Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stats Cheat Sheet
Stats Cheat Sheet
Pearsons Correlation
- Correlation is a numerical summary that shows the strength P-Value
and direction of the linear relationship between 2 numerical > 0.05 we fail to reject the null
variables hypothesis - accept null
Scatterplot - swilk and Levene’s we want above
- Correlation coefficient (r) ranges from -1.00 to +1.00 0.05 so we can run it
- Values closer to 0 - weaker correlation
- Values closer to +/-1 - stronger correlation < 0.05 we reject the null hypothesis -
no difference between means and
In general there is no significant difference
- 0-0.10 = very weak to no relationship
- 0.10-0.30 = weak relationship
- 0.30-0.50 = moderate relationship
- 0.50-1 = strong relationship
- the more scatter/variability (spread out, no pattern) = the correlation is weaker
Cause and Effect: Distinction between - two things being related vs one thing causing the other
Criteria for a cause and effect (causal) relationship:
1. Covariance rule: must be a relationship
2. Temporal precedence: the cause must precede the effect
3. Internal validity: exclude other potential causes of the effect
Normal Distribution
- bell shaped distribution - has an unlimited range
- The height and width of the “bell” depends on s, the standard deviation.
- The “bell’s” position along the horizontal axis depends on m, its
mean.
Independent (IV): use to predict or explain or cause
a change in the outcome
Dependent (DV): dependent on independent
variable - outcome
2. Correlational research: no (or minimal) interference, measuring things that already exist
- eg. Do Psychology students have higher self-reported science aptitude than Philosophy students?
2. Correlation RQs/hypotheses (tested with correlational analyses) - is there a relationship between the 2 groups?
- they have 2 numeric variables
2. Within subjects (related group comparison) - tested with paired samples t-test
Eg: Does condition A cause a different score of Y than condition B?
- still have a “group” (“condition” variable)
- Same group of people experiencing all conditions
- ALL participants do/experience ALL conditions
- Same control as between subjects - but better
- only need half the amount of people
- Less variation/error in scores - scores are more related, cause they’re from the same people
2. Focus groups: small no. of people in a room together Tools to summarise and build models for
- individuals response can be affected by others responses qualitative data
- see intergroup processes Word cloud - picks out certain words in the
response
3. Online survey: open-ended questions Sentiment analysis - program that picks out
words to classify them into positive, neutral or
Themes:
negative
noticing the % of people who:
- mention the word cat
- Mention the feeling positive
- Mention another animal