Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Research On Exploring The Challenges of Multidisciplinary Team Collaboration in A Mental Health Hospital
A Research On Exploring The Challenges of Multidisciplinary Team Collaboration in A Mental Health Hospital
A Research On Exploring The Challenges of Multidisciplinary Team Collaboration in A Mental Health Hospital
INVESTIGATORS
1
2
EXPLORING THE CHALLENGES AFFECTING MULTIDISCIPLINARY
TEAM COLLABORATION AT ST. AMANUEL MENTAL SPECIALIZED
HOSPITAL 2023 G.C
INVESTIGATORS
OCTOBER 2023
I
DECLARATION
We the researchers declare,
II
APPROVAL SHEET
This research study entitled "Challenges Affecting Multidisciplinary Team
Collaboration at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital" has been proposed by
Seifeslassie Wendwosen, Kedire seid and Kalkidan Dawit in currently working at St.
Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital. This study aims to investigate and address the
challenges that impact multidisciplinary team collaboration within our healthcare
setting.
The research proposal and methodology have been reviewed and evaluated by the
undersigned, who hereby grants approval for the commencement of the research
study.
III
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the individuals and organizations
that have supported us during the preparation of this research proposal. Although this
proposal has not been approved yet, we would like to acknowledge the potential
contributions and support we anticipate receiving. We extend our gratitude to the St.
Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, whose potential financial support would
greatly facilitate the execution of this study. We would also like to thank the
administration and staff of the specialized mental health hospital for their anticipated
cooperation and willingness to participate in this research. Furthermore, we anticipate
the involvement of participants in this study and express our gratitude for their
potential contribution in providing insights and perspectives crucial to the success of
this research. Finally, we would like to acknowledge our advisors, mentors, and
colleagues for their anticipated guidance, feedback, and valuable input throughout the
research proposal development process.
IV
ACRONYM/ABBREVIATION
MDT……………………………………………Multidisciplinary Team
IPE………………………………………………Interprofessional Education
V
Table of Contents
DECLARATION...........................................................................................................II
APPROVAL SHEET...................................................................................................III
ACKNOWLEDGMENT..............................................................................................IV
ACRONYM/ABBREVIATION...................................................................................V
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................VIII
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................IX
1.1 Background..........................................................................................................1
1.4 Objectives.............................................................................................................6
2.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................8
VI
3.1 Study Area..........................................................................................................20
REFERENCE...............................................................................................................27
ANNEX 1.....................................................................................................................31
LIST OF FIGURES
VII
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework for Challenges of Multidisciplinary Team
Collaboration.................................................................................................................................29
VIII
SUMMARY
Objective: The objective of this research study is to investigate the challenges
impacting multidisciplinary team (MDT) collaboration at St. Amanuel Mental
Specialized Hospital. The study aims to explore the perspectives and experiences of
health professionals, including psychiatrists, general practitioners, psychologists,
pharmacists, nurses, and administrative personnel, who are involved in MDT
collaboration.
Expected Outcomes: The study expects to identify and analyze the challenges faced
by the MDT collaboration at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital. The findings
will provide valuable insights into the factors hindering effective collaboration and
help in developing strategies for improvement. The research outcomes will not only
be beneficial for the hospital itself but will also serve as a foundation for other
healthcare institutions facing similar challenges. The research study is allocated a
budget of 78,500 ETB, which will cover expenses related to research materials, data
collection tools, data analysis software, participant incentives, and administrative
support.
Budget Breakdown: The research study is allocated a budget of 78,500 ETB, which
will cover expenses related to research materials, data collection tools, data analysis
software, participant incentives, and administrative support.
IX
X
CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION
The introduction section of a research paper provides an overview and context for the
study. It aims to engage the reader, present the research problem or question, and
provide a rationale for the study. The introduction outlines the purpose, objectives,
and significance of the research, as well as any relevant background information and
previous studies that inform the current investigation. (Helwig et al., n.d.)
1.1 Background
The presence of disciplinary and professional barriers is one of the main obstacles to
interdisciplinary team collaboration. Healthcare practitioners frequently receive
training from inside their own specialties, which produces a variety of viewpoints,
terminologies, and methods for providing patient care. These disciplinary boundaries
can hinder effective communication, coordination, and mutual understanding among
1
team members, leading to fragmented care and potential errors in decision-making.
(Lee et al., 2021; Anderson et al., 2022).
The healthcare system itself can also help or hamper the collaboration of
interdisciplinary teams depending on its organizational structures, rules, and
workflows. Effective collaboration can be significantly hampered by poor
interprofessional education and training opportunities, ineffective care coordination
procedures, and inadequate communication routes. For the purpose of encouraging a
collaborative culture and improving the performance of interdisciplinary teams, these
systemic hurdles must be addressed. (Barr et al., 2018; Reeves et al., 2020)
The limited integration of mental health services within the broader healthcare system
is another challenge in Ethiopia. Mental health care often remains isolated from
primary care and other medical specialties, leading to a lack of coordination and
continuity of care . This fragmentation can impede multidisciplinary team
collaboration and result in suboptimal outcomes for individuals with mental health
conditions.( Alem et al., 2020; Kebede et al., 2019)
2
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Collaborative work among different professionals is crucial for delivering the desired
outcomes such as accurate diagnosis, effective treatment planning, seamless care
transitions, and improved patient satisfaction. The Norwegian health system
conducted a research to explore the challenges from the perspectives of both
healthcare providers and patients and arrived in a conclusion that the lack of
collaboration had negative consequences, including fragmented services for mental
health service users, inadequate rehabilitation services, and prolonged institutional
stays for older patients(Steihaug et al., 2016)
3
Power dynamics and trust among health professionals are observed, with
professionals using their power to protect their autonomy, power imbalances between
private and public sector providers, and attempts to reduce dependency on others to
maintain power. These power dynamics influence the strategic choices made by
health professionals regarding collaboration, impacting patient experiences. Trust is
identified as a crucial element in collaboration, developed through factors such as role
perceptions, demonstrated competence, and effective communication. However,
despite government policies promoting shared decision-making, its implementation
remains limited. The complexity of interprofessional relationships, particularly in the
delivery of primary and community-based health services across organizational
boundaries, adds challenges. The changing roles and boundaries generate uncertainty
and vulnerability, affecting trust levels and leading to mistrust. Ultimately, these
power dynamics and levels of trust directly influence patient experiences, highlighting
the importance of addressing power imbalances and fostering trust to improve
collaboration and enhance patient care. (McDonald et al., 2012)
Study that was conducted by also showed that Communication barrier can arise by
using complex medical terminologies and jargon. Healthcare professionals, including
nurses, often use specialized terminology that may not be easily understood by all
team members. This can create confusion and misinterpretation of information,
leading to errors or conflicts arising from misunderstandings. Effective
communication requires clear and concise language that is easily understood by all
members of the team. And also time constraints and high workload in the acute care
setting can also contribute to communication barriers. Nurses and other healthcare
professionals often face time pressures, requiring them to convey information quickly
and efficiently. This can result in incomplete or unclear communication, leading to
gaps in understanding and potential conflicts. Additionally, the fast-paced nature of
the acute care setting may limit opportunities for team members to engage in thorough
discussions or seek clarification, further exacerbating communication barriers. (Head
et al., 2019)
5
1.4 Objectives
While the importance of collaboration and the need for multidisciplinary teams are
acknowledged, there is limited exploration of the specific barriers and challenges
faced by professionals in working collaboratively. By conducting this research study,
it can contribute to filling this gap in empirical evidence by providing a deeper
understanding of the challenges specific to multidisciplinary team collaboration in a
mental health hospital setting. Furthermore mental health hospitals often have distinct
characteristics and challenges compared to other healthcare settings. By focusing
specifically on multidisciplinary team collaboration within a mental health hospital,
this research study can shed light on the unique challenges faced by professionals in
this context. This knowledge can inform the development of targeted interventions
6
and strategies to enhance collaboration and address the specific needs of mental health
patients Specifically in St. Amanuel mental Specialized Hospital. In summary,
conducting this research study on the challenges of multidisciplinary team
collaboration in St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital is significant because it
addresses a gap in empirical evidence, examines the impact on client outcomes,
considers the unique context of mental health hospitals, and has practical implications
for improving collaboration and patient care in mental health settings.
This research is to investigate and address the challenges that impact multidisciplinary
team (MDT) collaboration at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital. This research
will utilize a mixed-method study design, combining quantitative data collection
through a census survey and qualitative data collection through in-depth interviews
and focus group discussions. The census survey will be distributed to all health
professionals at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital who possess knowledge
and experience in MDT collaboration. This study aims to comprehensively explore
the barriers and facilitators of effective MDT collaboration among various health
professionals, including psychiatrists, general practitioners, psychologists,
pharmacists, nurses, and administrative personnel. This study holds significant
implications for the improvement of patient care and outcomes in the context of
mental health care. By addressing the challenges surrounding MDT collaboration, we
aim to create a more cohesive and efficient healthcare environment, ultimately leading
to enhanced treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. Moreover, the findings of
this research will have broader implications for the healthcare community, serving as
a valuable resource for other hospitals and institutions seeking to optimize
multidisciplinary teamwork and collaboration.
7
CHAPTER TWO- LITERATURE REVIEW
A literature review is a comprehensive and critical analysis of existing scholarly
literature and research on a specific topic or research question. It involves
systematically identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant sources to provide an
overview, summary, and evaluation of the current knowledge and understanding of
the topic.(Danson & Arshed, 2015)
2.1 Introduction
This literature review aims to explore the challenges faced by MDTs in healthcare
settings, focusing on the factors that impact collaboration and hinder the achievement
of desired outcomes. this review will examine the literature on the challenges related
to communication barriers, role ambiguity, power dynamics, divergent goals, and
interprofessional conflicts within MDTs. By examining the evidence from various
healthcare contexts, this review seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of
the challenges faced by MDTs in different settings and identify common themes and
patterns.
8
multidisciplinary teams and the expertise available within them. According to the
study absence of the capacity to actively listen, to engage in dialogue, and to reflect
another person’s point of view may derail an interdisciplinary collaborative effort.
While the article briefly mentions the need for greater collaboration and the impact of
differing scopes of practice and training, it does not extensively explore the barriers or
challenges that professionals face in working collaboratively and but it does not delve
into the empirical evidence demonstrating the impact of such collaboration on client
outcomes.(LaFrance et al., 2019)
9
2.2.2 Organizational Factors
A collaborative study conducted by universities in USA in 2011 established the
importance of interprofessional education (IPE) in healthcare .The study stated that
one of the major challenges of effective interprofessional collaboration is lack of
adequate training and education which eventually negatively impacts the quality of
care being provided. As a result the study highlights that IPE allows for the sharing of
skills and knowledge between different healthcare professions. It promotes a better
understanding, shared values, and respect for the roles of other healthcare
professionals. By engaging in IPE, students gain insights into the perspectives and
expertise of other professions, fostering a collaborative and team-based approach to
healthcare.(Bridges et al., 2011)
10
as a dynamic model that can be used in conjunction with a Reflective Analysis and
Team Building Guide to help healthcare practitioners critically evaluate and enhance
their team functioning. Furthermore the study acknowledges the challenges and
obstacles to effective teamwork, such as separate lines of control, diverse objectives,
professional barriers, and conflicts between individuals and the organization. It
emphasizes the need for suitable organizational structures, rewards systems, and
workforce development opportunities to support effective teamwork. However the
study focuses on identifying the characteristics of effective teams but provides limited
insight into the underlying team dynamics and processes that contribute to those
characteristics. (Mickan & Rodger, 2005)
A concurrent mixed research method design that was conducted in the northwest
region of Ethiopia. Specifically, teaching and referral hospitals on 2022, among 279
nurses and 87 physicians revealed that unsatisfactory organizational support, poor
professional support, and poor interpersonal support were independently associated
with ineffective collaboration among nurses and physicians. a significant number of
the respondents (43.4%) reported ineffective collaboration during their professional
activities. Participants reported that ineffective communication between nurses and
physicians hindered collaboration. Furthermore the qualitative data indicated
instances where both nurses and physicians did not fulfill their professional
responsibilities, which impeded collaboration. This could include neglecting to
consult with each other, not sharing important patient information, or not involving
the appropriate healthcare professional in decision-making. The qualitative findings
identified unsatisfactory organizational support as a significant barrier to
collaboration. This could involve inadequate resources, lack of clear policies and
guidelines, or insufficient support from management or administration. However the
study fails to Includes broader range of healthcare professional’s policy makers and
incorporating patient perspectives which could have provided valuable insights into
the collaborative dynamics and outcomes of healthcare delivery.(Degu et al., 2023)
A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) was conducted
in Canada in 2021, with a total of 66 OR healthcare professionals participated,
including registered nurses, practical nurses, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and
perfusionists. The study managed to figure out enablers of effective teamwork like
people management, shared definition of teamwork, communication strategies,
positive emotions, familiarity with team members, and alignment of teamwork with
professional roles. On the other hand, barriers to teamwork included others'
personalities, gender dynamics, hierarchies, resource issues, lack of knowledge of best
teamwork practices, negative emotions, conflicting norms and perceptions across
professions, unfamiliarity with team members, and challenges related to on-call and
night shifts. The study demonstrates the application of the Theoretical Domains
Framework in understanding the determinants of interprofessional behavior and
informs the development of evidence-based interventions to improve teamwork.
However while qualitative research provides rich insights and in-depth understanding
of the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals, quantitative research
can offer additional information on the prevalence and impact of the identified
barriers and enablers. The study lacks a quantitative research approach that could
complement the qualitative data. (Etherington et al., 2021)
A qualitative study with grounded theory analysis that was conducted in Sabah
Malaysia identified several barriers that hindered collaboration in the mental health
system. These barriers included Lack of autonomy: Limited decision-making
authority or independence for individuals or systems involved in the mental health
system. Lack of relatedness, a lack of trust, understanding, or caring about each other
among stakeholders.. Lack of motivation: A lack of willingness or motivation to
engage in collaborative efforts. Lack of resources: Inadequate availability of
12
competence, time, physical resources, and opportunities necessary for collaboration.
The study insists the need for a conceptual framework that specifically addresses
collaboration in psychiatry, particularly in non-Western and lower- and middle-
income countries. Furthermore the study acknowledges patient-centered approach
which can lead to increased patient and care satisfaction, improved treatment
adherence, and better overall mental health outcomes.(Shoesmith et al., 2020)
Data from the selected studies were extracted using a standardized approach. The
study collected information on study characteristics, participant demographics,
intervention details, outcome measures, and results. A narrative synthesis approach
was used to summarize and analyze the findings of the included studies. The main
findings of the systematic review described in the document were
Attitudes and Perceptions: Out of the 19 studies included in the review, 17 (89%)
reported statistically significant improvements in attitudes toward other disciplines
and the value placed on a team-based approach for improving patient care. This
suggests that IPE had a positive impact on changing attitudes and perceptions among
healthcare students and professionals.
As per a study (Degu et al., 2023)that was conducted among nurses and physicians in
specialized public hospitals, the northwest, Ethiopia: mixed method multi-centered
cross-sectional study" presents a research study conducted in Ethiopia to investigate
inter-professional collaboration between nurses and physicians in specialized
hospitals. The study utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather data
and analyze the factors affecting collaboration.
In addition to the quantitative data, qualitative data were collected through focused
and semi-structured interviews with nine key informants. The thematic analysis of the
qualitative data revealed that poor communication, lack of professionalism, and
failure to adhere to professional duties were barriers to nurse-physician collaboration.
The study concludes that nurse-physician collaboration in the studied hospitals was
below the expected level, with a large proportion of participants experiencing
ineffective collaborations. The findings highlight the importance of improving
collaboration by enhancing organizational, professional, and interpersonal factors.
The qualitative findings support the quantitative results, emphasizing the need for
interventions to empower interprofessional collaboration.
15
healthcare organizations, and facility managers to plan and intervene in
interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians in clinical settings.
Overall, this document provides valuable insights into the state of inter-professional
collaboration between nurses and physicians in specialized hospitals in Ethiopia,
highlighting the factors influencing collaboration and suggesting strategies for
improvement.
The review identified organizational factors that impact MDT collaboration. Lack of
adequate training and education was highlighted as a major challenge, negatively
affecting the quality of care provided. Interprofessional education (IPE) interventions
were found to be beneficial in improving professional practice, enhancing
communication, collaboration, and patient-centered care. The organizational context,
including culture, structure, and resources, significantly influenced the success of IPE
initiatives.
1. Empirical Evidence: Some studies mentioned the need for greater collaboration and
the impact of certain factors on collaboration, but they did not delve into the empirical
evidence demonstrating the actual impact on patient outcomes. Future research should
focus on gathering empirical data to support the identified challenges and their effects
on desired outcomes.
16
2. Patient Perspectives: The literature review primarily focused on the perspectives of
healthcare professionals and organizational factors. Future research should
incorporate the perspectives of patients to gain a more comprehensive understanding
of the collaborative dynamics and outcomes of healthcare delivery. Quantitative
Approaches: While qualitative research provided in-depth insights into the
experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals, future research should
consider incorporating quantitative approaches to complement the qualitative data.
Quantitative studies can offer additional information on the prevalence and impact of
identified barriers and enablers. Cultural and Contextual Factors: The influence of
cultural, organizational, and contextual factors on teamwork within healthcare settings
was not extensively explored. Future research should examine how these factors
impact collaboration and identify strategies to address cultural barriers and promote
effective teamwork.
17
2.5Conceptual Framework for Challenges of Multidisciplinary Team
Collaboration
Team
Factors
Roles and Communicatio
Responsiblility Multidiscipli n Barrier
Trust abd nary Team Active listening
Respect Information
Collaboratio Sharing
Decision
Making
n Feedback
Conflict Mechanism
Resolution
Organizati
onal
Factors
Leadership
Resource
Allocation
Policies
IPE
18
CHAPTER THREE- METHODS AND MATERALS
The study will employ a mixed-methods study design; in order to capture the
complexity of the challenges and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the
topic, strengthening the validity and reliability of the research findings.
19
3.5 Sampling Technique and Sample Size
20
settings to assess and analyze the organizational culture, supporting efforts to
enhance the quality of care, patient experience, and overall organizational
performance.(Heritage et al., 2014)
TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and
Patient Safety) is a teamwork system developed by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) in collaboration with the Department of
Defense. It is designed to improve communication, teamwork, and patient
safety within healthcare settings.(Grose & Burney, 2022)
The CPAT- designed to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative teamwork
within healthcare teams, such as interprofessional teams or multidisciplinary
teams. It assesses various dimensions of collaboration, including
communication, coordination, shared decision-making and mutual respect
among team members.(Quek et al., 2022)
Quantitative Section-To analyze the data and examine the relationship between
the identified challenges and multidisciplinary team collaboration, regression
analysis will be performed. Multiple linear regressions will be used to assess the
21
impact of independent variables (challenges) on the dependent variable (team
collaboration). The independent variables will include communication
breakdowns, role ambiguity, conflicts, and organizational factors. The dependent
variable, team collaboration, will be measured using a validated scale assessing
collaboration effectiveness.
The regression analysis will allow for the identification of significant predictors of
team collaboration challenges and provide insights into the relative influence of each
challenge. Additionally, it will allow for the quantification of the strength and
direction of the relationships between the independent and dependent variables. The
regression analysis will be conducted using statistical software such as SPSS version
26.
The qualitative findings will be integrated with the quantitative results obtained from
the census survey to provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges
affecting MDT collaboration. The convergence of data from both methods will allow
for a triangulation of findings, enhancing the overall validity and reliability of the
research outcomes.
Prior to initiating the study, ethical approval will be obtained from the relevant
institutional review board or ethics committee at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized
Hospital. The research protocol, including the study design, data collection methods,
and participant confidentiality measures, will be reviewed to ensure adherence to
ethical guidelines and the protection of participants' rights.
Informed consent will be obtained from all participants involved in the study.
Participants were provided with detailed information about the research objectives,
procedures, potential risks, and benefits. They will be assured of their right to refuse
22
participation or withdraw from the study at any time without consequences. Written
consent will be obtained from participants, and their anonymity and confidentiality
were strictly maintained throughout the research process.
23
CHAPTER FOUR- WORK PLAN
Table 1: Work plan of the study
Total 65
24
Table 2: Budget Breakdown
Surveys/questionnaire 4,000
4 Data Collection
Interviews/ Focus Group 8,000
Miscellaneous
5 Unforeseen Costs 10,000
Expenses
Contingency
6 Reserve Budget 15,000
Fund
Total 78,500
REFERENCE
Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., Maki, I. V, & Tomkowiak, J. (2011).
Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional
education. 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035
25
Cawich, S. O., Johnson, P. B., Shah, S., Roberts, P., Arthurs, M., Murphy, T.,
Bonadie, K. O., Crandon, I. W., Harding, H. E., Hilal, M. A., & Pearce, N. W.
(2014). Overcoming obstacles to establish a multidisciplinary team approach to
hepatobiliary diseases: A working model in a Caribbean setting. Journal of
Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 7, 227–230.
https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S60604
D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M. D.
(2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts
and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(SUPPL. 1),
116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500082529
Danson, M., & Arshed, N. (2015). A guide to writing your dissertation: Literature
Review. In The Global Management Series: Research Methods for Buisness and
management. The Journal of the New York State Nurses" Association, 32–34.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbq45.15
Degu, T., Amsalu, E., Kebede, A., & Adal, O. (2023). Inter-professional collaboration
and associated factors among nurses and physicians in specialized public
hospitals, the northwest, Ethiopia: mixed method multi-centered cross-sectional
study. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09200-5
Etherington, N., Burns, J. K., Kitto, S., Brehaut, J. C., Britton, M., Singh, S., & Boet,
S. (2021). Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the
operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
PLoS ONE, 16(4 April), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249576
Grose, A., & Burney, D. (2022). TeamSTEPPS: Strategies and Tools to Enhance
Performance and Patient Safety. Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in
Orthopaedic Surgery, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07105-8_3
Head, R., Within, C., & Teams, M. (2019). Exploring Conflict within
26
Multidisciplinary Teams in the Acute Care Setting from a Nurses Perspective by
Rod Lorne Iwanow A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Social and Applied
Sciences in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master o.
Heritage, B., Pollock, C., & Roberts, L. (2014). Validation of the organizational
culture assessment instrument. PLoS ONE, 9(3).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092879
LaFrance, D. L., Weiss, M. J., Kazemi, E., Gerenser, J., & Dobres, J. (2019).
Multidisciplinary Teaming: Enhancing Collaboration through Increased
Understanding. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 709–726.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00331-y
Li, S. A., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M., & Stevens, B. (2018). Organizational contextual
features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across
healthcare settings: A systematic integrative review. Systematic Reviews, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5
McDonald, J., Jayasuriya, R., & Harris, M. F. (2012). The influence of power
dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: A qualitative case study of
type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-63
Mickan, S. M., & Rodger, S. A. (2005). Effective health care teams: A model of six
characteristics developed from shared perceptions. Journal of Interprofessional
Care, 19(4), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500165142
Pauzé, E., & Reeves, S. (2010). Examining the effects of interprofessional education
on mental health providers: Findings from an updated systematic review.
Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 19(3), 258–271.
27
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638230903469244
Quek, G. S. M., Kwan, Y. H., Chan, C. Q. H., Phang, J. K., & Low, L. L. (2022).
Validation of the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) to assess the
degree of inter-professional collaboration (IPC) in a Community Hospital in
Singapore. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100504
Reeves, S., Fletcher, S., Barr, H., Birch, I., Boet, S., Davies, N., McFadyen, A.,
Rivera, J., & Kitto, S. (2016). A BEME systematic review of the effects of
interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical Teacher, 38(7), 656–
668. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663
Reeves, S., Macmillan, K., & Van Soeren, M. (2010). Leadership of interprofessional
health and social care teams: A socio-historical analysis. Journal of Nursing
Management, 18(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01077.x
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017).
Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare
outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(6).
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013).
interprofessional education, effects on professional practice and healthcare
outcomes (Review) Reeves,Goldman Freeth Zwarenstein. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, 3, 47.
Shoesmith, W., Awang Borhanuddin, A. F. Bin, Pereira, E. J., Nordin, N., Giridharan,
B., Forman, D., & Fyfe, S. (2020). Barriers and enablers to collaboration in the
mental health system in Sabah, Malaysia: towards a theory of collaboration.
BJPsych Open, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.92
Spaulding, E. M., Marvel, F. A., Jacob, E., Rahman, A., Hansen, B. R., Hanyok, L.
A., Martin, S. S., & Han, H. R. (2021). Interprofessional education and
collaboration among healthcare students and professionals: a systematic review
and call for action. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(4), 612–621.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1697214
28
Steihaug, S., Johannessen, A. K., Ådnanes, M., Paulsen, B., & Mannion, R. (2016).
Challenges in achieving collaboration in clinical practice: The case of norwegian
health care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(July-September), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2217
Walter, J. K., Schall, T. E., DeWitt, A. G., Faerber, J., Griffis, H., Galligan, M.,
Miller, V., Arnold, R. M., & Feudtner, C. (2019). Interprofessional Team
Member Communication Patterns, Teamwork, and Collaboration in Pre–family
Meeting Huddles in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Pain and
Symptom Management, 58(1), 11–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.009
Zajac, S., Woods, A., Tannenbaum, S., Salas, E., & Holladay, C. L. (2021).
Overcoming Challenges to Teamwork in Healthcare: A Team Effectiveness
Framework and Evidence-Based Guidance. Frontiers in Communication,
6(March), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.606445
ANNEX 1
Informed Consent
29
You are invited to participate in a research study examining the challenges of
multidisciplinary team collaboration at St. Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital. The
purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of the obstacles faced by
healthcare professionals when working together as a multidisciplinary team, and to
identify potential solutions to improve collaboration.
Participating in this research study does not involve any physical risks. However,
discussing potential challenges in multidisciplinary team collaboration may evoke
personal or professional discomfort. Should you experience any distress during the
interview, you have the right to decline answering any specific questions or withdraw
from the study at any time without penalty.
There are no direct benefits to you as a participant, but your involvement will
contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of multidisciplinary team
collaboration in a mental health setting. The findings from this study may help
identify areas for improvement and inform future interventions to enhance teamwork
and patient care outcomes.
Your confidentiality and privacy are of utmost importance in this study. All
information collected during this research will be kept strictly confidential and stored
securely. Your personal identifying information will be separated from the data
collected during the interview, ensuring that your responses remain anonymous. Only
the researcher and authorized personnel will have access to the data, and your
information will be used solely for the purpose of this study.
By signing this document, you confirm that you have read and understood the
information provided above, and that you voluntarily agree to participate in this
research study. You understand that you have the right to withdraw from the study at
any time without penalty and that your decision to participate or decline participation
will be respected.
Date: _______________________
30
ANNEX 2ENGLISH VERSION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions: Circle the alternatives you have chosen umber given parallel to the
answer you chose
31
5. Doctorate (MD)
The OCAI consists of six questions. Each question has four alternatives. Divide 100
points among these four alternatives depending on the extent to which each alternative
is similar to your own organization. Give a higher number of points to the alternative
that is most similar to your organization. For example, in question one, if you think
alternative A is very similar to your organization, alternative B and C are somewhat
similar, and alternative D is hardly similar at all, you might give 55 points to A, 20
points to B and C, and five points to D. Just be sure your total equals 100 points for
each question.
Note, that the first pass through the six questions is labeled “Now”. This refers to the
culture, as it exists today. After you complete the “Now”, you will find the questions
repeated under a heading of “Preferred”. Your answers to these questions should be
based on how you would like the organization to look five years from now
32
C The leadership in the organization is generally considered to exemplify a
no-nonsense, aggressive, results-oriented focus.
Total
D
The management style in the organization is characterized by security of
employment, conformity, predictability, and stability in relationships.
Total
A The glue that holds the organization together is loyalty and mutual trust.
Commitment to this organization runs high.
C The glue that holds the organization together is the emphasis on achievement
and goal accomplishment. Aggressiveness and winning are common themes.
D The glue that holds the organization together is formal rules and
policies. Maintaining a smooth-running organization is important.
Total
33
C The organization emphasizes competitive actions and achievement. Hitting
stretch targets and winning in the marketplace are dominant.
Total
B The organization defines success on the basis of having the most unique
or newest products. It is a product leader and innovator.
Total
Instructions: Please respond to the questions below by placing a check mark (√) in
the box that corresponds to your level of agreement from Strongly Disagree to
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
34
Team Structure
It is important to ask patients and their families for feedback
1.
regarding patient care.
2. Patients are a critical component of the care team.
This facility’s administration influences the success of direct
3.
care teams.
A team's mission is of greater value than the goals of
4.
individual team members.
Effective team members can anticipate the needs of other
5.
team members.
High-performing teams in health care share common
6. characteristics with high-performing teams in other
industries.
Leadership
It is important for leaders to share information with team
7.
members.
Leaders should create informal opportunities for team
8.
members to share information.
Effective leaders view honest mistakes as meaningful
9.
learning opportunities.
It is a leader's responsibility to model appropriate team
10.
behavior.
It is important for leaders to take time to discuss with their
11.
team members plans for each patient.
Team leaders should ensure that team members help each
12.
other out when necessary.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Situation Monitoring
Individuals can be taught how to scan the environment for
13.
important situational cues.
Monitoring patients provides an important contribution to
14.
effective team performance.
Even individuals who are not part of the direct care team
15. should be encouraged to scan for and report changes in
patient status.
It is important to monitor the emotional and physical status
16.
of other team members.
It is appropriate for one team member to offer assistance to
17.
another who may be too tired or stressed to perform a task.
Team members who monitor their emotional and physical
18.
status on the job are more effective.
Mutual Support
35
To be effective, team members should understand the work
19.
of their fellow team members.
Asking for assistance from a team member is a sign that an
20.
individual does not know how to do his/her job effectively.
Providing assistance to team members is a sign that an
21.
individual does not have enough work to do.
Offering to help a fellow team member with his/her
22. individual work tasks is an effective tool for improving team
performance.
It is appropriate to continue to assert a patient safety concern
23.
until you are certain that it has been heard.
Personal conflicts between team members do not affect
24.
patient safety.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communication
Teams that do not communicate effectively significantly
25.
increase their risk of committing errors.
Poor communication is the most common cause of reported
26.
errors.
Adverse events may be reduced by maintaining an
27.
information exchange with patients and their families.
I prefer to work with team members who ask questions about
28.
information I provide.
It is important to have a standardized method for sharing
29.
information when handing off patients.
It is nearly impossible to train individuals how to be better
30.
communicators.
Somewhat Agree
Mostly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Mostly Agree
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Neither
36
2. Our team’s primary purpose is to assist patients/clients in
achieving treatment goals.
3. Our team’s goals are clear, useful and appropriate to my
practice.
4. Our team’s mission and goals are supported by sufficient
resources (skills, funding, time, space).
5. All team members are committed to collaborative practice.
6. Members of our team have a good understanding of
patient/client care plans and treatment goals.
7. Patient/client care plans and treatment goals incorporate
best practice guidelines from multiple professions.
8. There is a real desire among team members to work
collaboratively.
General Relationships
Somewhat Agree
Mostly Disagree
Team Leadership
Strongly Agree
Mostly Agree
Somewhat
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Neither
17. Procedures are in place to identify who will take the lead
role in coordinating patient/client care.
18. Team leadership ensures all professionals needing to
participate have a role on the team.
19. Team leadership assures that roles and responsibilities for
patient/client care are clearly defined.
20. Team leadership discourages professionals from taking the
initiative to support patient/client care goals.
21. Team leadership supports interprofessional development
opportunities.
22. Our team leader models, demonstrates and advocates for
patient/client-centered best practice.
23. Our team leader is out of touch with team members’
concerns and perceptions.
24. Our team leader encourages members to practice within
their full professional scope.
25. Our team has a process for peer review.
37
General Role Responsibilities, Autonomy
Somewhat Agree
Mostly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Mostly Agree
Somewhat
Agree nor
Communication and Information Exchange
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagre
Neither
e
38
S
39