Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GHGHFGFGF
GHGHFGFGF
GHGHFGFGF
Faculty of Engineering
Objectives:
The objectives from the implement of this experiment are study the principles of
Venturi meter and to determine its coefficient (Cd) by comparing the measure flow
rate (Qactual) with the ideal flow rate (Qtheortical). Typically, the discharge
coefficient (Cd) has a value between , and . The actual value of Cd is
dependent on a given Venturi meter, and even it may change with Qactuual.
Theory:
As shown in figure, the Venturi meter is used for measuring the discharge in the long
pipe. It is consisting from converging cone (contraction section) with angle about (15-
20˚ ). This section is accelerated the fluid and lead it to a throat section, which has
cross-sectional area smaller than the pipe (the flow area is the minimum), so that, the
fluid velocity through the throat is higher than that in the pipe. This increase of
velocity is accompanied by a fall in pressure, the magnitude of which depends on the
rate of flow, so that by measuring the pressure drop (the pressure difference between
the upstream side of the cone and the throat), the signal for the flow rate is provided
and the discharge is calculated. Then the fluid slow down in a cone with smaller angle
about (5-7 ˚), where, most of the kinetic energy is converted back to pressure energy
The Equations
The theoretical (ideal) piezometric head coefficient=
0.6
y = 0.1103x +
0.4
0.3
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sample of calculations:
The slope = 1103
The graph become:
(h1 – h2)1/2 = 1103 Q
Then: - Q= 0.906 x 10-3. (h1 – h2)1/2
Theoretical
Piezometer Tune No n Hm Hn – H1 Hn – H1
A 247.5 0 0
B 228.5 -0.019 -0.077
C 140.5 -0.1075 -0.429
D 6.0 -0.2415 -0.961
E 26.0 -0.2215 -0.880
F 112.0 -0.1355 -0.540
G 150.5 -0.0970 -0.388
H 176.0 -0.0715 -0.297
J 193.0 -0.0545 -0.216
K 204.0 -0.0435 -0.173
L 209.0 -0.0385 -0.153
Actual pressure distribution at Q= 1.8x10^-4 (m³/s)
Piezometer Tune No Hm Hn – H1 Hn – H1
A 247.5 0 0
B 228.5 -0.019 -0.077
C 140.5 -0.1075 -0.429
D 6.0 -0.2415 -0.961
E 26.0 -0.2215 -0.880
F 112.0 -0.1355 -0.540
G 150.5 -0.0970 -0.388
H 176.0 -0.0715 -0.297
J 193.0 -0.0545 -0.216
K 204.0 -0.0435 -0.173
L 209.0 -0.0385 -0.153
distance along venturi (mm)
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
-0.1
-0.2
dimensionless pressure
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
-0.8
-0.9
Q ideal QL=1.8*10^-4 (m³/s) QH=4.63*10^-4 (m³/s)
Discussion and Conclusion:
In this Experiment (Flow through a Venturi-meter) , We studied another application
of Bernoulli's theory and the connection between a duct's flow area, pressure head,
velocity head, and head loss and how it relates to the calculation of flow rate and
determine the discharge coefficient for various flow rate.
And also calculate theoretical pressure distribution
(non-dimensional) and compare it to pressure distribution at highest flow rate value
that is equal to(Q=4.63x 10-4 m3/s) and the lowest flow rate value is equal to(1.8x 10-4
m3/s)
We find that the calculated flow rate is less than actual flow rate ,and the range of
discharge coefficient between and wher the average discharge
coefficient equals to
And from pressure distribution of actual flow rates and theoretical flow rate we find
that there is consensus between Bernoulli’s thermo and actual measurement of
pressure because :The venturimeter always have smaller convergent portion and
larger divergent portion. This is done to ensures a rapid converging passage and a
gradual diverging passage in the direction of flow to avoid the loss of energy due to
separation. In the course of flow through the converging part, the velocity increases in
the direction of flow according to the principle of continuity, while the pressure
decreases according to Bernoulli’s theorem. The velocity reaches its maximum value
and pressure reaches its minimum value at the throat. Subsequently, a decrease in the
velocity and an increase in the pressure take place in course of flow through the
divergent part. The angle of convergence ≈ 20° The angle of divergence = 6° - 7° →
It should not be greater than 7° to avoid flow separation
There is some error rate in experiment , which lies in the lack of calibration of the
device and some errors in taking readings due to not waiting for a period of time
between each reading and the other until the device reaches a stable state, which
affected the accuracy of the results, and Some of the bubbles are inside some tubes
and the pressure on the manometer tube to take the reading from the gradient of the
numbers leading to its removal from its position and the rise of the liquid inside the
manometer tube as a result of the pressure on it.