Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carlos Monte-Michaux Heard
Carlos Monte-Michaux Heard
Notice: Unless a specific Form IV is sealed or ordered redacted by the Court, all Form IVs are public records of the
Court or Clerk at the time they are provided to the Court and will be released in their entirety upon request.
DEFENDANT'S NAME CARLOS MONTE-MICHAUX HEARD, II DOB 1997-08-10 BOOKING NO. G071951
ALIAS(ES) CASE NO. PF2024102279001
H. DRUG OFFENSES
1. If the defendant is considered to be a drug dealer, please
4. Is defendant currently the subject of: state the supporting facts:
An order of protection Any other court order
Injunction against harassment
Explain:
20248627/AZ0071700 / /
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT NO.
DEFENDANT'S NAME CARLOS MONTE-MICHAUX HEARD, II DOB 1997-08-10 BOOKING NO. G071951
ADDENDUM
B1. Probable Cause Statement
ON 1/13/2024, AT APPROXIMATELY 0309 HOURS, THE DEFENDANT WAS IN
THE MCDONALDS DRIVE THRU AT 1250 S. COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, MESA,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHILE IN LINE HE BELIEVED THE DRIVER OF
ANOTHER VEHICLE WAS MAKING OFFENSIVE STATEMENTS TOWARD HIM. THE
DEFENDANT THEN EXITED HIS VEHICLE AND APPROACHED THE DRIVER OF THE
VEHICLE BEHIND HIM. THE DEFENDANT AND THIS DRIVER BECAME
INVOLVED IN A VERBAL ARGUMENT. THIS DRIVER (VICTIM 2) EXITED HIS
VEHICLE. THE DEFENDANT STATED THAT HE BELIEVED VICTIM 2 WAS
PREPARING TO PHYSICALLY FIGHT HIM BASED ON HIS BODY MOVEMENTS.
THE DEFENDANT THEN PRODUCED A FIREARM AND CHAMBERED A ROUND,
TELLING VICTIM 2 TO GET BACK IN HIS CAR. VICTIM 2 STATED HE WAS IN FEAR
FOR HIS SAFETY AND BELIEVED THE DEFENDANT WAS GOING TO SHOOT HIM.
VICTIM 2 THEN RAN TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DRIVE THRU TO AVOID BEING
SHOT.
WHILE THIS IS TAKING PLACE, VICTIM 1 OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT PULL OUT
A GUN WHILE IN A CONFRONTATION WITH HIS FRIEND. VICTIM 1 THEN
RETRIEVES HIS FIREARM FROM HIS VEHICLE. WHEN VICTIM 1 RETURNS
ARMED, THE DEFENDANT OBSERVED VICTIM 1 POINTING A GUN AT HIM. A
SHOOTING BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND VICTIM 1 THEN OCCURS.
VICTIM 3 WAS SITTING IN HIS VEHICLE WHEN HE OBSERVED THE ALTERCATION
AND THE FIREARMS PRODUCED. IN FEAR FOR HIS SAFETY, VICTIM 3 EXITED
HIS CAR AND RAN AWAY AS HIS VEHICLE WAS STRUCK NUMEROUS TIMES BY
PROJECTILES. VICTIM 4 WAS SITTING IN HER VEHICLE BEHIND VICTIM 3.
VICTIM 4 OBSERVED THE ALTERCATION AND THE FIREARMS PRODUCED.
VICTIM 4, IN FEAR FOR HER SAFETY, CLIMBED THROUGH THE PASSENGER SIDE
OF THE VEHICLE AND THEN RAN FROM THE VEHICLE. BOTH VEHICLES
BELONGING TO VICTIM 3 AND VICTIM 4 WERE STRUCK WITH PROJECTILES FROM
THE GUN FIRE.
DURING THE SHOOTING, THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT STRUCK. VICTIM 1 WAS
STRUCK NUMEROUS TIMES CAUSING HIS DEATH. AFTER THE SHOOTING THE
DEFENDANT LEFT THE SCENE AND DID NOT REPORT HIS INVOLVEMENT TO
POLICE, THE DEFENDANT DID NOT SELF-SURRENDER TO POLICE AND WAS
TRACKED DOWN USING LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES.
THE DEFENDANT CLAIMS THAT HE WAS DEFENDING HIMSELF WITH HIS
ACTIONS. THE FIREARM THE DEFENDANT ADMITTED TO USING DURING THE
INCIDENT WAS LOCATED IN HIS APARTMENT,
BASED ON THE WITNESSES STATING THE DEFENDANT PRODUCES A FIREARM
DURING A VERBAL ARGUMENT, I BELIEVE THIS PROMPTS VICTIM 1 INTO
RETRIEVING HIS FIREARM IN DEFENSE OF VICTIM 2. I BELIEVE PROBABLE
CAUSE EXISTS FOR THESE CHARGES BASED ON THE DEFENDANTS ACTIONS.