Professional Documents
Culture Documents
08 FrangipaneEuphratesPeltenburgbas
08 FrangipaneEuphratesPeltenburgbas
08 FrangipaneEuphratesPeltenburgbas
net/publication/278007544
CITATIONS READS
7 507
1 author:
M. Frangipane
Accademia dei Lincei and Fondazione Roma Sapienza University of Rome
82 PUBLICATIONS 1,292 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Excavations and Researches at Arslantepe, Malatya - Researches on the development of hierarchical societies in Greater Mesopotamia. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by M. Frangipane on 11 October 2015.
Edited by
Edgar Peltenburg
OXBOW BOOKS
Published by
Oxbow Books, Oxford
ISBN 978‑1‑84217‑272‑8
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
Oxbow Books
and
www.oxbowbooks.com
Contributors v
List of abbreviations vii
Acknowledgements viii
Preface ix
I%&-2B)A&/2%
1 New perspectives on the Carchemish sector of the Middle Euphrates River valley 1
in the 3rd millennium BC
Edgar Peltenburg
P$-& &p2 S"&&+","%&0 2r &?" M/BB+" E)*?-$&"0 $%B S$s)- R/#"- t$0/%0
9 The Tilbes Project (Birecik Dam, Turkish Euphrates): the Early Bronze evidence 142
Jesús Gil Fuensanta
iv Contents
10 Dynamics, diagnostic criteria and se•lement pa•erns in the Carchemish area 152
during the Early Bronze period
Christine Kepinski
11 The Early Bronze Age in the Syrian north‑west Jezireh: the Tell es‑Sweyhat region 164
Michael D. Danti and Richard L. Ze2ler
12 The metalwork of the Carchemish region and the development of grave repertories 187
during the third millennium BC
Graham Philip
13 Regional culture and metal objects in the area of Carchemish during the Early 198
Bronze Age
Filomena Fausta Squadrone
14 Is there a Carchemish regional glyptic style? Reflections on sealing practices 214
in the northern Euphrates region
Andrew McCarthy
15 The Carchemish region in the Early Bronze Age 222
Catherine Marro
16 Fruit stands and the definition of a cultural area around Carchemish 238
Kemal Sertok
17 Plain and luxury wares of the third millennium BC in the Carchemish region: 250
two case‑studies from Tell Shiyukh Tahtani
Paola Sconzo
18 The Carchemish region as a ceramic province in the Early Bronze Age: analysis 267
of the ceramics from the Carchemish Dam focusing on the material of Gre Virike
Atilla Engin
Contributors
Kemal Sertok
Archeaeological Museum of Gaziantep
Gaziantep
Turkey
List of Abbreviations
Many people contributed to the success of this Levant, and his colleagues gave to the proposal
initiative. First and foremost are the participants to publish the papers of the Berlin workshop.
of the workshop who responded so positively In this I have benefited from Michael Given’s
to the idea of a meeting, made the workshop so conscientious guidance and the assistance of
enjoyable and sent revised manuscripts in a timely Oxbow staff, especially Val Lamb. Peer reviewers
manner. None of this would have been possible gave their valuable time and wisdom to comment
were it not for the agreement and support of the and make suggestions on papers; an anonymous
organisers and technical assistants of 4ICAANE, reviewer made helpful comments about the work
especially Hartmut Kühne. Without the superb as a whole. Lindy Crewe, Claire Herbert and Phil
help of the assistants, we would certainly have Karsgaard were enormously helpful with their
been pressed to complete delivery of papers technical expertise.
within what proved a busy workshop. All illustrations are copyright of the respective
I am happy for this opportunity to acknowledge authors with the exception of the following: Fig.
the support and encouragement that Bill Finlayson, 5.4 courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum;
Director, Council for British Research in the Figs 13.1–6, 9 courtesy of Kemal Sertok.
Preface
Carchemish was one of the great capital cities of opportunity to discuss their research strategies,
the Ancient Near East, well‑known for its role in problems, discoveries and interpretations
the 1st and 2nd millennia BC from documentary together. When it became clear that many would
sources and from the excavations of Hogarth, be a•ending the 4th ICAANE, I thought that
Woolley and others in the first quarter of the this might provide such an opportunity. Some
20th century. In contrast, its earlier history is 20 directors of excavations and their assistants
poorly understood because of scarcity of wri•en from both sides of the modern divide responded
references and limited investigations of relevant positively to the idea to gather for the first time in
periods at the site itself. The la•er situation is a workshop dedicated to an assessment of Early
unlikely to change while it remains inaccessible Bronze Age se•lement in the whole Euphrates
to archaeologists as a result of its current role as valley in the vicinity of Carchemish.
a military post on the border between Syria and To structure such a forum, we adopted the
Turkey. Insights, nonetheless, have unexpectedly theme “The Archaeology of Boundaries: was there
come from recent efforts to harness the Euphrates a Carchemish Region in the Early Bronze Age?”
for power and irrigation purposes. Questions to be addressed included: Is there a
Construction of the Tishrin Dam to the definable material culture that distinguishes a
south, and the Carchemish and Birecik Dams putative Carchemish region? How does it differ
to the north of the site have led to numerous from adjacent regions? How does it evolve in the
rescue excavations that have yielded much data Early Bronze Age? Participants went beyond site
relevant to developments at Carchemish. This reports and began to assess their evidence inter‑
has produced an altered spatial perspective on and intra‑regionally, that is to consider formal
the Ancient Near East in the 3rd millennium BC variation in spatial pa•erning of this newly
since now we possess much information about recovered material culture, an essential building
small‑scale sites in the Euphrates valley in this block for the interpretation of its meaning for
area and li•le from Carchemish itself. The papers social, ethnic and other reconstructions. Papers
in this volume deal with the evidence from these were pre‑circulated on the world wide web to
recent excavations, not to fashion an alternative allow discussion at the meeting.
(pre‑)history of Carchemish, but to characterise In the event, the workshop became a productive
human occupation in the region by focusing on learning process in respect of conceptualising
interactions between valley se•lements, without boundaries. It became clear that we could only
assuming a dominant role for Carchemish at this take the first tentative steps in approaching the
time. theme, and this was not just because knowledge
The impetus for the volume stems from the of the objects and other evidence from this
enthusiasm generated by participants of a one‑ valley is still at a rudimentary level. An essential
day workshop organised on 31 March 2004 as difficulty in addressing boundaries here is that we
part of the 4th International Congress on the have virtually no information from the uplands
Archaeology of the Ancient Near East in Berlin immediately beside the valley. Inclusion of papers
(4th ICAANE). To appreciate that enthusiasm on material from and developments at two key
it is worth recalling that for several years sites in neighbouring regions, Tell es‑Sweyhat
archaeologists had been working in adjacent and Tilbeshar, only provided limited controls.
parts of the same valley but on opposite sides It also became clear that we had no meaningful
of the o•en sealed modern border, without the framework for dealing with pastoralists’ use
x Preface
and possibly broad dissemination of material preliminaries, chiefly in the four volumes,
culture, a phenomenon that may well blur traits Carchemish Dam I–III and Tishrin Dam.
at boundaries and one that calls for definitions The upshot of the exchange of information at
of multiple and permeable boundaries. We the Berlin workshop was a sense of excitement
still need frameworks for evaluating the scope at pulling things together for the first time,
of interactions between sedentary, pastoral, of synthesizing if you will, and realising how
tribal, identity, ethnic, political and linguistic heterogeneous was the information to hand.
boundaries, to name but the more obvious. In Discussion led to the conviction that this
short, research at the stage is focussed on trait‑ material would continue to appear piecemeal,
oriented studies, and although workshop papers so exacerbating difficulties in dealing with what
fruitfully explored material culture boundaries, it is seen as quite varied intra‑valley se•lement
now remains to move beyond pa•ern recognition evidence, unless a more permanent record
in order to explore what these mean in terms of of these exchanges was made. This volume,
social and territorial boundaries. therefore, is the result of a concerted effort by all
The workshop, therefore, constituted an participants to overcome the myopia of working
important initial step towards the evaluation of on opposite sides of a modern boundary and
the valley hinterlands of Carchemish in the 3rd to consider collectively the challenging Early
millennium BC. Much of the material has only Bronze Age evidence from the Carchemish
recently come to light. Virtually all that was sector of one of the great river systems in the
discussed derives from rescue excavations in world. The papers here identify and interpret
which retrieval and recording are paramount. characteristics of what is proving to be highly
Most of the known forty‑five 3rd millennium distinctive societies and their evolution in the
sites are now destroyed by inundation. There 3rd millennium BC.
are almost no final excavation reports, only
Edgar Peltenburg
U
!"#$%&'"()*+#,-.,$,/'00&*1233*4,!53(4$#*",!$4&6,
74-+8*,9,:56*,.4-),#(*,.4$;)*+#$#'-+,-.,#(*,245<,
=-4&0>,?*=,0$#$,.4-),@*6#'+&',7$(A*,BC6D<,,
E24.$F,G54<*6H
!"#$%&&"'(#")*+,")%
(+*:#%' -.?.' !",' 035@+)*' 13%' 4"+)' $:&1:#"&' "#%"0' +)' /"#&;' <#5)=%' >' ")7' 13%' 0+1%0' 4%)1+5)%7' +)' 13%' 1%A1.'
B#+")*&%0'#%6%#'15'0+1%0'@+13'%C+7%)$%'56'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>>D>>>'45):4%)1"&'015)%'15420.'B3%'7"03%7'&+)%'+)'13%'
9,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'"#%"'7+C+7%0'13%'1@5'=5)%0E')5#13'")7'05:13'56'13%'45:)1"+)0
(+*:#%'-.F.'G15,H'I%;1+)&+'<"3J%'KL;MN'0%%)'6#54'13%'<+#%$+N'2#+7*%'5)'13%'/:,3#"1%0O'-.P.'G$%)1#%H'Q&")'56'
Zeytinli Bahçe Höyük with excavated areas; 8.4. (bo?om) The western eroded flank of the Zeytinli Bahçe
mound with the three soundings opened there. Bo?om to top, right to leI: B8, C6‑7 and C5‑6
Salvage excavation at Zeytinli Bahçe Höyük: dK/, "$&J$;*, 34-O*:#F, :--40'+$#*0, %6, ?5)$+,
its contribution to the understanding of 4th G5+$, -., #(*, /'00&*, !$"#, G*:(+':$&, 2+'J*4"'#6,
to 3rd millennium cultural developments -.,K+<$4$>,9#,'",$+,-5#"#$+0'+;,)-5+0F,#(-5;(,
4*&$#'J*&6,")$&&,'+,*M#*+#,E$%-5#,R>eS,(*:#$4*"HF,
in the Carchemish region
4'"'+;,53,.4-),#(*,3&$'+,#-,%*,J'"'%&*,.4-),$&)-"#,
9+J*"#';$#'-+", -., @*6#'+&', 7$(A*, BC6D<, %6, #(*, *J*46=(*4*,'+,#($#,3$4#,-.,#(*,!53(4$#*",J$&&*6,
9#$&'$+,#*$),.4-),#(*,PI$,\$3'*+8$Q,2+'J*4"'#6,-., EN';>,U>RH>,K,(';(,:-+':$&,"*:-+0$46,)-5+0,#($#,
c-)*F,='#(,#(*,"533-4#,-.,#(*,9#$&'$+,/'+'"#46,-., 4'"*",-+,#(*,+-4#(L=*"#*4+,3$4#,-.,#(*,)$'+,(C6D<,
Foreign Affairs, began in 1999 as part of the TAÇ ;'J*",@*6#'+&',7$(A*,'#",J*46,3*:5&'$4,"($3*,EN';",
TRe !"#$%&&"'(#")*+,")%
'+,$,")$&&,$4*$,$#,#(*,%$"*,-.,#(*,(';(,:-+':$&,
secondary mound (squares C5–6), and – at
&*$"#, '+, #(*, :$"*, -., #(*, /'00&*, 74-+8*,K;*,
– in the eastern part of the lower mound
E"-5+0'+;,NbH,N';>,U>YH>
YH, G=-, 3($"*", -., 4*L-::53$#'-+, -., #(*, "'#*, '+,
#(*, c-)$+, $+0, I$#*, 768$+#'+*1)*0'$*J$&,
periods, aCer short insubstantial Iron Age
$+0, B*&&*+'"#':, -::53$#'-+">, G(*"*, &$#*4,
"*##&*)*+#", $&"-, *M#*+0*0, )$'+&6, #-, #(*,
small conical hill (squares C5–6, D4–6)
$+0, '+, #(*, +-4#(*4+, $+0, *$"#*4+, 3$4#", -.,
#(*, &-=*4, )-5+0, $4-5+0, '#, EdR, $+0, NbHF,
34-%$%&6, *+&$4;'+;, #(*, "'#*, #-, #(*, +-4#(, %6,
accumulating an artificial filling (Fig. 8.3).
f($#, '", '+#*4*"#'+;F, '+, #*4)", -., #('", J-&5)*F,
'", #(*, *M#4*)*&6, &-+;, $+0, 5+'+#*4453#*0,
sequence of superimposed se#lements of the
4th and the beginning of the 3rd millennium
7V, EI$#*, V($&:-&'#(':, $+0, !7, 9HF, :-+#'+5-5"&6,
reconstructed, oCen with the same layout, one
above the other, which finds close comparisons in
+*$4%6,"'#*"F,"5:(,$",B-45),BC6D<,E/$44-,%1'"&>,
RSSSH>,G(*,&')'#*0,4*":5*,*M:$J$#'-+",:-+05:#*0,
'+, "5:(, $, (';(, )-5+0, "-, .$4, ($J*, +-#, 6'*&0*0,
sufficient information on the general layout of
#(*"*, "*##&*)*+#">, B-=*J*4F, =*, :$+, $&4*$06,
4*:-;+'"*, "-)*, J*46, '+#*4*"#'+;, .*$#54*", #($#,
offer hints for the interpretation of the general
0*J*&-3)*+#",-.,#(*,"'#*,'+,#(*,:45:'$&,#4$+"'#'-+$&,
period from the 4th to the 3rd millennium and
"5%"*X5*+#, :*+#54'*"F, =(*+, +*=, :56$&, $+0,
34-%$%&6, 3-&'#':$&, 4*;'-+", =*4*, ;-'+;, #-, %*,
Figure 8.5. Zeytinli Bahçe. Po?ery from the lower .-4)*0,'+,#('",$4*$>,
Late Chalcolithic levels (LC3) in trench B8 The long Late Chalcolithic–EB I sequence of
@*6#'+&',7$(A*,($",%**+,-%#$'+*0,%6,:-)%'+'+;,
#(*,"#4$#';4$3(6,-.,#=-,"-5+0'+;",-+,#(*,=*"#*4+,
eroded side of the mound (Figs 8.3, 8.4): one,
8.2–8.4). The high elevation of the mound (31 m) ")$&&*4, Ee, g, _, )HF, &-=*4, 0-=+, E7UHF, $+0, -+*F,
'",05*,#-,#(*,'+#*+"'J*,-::53$#'-+,-.,#(*,"'#*,.-4, &$4;*4,ERS,g,e,)HF,-+,#(*,533*4,3$4#,-.,#(*,"&-3*F,
"5:(,$,&-+;, #')*>,B-=*J*4F,#(4**,)$'+, 3($"*", starting from the surface (C6–7) (Frangipane %1'
of occupation, differently located on the mound, "&>,RSSRH>,G('4#**+,!7,9,&*J*&"F,.-4)'+;,$&#-;*#(*4,
:$+,%*,0'"#'+;5'"(*0Z, $+, $&)-"#, U, ), #(':<, 0*3-"'#F, ($J*, %**+, "-, .$4,
TH,, K, &$#*, 34*('"#-4':, 3*4'-0F, .4-), #(*, I$#*, %4-5;(#,#-,&';(#>,N-54,%5'&0'+;,&*J*&"F,%*&-+;'+;,
Chalcolithic to the end of EB I (4th to the #-, $+, *$4&6, 3($"*, -., !7, 9, E!7, 9KHF, *+0*0, #(*,
%*;'++'+;,-.,#(*,Y40,)'&&*++'5),7VHF,='#(, "#4$#';4$3(6,-.,#(*,&-=*4,#4*+:(F,0'4*:#&6,&6'+;,-+,
a major concentration of the se#lements in #(*,I$#*,245<,&$6*4"^,+'+*,&*J*&",)-4*F,%*&-+;'+;,
#(*, =*"#*4+, 3$4#, -., #(*, (C6D<F, +-=, %$0&6, #-, -+*, $+0, #(*, "$)*, $4:($*-&-;':$&, 3($"*, $+0,
eroded (soundings B8 and C6–7) (Fig. 8.3). 4*34*"*+#'+;, $, &$#*4, 0*J*&-3)*+#, -., !7, 9, E!7,
2) A late Early Bronze (EB III–IV) se#lement, not 97HF, ($J*, %**+, 5+:-J*4*0, '+, #(*, 533*4, #4*+:(F,
6*#, #(-4-5;(&6, '+J*"#';$#*0F, $+0, $, /'00&*, "#$4#'+;,.4-),J*46,:&-"*,#-,#(*,"54.$:*F,5+0*4,$,
Bronze se#lement, both mainly concentrated .*=,/*0'*J$&,4*)$'+">
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% 127
Figure 8.11. Po?ery from the upper levels in trench B8. 1–12, 16: Late Uruk period; 13–15: Early'
<#5)=%'>R
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% TYT
nature of the changes in both po#ery materials • #(*, 0'"$33*$4$+:*, -., '+:'"*0, :4-""($#:(*0,
$+0, $4:('#*:#54*>, K&#(-5;(, #(*, *M:$J$#*0, $4*$, 0*:-4$#'-+,$+0,+-"*L&5;",EN';>,U>TS>,YH^
'", *M#4*)*&6, ")$&&F, %*'+;, '+, #(*, 533*4, 3$4#, -., • #(*, '+:4*$"*0, +5)%*4, -., %$+0L4'), %-=&"F,
"-5+0'+;, 7UF, =*, :$+, +-#':*, #($#, #(*, 0=*&&'+;", very oCen marked with clearly distinguished
=*4*,)$0*,5"'+;,#(*,"$)*,#*:(+'X5*",$",'+,#(*, bands (Fig. 8.11.13–14), which appear to have
I$#*, 245<, 3($"*, $+0, =*4*, %5'&#, '+, #(*, "$)*, %*:-)*,%6,.$4,#(*,34*J$'&'+;,"($3*,-.,%-=&F,
3&$:*", $+0, ='#(, $, "')'&$4, &$6-5#>, G(*, "$)*, $",$,"-4#,-.,P'+05"#4'$&Q,34-05:#'-+>
<'+0, -., (-5"*", ='#(, #('+, $+0, 4-5;(&6, )$0*,
9+, ;*+*4$&, #*4)"F, $", $&4*$06, )*+#'-+*0F, #(*,
=$&&",:-+#'+5*0,#-,%*,.4*X5*+#&6,4*L%5'&#F,=('&*,
3-##*46, (-=*J*4, )$'+#$'+", #63-&-;':$&, $+0,
the general layout of the se#lement, at least
#*:(+-&-;':$&,#4$'#",J*46,"')'&$4,#-,#(-"*,.-5+0,'+,
'+, #('", $4*$F, $33*$4", #-, ($J*, %**+, #($#, -., $+,
#(*,&*J*&",%*&-+;'+;,#-,#(*,I$#*,245<,3*4'-0>,
'+"5%"#$+#'$&,J'&&$;*>
, K,4*)$4<$%&*,:-+#'+5'#6,'",$&"-,)$+'.*"#*0,'+,
, \')'&$4, :-+#'+5'#6, :$+, %*, $&"-, -%"*4J*0, '+,
0$'&6,&'.*>,G(*,"5%"#$+#'$&&6,(';(,3*4:*+#$;*",-.,
3-##*46, )$+5.$:#54*F, #(-5;(, "-)*, :($+;*",
"(**31;-$#",4*:-40*0,'+,#(*,245<,3*4'-0,&*J*&",
*+$%&*, 5", #-, 4*:-;+'"*, $, +*=, 3($"*>, G(*,
$#,@*6#'+&',7$(A*,$4*,"#'&&,#(*,:($4$:#*4'"#':,#4$'#,
:-)%'+$#'-+,-.,-&0,$+0,+*=,#4$'#",'",3$4#':5&$4&6,
-., #(*, !7, 9K, .$5+$&, 4*)$'+", E\'4$:5"$+-, RSSRF,
evident in the last of the levels a#ributed to
96–98, fig. 42).
#(*,I$#*,245<,3*4'-0F,=(':(F,#-;*#(*4,='#(,#(*,
, K&&, #(*, $4:($*-&-;':$&, )$#*4'$&", .-5+0, $#,
3*4"'"#*+#, 34*"*+:*, -., %*J*&&*0, 4'), %-=&", $+0,
@*6#'+&',7$(A*F,=(*+,:-)3$4*0,='#(,0$#$,.4-),
the whole inventory of ledge (Fig. 8.11.4), band
-#(*4,"'#*"F,'+,)6,-3'+'-+,'+0':$#*,#(*,.-4)$#'-+,
$+0, '+#54+*0, 4'), %-=&"F, "(-=", #(*, *M:&5"'J*,
-., $, 4*;'-+$&, !7, 9, :56*, '+, #(*, V$4:(*)'"(,
5"*F,$)-+;,#(*,O$4"F,-.,+*:<*0,J*""*&",='#(,(';(,
4*;'-+,$+0,'+,#(*,=(-&*,!53(4$#*",$4*$,"-5#(,-.,
+*$4&6, :6&'+04':$&, +*:<", $+0, "')3&*, *J*4#*0,
#(*,G$545",:($'+F,=(':(,*)*4;*0,0'4*:#&6,.4-),$,
EN';>, U>TT>TeH, -4, "&';(#&6, #(':<*+*0, 4-5+0, 4')">,
&-:$&,0*J*&-3)*+#,-.,#(*,+-4#(*4+,245<,(-4'8-+>,
A few deep bowls with a carinated profile, one
G('",:56*,)$6,($J*,34'J'&*;*0,:-+#$:#",$&-+;,
='#(, $, =$J6, '+:'"*0, 0*:-4$#'-+, EN4$+;'3$+*,
#(*, 4'J*4, J$&&*6, ='#(, #(*, :-))5+'#'*", -., #(*,
and Bucak 2001, fig. 5.8, 7), were found only
+-4#(*4+, "#4*#:(*", '+, #(*, )-5+#$'+"F, =(*4*, '#,
'+, #('", #4$+"'#'-+$&, &*J*&, $+0, $4*, :-)3$4$%&*,
"34*$0, '#", %$"':, .*$#54*", $+0, .4-), =(*4*, '#, '+,
='#(, *M$)3&*", .4-),K)5X, h, E74$'0=--0, $+0,
turn received some stimuli and influences, due
Braidwood 1960, fig. 220.23–25) and Mohammad
#-,#(*'4,"#45:#54$&,"')'&$4'#6>,
K4$%,TF,$,&*J*&,:-+"'0*4*0,%6,#(*,*M:$J$#-4",$",
$, 3-"#L245<F, #4$+"'#'-+$&, #-, ?'+*J'#*, b, 3($"*,
(Killick 1986, fig. 2.8–9). A few examples of large The later Early Bronze I se1lements (EB IB)
deep bowls with fla#ened rims decorated with in the upper trench C6–7: new trends towards
incisions (Frangipane and Bucak 2001, fig. 8.3) ‘urban’ arrangements in an uninterrupted
$&"-,"**),#-,($J*,%**+,34-05:*0,%-#(,'+,#(*,&$"#, cultural development
I$#*,245<,&*J*&",$+0,'+,#(*,#4$+"'#'-+$&,3($"*", K, )-4*, )$4<*0F, #(-5;(, +-#, $%453#F, :($+;*,
to EB I. Different from the wavy line incised :$+, %*, "**+, '+, #(*, &$#*4, 0*J*&-3)*+#", -., !7, 9F,
%-=&"F,=(':(,$33*$4,#-,%*,$,+-4#(*4+,#63*F,#(*"*, 4*34*"*+#*0,'+,#(*,533*4,3$4#,-.,#(*,"#4$#';4$3(':,
*M$)3&*",$4*,$,)-4*,='0*"34*$0,.*$#54*F,=(':(, "*X5*+:*F, %4-5;(#, #-, &';(#, '+, $, &$4;*, #4*+:(,
%*&-+;",#-,$,='0*4,P/*"-3-#$)'$+Q,*+J'4-+)*+#F, (C6–7) opened at a higher level on the western
"#'&&,&'+<'+;,53,#(*,+-4#(,='#(,#(*,"-5#(,'+,#(*, slope of the lower mound (Figs 8.3, 8.4). Here,
final Late Uruk and Jemdet Nasr periods. +'+*, "53*4')3-"*0, &*J*&", ='#(, ')3-"'+;,
, N-54,&*J*&",($J*,%**+,*M:$J$#*0,'+,#(*,533*4, 0-)*"#':, $4:('#*:#54*F, .-4)'+;, $, (5;*, 0*3-"'#,
3$4#,-.,"-5+0'+;,7UF,=(':(,=*,.5&&6,$":4'%*,#-, $&)-"#, b, ), 0**3F, ($J*, %**+, *M:$J$#*0>, G(*6,
$+,!7,9,(-4'8-+>,G(*,0'"#'+;5'"('+;,.*$#54*",-., :-+"'"#*0, -., &$4;*, :$4*.5&&6, %5'&#, (-5"*", ='#(,
#('",+*=,*$4&6,!7,9,3($"*,E!7,9KH,$4*Z #(':<, )50L%4':<, =$&&", "*3$4$#*0, %6, "#4**#", -4,
• the appearance of band rim – or carinated $&&*6", '+, $, ;*+*4$&, =*&&L3&$++*0, &$6-5#, EN';",
– bowls with high cylindrical stems oCen U>TRF,U>TYH>,G(*"*,%5'&0'+;"F,=(':(F,%*'+;,-.,&$4;*,
0*:-4$#*0, %6, (-4'8-+#$&, 3$4$&&*&, ;4--J*", 0')*+"'-+",$4*,-+&6,3$4#&6,5+:-J*4*0F,=*4*,)$0*,
E"-L:$&&*0,:($)3$;+*,:53"H,EN';>,U>TT>TbH^ -., ='0*, X5$04$+;5&$4, 4--)"F, =*&&L3&$"#*4*0,
• #(*,0'"$33*$4$+:*,-.,%*J*&&*0,4'),%-=&"^ $+0, *X5'33*0, ='#(, %*+:(*", $+0, .'4*3&$:*",,
TYR !"#$%&&"'(#")*+,")%
(+*:#%'-.?F.'I%;1+)&+'<"3J%.'B3%'5&7%01'/"#&;'<#5)=%'
IB level reached so far in trench C6–7
(+*:#%'-.?S.'I%;1+)&+'<"3J%.'Q"#1'56'")'/"#&;'<#5)=%'
><'35:0%'
Figure 8.17. Zeytinli Bahçe. Po?ery from the Early Bronze IB phase
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% TYb
(+*:#%'-.?T.'I%;1+)&+'<"3J%.'!%1"&&+$'@"#%E'$5##:*"1%7'
*52&%10'")7'6551'6#"*4%)10'6#54'1#+,57'C%00%&0'65:)7'
in final Early Bronze levels under the Middle Bronze
fortification wall in squares C5–6
4*:*'J*0,#(-"*,#4$'#",=(':(,=*4*,)-4*,"5'#$%&*,#-,
*M34*"",#(*'4,+*=,.-4)",-.,3-&'#':$&,-4;$+'"$#'-+>, (+*:#%0'-.FUDF?.'!+77&%'<#5)=%'C%00%&0'6#54'I%;1+)&+'
i$4#':5&$4&6F, #(*, $&4*$06, )*+#'-+*0, %54'$&, <"3J%
customs, which stressed social differentiation,
#(*,')3-4#$+#,4-&*,-.,#(*,)'&'#$46,.5+:#'-+F,+*=,
concepts of wealth – no longer based on staple Changes in the se1lement pa1ern and site
34-05:#,$::5)5&$#'-+,%5#,4$#(*4,-+,&5M546,;--0", function in the transition between the 3rd to
such as metals – became a new characteristic the 2nd millennium
.*$#54*,-.,#(*,G54<'"(,!53(4$#*",:56*">,V'"#,-4, G(*,*M#4$-40'+$46,4':(+*"",-.,#(*"*,&$#*4,#-)%",
stone graves rich in metal giCs, sometimes in large '", *X5$&&6, $+, '+0':$#'-+, -., "5%"#$+#'$&, :($+;*",
:*)*#*4'*"F,&'<*,#(*,7'4*:'<,+*:4-3-&'",E\*4#-<,$+0, '+,#(*,0*J*&-3)*+#,-.,#(*"*,:-))5+'#'*">,]+*,
!4;*A,T___HF,"34*$0,"-5#(=$40",$&-+;,#(*,4'J*4, -., #(*, )-"#, ')3-4#$+#, $:('*J*)*+#", '+, #(*,
J$&&*6,'+,#(*,:-54"*,-.,#(*,.'4"#,($&.,-.,#(*,Y40, "*:-+0, ($&., -., #(*, Y40, )'&&*++'5), =$", $&"-,
)'&&*++'5)F,4*$:('+;,#(*,\64'$+,%-40*4,*M$:#&6,'+, #(*, 4*"5)3#'-+, -., 54%$+'"$#'-+, '+, #(*, =*"#*4+,
the area of Carchemish (Woolley 1914; Carchemish 4*;'-+,-.,233*4,/*"-3-#$)'$F,3$4#':5&$4&6,'+,#(*,,
999H>,G('",#4$0'#'-+,%*:$)*,"-,=*&&L4--#*0,#($#,'#,'+, 24.$, $4*$F, "-5#(, -., #(*, a$4$%$%$, 0$), EK&;$8*,
"-)*,=$6,3*4"'"#*0,'+,#(*,$4*$F,='#(,"5::*""'J*, T___H>, \'#*", $", G'#4'"F, a$8$+*F, 34-%$%&6, I'0$4F,
modifications and local adaptations, in the second #-;*#(*4,='#(,#(*,+5)*4-5",&$4;*,5+*M:$J$#*0,
($&.,-.,#(*,Y40,)'&&*++'5)F,:($4$:#*4'"'+;F,'+,'#", )-5+0",'+,#(*,24.$,3&$'+,$33*$4,$",4*$&,54%$+,
+*=,.-4)"F,$&"-,#(*,&$#*4,Y40,)'&&*++'5),:56*", "*##&*)*+#", EB$53#)$++, T__Y^, /$#+*6, $+0,
-.,#('",4*;'-+,EK&;$8*,%1'"&>,T__e^,B$53#)$++,T__RF, K&;$8*, T__b^, /$#+*6, %1' "&. 1999; Wa#enmaker
T__Y^,I$+*4',T___^,i*&#*+%54;,T___^,i*&#*+%54;,%1' T__eH, $+0, '+0':$#*, $, "*:-+0, 54%$+'"$#'-+,
"&>,T__b^,RSSS^,\:(=$4#8,%1'"&>,RSSSF,RSSYH> 3(*+-)*+-+F,=(':(,=$",)$'+&6,4*:-;+'"$%&*,'+,
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% 137
(+*:#%'-.FFDFS.'Q&")'")7'C+%@0'6#54'13%')5#13'")7'
13%' 05:13' 56' 13%' !+77&%' <#5)=%' R*%' 7%6%)$%' @"&&'
with a quadrangular tower, built at the base of the
3+*3'$5)+$"&'45:)7.'R'&"#*%'*"1%@";'*+C+)*'"$$%00'
15'13%'$54,&%A'+0'C+0+2&%'+)'(+*:#%0'-.FF'G"25C%H'")7'
-.FP'G15,'#+*31H'
#(*,3&$'+",$+0,.--#('&&",-.,233*4,/*"-3-#$)'$F, =(*#(*4,'#,=$","')3&6,$,")$&&*4,'+($%'#*0,$4*$,
=('&*,%*'+;,)-4*,:'4:5)":4'%*0,'+,#(*,!53(4$#*", in the mid–late 3rd millennium.
[$&&*6, 34-3*4>, G(*, :56$&, &'+<", %*#=**+, , G(*,"'#5$#'-+,'",)5:(,:&*$4*4,$#,#(*,%*;'++'+;,
#(*, *$"#*4+, $+0, =*"#*4+, 3$4#", -., #(*, 4*;'-+,, of the 2nd millennium. An undoubtedly fortified
became stronger again, and a town–country $4:('#*:#54$&,:-)3&*M,E:'#$0*&,-4,P3$&$:*QH,"#--0,
"6"#*)':,4*&$#'-+"('3,=$",34-%$%&6,*"#$%&'"(*0, -+,#('",3$4#,-.,#(*,)-5+0,'+,#(*,/'00&*,74-+8*,
%*#=**+,#(*,&$4;*,:*+#4*",$+0,#(*,")$&&*4,"'#*", Age, forming the first nucleus of the steep conical
='#('+, $, +*=, ('*4$4:(':$&, $44$+;*)*+#, -., #(*, ('&&>, K, (5;*, )-+5)*+#$&, Y), #(':<, )50L%4':<,
#*44'#-46> =$&&, ='#(, $, X5$04$+;5&$4, P#-=*4Q, 34-#450'+;,
, f*,0-,+-#,($J*,*+-5;(,'+.-4)$#'-+,.-4,#('", from the exterior of the walls and flanking a
period from Zeytinli Bahçe, but the po#ery found 3$J*0, 4-$0, -4, ;$#*=$6, ;'J'+;, $::*"", #-, #(*,
in stratified levels in a small area at the base of '+#*4'-4,-.,#(*,:-)3&*M,($",%**+,%4-5;(#,#-,&';(#,
#(*,(';(*4,:-+':$&,)-5+0F,-+,#(*,=*"#*4+,"&-3*F, '+, #(*, *M:$J$#'-+, $4*$, -3*+*0, -+, #(*, "-5#(L
can be ascribed to a typical EB III–IV horizon of western flank of this cone. The abundant +)'0+1:,
#(*,4*;'-+,EN';>,U>T_H> materials found on the floor of the tower in this
, ?-,!7,99,='#(,3$'+#*0,a$4$%$%$,=$4*,-4,!7, seriously fire‑damaged building all point to a
999, &$6*4", ($J*, "-, .$4, %**+, .-5+0, '+, #(*, &-=*4, )$#54*, /'00&*, 74-+8*, 3($"*F, 34-%$%&6, /799F,
)-5+0>,G('",$%"*+:*,)$6,%*,05*,#-,$,4*$&,;$3, =(':(, '", :&-"*&6, :-)3$4$%&*, #-, -#(*4, /'00&*,
in the sequence or to a shiC or reduction in 74-+8*,"'#*",'+,#(*,4*;'-+F,"5:(,$",a54%$+,$+0,
"'8*,-.,#(*,'+($%'#*0,$4*$>,9.,@*6#'+&',7$(A*,=$", Lidar Höyük (Figs 8.20–24; $6>, K&;$8*, T__S^,
'+($%'#*0, $#, $&&, '+, #(*, )'0LY40, )'&&*++'5), '#, a$":($5,T___H>
)';(#,($J*,%**+,:-+:*+#4$#*0,'+,#(*,")$&&,:*+#4$&, , c*)$'+", -., /'00&*, 74-+8*, &*J*&", ($J*, $&"-,
$4*$, $#, #(*, %$"*, -., #(*, (';(, :-+':$&, )-5+0F, %**+, .-5+0, -+, #(*, *$"#*4+, "'0*, -., #(*, &-=*4,
where remains of EB III–IV structures have been )-5+0,E"-5+0'+;,NbHF,5+0*4,$,"*X5*+:*,-.,I$#*,
.-5+0>, f*, 0-, +-#, <+-=, =(*#(*4, #('", 3$4#, -., Byzantine and damaged Roman se#lements. It
the se#lement housed an inner town citadel or '", +-#, 6*#, :&*$4, =(*#(*4, #(*"*, R+0, )'&&*++'5),
TYU !"#$%&&"'(#")*+,")%
4*)$'+",$4*,3$4#,-.,$,P&-=*4,#-=+QF,=(':(,($0,'#, %-=&",EN4$+;'3$+*,$+0,i$&)'*4',T_UYH>,G(*"*,
*M'"#*0,$#,$&&,=-5&0,34-%$%&6,($J*,%**+,&')'#*0, =*4*,'+0**0,:-)3&*#*&6,$%"*+#,'+,#(*,i*4'-0,[9K,
'+, '#", *M#*+"'-+F, -4, =(*#(*4, #(*6, $4*, )*4*&6, 34-05:#'-+,E#(*,&-:$&,I$#*,245<,3($"*HF,$+0,=*4*,
the remains of sca#ered buildings around the '+#4-05:*0,'+#-,#(*,!7,9,4*3*4#-'4*,34-%$%&6,$",#(*,
P.-4#4*""Q>, 4*"5&#,-.,:-+#'+5'+;,&'+<",='#(,#(*,"-5#(*4+)-"#,
During the EB III–IV and Middle Bronze 3$4#,-.,#(*,J$&&*6>,G(*,"$)*,)';(#,%*,"$'0,-.,#(*,
ages, the se#lement therefore seems to have .45'#L"#$+0"Z,#(*,!7,9,.45'#L"#$+0",$#,K4"&$+#*3*,
%**+, 4*"#4':#*0, #-, $, ")$&&*4, $4*$F, $+0, $#, #(*, ='#(,$,:$4'+$#*0,:53,$+0,:6&'+04':$&,"#*),0-,
%*;'++'+;,-.,#(*,R+0,)'&&*++'5),=$",$,:'#$0*&, +-#,"**),#-,($J*,$+6#('+;,'+,:-))-+,='#(,#(*,
or acropolis surrounded by fortification walls. *$4&'*4,K4"&$+#*3*,[9K,.45'#L"#$+0"F,-4,#(*,G*3*:'<,
This period seems to have marked a significant *M$)3&*",'+,#(*,!&$8';,$4*$,E!"'+,T_URHF,%5#,:-36,
change in the se#lement type, aCer a period of #(*,"-L:$&&*0,"-5#(*4+,:($)3$;+*,:53"')-0*&F,
3-""'%&*, $%$+0-+)*+#, -4, :4'"'"F, $+0, '#, =-5&0, =(':(,'+,#54+,"**),#-,-4';'+$#*,.4-),#(*,%$+0L
%*, '+#*4*"#'+;, #-, <+-=, =(*#(*4, #('", :($+;*, 4'),%-=&,#63*>
)$#:(*0, $, )-4*, ;*+*4$&, #4$+".-4)$#'-+, -., #(*, , G(*"*, &'+<"F, $", '+0':$#*0, *$4&'*4F, :$+, $&"-,
se#lement pa#ern in the region. Though not %*, "**+, .4-), #(*, :56$&, *&*)*+#", "*&*:#'J*&6,
6*#,#(-4-5;(&6,'+J*"#';$#*0F,#(*,/'00&*,74-+8*, filtered in the opposite direction, from north
)-+5)*+#$&, :-)3&*M, $#, @*6#'+&', 7$(A*F, ='#(, #-, "-5#(F, "5:(, $", #(*, :'"#, #-)%", $+0, #(*, +*=,
'#",')3-"'+;,=$&&"F,)$6,%*,*J'0*+:*,-.,$,3*4'-0, .5+*4$46, #4$0'#'-+"F, =(':(, %*:$)*, *"#$%&'"(*0,
of insecurity and conflicts – also suggested by #(4-5;(-5#, #(*, 4*;'-+, ;4$J'#$#'+;, $4-5+0, #(*,
the spreading of walled se#lements – in what G54<'"(,!53(4$#*",$+0,%*6-+0>,K+-#(*4,&'+<,'",
$33*$4", #-, ($J*, %**+, $, <'+0, -., %-40*4'+;, $+0, 4*34*"*+#*0, %6, )*#$&&54;6, ='#(, #(*, "34*$0, -.,
:4-""'+;, &$+0, %*#=**+, '+:4*$"'+;&6, 3-=*4.5&, "')'&$4,)-0*&",$+0,)$+5.$:#54'+;,#*:(+'X5*">,
*)*4;'+;,#*44'#-4'$&,"#$#*">, , G(*,"*:-+0,'+#*4*"#'+;,4*)$4<,'",#($#F,0*"3'#*,
#(*,.$:#,#($#,#(*,=(-&*,J$&&*6,=$",+-=,0'J'0*0,
into two clearly distinct zones – a northern zone
#-, #(*, +-4#(, -., #(*, )-5+#$'+", $+0, $, "-5#(*4+,
Concluding remarks zone – it was affected throughout by a similar
G=-,-4,#(4**,3$4#':5&$4&6,'+#*4*"#'+;,$"3*:#",'+, 3-&'#':$&, :4'"'", =(':(, 4$0':$&&6, :($+;*0, 3-=*4,
)6,-3'+'-+,*)*4;*,.4-),=($#,($",%**+,"#$#*0, 4*&$#'-+",$+0,#(*,=(-&*,*:-+-)':,$+0,#*44'#-4'$&,
so far. The first, which is well documented in the "6"#*),$#,#(*,%*;'++'+;,-.,#(*,Y40,)'&&*++'5)>
@*6#'+&',7$(A*,"*X5*+:*F,'",#($#,#(*,!7,9,:56*, , G(*, -5#:-)*", -., #('", :4'"'", 0'..*4*0, .4-),
-.,#(*,G54<'"(,!53(4$#*",:-))5+'#'*","**)",#-, -+*, $4*$, #-, $+-#(*4F, %5#, 4$0':$&, "#45:#54$&,
have developed specifically in the southernmost :($+;*", =*4*, #$<'+;, 3&$:*, *J*46=(*4*F, &'+<*0,
$4*$,-.,V$4:(*)'"(,$+0,#(*,a$4$%$%$,0$),-5#, #-, #(*, :-&&$3"*, -., #(*, *:-+-)':, $+0, 3-&'#':$&,
of the local Uruk culture – an adaptation process :*+#4$&'"$#'-+, "6"#*)>, G(*, 0'"$33*$4$+:*, -.,
#($#,=$",$&4*$06,'+,34-;4*"",'+,#(*,&$#*,3($"*,-., :&$6L"*$&'+;",$+0,"*$&"F,#(*,$&)-"#,#-#$&,$%"*+:*,
#(*,245<,3*4'-0,EIVbH>,G(*,J*46,34-+-5+:*0, -.,)$""L34-05:*0,:-+':$&,%-=&"F,$+0,#(*,.$'&54*,
:-+#'+5'#6,.-5+0,%*#=**+,I$#*,245<,$+0,!7,9,'+, to find any monumental public buildings, set
#('","-5#(*4+,3$4#,-.,#(*,G54<'"(,!53(4$#*",'",+-#, #(*, 4*;'-+, -., #(*, 233*4, !53(4$#*", $3$4#, .4-),
.-5+0,'+,#(*,)-4*,+-4#(*4+,"*:#'-+F,+-4#(,-.,#(*, the rest of Mesopotamia in the first half of the
G$545">,G('",'",*J'0*+#,$#,K4"&$+#*3*F,=(*4*F,'.,#(*, Y40, )'&&*++'5)>, N-4, #(*, 54%$+'"$#'-+, -., #(*,
)$4<*0,3-&'#':$&,$+0,"6"#*)':,%4*$<0-=+,$4-5+0, *$"#*4+)-"#,4*;'-+",-.,233*4,/*"-3-#$)'$,0-*",
YSSS,7V,=(':(,"500*+&6,%&-:<*0,#(*,0*J*&-3)*+#, +-#,"**),*J*4,#-,($J*,:*$"*0F,%5#,)$6,-+&6,($J*,
-.,K4"&$+#*3*Q",*$4&6,"#$#*,"-:'*#6,)';(#,-+&6,($J*, 5+0*4;-+*,$,4*-4;$+'"$#'-+$&,3($"*,'+,#(*,*$4&6,
been specific to this site because of its dominant :*+#54'*", -., #(*, Y40, )'&&*++'5)F, O50;'+;, .4-),
4-&*F,#(*,:($+;*",'+,'#",:*4$)':,4*3*4#-'4*,($J*, #(*,0*J*&-3)*+#",-.,#(*,?'+*J'#*,b,:56*,Ec-J$,
)-4*,;*+*4$&,')3&':$#'-+",EN4$+;'3$+*,RSSSH>, $+0,f*'"",RSSYH>,
For it was only in EB I that the Arslantepe po#ery The different social, economic and political
4$+;*,Ei*4'-0,[97RH,$:X5'4*0,"-)*,-.,#(*,*&*)*+#", 0'4*:#'-+", #$<*+, %6, #(*, #=-, $4*$", :$+, &$4;*&6,
of Uruk origin – that were already part of the %*, 35#, 0-=+, #-, #(*'4, 0'..*4*+#, *:-&-;':$&,
4th millennium inventory in the southernmost se#ing, which enabled the Khabour plains to
region – such as the band‑rim and ledge‑rim 0*J*&-3,$,=*$&#(6,*:-+-)6,%$"*0,-+,34')$46,
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% TY_
:-))-0'#'*"F, 3$4#':5&$4&6, $;4':56*F, $", #(*, , V56$&, :-+#'+5'#6, $+0, $%"*+:*, -., $+6, 4*$&,
*""*+#'$&, %$"'", .-4, #(*'4, 54%$+, ;4-=#(>, 9#, '", %4*$<F, :-)%'+*0, ='#(, #(*, *J'0*+:*, #($#, "-)*,
$&"-, 3-""'%&*, #($#, #(*, .$4L4*$:('+;, :4'"'", '+, #(*, se#lements possibly underwent moments of
\#$#*, .-4)$#'-+, 34-:*""F, =(':(, )-4*, "#4-+;&6, %*'+;,$%$+0-+*0,$+0,4*-4;$+'"*0,'+,#(*,"*:-+0,
affected the western areas around the Euphrates, ($&.,-.,#(*,Y40,)'&&*++'5)F,$","(-=+,$#,"5:(,"'#*",
)$6, ($J*, .$:'&'#$#*0, #(*, 4*L*"#$%&'"()*+#, -., $",@*6#'+&',7$(A*,$+0,B-45),BC6D<,E/$44-,%1'"&.'
#4$0'#'-+$&,"6"#*)",-.,4*&$#'-+",#($#,=*4*,#63':$&, 2000), may reflect on the one hand the long‑term
-.,#4'%$&,"-:'*#'*",%$"*0,-+,&'+*$;*",$+0,:&$+",$+0, )$'+#*+$+:*,-.,#(*,:56$&,$+0,"-:'$&,'0*+#'#6,
on elite kin relations (Stein 2004). The spread -.,#(*,!53(4$#*",;4-53"F,$+0,-+,#(*,-#(*4,($+0,
-., .5+*4$46, 4'#5$&", ='#(, =*&&L*+0-=*0, #-)%"F, $,:*4#$'+,'+"#$%'&'#6,-.,#(*'4,3-&'#':$&,"6"#*)">
4':(,'+,)*#$&,$+0,=*$3-+"F,$+0,#(*,34$:#':*,-., , !J*+,#(*,'+0':$#'-+",*)*4;'+;,.4-),!%&$,#*M#",
"'#'+;, )-+5)*+#$&, #-)%", '+, ')3-4#$+#, $4*$", "(-=,#($#F,$#,#(*,*+0,-.,#(*,!d,3*4'-0F,#(*4*,=$",
of the se#lements and in acropolises, which is $, j(';(, :-+:*+#4$#'-+, -., ")$&&F, +*';(%-54'+;,
$&4*$06,4*:-;+'"$%&*,$#,#(*,%*;'++'+;,-.,#(*,Y40, <'+;0-)"k, '+, #(*, !53(4$#*", 4*;'-+, $4-5+0,
)'&&*++'5),$#,K4"&$+#*3*,EN4$+;'3$+*,%1'"&>,RSSTHF, V$4:(*)'"(, $+0, $, #*44'#-46, j:($4$:#*4'"*0, %6,
:-5&0,%*,4*&$#*0F,.4-),#(*"*,*$4&'*"#,3($"*",E!7,9HF, '+#*+"*,54%$+'"$#'-+k,$+0,#*44'#-4'$&,5+'#",-+,$,
#-,#(*,+**0,#-,&*;'#')'"*,$5#(-4'#6,%6,j$+:*"#-4, &$4;*4,":$&*,'+,#(*,$4*$,-.,a($%-54,E/'&$+-,$+0,
J*+*4$#'-+,$+0,.5+*4$46,J'"'%'&'#6k,'+,$,3*4'-0, c-J$,RSSSH>
-., 3-&'#':$&, '+"#$%'&'#6F, $", ($", %**+, "5;;*"#*0, , G(*, j+-4#(*4+, 54%$+'")k, =(':(, \#*'+, ($",
.-4,&$#*4,0*J*&-3)*+#",'+,#(*,"*:-+0,($&.,-.,#(*, :-)3$4*0,='#(,#(*,"-5#(*4+,:'#'*",$",$,5+'#$46,
Y40, )'&&*++'5), Ei*&#*+%54;, T___^, i-4#*4, RSSR^, 3(*+-)*+-+, -., =(':(, #(*, 4':(, )-+5)*+#$&,
Schwartz 2003, 338–340). The establishment #-)%", '+, #(*, =*"#*4+, 8-+*, $&"-, .-4)*0, 3$4#,
-., #('", 34$:#':*F, =(':(, "5%"*X5*+#&6, *)*4;*0, (Stein 2004, 72) is much more a geographically
='#(,'+:4*$"'+;&6,)-4*,*J'0*+#,$+0,-"#*+#$#'-5", diversified phenomenon in which on the one
.-4)",#(4-5;(-5#,#(*,=(-&*,$4*$,%-#(,'+,"-5#(L ($+0,E#-,#(*,*$"#H,#(*4*,=$",54%$+,;4-=#(,$+0,
*$"#*4+,K+$#-&'$, EG'#4'"F, h4*, ['4'<*H, EK&;$8*, %1' *M3$+0*0,:-+#4-&,-J*4,#(*,#*44'#-46,%6,#(*,&$4;*,
"&>,T__e^,l<"*,RSSRH,$+0,'+,+-4#(L=*"#*4+,\64'$, :*+#4*", #($#, ($0, $&4*$06, :-)*, '+#-, %*'+;, '+,
E`*4$%&5",G$(#$+'F,7$+$#F,K()$41G'&,7$4"'3F,2)), #(*,34*J'-5",3*4'-0F,$+0,-+,#(*,-#(*4,($+0,E#-,
*&L/$44$H, Ei*&#*+%54;, %1' "&>, T__b^, /:V&*&&$+, the west) there was a complex and fluctuating
$+0, i-4#*4, T___^, c--%$*4#, $+0, 75++*+", T___^, 34-:*"",-.,*"#$%&'"('+;,+*=,3-&'#':$&,*+#'#'*",-5#,
\:(=$4#8,RSSS^,RSSYH,=-5&0,"**),#-,%$:<,53,#('", -., #(*, #4'%$&, $+0, &'+*$;*, "#45:#54*", #($#, )$0*,
#(*-46F,'+0':$#'+;,#($#,#(*,"-:'*#'*",-.,#(*,233*41 53, #(*, "-:'$&, $+0, 3-&'#':$&, "5%"#4$#*, -., #(*, Y40,
/'00&*, !53(4$#*", $+0, +-4#(L=*"#*4+, \64'$, )'&&*++'5),233*4,!53(4$#*",:56*">
were different in character from the societies in
#(*,*$"#*4+)-"#,8-+*",-.,233*4,/*"-3-#$)'$F,
*J*+,'+,#(*,3*4'-0,'+,=(':(,$,+*=,54%$+'"$#'-+, References
34-:*"", =$", #$<'+;, 3&$:*, $+0, +*=, #*44'#-4'$&, K&;$8*F,h>,E*0>H,T__S
states were being formed. This difference is B5@)'")7'$5:)1#;'+)'V5:13%"01%#)'R)"15&+"'99.'B3%'01#"1+*#",3+$'
.54#(*4, (';(&';(#*0, %6, #(*, .$:#, #($#, #(*, $&&L-5#, sequence at Kurban,KL;MN>,]4'*+#$&,9+"#'#5#*,i5%&':$#'-+",
54%$+'"$#'-+, -., #(*, +-4#(, '+, #(*, "*:-+0, ($&., -., TTS>,V(':$;-F,2+'J*4"'#6,-.,V(':$;-,i4*"">
the 3rd millennium only marginally affected the
34-3*4,233*4,!53(4$#*",8-+*"> K&;$8*F,h>,T___
, K00'#'-+$&&6F, $+, *:-+-)6, %$"*0, -+, =*$&#(, G4*+0", '+, #(*, $4:($*-&-;':$&, 0*J*&-3)*+#, -., #(*,
finance to support the power of the elites would 233*4, !53(4$#*", %$"'+, -., \-5#(*$"#*4+, K+$#-&'$,
054'+;,#(*,I$#*,V($&:-&'#(':,$+0,!$4&6,74-+8*,K;*>,
$&"-, %*, :-+"'"#*+#, ='#(, #(*, "#45:#54*, -., #4'%$&,
9+,B+03#+)'W"4, 535–572.
$+0, &'+*$;*L%$"*0, :-))5+'#'*", "5;;*"#*0, .-4,
the Turkish–Syrian Euphrates areas in the 3rd K&;$8*F,h>F,G>,/$#+*6F,d>,\:(&**,$+0,`>,a*&&6,T__e,
)'&&*++'5), E\:(=$4#8, RSSYH>, K+0, #('", =-5&0, I$#*,!7K,54%$+,"#45:#54*,$#,G'#4'",BC6D<F,\-5#(*$"#*4+,
$&"-,*M3&$'+,#(*,"3*:'$&,4*&$#'-+",#($#,&'+<*0,#(*, G54<*6Z,#(*,T__b,"*$"-+>,R)"15&+$" 22, 129–143.
southern areas, at least in the first half of the 3rd
)'&&*++'5)F,#-,#(*,+-4#(*4+,8-+*",-.,#(*,233*4, 7*()L7&$+:<*F, />F, />, c>, B-(F, ?>, a$4;F, I>, /$":(F, !>,
!53(4$#*"F,.4-),=(*4*,#(*6,)$6,($J*,34-:54*0, i$4":(*F,a>,I>,f'*+*4F,K>,J>,f':<*0*,$+0,h>,@'*;*&)$6*4,
4$=,)$#*4'$&"F,3$4#':5&$4&6,)*#$&"> 1984
140 !"#$%&&"'(#")*+,")%
74$'0=--0F,c>,`>,$+0,I>,74$'0=--0,T_eS, N4$+;'3$+*F,/>,$+0,!>,75:$<,RSST
/A$"C"1+5)0'+)'13%'Q&"+)'56'R)1+5$3.'B3%'%"#&+%#'"00%42&"*%0' !M:$J$#'-+",$+0,4*"*$4:(*",$#,@*6#'+&',7$(A*,BC6D<F,
GQ3"0%0' R–Z.H.' ]4'*+#$&, 9+"#'#5#*, i5%&':$#'-+", eT>, T___>,9+,Carchemish Dam II, 84–131.
V(':$;-F,2+'J*4"'#6,-.,V(':$;-,i4*"">
N4$+;'3$+*F,/>F,V>,K&J$4-F,c>,N4$+:*":$,7$&-""',$+0,
V-+#'F,K>,/>,$+0,V>,i*4"'$+',T__Y h>,\'4$:5"$+-,RSSR
f(*+, =-4&0", :-&&'0*>, V56$&, 0*J*&-3)*+#", '+, G(*, RSSS, V$)3$';+, $#, @*6#'+&', 7$(A*, BC6D<>, 9+,
!$"#*4+, K+$#-&'$, '+, #(*, !$4&6, 74-+8*, K;*>, 9+, />, Carchemish Dam III, 41–99.
Frangipane, H. Hauptmann, M. Liverani, P. Ma#hiae,
/>, /*&&'+<, E*0"H, <%1@%%)' 13%' #+C%#0' ")7' 5C%#' 13%' B$53#)$++F,B>,T__R
45:)1"+)0.' R#$3"%5&5*+$"' R)"15&+$"' %1' !%05,51"4+$"' I'0$4,BC6D<>,Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 26–1, 93–110.
R&2"'Q"&4+%#+'W%7+$"1", 361–413. Roma, Università ‘La
\$3'*+8$Q> B$53#)$++F,B>,T__Y
Vier Jahrtausende Siedlungsgeschichte am mi#leren
!"'+F,2>,T_UR !53(4$#>,R#$3^5&5*+%'+)'W%:10$3&")7 1, 10–15.
Tepecik excavations, 1974, Keban Project 1974–1975
R$1+C+1+%0, 71–118. Ankara, METU (Middle Eastern a$":($5F,h>,T___
G*:(+':$&,2+'J*4"'#6H> Lidar Höyük. Die Keramik der Mittleren Bronzezeit>,
K4:($*-&-;':$, !53(4$#':$, Y>, /$'+8F, i('&'3, J-+,
N4$+;'3$+*F,/>,RSSS @$%*4+>
G(*, I$#*, V($&:-&'#(':1!7, 9, "*X5*+:*, $#, K4"&$+#*3*>,
V(4-+-&-;':$&, $+0, :56$&, 4*)$4<", .4-), $, .4-+#'*4, a'&&':<F,c>,T_Ue
"'#*>,9+,Chronologies, 439–471. G(*,!"<',/-"5&,4*;'-+>,9+,2>,N'+<%*'+*4,$+0,f>,cC&&';,
E*0"H, X"47"1' Y"0#.' Q%#+57' 5#' _%*+5)"&' V1;&%` BeiheCe
N4$+;'3$+*F,/>,RSST zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients 62, 229–244.
V*+#4$&'8$#'-+, 34-:*""*", '+, h4*$#*4, /*"-3-#$)'$>, f'*"%$0*+F,c*':(*4#>
245<,j*M3$+"'-+k,$",#(*,:&')$M,-.,"6"#*)':,'+#*4$:#'-+", ,
$)-+;,$4*$",-.,#(*,h4*$#*4,/*"-3-#$)'$+,4*;'-+>,9+, I$+*4'F,?>,T___
/>,c-#()$+,E*0>H,9#:N'!%05,51"4+"'")7'+10')%+*325#0.' 9+#4$)54$&,#-)%">,K,.5+*4$46,#4$0'#'-+,-.,#(*,/'00&*,
Cross‑cultural interactions in the era of state formationF, !53(4$#*", J$&&*6, 054'+;, #(*, Y40, )'&&*++'5), 7V>,
307–347. Santa Fe, School of American Research R)"15&+$" 25, 221–241.
i4*"">
/$44-F,V>F,K>,G'%*#,$+0,N>,75&;$+,RSSS
Frangipane, M. (ed.) 2004 N-5'&&*",0*,"$5J*#$;*,0*,B-45),BC6D<,E34-J'+:*,0*,
Alle Origini del Potere. Arslantepe, la Collina dei Leoni>, h$8'$+#*3HZ,X5$#4'p)*,4$33-4#,34*&')'+$'4*>,R)"15&+"'
/'&$+-F,/-+0$0-4'1!&*:#$> Antiqua 8, 257–278.
N4$+;'3$+*F,/>,$+0,K>,i$&)'*4',T_UY /$#+*6F,G>,$+0,h>,K&;$8*,T__b
V56$&,0*J*&-3)*+#",$#,K4"&$+#*3*,$#,#(*,%*;'++'+;, 24%$+, 0*J*&-3)*+#, $#, )'0L&$#*, !$4&6, 74-+8*, K;*,
-.,#('40,)'&&*++'5)>,[#+*+)+ 12/2, 523–574. G'#4'",BC6D<,'+,\-5#(*$"#*4+,K+$#-&'$>,<:&&%1+)'56'13%'
R4%#+$")'V$355&0'56'[#+%)1"&'_%0%"#$3 299/300, 33–52.
-.' /01"2&+034%)1'56'"'!+77&%89,,%#'/:,3#"1%0'/"#&;'<#5)=%'>'$:&1:#% 141
/$#+*6F,G>F,h>,K&;$8*,$+0,\>,K>,c-"*+,T___ +)1%#"$1+5)0'+)'13%'%#"'56'01"1%'65#4"1+5)>,\$+#$,N*F,\:(--&,
!$4&6, 74-+8*, K;*, 54%$+, "#45:#54*, $#, G'#4'", BC6D<F, -.,K)*4':$+,c*"*$4:(,i4*"">
\-5#(*$"#*4+, G54<*6Z, #(*, T__U, "*$"-+>, R)"15&+$", RbF,
185–201. c-J$F,!>,$+0,B>,f*'"",RSSY
The origins of North Mesopotamian civilisation: Ninevite
/:V&*&&$+F,G>,$+0,K>,i-4#*4,T___ 5 chronology, economy, society>, \5%$4#5, _>, G54+(-5#F,
\54J*6,-.,*M:$J$#'-+",$#,G*&&,7$+$#Z,N5+*4$46,34$:#':*">, 74*3-&">
9+,B+03#+)'W"4, 107–116.
\*4#-<F,a>,$+0,c>,!4;*A,T___
/'&$+-F,I>,$+0,!>,c-J$,RSSS K, +*=, !$4&6, 74-+8*, K;*, :*)*#*46>, !M:$J$#'-+",
V*4$)':, 34-J'+:*", $+0, 3-&'#':$&, %-40*4", '+, 233*4, +*$4,#(*,7'4*:'<,d$)F,\!,G54<*6>,i4*&')'+$46,4*3-4#,
/*"-3-#$)'$,'+,#(*,I$#*,!$4&6,d6+$"#':,3*4'-0>,9+,\>, (1997–98). R)"15&+$" 25, 87–107.
h4$8'$+',E*0>H,V1:7+'0:&'a+$+)5'[#+%)1%'R)1+$5'7%7+$"1+'
alla memoria di Luigi Cagni, 709–749. Napoli, Istituto \:(=$4#8F,h>F,B>,V54J*4"F,N>,h*44'#"*+F,`>,/$:V-4)':<F,
2+'J*4"'#$4'-,]4'*+#$&*> ?>,/'&&*4,$+0,`>,f*%*4,RSSS
!M:$J$#'-+",$+0,"54J*6,'+,#(*,`$%%5&,i&$'+F,f*"#*4+,
]$#*"F,d>,$+0,`>,]$#*",T__Y Syria: Umm el‑Marra 1996–1997. R4%#+$")'Z5:#)"&'56'
Excavations at Tell Brak 1992–93. Iraq 55, 155–199. R#$3"%5&5*; 104, 419–462.
]$#*"F,`>,RSSR \:(=$4#8F,h>F,B>,V54J*4"F,\>,d5+($),$+0,7>,\#5$4#,
The rea#ribution of Middle Uruk materials at Brak. In RSSY,
!>,!(4*+%*4;,E*0>H,b%"C+)*')5'015)%0':)1:#)%7.'/00";0' K, #('40, )'&&*++'5), 7V, *&'#*, #-)%, $+0, -#(*4, +*=,
5)'13%'R)$+%)1'Y%"#'/"01'")7'/*;,1'+)'35)5#'56'W5)"&7' *J'0*+:*, .4-), G*&&, 2)), *&L/$44$F, \64'$>, R4%#+$")'
K")0%), 145–154. Winona Lake, Eisenbrauns. Z5:#)"&'56'R#$3"%5&5*; 107/3, 325–361.
l<"*F,K>,G>,RSSR \'4$:5"$+-F,h>,RSSR
!M:$J$#'-+", $#, h4*, ['4'<*, RSSS>, 9+, Carchemish Dam i4*&')'+$46, "#506, -., #(*, .$5+$, $#, @*6#'+&', 7$(A*,
III, 241–286. BC6D<>,9+,Carchemish Dam III, 80–81, 96–98.
c-#()$+F,/>,E*0>H,RSST
Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: Cross‑cultural