Republic of the Philippines)

City of Bacolod……………) s.s.

x --------------------------------- x

SWORN STATEMENT

I, WESLEY Z. ESPINOSA, 43 years old, Filipino citizen, married having an

address at No. 5 and 7 Walnut Street, Villamonte, Bacolod City after duly sworn in
accordance with law, hereby state and disposed that;

That, the following herein under name persons are being accused of the
commission of the offense defined and punished under Obstruction of
justice refers to the commission of acts penalized under Presidential
Decree No. 1829 (“Penalizing Obstruction of Apprehension and
Prosecution of Criminal Offenders”). Any person — whether private or
public — who commits the acts enumerated below may be charged with
violating PD 1829; this

a. Preventing witnesses from testifying in any criminal proceeding or

from reporting the commission of any offense or the identity of any
offender/s by means of bribery, misrepresentation, deceit,
intimidation, force or threats.

That, the Affiant accuses the following Respondents;

1. Atty. Jerizza Alabado
2. Dr. Loueda Alabado
3. Several John and Jane Does
4. Several John and Jane Does
5. Several John and Jane Does
6. Several John and Jane Does

That, the above-stated names, except those names of number 1,2 and 3, were
all labeled as Several John and Jane Does enumerate in numbers 4,5,6 and 7
represents the neighbors Affiant whose names are not yet ascertained as of this
moment;
 That, the names of the neighbors labeled as Several John and Jane Does
as above-mentioned can be ascertain, inter alia, by those owners, leasee
or residents of those houses occupying on or before October 25, 2019 to
the present 2023;

That, those other names referred as Respondents enumerated and labeled

“Several John and Jane Does” were not yet made available as of this
time and as soon as their identities, personal details and other
circumstances be ascertained by personal knowledge and other
competent evidence may be included in support of this criminal
complaint;

That, the Affiant respectfully request before the Honorable Prosecutor to

consider in support of the above-stated be considered, inter alia, in the
interest of justice and the right of the State to prosecute those persons
that may be found criminally liable for violating a relevant penal statute
or statutes during the course of the trial;

That, during these above-mentioned years, the “act of harnessing [1][2]

human brain resonance1 frequencies inaudible sound wave”3 is the overt
act causing obstruction of justice;

That, the Affiant despite of the exercise of the due diligence and
conscious efforts suffers delay in the prosecution on account of “the act
of harnessing human brain resonance frequencies and inaudible sound
wave”;

That, “the act of harnessing inaudible sound wave” will be used instead
and would mean the act of harnessing human brain resonance
frequencies and inaudible sound wave for convenient use of terms;

That, the Affiant emphasizes the factual obstacle of the Act of

Harnessing resonant frequency through the employment of a
sophisticated technology designed to evade criminal prosecution;

1 Resonant Frequencies and the Human Brain

BY RON TURMEL
Issue 1, Summer 1997
Originally published in The Resonance Project
https://www.erowid.org/
 That, the Affiant would like to emphasis on the scientific research and
development resulting to its impact, benefits medical breakthrough in the
field of Medical Science and Psychology. However, there dark side of it
that must be the unconscionable effects of “the act of harnessing
inaudible sound wave”;

That, “the act of harnessing inaudible sound wave” must be a deliberate

act brought about by highly advance knowledge of experts. It must be
based on a concerted effort, among others, from the field Medicine
particularly the specialty on Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychology and
members of a specialized law enforcement agencies;

That, the efforts are focused of the harnessing of human brain resonance
frequency and inaudible sound waves and its effects on a perception,
unconscious mind, behavior and habits of a person;

That, according to leading experts in the field of Neurology, Psychiatry

and Psychology, inaudible sound wave has a power controlling influence
to a perception, unconscious mind, habit and behavior of a human being.3
That, it underscores the dangers of the so-called “act of harnessing
inaudible sound wave”. Authorities in the field of Neurology and
Psychology have the following claims caused by the “Act of Harnessing
Inaudible Sound Wave”;

1. The act of harnessing inaudible sound wave can change the

perception of a person;

2. The act of harnessing inaudible sound wave can greatly influence

a person unconscious mind;

3. That, according to Sigmund Frued, “Tip of the Ice-burg Theory”,2

“That, a human mind is just a tip of an ice-
burg where the huge part of it is composed of the
more powerful unconscious mind.”

That Affiant, however, has a more sophisticated frequency that can

communicate inaudibly via covert or imagine speech. This signal is
Resonance Frequency3 which came from auditory cortex located at
temporal lobe of the human brain;4

That, the Affiant assumption that the sophisticated technology employed

in the act of harnessing inaudible sound wave is Brain Computer
Interface (BCI);5
 That, Affiant claimed the act of harnessing inaudible sound wave can
make use of network towers to acquire a wide range of signal coverage.
The so-called inaudible sound wave are enumerated on the lists of
published NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
National Radio Frequency Allocation Table (NRFAT) (Rev. 2020)
provided by the National Telecommunication Commission (NTC);6

That, the Affiant consistently demanded for the immediate and

unconditional disconnection, termination or deactivation of the illegal or
unauthorized inaudible communication line against the principal
proponents thereof the same were stubbornly refused;
That, the Affiant the stubborn refusal is accompanied by the continued
reliance of the questioned communication line and the repeated acts of
harnessing inaudible sound wave are consistently implemented and
series of cycle of upheavals were effected against the Affiant committed
by the herein respondents in furtherance their highly unethical and
unlawful pursuit of medical endeavor per there chosen field is
concerned;

1. The Right to Privacy is fundamental in character for the same is

essential to life, liberty and security. Information breach means imminent danger or
high inimical to the interest to any other person, particularly to the Affiant. Since
the inception, October 25, 2019 up to the present being exposed to unauthorized
and unlawful inaudible communication line subjected to capriciousness and
whimsical manner, notwithstanding the nature of inaudible sound wave.

2. Any prudent man under normal circumstances could fairly have in his
mind that this unauthorized and unlawful inaudible communication line is the
proximate cause of all identically cause of legal injuries, including but not limited
to, serious economic losses, damages or losses and terms of similar nature;

3. I am executing this Omnibus Sworn Statement to attest to the veracity

of the foregoing statements in support of the above-cited application.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of

February 2022, in the City of Bacolod, Philippines.

Wesley Z. Espinosa
Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this _______ day of

_________.

________________________

Notary Public
Counsel for the plaintiff
IBP Lifetime No. __________
Date___________
Issued:______________
PTR NO. ____________
Date___________ Issued:______________
Place ___________ Issued:________________.
Roll No. ___________ at MCLE Exe. No._____Date
Issued:_________________