Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is Aggregate Demand
What Is Aggregate Demand
What Is Aggregate Demand
Aggregate demand is a measurement of the total amount of demand for all finished goods and
services produced in an economy.Aggregate demand is commonly expressed as the total amount
of money exchanged for those goods and services at a specific price level and point in time.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Aggregate demand measures the total amount of demand for all finished goods and
services produced in an economy.
Aggregate demand is expressed as the total amount of money spent on those goods and
services at a specific price level and point in time.
Aggregate demand consists of all consumer goods, capital goods, exports, imports, and
government spending.
Aggregate demand equals GDP only in the long run after adjusting for the price level. Short-run
aggregate demand measures total output for a single nominal price level without adjusting for
inflation. Other variations in calculations can occur depending on the methodologies used and
the various components.
Aggregate demand consists of all consumer goods, capital goods, exports, imports, and
government spending programs. All variables are considered equal if they trade at the same
market value.
While aggregate demand helps determine the overall strength of consumers and businesses in an
economy, it does have limits. Since aggregate demand is measured by market values, it only
represents total output at a given price level and does not necessarily represent the quality of life
or standard of living in a society.
Consumption Spending
Consumer spending represents the demand by individuals and households within the economy.
While there are several factors in determining consumer demand, the most important is consumer
incomes and the level of taxation.
Investment Spending
Investment spending represents businesses' investment to support current output and increase
production capability. It may include spending on new capital assets such as equipment,
facilities, and raw materials.
Government Spending
Net Exports
Net exports represent the demand for foreign goods, as well as the foreign demand for domestic
goods. It is calculated by subtracting the total value of a country's exports from the total value of
all imports.
Aggregate Demand=C+I+G+Nx
Interest rates affect decisions made by consumers and businesses. Lower interest rates will lower
the borrowing costs for big-ticket items such as appliances, vehicles, and homes and companies
will be able to borrow at lower rates, often leading to capital spending increases. Higher interest
rates increase the cost of borrowing for consumers and companies and spending tends to decline
or grow at a slower pace.
Inflation Expectations
Consumers who anticipate that inflation will increase or prices will rise tend to make immediate
purchases leading to rises in aggregate demand. But if consumers believe prices will fall in the
future, aggregate demand typically falls.
When the value of the U.S. dollar falls, foreign goods will become more expensive. Meanwhile,
goods manufactured in the U.S. will become cheaper for foreign markets. Aggregate demand
will, therefore, increase. When the value of the dollar increases, foreign goods are cheaper and
U.S. goods become more expensive to foreign markets, and aggregate demand decreases.
With businesses suffering from less access to capital and fewer sales, they began to lay off
workers and GDP growth contracted in 2008 and 2009, resulting in a total production contraction
in the economy during that period. A poor-performing economy and rising unemployment led to
a decline in personal consumption or consumer spending. Personal savings also surged as
consumers held onto cash due to an uncertain future and instability in the banking system.
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused reductions in both aggregate supply or production, and
aggregate demand or spending. Social distancing measures and concerns about the spread of the
virus caused a significant decrease in consumer spending, particularly in services as many
businesses closed. These dynamics lowered aggregate demand in the economy. As aggregate
demand fell, businesses either laid off part of their workforces or otherwise slowed production as
employees contracted COVID-19 at high rates.2
Boosting aggregate demand also boosts the size of the economy regarding measured GDP.
However, this does not prove that an increase in aggregate demand creates economic growth.
Since GDP and aggregate demand share the same calculation, it only indicates that they increase
concurrently. The equation does not show which is the cause and which is the effect.
Early economic theories hypothesized that production is the source of demand. The 18th-century
French classical liberal economist Jean-Baptiste Say stated that consumption is limited to
productive capacity and that social demands are essentially limitless, a theory referred to as Say's
Law of Markets.3
Say's law, the basis of supply-side economics, ruled until the 1930s and the advent of the
theories of British economist John Maynard Keynes. By arguing that demand drives supply,
Keynes placed total demand in the driver's seat. Keynesian macroeconomists have since believed
that stimulating aggregate demand will increase real future output and the total level of output in
the economy is driven by the demand for goods and services and propelled by money spent on
those goods and services.
Other schools of thought, notably the Austrian School and real business cycle theorists stress
consumption is only possible after production. This means an increase in output drives an
increase in consumption, not the other way around. Any attempt to increase spending rather than
sustainable production only causes maldistribution of wealth or higher prices, or both.
As a demand-side economist, Keynes further argued that individuals could end up damaging
production by limiting current expenditures—by hoarding money, for example. Other
economists argue that hoarding can impact prices but does not necessarily change capital
accumulation, production, or future output. In other words, the effect of an individual's saving
money—more capital available for business—does not disappear on account of a lack of
spending.
There are three principal tenets in the Keynesian description of how the
economy works:
1. Aggregate Demand Influence:
Keynes emphasized that economic decisions made by individuals and
businesses collectively determine the total demand in the economy,
known as aggregate demand. This includes decisions on consumption,
investment, government spending, and net exports.
Sometimes, private sector decisions may lead to undesirable outcomes
for the economy as a whole. For instance, during an economic
downturn, consumers and businesses may become cautious and cut
back on spending, leading to a decrease in aggregate demand, which
can exacerbate the recession.
In such situations, Keynes advocated for government intervention to
stimulate demand and boost economic activity. This could involve
policies like increasing government spending on infrastructure
projects or providing tax incentives to encourage consumer spending.
For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, many governments
around the world implemented stimulus packages to increase
aggregate demand and counteract the effects of the recession.
2. Price and Wage Rigidity:
Keynes argued that prices, including wages, do not adjust quickly to
changes in supply and demand in the short run. This rigidity can lead
to imbalances in markets, such as shortages or surpluses, particularly
in labor markets.
For instance, during an economic downturn, firms may face reduced
demand for their products or services but find it difficult to lower
wages immediately due to factors like labor contracts, social norms,
or minimum wage laws. As a result, they may choose to lay off
workers instead of reducing wages, leading to unemployment.
Similarly, in times of economic expansion, increased demand for
labor may lead to labor shortages, pushing up wages. However, firms
may be reluctant to increase wages quickly, leading to labor shortages
and potential inflationary pressures.
Graphically, this can be illustrated by a downward sloping aggregate
demand curve intersecting with a relatively flat short-run aggregate
supply curve, indicating that changes in demand primarily affect
output and employment in the short run, rather than prices.
3. Short-run Effects:
Keynesians believe that changes in aggregate demand have the most
significant short-term impact on real output and employment, rather
than on prices. This is particularly true when prices and wages are
slow to adjust.
For example, if the government increases spending during a recession,
it directly boosts aggregate demand, leading to an increase in output
and employment as firms increase production to meet the higher
demand.
This short-run relationship between changes in aggregate demand and
real output is often represented graphically by a Keynesian cross
diagram or an aggregate demand/aggregate supply (AD/AS) diagram.
In these diagrams, an increase in aggregate demand shifts the
aggregate demand curve to the right, leading to an increase in real
GDP and employment in the short run, with little impact on prices.
However, over the long run, prices and wages may eventually adjust,
leading to a movement along the short-run aggregate supply curve and
potentially affecting inflation rates.
Keynesian economics dominated economic theory and policy after World War II
until the 1970s, when many advanced economies suffered both inflation and
slow growth, a condition dubbed “stagflation.” Keynesian theory’s popularity
waned then because it had no appropriate policy response for stagflation.
Monetarist economists doubted the ability of governments to regulate the
business cycle with fiscal policy and argued that judicious use of monetary
policy (essentially controlling the supply of money to affect interest rates) could
alleviate the crisis (see “What Is Monetarism?” in the March 2014 F&D).
Members of the monetarist school also maintained that money can have an effect
on output in the short run but believed that in the long run, expansionary
monetary policy leads to inflation only. Keynesian economists largely adopted
these critiques, adding to the original theory a better integration of the short and
the long run and an understanding of the long-run neutrality of money—the idea
that a change in the stock of money affects only nominal variables in the
economy, such as prices and wages, and has no effect on real variables, like
employment and output.
Both Keynesians and monetarists came under scrutiny with the rise of the new
classical school during the mid-1970s. The new classical school asserted that
policymakers are ineffective because individual market participants can
anticipate the changes from a policy and act in advance to counteract them. A
new generation of Keynesians that arose in the 1970s and 1980s argued that
even though individuals can anticipate correctly, aggregate markets may not
clear instantaneously; therefore, fiscal policy can still be effective in the short
run.
The global financial crisis of 2007–08 caused a resurgence in Keynesian
thought. It was the theoretical underpinnings of economic policies in response to
the crisis by many governments, including in the United States and the United
Kingdom. As the global recession was unfurling in late 2008, Harvard professor
N. Gregory Mankiw wrote in the New York Times, “If you were going to turn to
only one economist to understand the problems facing the economy, there is
little doubt that the economist would be John Maynard Keynes. Although
Keynes died more than a half-century ago, his diagnosis of recessions and
depressions remains the foundation of modern macroeconomics. Keynes wrote,
‘Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual
influence, are usually the slave of some defunct economist.’ In 2008, no defunct
economist is more prominent than Keynes himself.”
But the 2007–08 crisis also showed that Keynesian theory had to better include
the role of the financial system. Keynesian economists are rectifying that
omission by integrating the real and financial sectors of the economy.■