Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    IOS CaseStudyCase1

    Uploaded by

    nayna sakpal
    The Supreme Court of India made minor corrections to its previous judgment dated February 23, 2016 regarding an appeal by the CBI against Ramesh Gelli and others. Specifically, the Court ordered that in paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" should be replaced with "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949". Additionally, in the last sentence of paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988" should be replaced with "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988". With these corrections, the Court allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions 6416-6420 of 2016.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    IOS CaseStudyCase1

    Uploaded by

    nayna sakpal
    16 views1 page
    The Supreme Court of India made minor corrections to its previous judgment dated February 23, 2016 regarding an appeal by the CBI against Ramesh Gelli and others. Specifically, the Court ordered that in paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" should be replaced with "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949". Additionally, in the last sentence of paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988" should be replaced with "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988". With these corrections, the Court allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions 6416-6420 of 2016.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court of India made minor corrections to its previous judgment dated February 23, 2016 regarding an appeal by the CBI against Ramesh Gelli and others. Specifically, the Court ordered that in paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" should be replaced with "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949". Additionally, in the last sentence of paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988" should be replaced with "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988". With these corrections, the Court allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions 6416-6420 of 2016.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    16 views1 page

    IOS CaseStudyCase1

    Uploaded by

    nayna sakpal
    The Supreme Court of India made minor corrections to its previous judgment dated February 23, 2016 regarding an appeal by the CBI against Ramesh Gelli and others. Specifically, the Court ordered that in paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" should be replaced with "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949". Additionally, in the last sentence of paragraph 25, the reference to "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988" should be replaced with "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988". With these corrections, the Court allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions 6416-6420 of 2016.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.

    Page 1 Tuesday, August 08, 2023


    Printed For: M/s marathon realty pvt ltd
    SCC Online Web Edition: http://www.scconline.com
    © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Crl.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of 2016

    C.B.I., Bank Securities & Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gelli

    2016 SCC OnLine SC 1641

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    (BEFORE RANJAN GOGOI AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.)

    C.B.I., Bank Securities & Fraud Cell .…. Appellant(s)


    v.
    Ramesh Gelli & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
    Crl.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of 2016
    In
    Criminal Appeal Nos. 1077-1081 of 2013
    Decided on May 2, 2016
    ORDER
    1. In paragraph 25 of the judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla C. Pant, J.)
    instead of words “Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949” the words “Section 46A
    of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949” shall be substituted and in the last sentence of
    the paragraph instead of “Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988”, the words “Section 7
    to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988”, shall be substituted.
    2. CRL.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of 2016 are accordingly allowed.
    ———
    Disclaimer: While every effort is made to avoid any mistake or omission, this casenote/ headnote/ judgment/ act/ rule/ regulation/ circular/
    notification is being circulated on the condition and understanding that the publisher would not be liable in any manner by reason of any mistake
    or omission or for any action taken or omitted to be taken or advice rendered or accepted on the basis of this casenote/ headnote/ judgment/ act/
    rule/ regulation/ circular/ notification. All disputes will be subject exclusively to jurisdiction of courts, tribunals and forums at Lucknow only. The
    authenticity of this text must be verified from the original source.

    You might also like