To deliver the thing.
(2) under a stipulation in the contract.
Delivery is placing the thing in the possession or
NOTE: Art. 1174 is only applicable to real
control of the active subject (obligee) by the
obligations.
passive subject (obligor) either actually or
Effect of Fortuitous Event constructively.
a. If DETERMINATE, if lost, then the III. To deliver the fruits of the thing.
obligation is extinguished.
The creditor has a right to the fruits of the thing
b. If the object is GENERIC, even if there’s
from the time the obligation to deliver the thing
a fortuitous event, the debtor is liable.
arises. However, such creditor has no real right
Assumption of Risk (Created Risk Doctrine) over the thing unless such it has been delivered to
him.
Rights of the creditor (obligee) such as those plants sown on a parcel of land sold
to a buyer.
a. Personal right - a right that may be enforce by
one person on another, such as the right of a b. Accessories - joined to or included in the
creditor to demand delivery of the thing and its principal thing for the latter's better use. Example: Page | 12
fruits from the debtor. keys to the car or house.
b. Real right - a right or power over a specific Q: What are the remedies of the creditor when
thing which is enforceable against the whole world. the debtor fails to perform his obligation?
It is acquired by the creditor from the delivery of
1. If to deliver a determinate thing
the thing and its fruits unto him.
a. compel the debtor to make the delivery (Art.
Kinds of fruits (Art. 441) that the debtor is also
1165)
obliged to deliver:
b. demand damages from the debtor (Art. 1170)
a. Natural Fruits - They are the spontaneous
Q: What if in the case to deliver an
products of the soil, and the young and other
indeterminate thing?
products of animals. (Art. 442).
A:
b. Industrial Fruits - Industrial fruits are those
produced by lands of any kind through cultivation a. ask that the obligation be complied with at
or labor. (Art. 442). the expense of the debtor (Art. 1165)
b. demand damages from the debtor (Art.
c. Civil Fruits -They are the result of a juridical
1170)
relation such as the rents of buildings, the price of
leases of lands and other property and the amount Q: What are the remedies of a creditor if the
of perpetual or life annuities or other similar debtor fails to perform his obligation?
income. (Art. 442)
1. If an obligation to do
IV. To deliver its accessories and accessions
When the debtor fails to perform his obligation
even though not mentioned.
to do or performs it but contravenes the tenor
a. Accessions - everything which is produced thereof:
thereby, or which is incorporated or attached
thereto, either naturally or artificially, (Art. 440)
a. The creditor may have the obligation executed at Q: If you fail to pay our tuition fees, can UST
the expense of the debtor. (Art. 1167) hold you on delay of your obligation?
b. The creditor may demand damages from the
A: NO. Because under a reciprocal obligation,
debtor. (Art. 1170)
neither party is in delay when one party does not Page | 13
In obligation to do, the obligor (debtor) cannot be or is not ready to comply with its obligation. Delay
forced to perform his obligation as it will constitute only begins when one party has already complied
an involuntary servitude. The only remedy of the with his obligation. In the case at bar, UST may
creditor is to have the obligation executed by refuse to provide its services if the student does not
another at the expense of the debtor or ask for pay his tuition fees.
damages. Moreover, the obligor cannot substitute
Delay - or default or mora is the non-fulfillment of
others to perform his obligation to do without the
an obligation with respect to time. It is when
consent of the obligee (creditor) because the
someone does not fulfill an obligation within the
obligation is personal in nature.
time given unto him.
When the debtor performs his obligation but
I. Mora solvendi - it is a delay on the
poorly done
part of the debtor.
a. The creditor may have the same be undone at
the debtor's expense (Art. 1167)
b. The creditor may demand damages from the a. Ex re - delay in real obligations (to give)
debtor. (Art. 1170)
b. Ex persona - delay in personal obligations (to
2. If an obligation not to do do)
When the debtor performs what has been Tips: to easily memorize the two, re for real,
forbidden of him persona for personal. Always keep in mind that the
debtor can only have an obligation to give, to do,
a. The creditor may demand what has been done
and not to do, so he can only be delayed between
be undone.
the two, to give and to do, because there is no delay
b. The creditor may demand damages from the
in not to do. One cannot be in delay for not doing
debtor.
at all.
II. Mora accipiendi - it is a delay on the was a controlling motive for the establishment
part of the creditor. of the contract; or
Q: How can a creditor be in delay? (3) When demand would be useless, as when
the obligor has rendered it beyond his power Page | 14
A: A creditor can be in delay if the debtor fulfills
to perform.
his obligation but the creditor refuses to accept the
thing due without justifiable reason. It must be an There is delay when:
unjustifiable reason so as delay to exist.
a. The obligation must be due and demandable
Tips to easily remember: accipiendi sounds the
b. The debtor does not perform his obligation
same with accept. And who accepts? it is the
creditor. So accipiendi is delay in accepting a c. The creditor demands for the performance
fulfillment of an obligation by the creditor. of the obligation judicially or extra-judicially
III. Compensatio morae - it is a delay in d. The debtor fails to comply to such demand
reciprocal obligations. It is therefore
Q: If you ride a jitney along España Blvd. and
the creditor and debtor who are in
asked the driver to drop you exactly in front of
default. If both is in delay therefor in
UST, does he need to demand payment of your
effect there is no delay at all.
fare upon arrival?
Rules on Delay:
A: NO. Because there is a reciprocal obligation
GR: No demand. no delay between you and the driver; therefore, demand is
not required to hold you in delay of your obligation
XPNs: (Art. 1169)
should you not pay.
(1) When the obligation or the law expressly so
In a contract of carriage, no delay incurred. For as
declare; or
long as one party fulfills the obligation, it is
(2) When from the nature and the automatic that the party performs the obligation.
circumstances of the obligation it appears that There’s already fulfillment of one party to perform.
the designation of the time when the thing is to
Q: What are the effects of delay?
be delivered or the service is to be rendered
A: As to debtor:
a. Debtor shall be liable for damages (Art. 1170) a. dolo causante or causal fraud - fraud
used to obtain the consent of the other
b. If obligation to deliver determinate thing, debtor
party. It refers to fraud without which
shall be responsible for any fortuitous event until
consent would not have been given. It Page | 15
he has effected the delivery. (Art. 1165)
makes a contract voidable.
As to creditor: b. dolo incidente or incidental fraud -
refers to fraud without which consent
a. Debtor may resort to consignation of the thing
would still been given but the person giving
due. (Art 1258)
it would not have agreed but may agree on
b. Creditor shall bear the risk of loss and shoulders different terms. The person employing
the expenses for preservation of the thing. fraud will be liable for damages.
A2: In mutuum, a generic thing is given; thus, it b. an understanding between the parties that
involves the return of the equivalent only and not the loan shall or may be returned;
the identical thing because the debtor acquires
c. an unlawful intent to take more than the
ownership of the property given regardless if the
legal rate for the use of money or its Page | 17
full amount has yet to be paid. In the case, the
equivalent;
debtor has the right to use it however he wishes.
Therefore, even if the loan was acquired under a d. the taking or agreeing to take for use of the
housing loan contract, being the owner already, he loan of something in excess of what is
may use it elsewhere. allowed by law.
a. a loan or forbearance;
Legal interest - that which the law directs to A: Effectivity: May 1, 1916
be charged in the absence of any agreement as
Suspended: January 1, 1983 (Sec. 1, CB Circular
to the rate between the parties.
No. 905, Series of 1982)
Lawful interest - that which the law allows or Page | 18
Q: Why was the Usury Law enacted during the
does not prohibit, that is, the rate within the
American Era?
maximum prescribed by law.
A: Transition of power from the Spaniards to the
Unlawful or usurious interest - that which
Americans produced changes in the political
is paid or stipulated to be paid beyond the
landscape. At that time, the Spanish Civil Code was
maximum fixed by law.
still in effect. And so, the Americans introduced
Q: What is the rate of interest prescribed under changes based on their own laws.
the Usury Law?
NOTE: According to public international law,
A: Under the Usury Law, the rate of interest for the non-political laws in case of state succession are
loan or forbearance of any money goods, or credits not automatically abrogated. Hence, without a
and the rate allowed in judgments, in the absence positive act removing such, we retain the American
of express contract as to such rate of interest, shall usury law.
be six per centum (6%) per annum or such rate as
NOTE: The Usury Law may not be applied to
may be prescribed by the Monetary Board of the
commodatum for they are essentially gratuitous.
Central Bank of the Philippines for that purpose in
Simple loans (mutuum), on the other hand, may be
accordance with the authority hereby granted (Sec.
onerous which imposes interests.
1, Act 2655).
Q: What amendment was made into the law?
NOTE: The Usury Law is still existing and not yet
repealed as it was only rendered suspended by A: The Central Bank was given authority by virtue
virtue of CB Circular 905 (ADVOCATES IN of PD 116 to fix or change the legal interest rate.
TRUTH IN LENDING INC. V BSP
NOTE:
MONETARY BOARD).
1. CB No. 416 – 12 % interest
Q: What is the date of effectivity of the Usury
2. CB No. 799 – 6% interest (current rule)
Law and when was it suspended?
NOTE: Imposition of Legal Interest not only make good the loss sustained by the landowner,
applicable to loans and forbearances of money. with due consideration to the circumstances
availing at the time the property was taken.
SITUATIONS WHERE LEGAL
In addition, the Court also recognizes that the Page | 19
INTERESTS APPLY AS PER CB NO. 799:
owner's loss is not only his property, but also its
1. Breach of Contract on Loans and income-generating potential. Thus, when
Forbearances property is taken, full compensation of its value
must be immediately paid to achieve a fair
GR: 6% p.a. apply exchange for the property and the potential
XPN: Express Contractual income lost. The value of the landholdings
Stipulations should be equivalent to the principal sum of the
just compensation due, and interest is due and
2. Breach of Contract on obligations NOT should be paid to compensate for the unpaid
constituting Loans and Forbearances balance of this principal sum after taking has
3. Judgment of the Court becoming Final and been completed. This shall comprise the real,
Executory (6% p.a.) substantial, full, and ample value of the
expropriated property, and constitutes due
REPUBLIC v. MACABAGDAL
compliance with the constitutional mandate of
ISSUE: WON interest rate applicable is that
just compensation in eminent domain.
which was set during the date of filing of
Legal interest shall run not from the date of the
complaint or the issuance of the Writ of
filing of the complaint but from the date of the
Possession.
issuance of the Writ of Possession on May 5,
HELD: The purpose of just compensation is
2008, since it is from this date that the fact of the
not to reward the owner for the property taken,
deprivation of property can be established. As
but to compensate him for the loss thereof. As
such, it is only proper that accrual of legal
such, the true measure of the property, as upheld
interest should begin from this date.
in a plethora of cases, is the market value at the
time of the taking, when the loss
resulted. Indeed, the State is not obliged to pay
premium to the property owner for CONCURRING AND DISSENTING
appropriating the latter's property; bound to OPINION OF J. CAGUIOA ON LARA’S
“Further like the differential treatment under Art. HOWEVER, some banks may be open to
2209 with respect to the imposable rate of interest, crediting the payment on the principal first before
the BSP-prescribed rate of interest must be the interest.
imposed on any accrued interest under Art. 2212
Q: What are the Remedies of a Creditor to
(even if it doesn’t technically constitute a loan or
enforce his claims? (Art. 1177)
forbearance) because the Usury Law likewise
expressly authorizes the BSP to prescribe the rate a) Pursue the properties of the debtor except
allowed in judgments in litigations involving such those exempt by law.
loans and forbearances. In all other types of b) Exercise all the rights and bring all the
monetary obligations involving stipulated accrued actions of the latter for the same purpose,
interest however, the rate of 6% per annum under save those which are inherent in his person
the Civil Code applies.” (J. Caguioa on Lara’s (accion subrogatoria).
Gifts v. Midtown) Dean LR’s Commentary:
In essence, you will step into the shoes of
INTEREST ON ACTUAL AND
the debtor to be the creditor of his debtors
COMPENSATORY DAMAGES
(creditor of your debtor’s debtor) for the
1. Art. 2209 – interest for damages for delay purpose of collecting what he ought to
GR: 6% per annum collect.
XPN: Express Stipulation Ang scenario ‘jan isyung debtor mo ayaw singilin
2. Art. 2210 – interest for damages on breach yung may utang sa kanya dahil kapag nalaman
of contract (Court discretion) ng creditor niya na may ganun, it goes as payment
3. Art. 2211 - interest for damages based on to his creditor.
delicts and quasi-delicts (Court discretion) c) Impugn the acts which the debtor may
4. Art. 2212 – for damages on interest due have done to defraud his creditors (accion
after judicial demand has been made. pauliana).
Accion pauliana is the last resort of the creditor. He Art. 1380 – Contracts validly agreed upon may be
must have to exhaust the first two remedies before rescinded in the cases established by law under Art.
he can resort to accion pauliana. 1381 (Rescissible Contracts).
Rules on the Transmissibility of Rights Article 1381. The following contracts are
rescissible:
GR: All rights acquired in virtue of an
obligation are transmissible. (1) Those which are entered into by
guardians whenever the wards whom they
XPNs:
represent suffer lesion by more than one-
1. If the law so prohibits the transmission of fourth of the value of the things which are
rights. the object thereof;
2. If there is a stipulation or the parties agreed
(2) Those agreed upon in representation of
against transmission of rights
absentees, if the latter suffer the lesion
3. When the nature of such right is not
stated in the preceding number;
transmissible
litigation if they have been entered into by 1. Pure – Performance doesn’t depend on a
the defendant without the knowledge and happening of a certain event and is
approval of the litigants or of competent demandable at once.
judicial authority; 2. Conditional – Performance is dependent
a. When there is no delivery of the event will give rise to the demandability of the
b. The contract stipulates that either Condition - An event that is not certain to happen.
party may rescind.
The happening of the event will give rise to the
NOTE: As to uncertainty:
The effects of suspensive and resolutory events Condition – not sure IF something will happen as
vary between PERIODS or CONDITIONS. a fact or not.
Page | 23
Period – Demandabillity. Period - sure if something will happen but
uncertain as to WHEN.
Condition – Acquisition or Extinguishment of a
right. NOTE: Condition and period is exclusive from
the obligation. They only have an effect to an
Period vs. Condition
obligation.
1. in terms of fulfillment:
Requisites of a Valid Period or Term
c. period is a future and certain
event. 1. Refers to a future time or event.
d. condition is an uncertain event. 2. Certain to come but can be extended.
2. in terms of time: 3. Must be physically and legally possible.
a. period refers only to the future.
Kinds of Period
b. condition may refer also to the
past. 1. As to effect:
3. in terms of influence on the obligation: a. Suspensive period (ex die) - wherein the
a. period fixes the time for the obligation begins only from a day certain or
performance of an obligation. It upon the arrival of the period; as in:
does prevent its existence
b. Resolutory period (in diem) - wherein
(suspensive) and conception in due
the obligation is performed only up to a day
time (resolutory).
certain and terminated upon the arrival of
b. condition causes the existence or
the period; as in:
the extinguishment of an
obligation. 2. As to source:
a. Legal period - when it is provided by law.
Both a period and a condition are required to be
legally and physically possible to be valid. b. Conventional/Voluntary period – when
it is agreed upon by the parties.
Condition vs. Term
NOTE: Art. 1180 is akin to a potestative The Court may fix a period:
condition because it is dependent upon the will of
1. When there is no fixed period, but it can be
the debtor.
inferred that a period was intended by the
NOTE: In order for Art. 1189 to apply, it must be: parties from its nature and the
circumstances.
1. A real obligation
2. Concerns a specific thing. 2. When the duration of the period depends
upon sole will of the debtor.
Computation of Period (Art. 13)
In determining a period, the court aims:
A period shall be based on time as defined by the
law in terms of: 1. To enforce the intention of the parties, not
to modify the obligation.
a. Years - are of three hundred sixty-five
(365) days each, whether it is a regular year 2. To prevent the possibility of breach of
or a leap year; or twelve (12) calendar obligation.
months.
A complaint for right of action (to fix a period)
b. Months - are of thirty (30) days; unless it should be supported by:
refers to a specific calendar month in which
1. Facts showing or inferring that a period for
case it shall be computed according to the
the performance of obligation was
number of days the specific month
intended by the parties.
contains.
Such complaint must EXPRESSLY ask for the GR: Both the debtor and creditor (debtor Page | 25
court for a period, unless the facts are sufficient to cannot pay prematurely and creditor
show the need for such right of action. cannot demand prematurely)
A period cannot be fixed by the court: XPNs: (Only applicable if intended by the
parties)
1. If such period is agreed upon by the parties
and has already lapsed or expired. e. Benefit of Debtor – Debtor may
only be required to pay only at
2. If such period was already (previously)
maturity or before.
fixed by the court with the consent and
f. Benefit of the Creditor – Creditor
acceptance by the parties.
may demand anytime even before
NOTE: However, the parties may create a new maturity and cannot be compelled
period under a new agreement. to accept premature payment.
Conditions for Recovery for Premature Q: How do you determine to whose benefit it
Payment (Real Obligations) – Art. 1195 should redound? (Art. 1196)
power of the currency, the benefit may not the Civil Code gives the obligor the privilege to
redound to the debtor. substitute that prestation with another prestation.
(2) when it is stipulated that payment is to
i.e. You may be given a thing instead of
be made within the period.
paying in cash in pro bono cases such as Page | 26
The 10-year Prescriptive Period (Art. 1144) runs giving of apple or orange. (Although there
after the period provided has elapsed. is no obligation to pay in PAO).
Class Suits – Cases with multiple petitioners NOTE: For facultative obligations, only when the
seeking for the same damage, or that with multiple first obligation cannot be fulfilled that the debtor
same respondents. has the choice to substitute the prestation.
of the payment or performance of an outstanding former or of the latter may demand the fulfillment
debt. of or must comply with the whole obligation.
“Kapag hindi nakabayad ng pera, object na lang.” You will be assuming temporarily the obligation of
your other co-debtors and it will be your Page | 27
Obligations with Plurality of Parties
responsibility to demand to your co-debtors,
Joint Obligation – Even if there are multiple reimbursement. SC will always render a solidary
parties involved, the complainants may only go liability. Because that is one way of helping the
after the share of a joint respondent. complainant, so he will not implead all
respondents. For as long as a complainant can file
Solidary Obligation – Even if the share of the
against one debtor, even if he has other co-debtors,
debtor is apportioned, the complainant may
still, SC will render a decision making the liability
demand to the payment from one party solidarily
solidary. Between a joint and solidary, “onerous
liable.
yung solidary”.
NOTE: Joint obligation is more “humanitarian”
NOTE TO REMEMBER:
towards the debtor for he is only liable for his
share. 1. (a) Joint Obligations — “To each his own.’’
The presumption favors a joint2.liability in the Obligations — “One for all, all for one.”
(b) Solidary
absence of express stipulation.
Rules where there are two or more debtors OR
HOWEVER, the Court is highly inclined in ruling two or more creditors, the obligation is:
for a solidary liability for the more practical and
GR: Joint
speedy dispensation of the case.
XPNs:
Joint vs. Solidary Obligations
1. when there is a stipulation in the contract
Joint obligation - each obligor answers only for a
that the obligation is solidary
part of the whole liability and to each obligee
2. when the nature of the obligation requires
belongs only a part of the correlative rights.
liability to be solidary
Solidary (joint and several) obligation (in 3. when the law declares the obligation to be
solidum) - the relationship between the active and solidary
the passive subjects is so close that each of the
Special Parental Authority being no longer corresponding share. Going back to the indemnity
applicable. for damages, that’s the solution if the thing to be
3. Art. 2194 of the Civil Code - delivered is indivisible. If it joint and indivisible,
Responsibility of two or more persons who and only one debtor is willing to perform, it will be Page | 29
are liable for quasi-delict. converted into a singil for damages, it will be
quantified.
Indivisible Joint Obligation – the object is
indivisible (meaning it cannot be divided). NOTE: Although the law is silent, if the insolvent
Indivisibility does not refer to the obligation but co-debtor becomes capable, it should be upon his
the object (prestation to give). good faith to pay or reimburse. You may argue
under the principle of unjust enrichment.
Q: A, B, C all of them have obligation to delivery
one carabao to Miguel. But unfortunately, only B is Characteristics of Indivisible Joint Obligations
willing to deliver the carabao. But how can B (Art. 1209)
deliver it if A and C are opposing the former.
1. Although JOINT, creditor must proceed
Object is indivisible. Does it mean to say that B will
against ALL debtors since compliance of the
suffer the consequences?
obligation is only possible if all of them acted
A: NO. The cause of action that the Court may together.
give to satisfy the shares on an indivisible thing is 2. Demand must be made to ALL debtors.
to liquidate the share into the form of damages.
NOTE: A demand by one joint creditor is not a
In case of Insolvency, there will be as if there is an demand by all other co-creditors. While it would
accretion to the debt with the co-debtors as to the appear that by implication this should have been
insolvent debtor in proportion to the debt of each so, because it benefits and does not prejudice the
co-debtor. (Art. 1217) other creditors (Art. 1212), the share of credits is
independent with each other (Buard v. Lemes
Commentary of Dean LR:
Syndicate).
One person may be demanded for the entire, if the
3. There is indemnity for damages from the
object to be delivered is indivisible, it is better that
time anyone of the debtors does not comply
the obli is solidary. Pwedeng B can deliver agad.
with his undertaking (Art. 1224).
Problem will arise if liablity if joint. In a joint
relation, only required ka lang to deliver your
4. Insolvency of one of the debtors will not and conditions of his obligation. Once the others
make the others liable for his share. have fulfilled theirs, the creditor may then recover
5. Delivery must be made to ALL creditors in from them.
case the latter is joint.
Rule: Creditor can recover the whole solidary Page | 30
XPN: If one is an authorized representative
obligation from ANY of the solidary debtors
of the others.
MINUS the share of those unmatured terms and
6. A joint creditor is allowed to renounce his
conditions.
proportionate credit.
Assignment of Rights of a Solidary Creditor
Indivisibility of an obligation does not necessarily
(Art. 1213)
give rise to solidary liability or vice versa. (Art.
1210) GR: Solidary Creditor cannot assign his
rights.
NOTE: Not to be confused with the previous
Article on Indivisible Joint (or Solidary) XPN: If given consent by co-creditors.
Obligations. Here, what is indivisible is the subject
RATIO: Solidarity brings about
matter of obligation. (i.e., Joint Divisible, Joint
representation and confidence of all
Indivisible, Solidary Divisible, Solidary Indivisible)
involved parties.
Kinds of Solidarity
Payment on a Solidary Creditor
I. First Classification
GR: ANY solidary creditor.
1. Active - part of creditors or obligees.
2. Passive - part of debtors or obligors. XPN: To the one who made demand (judicial or
3. Mixed – on the part of either or both. extrajudicial).
II. Second Classification
Circumstances which Extinguish Obligations
4. Conventional – What was agreed upon.
5. Legal – What is imposed by law. A. Novation – Modification of obligation by
changing the object or principal conditions,
NOTE: There may be solidarity even if parties are
or substituting the debtor, or subrogating the
bound by different terms and conditions (Art.
debtor or a third person in the rights of a
1211). Thus, a creditor may only come after a
creditor. (i.e., substituting the payment of a
debtor’s share who has already fulfilled the terms
debt for rendering of services)
Here, the old contract is extinguished in A. If the remission by the creditor extended
lieu of the new one established. ONLY AFTER the whole obligation has
been paid – He has obligation to reimburse
NOTE: However, solidary creditors are
the one who paid. Reimbursement is a Page | 31
entitled to reimbursement by the accepting
matter of right because here remission is
creditor.
useless in lieu of complete payment of the
B. Compensation – occurs when parties in debt. Without reimbursement, there will be
their own rights are debtors and creditors to unjust enrichment.
each other. B. If the remission by the creditor extended
1. Total – When their mutual debt is equal. PRIOR to the full payment – No more
liability is extinguished totally. obligation to reimburse.
2. Partial – When their mutual debt in NOT
NOTE: Remission of the whole obligation
equal, liability is partially extinguished
obtained by one of the solidary creditors does
without prejudice to the remaining balance.
not entitle him to reimbursement (Art. 1220) as
C. Confusion or Merger – When the debtor
remission is essentially gratuitous.
and creditor becomes one and the same
person. i.e. When you advance payment for your friends
D. Remission or Condonation -Act of while buying a meal in a fastfood, upon delivery of
liberality where the creditor waives his right the order,“Sisingilin lang ng kaklase mo kung ano yung
to demand payment. meal na in-order mo”.
1. Total – Waiver of the entire amount of
NOTE: In all cases, mentioned above, the rights
the debt.
of a solidary creditor shall not be impaired. He is
2. Partial – Waiver of a portion of the debt.
subject to reimbursement by the co-creditor who
Q: “Kung 3 kayong may utang. Creditor extinguished the obligation.
remissed A’s share, does it mean to say A does
Enforcement of Liability from a Dispositive
not have the obligation? When is
Portion of the Decision by the Court
reimbursement an obligation in condonation?
If the decision provides liability to be “joint and
A: It depends.
several”, the judgment may be enforced against
ANY of the debtors.
Effect of Loss or Impossibility of Performance rate. The penal clause adds pressure to the obligor
in Solidary Obligations to fulfill his obligation.
A: NO. Penalty is different from interest. The law Payment - Termination of the obligation not only
regulates imposition of interest not the penal through delivery of money but also performance of
clause. Interest is income generation; penalty is not obligation (Art. 1231).
meant to be the same. Page | 33
Q: Why performance also?
Q: Does payment of the principal obligation
A: Payment cannot be restricted to giving because
without the creditor demanding for the
there are other prestations other than to give.
payment of the penalty a waiver?
i.e., As a student, aside from payment of tuition, the
A: NO. Although there are latches, it is not
obligation is also to study. Answering the questions
tantamount to an express waiver thereof. Payment
right is tantamount to a payment of the obligation
of the penalties should still be on good faith.
which is a prestation to do.
Q: In debts with interests the interest is
Q: Does payment really extinguish the
effected on the interest first before the
obligation?
principal (Art. 1253), what rule is applicable as
to penalties? A:
A: The penalty is not considered an interest but It depends. Who makes the payment?
payment of damages for delay of payment. It will
1. If the payee is the debtor/obligor – YES.
be included in the principal amount to be paid.
2. If the payee is a third person
Proof of actual damages is not necessary to entitle a. If with knowledge and consent of
the demandability of the penalty imposed by the debtor – YES but with
penal clause. (Art. 1228). REIMBURSEMENT and
SUBROGATION
Modes of Extinguishment of Obligations
b. If without knowledge and consent of
debtor- YES but with BENEFICIAL
We must go back to the definition of obligations…
REIMBURSEMENT
Obligations is the juridical necessity to give, to do,
or not to do. It is not merely a necessity to give? Q: What is beneficial reimbursement?
A person who pays a debt for the account of Q: What remedy does the third person have
another may recover from the debtor the sum so against the creditor?
paid out, at least to the extent in which the payment
A: Solutio indebiti because there would be unjust
may have been beneficial to the debtor. Such a Page | 34
enrichment on the part of the creditor.
payment cannot be considered as a payment of
what is not due under Article 2154, and cannot be Q: Who may receive payment to extinguish the
recovered from the creditor by the person who obligation?
paid; the right of the payor in such case is against
A: (Art. 1240)
the debtor whose obligation he has paid. The
debtor who knows that another has paid his 1. To the one whose obligation has been
obligation for him, and who does not object constituted.
thereto or repudiate the same at any time, must pay 2. His successor in interest,
the amount advanced by the third person 3. Any person authorized to receive it.
Generally, the third person who paid another’s
Q: Does the receipt of payment by those third
debt is entitled to recover the full amount he had
parties excluded from the enumeration
paid. The law, however, limits his recovery to the
invalidate the payment?
amount by which the debtor has been benefited, if
the debtor has no knowledge of, or has expressed A: Not all the time. If paid by an unauthorized
his opposition to such payment. person or incapacitated person, shall also be valid
insofar as it has redounded to the benefit of the
It is optional for the creditor to accept payment
creditor.
from a third person. If the debtor opposes the
payment by a third person, the latter will be entitled Such benefit to the creditor need not be proved in
to recover from the debtor only to the extent that the following cases: (Art. 1241)
the payment has benefited him. But as between the
1. If after the payment, the third person
debtor and the creditor, the obligation is
acquires the creditor's rights;
extinguished.
2. If the creditor ratifies the payment to the
Note: The obligation between the creditor and third person;
debtor is already extinguished, but no prejudice 3. If by the creditor's conduct, the debtor has
against the third person who paid on his behalf. been led to believe that the third person had
authority to receive the payment.
Kinds of Payment
4. Consignation - manifestation made by the
1. Dacion en pago – alienating another
debtor to the creditor of his desire to
property in lieu of payment.
comply with his obligation, with the offer of Page | 35
NOTE: Pactum commissorium is prohibited
immediate performance. Consignation is
by law (Art. 2088). In this practice,
the deposit of the object of the obligation in
alienation is involuntary on the part of the
a competent court in accordance with rules
debtor.
prescribed by law, after the tender of
2. Application of Payment - The designation
payment has been refused or because of 35
of the debt which is being paid by a debtor
See page 317 circumstances which render
who has several obligations of the same kind
direct payment to the creditor impossible or
in favor of the creditor to whom payment is
inadvisable The tender of payment,
made.
therefore, is a preparatory act which
Q: Who has the preferential right to
precedes consignation. The tender of
choose application of payment?
payment by itself does not cause the
A:
extinguishment of the obligation, unless
1. Preferential right is on the debtor.
completed by consignation. It is the
2. Only when the debtor does not exercise
consignation which constitutes a form of
the right, then the creditor may exercise.
payment, and must follow, supplement or
3. If neither exercise, it is applied to the most
complete to the tender of payment in order
onerous and so on.
to discharge the obligation In instances
where no debt is owing, consignation is not
3. Cession – Debtor may cede or assign his
proper
property to his creditors in payment of his
debts. This cession, unless there is Circumstances where creditor may refuse
stipulation to the contrary, shall only release payment
the debtor from responsibility for the net
1. Not legal tender
proceeds of the thing assigned. The
2. Without interest
agreements which, on the effect of the
3. Conditional payment
cession, are made between the debtor and
4. Due obligation
his creditors (Art. 1255).
weighing two obligations simultaneously in order of the condition A debt is liquidated when its
to extinguish them to the extent in which the existence and amount are determined.
amount of one is covered by the other. By this
5. Neither of them there be any retention or
means, payment is simplified and assured between
controversy, commenced by third persons Page | 37
persons who are indebted to each other.
and communicated in due time to the debtor.
Elements of Compensation NOTE: There can be no legal
compensation if either of the
1. Debtor-Creditor Relationship of the same
obligations is alternative or facultative.
level.
But the mere fact that one obligation
NOTE: The relationship must be pertaining has a penal clause, while the other has
to either mutually the principal or mutually the none, will not prevent legal
accessory contract. compensation, because the penal clause
is a mere guaranty of fulfillment and
2. Both debts consist in a sum of money, or if
does not affect the object of the
the things due are consumable, they be of the
obligation.
same kind, and also of the same quality if the
latter has been stated; NOTE: Compensation may be total or partial.
3. Obligations are both due and demandable.
NOTE: Compensation has two advantages over
4. Obligations are liquidated and demandable.
payment. In the first place, it is simple, taking effect
NOTE: Debts must be enforceable (there is without action by either party to extinguish their
already demand made, if needed) in court, respective obligations. In the second place, there is
there being no apparent defenses inherent in more guaranty in making the credit effective,
them. The obligations must be civil because there is less risk of loss by the creditor due
obligations, excluding those that are purely to insolvency or fraud of the debtor.
natural. Obligations which are subject to
NOTE: Taxes cannot be subject to
suspensive conditions cannot be set up by way
Compensation. As held in Corders v. Ganda, internal
of compensation before the fulfillment of the
revenue taxes cannot be the subject of
condition, although once fulfilled, the
compensation:
provisions of article1187 should be observed
as to the retroactive effect of the happening
RATIO: government and taxpayer are not is implied, the acts of the parties must clearly
mutually creditors and debtors of each demonstrate their intent to dissolve the old
other'…and a "claim for taxes is not such a obligation as the moving consideration for
debt, demand, contract or judgment as is the emergence of the new one. Page | 38
allowed to be set-off."
Implied novation necessitates the incompatibility
Pledge vs. Chattel Mortgage between the old and new obligation be total on
every point such that the old obligation is
Physical Possession transferred – Pledge
completely superseded by the new one. The test
No Physical Possession transferred– Chattel of incompatibility is whether they can stand
Mortgage. together, each one having an independent
existence; if they cannot and are irreconcilable,
NOTE: The newly-enacted Personal Property
the subsequent obligation would also extinguish
Security Law repealed Chattel Mortgage and
the first “An extinctive novation would thus have
Pledge Law.
the twin effects of, first, extinguishing an existing
Novation – the extinguishment of an obligation by obligation and, second, creating a new one in its
the substitution or change of the obligation by a stead.
subsequent one which extinguishes or modifies the
2. Modificatory novation - the change
first, either by changing the object or principal
brought about by any subsequent agreement
conditions, or by substituting the person of the
is merely incidental to the main obligation
debtor, or by subrogating a third person in the
(e.g., a change in interest rates or an
rights of the creditor.
extension of time to pay); in this instance, the
NOTE: Novation may either be extinctive or new agreement will not have the effect of
modificatory, much being dependent on the nature extinguishing the first but would merely
of the change and the intention of the parties. supplement it or supplant some but not all of
its provisions.
1. Extinctive novation – obligation is
terminated by the creation of a new Elements of Novation
obligation that takes the place of the former;;
1. A previous existing valid obligation - There
it is never presumed there must be an
must be an original existing obligation at
express intention to novate; in cases where it
the time of novation. This means that the
obligation must not only be valid, but also themselves in favor of another or others, or
that it has not been extinguished by any reciprocally, to the fulfillment of a prestation to
cause. give, to do or not to do” As a consensual relation,
2. The agreement of all the parties to the new a contract must be shown to exist as a fact, clearly Page | 39
obligation - Novation requires the creation and convincingly.
of a new contractual obligation, as well as
NOTE: There must be at least two parties to every
the extinguishment of the old. There must
contract, and their capacity and consent are
be consent of all the parties to the
essential to its existence. The number of parties,
substitution, resulting in the extinction of
however, should not be confused with the number
the old obligation and the creation of a
of persons. A single person can represent two
valid one.
parties, and one party can be composed of two or
3. The extinguishment of the old contract -
more persons.
This extinguishment may take place by
express stipulation in the new agreement, NOTE: The legal capacity of the parties is an
or by implication from the incompatibility essential element for the existence of the contract.
between the old and the new contracts. More accurately, it is an indispensable condition
4. The validity of the new one. for the existence of consent, because there is no
effective consent in law without the capacity to
give such consent. Because of this connection of
cause and effect between capacity and consent, the
CONTRACTS law does not expressly enumerate the former as a
separate requisite for the validity of contracts; legal
consent presupposes capacity Want of consent;
Contract - an agreement on the declaration of a
Consent is essential for the existence of a contract,
common will. It has been defined in other codes as
and where it is wanting, the contract is non-
“a bilateral legal transaction to create, modify or
existent.
terminate a legal tie between the parties”.
Characteristics of a Contract
According to Sanchez Roman, who defines it as “a
juridical convention manifested in legal form, by 1. Freedom – the right of parties to enter
virtue of which one or more persons bind into contractual relations.
NOTE: In labor law, in regards to mandated which, according to their nature, may be in
benefits, it is the law which provides such not keeping with good faith, usage and law.
the freedom the parties exercised in the (1258).
execution of the employment contract. Page | 40
Article 1159. Obligations arising from Formal requisites in **** contracts, it is void ab
contracts have the force of law between the initio (i.e., Donations not put in a public
contracting parties and should be complied instrument.)
with in good faith. (1091a).
Stages of Contract
Article 1315. Contracts are perfected by
mere consent, and from that moment the 1. Preparation, conception, or generation,
parties are bound not only to the which is the period of negotiation and
fulfillment of what has been expressly bargaining, ending at the moment of
stipulated but also to all the consequences agreement of the parties.
2. Perfection or birth of the contract, which is GR: All things or services may be the object of
the moment when the parties come to agree contracts.
on the terms of the contract.
XPNs:
3. Consummation or death, which is the Page | 41
fulfillment or performance of the terms 1. Things outside the commerce of men (Art.
agreed upon in the contract. 1347)
2. Intransmissible rights
Essential Elements of a Contract
3. Future inheritance, except in cases
expressly authorized by law
According to Art. 1318, There is no contract
unless the following requisites concur: 4. Services which are contrary to law, morals,
good customs, public order or public
1. Consent of the contracting parties;
policy
2. Object certain which is the subject matter of
5. Impossible things or services
the contract;
6. Objects which are not possible of
3. Cause of the obligation which is established.
determination as to their kind.
Object
Q: What about future inheritance? May it be an
Refers to the subject matter of the contract. object of a contract?
provided that the legitime of the 4. For Accessory Contracts - identical with cause
compulsory heirs is not prejudiced. of principal contract, the loan which it derived
its life and existence
NOTE: Except in cases authorized by law,
future inheritance cannot be an object of Rules Relative to Cause Page | 42
2. Real contracts - require for their perfection c. Antichresis - the amount of the principal
both the consent of the parties and the and interest must be in writing (Art. 2134).
delivery of the object by one party to the 3. Agency to sell real property or an interest
other. therein - authority of the agent must be in
3. Solemn or Formal contracts – contracts writing (Art. 1874). Page | 43
which must appear in writing 4. Stipulation to charge interest - interest must
GR: Form is not required in consensual contracts be stipulated in writing (Art. 1956).
(as long as all the essential requisites are present) 5. Stipulation limiting common carrier's duty of
extraordinary diligence to ordinary diligence:
XPN: When the law requires it to be in writing for
a. Must be in writing, signed by shipper or
validity, enforceability, or convenience.
owner
Formalities Required in Specific Contracts b. Supported by valuable consideration other
than the service rendered by the common
1. Donations carrier
a. Personal property – if value exceeds c. Reasonable, just and not contrary to public
5,000, the donation and acceptance must policy (NCC, Art. 1744).
both be written (Art. 748). 6. Chattel mortgage - personal property must
b. Real property: be recorded in the Chattel Mortgage Register.
i. Donation must be in a public (Art. 2140)
instrument, specifying therein the
property donated and value of Contracts which require to be in WRITING
charges which donee must satisfy.
1. Donation of personal property whose value
ii. Acceptance must be written,
exceeds five thousand pesos
either in the same deed of
2. Sale of a piece of land or any interest therein
donation or in a separate
through an agent
instrument.
3. Agreements regarding payment of interest in
iii. If acceptance is in a separate
contracts of loan
instrument, the donor shall be
4. Antichresis
notified thereof in authentic form,
and this step shall be noted in Contracts which require to be in a PUBLIC
both instruments (Art. 749). INSTRUMENT
2. Partnership where real property contributed
1. Donation of real properties
a. There must be a public instrument
2. Partnership where immovable property or
regarding the partnership;
real rights are contributed to the common
b. The inventory of the realty must be made,
fund
signed by the parties and attached to the
3. Acts and contracts which have for their
public instrument (Art. 1773).
object the creation, transmission,
modification or extinguishment of real rights
• The usage or custom of the place shall be 2. Expressio Unius est exclusion alterius- The
borne in mind in the interpretation of the express mention of one person, thing or
ambiguities of a contract, and shall fill the consequence implies the exclusion of all
omission of stipulations which are ordinarily others.
established (Art. 1376). Page | 46
• The interpretation of obscure words or 3. Noscitur a sociis – Interpretation should be
stipulations in a contract shall not favor the determined by considering the words with
party who caused the obscurity (Art. 1377). which it is associated in the context.
• When it is absolutely impossible to settle
doubts by the rules established in the preceding 4. Casus omissus – (similar to expressio unius)
articles, and the doubts refer to incidental
circumstances of a gratuitous contract, the least Dean LR’s Commentary:
transmission of rights and interest shall prevail.
• If the contract is onerous, the doubt shall be As to the status of contracts, just go back to the
settled in favor of the greatest reciprocity of provisions of the Family Code on Marriage. What
interests. is a ground for nullity, annulment, and the validity
• If the doubts are cast upon the principal object of marriage may be the same for an ordinary
of the contract in such a way that it cannot be contract.
known what may have been the intention or XPN: Fraud in ordinary contracts
will of the parties, the contract shall be null and
void (NCC, Art. 1378). Defective Contracts
• The principles of interpretation stated in Rule
123 of the Rules of Court shall likewise be Degree of Defectiveness in Contracts
observed in the construction of contracts (in descending manner as to validity)
NOTE: The provisions of Rule 123 of the 1. Rescissible Contracts
Rules of Court referred to are Secs. 58-67, 2. Voidable Contracts
now Secs. 8-17, Rule 130, New Rules of 3. Unenforceable Contracts
Court. 4. Void or Inexistent Contracts
Rescission
Some of the more common rules of statutory
Contracts validly constituted but nevertheless
construction used in interpreting contracts…
maybe set aside due to a particular economic
1. Ejusdem generis – General terms following damage or lesion caused to either to one of the
an enumeration of specific terms must parties or to a third person. It may be set aside in
necessarily be included in the class. (e.g., whole or in part, or up to the extent of the damage
Tocino, longganisa, ham, and other frozen caused.
processed foods)
NOTE: Applying the exclusio unius rule, the Q: How are unauthorized contracts ratified?
enumeration is exclusive.
A:
Principles Governing the Statute of Frauds
1. By failing to object to the presentation of
1. It only applies to executory contracts and not oral evidence. Page | 50
partially or completely executed. 2. By accepting benefits arising from the
2. It cannot apply if the action is neither for unauthorized contract.
damages because of violation of an
Q: What constitutes sufficient memorandum?
agreement nor for the specific performance
of said agreement. A:
3. It is exclusive as it applies only to the
agreements or contracts enumerated in Art. 1. No Particular Form needed (in terms of
1403. language used or kind of instrument)
4. The defense of Statute of Frauds may be 2. MUST only be sufficient in terms (all the
waived. appropriate information) and signature.
5. It is a personal defense; it cannot be assailed
Void and Inexistent Contracts
by third persons.
6. Contracts infringing the Statute of Frauds are Contracts which lack absolutely either in fact and
not void; they are merely unenforceable. or in law one or some or all of those elements
7. It is a Rule of Exclusion as it excludes oral which are essential for its validity. Void contracts
testimony. have no force and effect from the beginning and
8. It does not determine the credibility or which cannot be ratified or validated by lapse of
weight of evidence. It merely concerns itself time.
with the admissibility.
9. It does not apply if the claim is that the Kinds of Void Contracts
contract does not express the true agreement 1. Those lacking in essential elements
of the parties. a. Those whose cause, object or purpose is
NOTE: If the contract is enforceable under contrary to law, morals, good customs,
Statute of Frauds because it is duly evidenced by public order or public policy: illicit cause, or
writing, note, or memorandum, but it cannot be object
registered because it not in a public instrument, the b. Those which are absolutely simulated or
party concerned may compel the opposite party to fictitious: no cause
formalize it in the proper form required by law. If c. Those whose cause or object did not exist at
the latter refuses, the court will issue necessary the time of the transaction: no cause or
order to that effect (Art. 1406). object
d. Those whose object is outside the
NOTE: An unenforceable contract may be commerce of man: no object
subjected to ratification pursuant to Art. 1317.
or before any damage has been caused to a Inapplicability of Pari Delicto Rule
third person. In such case, the courts may
1. Breach of warranty cases
allow such party to recover what he has paid
2. Simulated contracts
or delivered, if the public interest will thus be
3. When parties are not equally guilty
subserved (Art. 1414). Page | 52
4. Against the government
3. Payment of money or delivery of property by
5. Prohibted conveyances under the law
an incapacitated person. In such case, the
6. Constitutional prohibition against alien
courts may allow such person to recover
landholding.
what he has paid or delivered, if the interest
of justice so demands (Art. 1415). Q: Given the problem of the recent Jollibee
4. Agreement or contract which is not illegal conundrum, where the supposed fried chicken
per se but is merely prohibited by law, and was replaced with a fried cleaning towel, what
the prohibition is designed for the protection is the status of the contract?
of the plaintiff. In such case, such plaintiff, if
public policy is thereby enhanced, may A: It depends how you argue.
recover what he has paid or delivered (Art.
VOIDABLE – the complainant may try to prove
1416).
that there is deceit or mistake which vitiated their
5. Payment of any amount in excess of the
consent.
maximum price of any article or commodity
fixed by law. In such case, the buyer may NOTE: As a general rule, moral damages only
recover the excess (NCC, Art. 1417). apply to natural persons. As an exception, if the
6. Contract whereby a laborer undertakes to juridical person suffers a bad reputation, it may be
work longer than the maximum number of awarded.
hours fixed law. In such case, the laborer may
demand for overtime pay (Art. 1417).
7. Contract whereby a laborer accepts a wage
lower than the minimum wage fixed by law.
In such case the laborer may demand for the
deficiency (Art. 1418).
Contract has never Valid until annulled; Refers to a valid Valid Contract
existed (Void ab Contract existed contract; and executory
Initio). although it may be contract although
annulled. parties cannot go
Characteristics CAUSE: Absence of to court as the Page | 53
any of the elements CAUSE:
parties failed to
of a contract. 1. Incapacity to give
comply with the
consent.
formality of the
2. Vitiated consent.
Statute of Frauds.
GR: The real party who is Remedy is not limited Only one of the
not at fault. The to Contracting parties contracting parties
-Can be assailed by
party who did not but it also extends to and it cannot be
ANY of the
exert undue the injured third assailed by a third
contracting party
influence, person. person. (Art.1408)
Real Party in UNLESS, he is in
intimidation or
bad faith or at fault.
interest violence.
XPN:
5. Declared by
Law
Art. 1382
1. Defect is the
incapacity of
one (Art.
Effect
1399).
2. Loss of the
thing
through
fault/fraud
of party
obliged to
return the
thing but has
no right to
institute
proceeding,
he shall
return the
fruits and the
value of the
thing (Art.
1400). Page | 56
3. Loss of the
thing
through
fault/fraud
of the person
who may
institute the
proceeding -
action for
annulment is
extinguished
(Art. 1401).
4. One does
not restore –
the other
cannot be
compelled to
comply (Art.
1402).
Natural Obligations
Natural obligations, not being based on positive NOTE: What is important to note is the fact
Page | 57
law but on equity and natural law, do not grant a fulfillment is
right of action to enforce their performance, but
Q: What separates Natural Obligations from
after voluntary fulfillment by the obligor, they
Unjust Enrichment?
authorize the retention of what has been delivered
or rendered by reason thereof (Art. 1423). A: In Natural obligations there is a right. It just so
happens that the right has already been lost by
NOTE: Natural obligations are real obligations
prescription. In Solutio Indebiti, there is no right to
which cannot be taken to court but voluntary
demand it in its inception.
performance may be allowed.
Voluntary Fulfillment
Dean LR’s Commentary:
Debtor complied with an obligation
Looking back to the definition of Obligation under
notwithstanding the fact that he may not be legally
Art. 1156, juridical necessity is what separates a
compelled to do so.
civil obligation from a moral obligation. The mere
fact that Natural Obligations have a separate
chapter under the Civil Code means that it does not
fall under the obligations under Art. 1156.
However, despite of the fact that there is no civil PRESCRIPTION
obligation, if there is voluntary fulfillment the other
party secures a right to retain the thing.
Prescription
“So kapag nagbigay ka without the civil obligation to
do so, you cannot later on recover that. Di mo na The means of acquiring ownership and other real
pwede bawiin” rights or losing rights or action to enforce such
rights through lapse of time in the manner and
Requisites of Natural Obligations
under the conditions laid down by law.
1. The obligation is not prohibited by law or
Dean LR’s Commentary:
contrary to morals and good customs.
2. There must be a previous juridical When you study Remedial Law, the period for
relationship between two persons but due to filing an answer within 10 days from receipt. It may
certain intervening circumstances, it lost its be in a form of reply. Sometimes instead of
legal enforceability leaving its fulfillment answering one by one the allegations, you can file
entirely to the free will or discretion of the a motion to dismiss on the ground of (1) action has
supposed debtor. prescribed, (2) complainant is in estoppel, (3)
complainant is bound by laches. These are valid 3. Possession of the thing under certain conditions
defenses in an allegation. This is the significance of 4. Lapse of time provided by law.
this chapter.
Estoppel
Kinds of Prescription
A plain and clear admission or representation Page | 58
1. Acquisitive (Adverse Possession) - rendered conclusive upon the person making it and
acquisition of ownership and other real rights cannot be denied or disproved as against the
through possession of a thing in the manner person relying thereon (Art. 1431).
and under the conditions provided for by law.
NOTE: Estoppel is effective only between the
a) Ordinary - requires possession of things
parties thereto or their successors in interest (Art.
in good faith and with just title for the
1439).
time fixed by law which is 10 years.
b) Extraordinary – does not need of title or RATIO: Based on public policy, fair dealing, good
of good faith or any other condition and faith and justice and its purpose is to forbid one to
would prescribe in 30 years. speak against his own act, representation or
commitments to the injury of one who reasonably
Dean LR’s Commentary: Under Political
relied thereon.
Law, there is what we call Regalian Doctrine.
Everything is property of the State except Waiver
those which maybe proven as private.
Government lands (patrimonial lands) which Rights which are not contrary to law, public policy,
are declared alienable land of the public public order, morals, customs, or prejudicial to a
domain which may be transferred to a natural person whose rights are protected by law may be
person under Adverse Possession (Acquisitive waived (Art. 6).
Prescription).
Such waiver is treated as an estoppel for future
2. Extinctive - loss of property rights or actions claims under such rights previously waived.
through the possession by another of a thing
NOTE: In the case of Lopez v. Ochoa, the
for the period provided by law or failure to
Supreme Court went as far as to iterate that the
bring the necessary action to enforce one’s
essence of waiver is estoppel and there is no
right with in the period fixed by law. Rights
estoppel if there is no waiver was made. So it may
and actions are lost by the lapse of time (Arts.
be inferred that a “party in estoppel” is someone
1106 and 1139).
who has made a waiver.
Requisites of an Acquisitive Prescription
Kinds of Estoppel
1. Capacity of person to acquire by prescription.
1. Estoppel in PAIS (Equitable)– a person is
2. The thing must be capable of acquisition by
considered in estoppel if by his conduct,
prescription.
representations, admissions or silence when
he ought to speak out, whether intentionally certain facts to exist and such other relies
or through culpable negligence, "causes and acts on such belief, as a consequence
another to believe certain facts to exist and of which he would be prejudiced if the
such other rightfully relies and acts on such former is permitted to deny the existence
belief, as a consequence of which he would be of such facts. Page | 59
prejudiced if the former is permitted to deny
c) Estoppel by Laches – Arises when a
the existence of such facts.
person who has failed or neglected to assert
2. Estoppel by DEED (Technical) – a party to a
a right for an unreasonable and unexplained
deed and his privies are precluded from
length of time is presumed to have
denying any material fact stated in the deed as
abandoned or otherwise declined to assert
against the other party and his privies.
such right and cannot later on seek to
enforce the same, to the prejudice of the
1. Under Estoppel in PAIS:
other party, who has no notice or
a) Estoppel by Conduct or Acceptance of knowledge that the former would assert
Benefits (Art. 1438) - Arises when a party, such rights and whose condition has so
by accepting benefits derived from a certain changed that the latter cannot, without
act or transaction, intentionally or through injury or prejudice, be restored to his former
culpable negligence, induces another to state.
believe certain facts to exist and such other
NOTE:
relies and act on such belief, as a
consequence of which he would be In laches, the right has not yet prescribed
prejudiced if the former is permitted to deny but using it as a defense may give rise to
the existence of such facts. doubt to the claim of the complainant. “If
he really has a right to the property, why did
b) Estoppel by Representation or
he wait for 9 years to file it?”
Concealment (Art. 1437) - Arises when a
party made a representation or concealment 2. Under Estoppel by DEED:
of fact to another person in words or by acts a) Estoppel by Deed Proper - Arises when
or conduct, or with the result of inducing a party made admissions expressly or
the other on the faith of such representation implied by executing a written instrument,
to alter his position to his detriment. or in the form of a bond or a mortgage.
b) Estoppel by Judgment - The preclusion
c. Estoppel by Inaction or Silence - Arises
of a party to a case from denying the facts
when a party, who has a right and
adjudicated by a court of competent
opportunity to speak or act as well as a
jurisdiction. It must not be confused with
duty to do so under the circumstances,
res judicata. Estoppel by judgment bars the
intentionally or through culpable
parties from raising any question that
negligence, induces another to believe
might have been put in issue and decided
in a previous litigation whereas, res judicata 3. Lack of knowledge or notice on the part of
makes a judgment conclusive between the the defendant that the complainant would
same parties as to the matter directly assert the right on which he bases his suit.
adjudged. 4. Conduct on the part of the defendant or one
under whom he claims, giving rise to the Page | 60
Sale of After-Acquired Property
situation complained of
The subsequent acquisition of title of a thing in
Laches Prescription
favor of a party who made a sale or alienation of Concerned with the Concerned with the
the same despite not being the owner of the effect of delay fact of delay
property would pass title to the buyer or grantee by Principally a question It is a matter of time
operation of law (Art. 1434).. of inequity of
permitting a claim to
(e.g., Maria sold Jessie’s house to Josie. Then later be enforced
on Josie donated the same house back to Maria. By Not statutory Statutory
Applies in equity Applies at law
the principle of estoppel, the title will belong to
Not based on fixed of Based on fixed of time
Josie by operation of law and not to Maria.) time
Laches
NOTE: Estoppel is a question of fact.
The failure or neglect, for an unreasonable length
of time, to do that which by exercising due NOTE: Estoppel cannot validate a void contract.
diligence could or should have been done earlier; it
is negligence or omission to assert a right within a
reasonable time, warranting a presumption that the TRUSTS
party entitled to assert it either has abandoned it or
declined to assert it. It is also known as stale
Trusts
demands.
The right of beneficial enjoyment of property.
RATIO: It is based upon grounds of public policy
Fiduciary in nature which obliges the person
which requires for the peace of society,
holding it to deal equitable ownership in a certain
discouragement of stale claims.
property and another person owning the legal title
Elements of Laches to such property.
1. Delay in asserting complainant’s right after he NOTE: A trust is founded on principles of equity
had knowledge of the defendant’s conduct and can never result from illegal acts.
and after he has opportunity to exercise it.
Characteristics of a Trust
2. Injury or prejudice to the defendant in the
event relief is accorded to the complainant. 1. Fiduciary
2. Created by law or agreement
3. Legal title is held by one, while an equitable or Created by the Comes into being by
beneficiary title to the other intention of the trustor operation of law. It
or of the parties. may be either resulting
Parties to a Trust or constructive
Created by the direct Those which, without
1. Trustor – the person who establishes the trust. and positive acts of the being expressed, are Page | 61
2. Trustee – one in whom confidence is reposed parties, by some deducible from the
as regards property for the benefit of another writing or deed or will nature of the
or by words transaction by
person. evidencing an operation of law as
3. Beneficiary or cesti que trust – person for intention to create a matters of equity,
whose benefit the trust has been created (Art. trust. independently of the
1440). particular intention of
the parties.
Elements of a Trust An express trust An implied trust
concerning an concerning an
1. Parties to the Trust immovable or any immovable or any
2. Trust Property interest therein cannot interest therein may be
be proved by parole proved by parole
NOTE: The subject-matter (Trust Property) of evidence (Art. 1443). evidence. (Art. 1457).
trust may be any property of value- real, personal, An action to enforce An action to enforce
an express trust, so an implied trust even
funds or money, or choses in action. long as there is no when there is no
express repudiation of express repudiation of
Trust Stipulation Pour the trust by the trustee the trust by the trustee
Autrui
and made known to and made known to
Based on law or Based on agreement the beneficiary, cannot the beneficiary, may be
agreement only be barred by laches or barred by laches or by
Refers to a right to a May refer to a specific extinctive prescription. extinctive prescription.
specific property property or other
things
Express Trust
NOTE: The principles of the law on trust is A trust which come into existence only by the
merely suppletory to the Civil Code, Special Laws, execution of an intention to create it by the trustor
and the Rules of Court (Art. 1442). or the parties.
Kinds of Trust NOTE: The defense that express trusts cannot be
1. Express Trust proved by parol evidence may be waived, either by
2. Implied Trust failure to interpose timely objections against
a) Resulting Trust presentation of oral evidence not admissible under
b) Constructive Trust the law or by cross- examining the adverse party
and his witnesses along the prohibited lines. An
Express Trust Implied Trust express trust over personal property or any interest
therein, and an implied trust, whether the property 2. Accumulation trust- one that will accumulate
subject to the trust is real or personal, may be income to be reinvested by the trustee in the trust
proved by oral evidence (Art. 1457). for the period of time specified.
NOTE: The general rule is that the burden of 3. Spendthrift trust- one established when the
Page | 62
proving the existence of a trust is on the party beneficiary need to be protected because of his
alleging its existence; and to discharge the burden, inexperience or immaturity from his imprudent,
it is generally required that his proof be clear and spending habits or simply because the beneficiary
satisfactory and convincing. is spendthrift.
NOTE: To affect third persons, a trust concerning 4. Sprinkling trust- one that gives the trustee the
an immovable or any interest therein must be right to determine the income of the beneficiaries
embodied in a public instrument and registered in who should receive income each year and the
the Registry of Property. Creation of express trust amount thereof.
Express trust are those trust voluntarily and
Termination of Express Trust
intentionally, created by direct and positive act of
the trustor, by some writing, deed, will, or oral 1. Destruction of the Corpus
declaration evincing an intention to create trust
(Art. 1444). 2. Revocation by the trustor
Implied Trust