MEKDELA AMBA UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURSE

DEPARTEMENT OF HORTICULTURE

EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATE AND INTRA ROW

SPACING ON GROWTH AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CABBAGE AT
UNDER IRRIGATION FARMING SYSTEM AT LEGAMBO DISTRICT
SOUTH WOLLO, ETHIOPIA

By

1. MEKDES MEKASHAW (MSc)

2. SEMAHAGN GEREMEW (BSc)

3. ADEM ENDRIS (BSc)

October 2019.

Tuluawlia, Ethiopia

1
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3

1.2. Statement of the Problem................................................................................................................6

1.3. Objectives of the Study.....................................................................................................................7
1.3.1 General Objective.......................................................................................................................7
1.3.2 Specific Objectives......................................................................................................................7
1.4. Research Questions..........................................................................................................................8
2.1 Origin, Distribution and Botany of Cabbage......................................................................................9
2.2 Importance of Cabbage...................................................................................................................10
2.3 World Cabbage Production and Importance...................................................................................10
2.4 Head Cabbage Production in Ethiopia............................................................................................11
2.5 Agronomic Practice of Cabbage Production....................................................................................12
2.6 Nutritional requirement of Cabbage..............................................................................................13
2.8 Cabbage crop response to nitrogen Fertilizer..................................................................................14
2.9 Maturity, harvesting, marketable yield and quality of cabbage......................................................15
3. MATERIAL AND METHODE..........................................................................................................18
3.1 Description of the Study Area..........................................................................................................18
3.2 Experimental Treatments and Design..............................................................................................18
3.5 Procedures and Management of the Experiment............................................................................20
3.6 Data Collected.................................................................................................................................21
3.6 .1 Growth parameters.................................................................................................................21
3.6.2 Yield parameters.......................................................................................................................22
3.6.3 Soil analysis...............................................................................................................................22
3.6 Data Analysis...................................................................................................................................22
7. Expected outcome of the study........................................................................................................24
8. WORK PLAN..........................................................................................................................................25
9. Logistics and budget.............................................................................................................................26

i
List of Tables
Table 1 : Details of the treatment combinations used in the study.............................................................18
Table 2: Time Schedule for Field Experiment ……………………………………………………………………………………….24
Table 3: Personal cost……………………………………………………………………………………..25
Table 4: Equipments and input cost...........................................................................................................25
Table 5: Laboratory Cost...........................................................................................................................25
Table 7: Transport expense......................................................................................................................26.
Table 8: Budget summary..........................................................................................................................26

ii
iii
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and justification

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) belongs to the family brassicaceae and it is biennial
crop with a very short stem supporting a mass of overlapping leaves to form a compact head. It
originated from wild non-headed type ‘Cole wart’ (Crambecordifolias) from Western Europe and
Northern Shore of Mediterranean (Semuli, 2005).

Cabbage is known for its nutritional importance and it is rich in mineral and vitamins like A, B1,
B2 and C. Being an appetizer, it aides digestion thereby help preventing constipation. It also
protects against cancers (Razawlahet al., 2002).

Cabbage can be grown in wide range of soils from light sand to heavier clays. Soils with high
organic matter content give the best yields. Early cultivars grow well in light soils, whereas, late
cultivars perform better on heavy soils. Well-drained soils however give larger yields. Although
cabbage is relatively tolerant to salt, in saline soils cabbage plants show leaf margin dieback and
dark foliage which may increase the susceptibility of plants to diseases like black leg (ARARI,
2005; Rail and Yadav, 2005). The optimum pH of soil for cabbage cultivation is between 6.0 - 6.5
(Yano et al., 1999).

Cabbage can grow easily under wide range of environmental condition in both temperate and
tropical, but cool moist climate is most suitable (Rai and Asati, 2005). Optimum growth occurs at a
mean daily temperature of about 17°C with daily mean maximum of 24°C and minimum of 10°C.
Mean relative humidity should be in the range of 60 to 90 percent (FAO, 2012).

Cabbage is grown for its head in more than ninety countries throughout the world (Meenaet al.,
2010). The major cabbage growing countries of the world are China, India, South Korea,
Germany, Japan and South Africa (Sarker, 2002).

Cabbage ranks fifth among the vegetable crops of the world. The area planted with headed
cabbage worldwide in 2009 was estimated at about 3.2 million hectare in 124 countries producing
some 71 million tones. In the same year, area planted by cabbage was about 2.5 million hectare in
Asia, 0.5 million hectare in Europe, 80,000 hectare in America and 120,000 hectare in Africa
(Nina, 2011).

1
In Africa a total of 2 million tons were produced in 2008 and it has shown an increase by 20% over
the 10-year period between 1998 and 2008. The five-cabbage producer of African countries are
Kenya, Egypt, Ethiopia, Nigeria and South Africa and these five countries have maintained the
dominance of the sector throughout this period. Area production and yield of cabbage in Ethiopia
in 2014/2016 were 1989 hectares, 11765 tons and 5.9 t/ha, respectively.

The major factors for the low productivity of this crop in Ethiopia in general and around Legambo
in particular are low fertility status of the soil, inappropriate use of fertilizer rate, improper plant
population per unit area, disease, pests and inappropriate agronomic practices. The current
farmer’s practice of cabbage production around Legambo is similar to other part of the country.
They cultivated this crop by rain fed and irrigation using commercial fertilizer of DAP and Urea.
The fertilizer rates they used is not uniform .Moreover, the plant spacing they used is also not
uniform. Due to this the yield they obtained is low. Its quality is also poor. Some cabbage heads
are very small where are others are very big, cracked, burst rotten and loose heads which are fewer
acceptances in the market. In general crop production can be increased either by improving
inherent genetic potential of the crop or through application of better agronomic management such
as optimum plant density and fertilizer rate which contribute to substantial amount of crop (Frezer,
2007).

The possibility of securing high yield depends much upon a proper consideration of optimum
number of plants per unit area and the pattern in which the given quantity of seeds or plant
population is arranged in the field of planting (Endale and Gebremedhin, 2001). This is due to the
fact that the quantity of solar radiation, which penetrates a crop canopy greatly, depends on
planting pattern or spacing and individual plant morphology (Jerry et al., 1980). Likewise the plant
density, low soil fertility also considered as serious problems among several production limiting
factors in the study area. Nitrogen is one of the critical plant nutrients in cabbage yield and it is
significant to note that nitrogen response is directly.

2
1.2. Statement of the Problem
The possibility of securing high yield depends much upon a proper consideration of optimum
number of plants per unit area and the pattern in which the given quantity of seeds or plant
population is arranged in the field of planting (Endale and Gebremedhin, 2001). This is due to the
fact that the quantity of solar radiation, which penetrates a crop canopy greatly, depends on
planting pattern or spacing and individual plant morphology (Jerry et al., 1980). Likewise the plant
density, low soil fertility also considered as serious problems among several production limiting
factors in the study area. Nitrogen is one of the critical plant nutrients in cabbage yield and it is
significant to note that nitrogen response is directly.

Associated to the soil type, emphasizing that soil varying in fertility status react differentially to
the applied fertilizer (Frezer, 2007). Thus, it requires applying of appropriate rate of fertilizer for
the enhanced cabbage productivity and sustainable yield. Many experiments show that nitrogen
application increases the total yield of cabbage (Westveldet al., 2003). But this is possible as long
as it is managed properly in terms of rate and time of application.

Therefore, plant density and nitrogen level have to be regulated to obtain high yield from cabbage.
Thus, knowledge on the interaction among these factors is helpful to optimize cabbage yield
through efficient use of land and rate of fertilizer. In the highlands of Ethiopia, particularly around
Legambo, there is a need by farmers to increase productivity of cash crops like cabbage to
maximize their profit from small plot of farm they have. However, farmers of this area who grow
cabbage frequently give less attention to optimum plant population and nitrogen fertilizer rate.
Moreover, information on cabbage plant density and nitrogen application rate for optimum yield
and other agronomic practices are limited. Since most of the farmers in this area has smaller plots
of land and the yield obtained from this is very low. Due to this their income is less and unable to
improve their livelihood. So it is important to increase the yield of cabbage from this small plot of
land to improve the income of farmers around the study area.

Therefore studying the effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate and intra row spacing on cabbage
production on Copenhagen variety is very important to increase productivity of the crop.

3
1.3. Objectives of the Study

1.3.1 General Objective

To improve production and productivity of cabbage by optimizing nitrogen fertilizer rate and
intra-row spacing in the study area.

1.3.2 Specific Objectives

 To determine the effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate and intra-row spacing on yield and yield
components of cabbage.
 To determine optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate and intra row spacing on yield and yield
components of cabbage.

4
1.4. Research Questions
 What is the effect of intra-row spacing and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and yield
component of cabbage
 Which intra-row spacing is optimum for the production of cabbage
 Which nitrogen fertilizer rate is optimum for the production of cabbage

5
2. LETRETURE REIVIEW
2.1 Origin, Distribution and Botany of Cabbage

Cabbage (Brassica oleraceae. varcapitata), is also known as Cole crops. It belongs to family
Brassicaceae and generally referred as Brassicas. It is important groups of crop worldwide. It is
originated from Western Europe and Northern Shore of Mediterranean region where it has been
grown for more than 3000 years. It has chromosome number 2n=2x=18 (Ijoyah et al., 2001). It is
dicotyledonous biennial crop, but it grows as an annual. In the first season growth, it produces the
head and in the second season it produces seeds. Cabbage form several different head shapes:
pointed conical, or oblong, round or bell shaped or drummed shaped. Cabbage generally classified
as headed which is round, oval or flat. Chinese head cabbage is oval and flat, moreover it is loosely
formed and light in weight. Head formation in cabbage is quantitative trait controlled additively
with low dominance effect.

It is only head cabbage that changes in leaf shape becoming wider because of the shorter petiole
length with increasing leaf position and thus cabbage acquired the developmental change in leaves.
Cabbage has been domesticated and used for human consumption since the earliest antiquity
(Semuli, 2005). The genus Brassica includes about 100 species majority of which are native to
Mediterranean region. The crop is attributed to the Mediterranean center of origin (Rai and Asati,
2005). It is widely grown as cool-season crop and is very popular with gardeners.

6
2.2 Importance of Cabbage

Cabbage is grown for its leaves and commonly used as vegetable. Cabbage is an excellent source
of mineral such as calcium, iron, sodium, potassium, phosphorus. It has substantial amount of ß-
carotene, ascorbic acid and others. It has calories (27%), fat (0.1%) and carbohydrate (4.6%). It is
good source of protein (1.3%) which contains all essential amino acids; particularly sulfur
containing amino acids (Rai and Asati, 2005). The only part of the cabbage plant that is normally
eaten by human being is the leafy head; more precisely, the spherical cluster of immature leaves,
excluding the partially unfolded outer leaves. Cabbage is used us row in salad such as coleslaw, as
a cooked vegetable, or preserved in pickle or sauerkraut. Flavor in cabbage is due to the
glucosidesinigrin (Rai and Asati, 2005). A 100 g edible portion of cabbage contains 1.8 mg
protein, 0.1 mg fat, 4.6 mg carbohydrate, 0.6 g mineral, 29 mg calcium, 0.8 mg iron and 14.1 mg
sodium (Singh and Naik, 1988).

2.3 World Cabbage Production and Importance

Cabbage is a cool season vegetable and produced in most temperate countries. The annual average
world production of cabbage is estimated to be about 70,644,191 tons with the average
productivity of about 29.23 t ha-1. The major cabbage producing countries are China, India,
Russian Federation, Japan and Republic of Korea (FAOSTAT, 2013-14).

7
Cabbage is usually consumed as a cooked or stir fried vegetable, or eaten fresh as an ingredient of
coleslaw (a salad made of row sliced and chopped cabbage) and mixed salads (Grubben and
Denton, 2004). It can be also used as processed products such as prickling. Cabbage supplies
essential vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates and vital minerals (Norman, 1992). According to FAO
(2000) and Tindall (1983): a 100 g edible portion of cabbage contains vitamin A (2000 IU),
thiamine (0.06 mg), riboflavin (0.03 mg), protein (1.8 g), fat ( 0.1g), carbohydrate (4.6 g) and
vitamin C (124 mg). Furthermore it contains phosphorus (44 mg), potassium (114 mg), calcium
(39 mg), sodium (14.1 mg) and iron (0.8 mg).
Cabbage is known in neutralizing acids, has a cooling effect, it improves digestion and appetite,
prevents constipation and is very useful for diabetic patient (BBS, 2009; Dhemre and Desale,
2009). Researches also revealed that crucifer family including cabbage provides significant
cardiovascular benefits (Beecher 1994; Singh et al.,2015) and reduces the risks of lung, colon,
breast, ovarian and bladder cancers (Beecher, 1994).
2.4 Head Cabbage Production in Ethiopia

Cabbage is cultivated in mid altitude and highland areas of Ethiopia. It is mostly produced by
stallholder farmers. Cabbage is mostly produced during the rainy season, although some
commercial farmers produce it during dry season using irrigation. According to CSA (2012/2013),
the average annual production of cabbage in the country during 2012/2013 production season was
estimated to be 22,160.3 tons which was produced on 2,913 hectares of land. Of which Oromia
Region with 6,179.5 tons was the larger producer of cabbage followed by Amhara Region,
S.N.N.P.R and Benishangul-Gumuz with 6,179.5, 5,561.3, 110.2 tons, respectively. However, in
terms of productivity, Amhara Region was the leader with 10.7 t ha-1 followed by Benishangul–
Gumuz (7.8 t ha-1), S.N.N.P.R (7.2 t ha-1) and Oromia (6.6 t ha-1) (CSA, 2013).

Cabbage is adapted to a wide range of climatic conditions. However, cabbage grows best under
cool moist conditions with altitude under the range of 500 -3000 m.a.s.l (Copenhagen market and
500-1700 m.a.s.l (Early drum head) (Molla Tefera, 2009). The optimum temperature ranges for
growth of cabbage is between 15oC and 20oC. The growth of most of the cabbage varieties is
arrested when temperature rises above 30oC (Chadha, 2006).

8
Cabbage can be grown on a variety of soils but it does best on a well - drained, loam soil well
supplied with organic matter. Sandy loams are preferred for early crops, while heavy clay soils
may easily become waterlogged after heavy rain and thus encourage the serious diseases such as
black rot (Xanthomonascampestris) and soft rot (Erwiniacarotovora) (Bok et al., 2006). As
cabbage is sensitive to soil acidity, soil pH should be between 6 and 6.5. When pH falls below 5.5,
lime should be applied a month before planting (ARARI, 2005 and ANRSBoARD, 2013)

Cabbage can be either direct seeded or transplanted. However in Ethiopia, it is mostly transplanted
after seedlings are raised in nursery. Depending on the variety about 500-700 gram of seed is
adequate to produce enough seedlings to plant one hectare of land (Chadha, 2006). Seeds are sown
thinly in nursery seedbed at the depth of one centimeter. The spacing between rows and plants
within the rows is 10 cm and 30cm, respectively. Seedlings are ready to transplanting when they
produce two pairs of true leaves or when they attain the height of 8-13 cm which will take about 4-
5 weeks after sowing (ARARI, 2005).

According to Tindall et al. (1987) cabbage is transplanted at the spacing of 60 -75 cm between
rows and 40-60 cm between plants within row depending on the types of cultivar used. The wider
spacing is used later maturing cultivars. Small-sized early maturing variety like `Copenhagen`,
commonly grown variety in Ethiopia, is planted at the spacing of 50cm x 50cm or 60 cm x 40cm
(ARARI, 2005).

2.5 Agronomic Practice of Cabbage Production

Cabbage grows well on wide range of soil. But it requires well drained sandy loam soil, with pH of
6-6.5, rain fall of 700-900mm and 17-240c. Water logging is unsuitable for cabbage production. It
is propagated by seed and system of planting is transplanting. It requires 0.6cm by 40cm between
rows and plants. Fertilizer interval should be 5-7 days. Its days to maturity are 80-100days. In
Ethiopia, its productivity is 25-30t/ha when improved practices are followed and 7t/ha when grows
conventionally at farmer’s level (Simretet al., 1994).

9
2.6 Nutritional requirement of Cabbage

For optimum plant growth, nutrient must be available in sufficient and balanced quantities for
better performance of crop. Soil contains natural reserve of plant nutrients, but these reserves are
largely in forms unavailable to plants, and only a minor portion is released each year through
biological activities and chemical processes. Therefore, fertilizers are designed to supplement the
nutrients already present in the soil. The type of fertilizer and quantity to apply depends on soil
type, initial nutrient reserves in the soil and yield level. (Zhibin et al., 2011).

Cabbage is one of the most important, high nutritive and palatable leafy vegetables. It is a rich
source of protein, minerals and vitamin A (Uddin et al., 2009). It has some medicinal value as it
prevents constipation, increases appetite, speeds up digestion and is very useful for diabetic
patient. Fertilizer enhances plant growth by providing amendments to the soil via various macro
and micronutrients. The fertilizer application for cabbage should ensure adequate levels of all
nutrients. Optimum fertilization is required to produce top quality and high yields while a lack of
essential fertilizers will stunt its growth, leading to undersized and poorly developed heads.

Inputs to soil are at least balanced against nutrient removal by crops (Jahiruddin and Rijpma, 2004
Cabbage is well known to be an exhaustive crop and has the capacity to absorb higher amount of
nutrient from soil. The supply of proper nutrient must be ensured during its cultivation, which is
related to the judicious application of fertilizer. In the upland field, cabbage yields were high when
chemical fertilizers were applied (Kamiyamaet al., 1995). The crop production system with high
yield targets cannot be sustainable unless nutrient).

2.7 The Role of Nitrogen in Cabbage

The doubling of agricultural food production worldwide over the past four decades has been
associated with a seven fold increase in use of nitrogen fertilizer. As the consequence, both the
recent and future identification of the use of nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture already has and will
continue to have major determinate impacts on agriculture (Hirel et al., 2007). Plants take up

nitrogen in the form of nitrate (NO3-) or ammonium (NH4+) from organic matter, inorganic matter
and fixation of free nitrogen by microorganisms. Nitrogen plays a major role in protein formation
and as a component of chlorophyll.

10
Chlorophyll is required for light energy absorption by the process of photosynthesis. Therefore,
adequate nitrogen supply enhances the amount of chlorophyll as the result of increase
photosynthesis. A deficiency of nitrogen reduces the formation of chlorophyll, as result plants lose
their green color leading to reduction the rate of photosynthesis (More, 2006).

2.8 Cabbage crop response to nitrogen Fertilizer

Higher levels of nitrogen have often been found to induce optimum yields in Brassica vegetables.
Zebarth et al. (1991) observed a positive yield response up to 500 kg·ha-1 N, but that percentage
nitrogen recovery was lower at the higher rates (± 30% lost at 500 kg·ha-1).Peck (1981) reported
increased yields of cabbage heads to about 40 tone/ha fresh mass more than plants grown without
nitrogen fertilizer.

Parmar et al. (1999) recorded higher yields in cabbage with increased nitrogen rates. The
application of 200 kg·ha-1 N produced significantly higher yield over 150 kg ha-1 N but at par
with 250 kg ha-1 N. This was attributed to the fact that higher nitrogen levels favored the growth
of plants with larger leaf area and it was more usefully utilized in head formation.

Similar observations on cabbage were made by Ghantis et al. (1982), where yield contributing
characters such as head diameter and gross mass of heads and number of marketable heads
increased with increase in the levels of nitrogen up to 200 kg ha-1. Gupta (1987) observed
significantly higher cabbage yields at 150 kg·ha-1 N than yields at 0, 50 and 100 kg·ha-1 N yet at
par with yield at 200 kg·ha-1 N.

Increase in yield was attributed to increase in head mass. To produce optimum yields of good
quality cabbages, often high amounts of nitrogen fertilizer are applied. In reality, the amount of
nitrogen fertilizer used is probably higher as farmers may apply more fertilizer than recommended
to secure yields .Nitrogen produces reliable and optimal yield and quality of vegetables. It is
however, the most difficult element to manage in a fertilization system in order to ensure an
adequate, yet not excessive, amount of available nitrogen within the rhizosphere from planting to
harvest (Peck, 1981).

11
Assessing of cabbage total yield, marketable yield, weight per head, head density, and head size for
two season by Westerveld et al.(2003) total yield showed a peak at 265 kg N ha-1 Head size and
weight per head increased with increasing N rate only in, reflecting differences in yield. Days to
maturity decreased with increasing N rate reaching a minimum at 245 and 226 kg ha-1. Nitrogen
rates above recommended levels are beneficial in maximizing cabbage yields in wet years and
minimizing days to maturity. Richards et al. (2016) say cabbage yield is higher at 375 kg nitrogen
per hectare and get a total yield of 103.9ton/ha.

2.9 Cabbage Response to Spacing

The possibility of securing high yield depends much on a proper consideration of optimum number
of plant per unit area and the pattern in which the given quantity of seed or plant population is
arranged in the field of planting. The most suitable crop density is that insures higher yields, good
quality and low production cost. Dragan (2007) reported highest cabbage head diameter (16.6 cm)

recorded in the case of lowest crop density (8 m 2) whereas the lowest diameter (9.6 cm) was

recorded at higher plant density (16.6 cm2). It was observed that head diameter decreased in parallel
with increased crop density.

In the contrary, higher cabbage yield (73 t/ha) were recorded in the case of higher plant density

(16.6 cm2) but the Lowest yield (71 t/ha) was recorded at lower plant density (8 m 2).The higher
crop densities were as the result recommended for cabbage production. It is however, important to
compare the issue of probability of such a production with the higher cost of transplant and manual
labor. The explanation given was that increasing plant population increased competition among
plant resulting in reduced marketable yield (Semuli, 2005).

2.9 Maturity, harvesting, marketable yield and quality of cabbage

Determining the optimum time of harvest is often difficult and differs between heading and non-
heading types (George, 2002). According to the author the principal harvest maturity index is
based on size. Heading-type cabbage may be harvested as small as 10 cm in diameter and
continued until 15 cm. The maturity indicator for non-heading type are that the color of the leaves
will change from deep green to light green and the leaves will spread outwards.

12
Harvest maturity for heading type is also based on head compactness and firmness to the touch. A
firm or compact head is mature. A very loose head is immature and will not be harvested. Harvest
maturity may also be based on arrangement of the wrapped leaves; when they are spread and the
head is exposed it is usually matured (Semuli, 2005). A mature cabbage has a longer post-harvest
life than immature cabbage. Delayed harvest even a few days beyond maturity can result in split
heads and increased incidence of field disease. Cabbage is ready for harvest when the head has
attained its expected full size and its firmness. The early cultivar takes 60-80 days, the medium
80-100 days and late 100-130 days for harvest after transplanting (George, 2002).

Cabbage will be sorted according to size, shape, and compactness of the head. There are three
established size categories (small, medium, large) for domestic marketing of cabbage, based on the
weight of the head. Small size heads weight 0.8 kg or less, medium sized heads weight between
0.9 kg and 1.4 kg, and large sized cabbage heads weigh 1.5 kg or more (NAARR, 1986). Only the
cabbage with crisp and turgid leaves will be packed for market. The heads will be a color typical of
the cultivar (i.e. green, red or pale yellow-green), firm, and heavy for the size and free of insect,
decay, leafy head and other defect. The harvest of cabbage will be marketable and non-marketable.

The marketable sizes are those with; compact head, minimum head weight of 0.45 kg, non-damage
to edible portion of the plant. Whereas non-marketable sizes are; those that will not be headed,
heads too small in size and weight, head burst or split, damage by insect or disease, miscellaneous
categories in which some essential quality for marketable was lacking (NAARR, 1986).
Westerveld et al. (2003) also noted that a cabbage heads that are burst (split), rotten, and non-
headed are considered as unmarketable. When cabbage doesn’t form head, this condition is called
blindness and can arise due to excess nitrogen to form more leaves than are loosely held and do not
make a head. The yield of early maturing cabbage ranges between 30-40 t/ha, whereas medium
and late maturing cabbage yield 40-60 t/ha (Rai and Asati, 2005). The crop is hand harvested by
cutting the stem below the head but including a few of the loose outer leaves.

In large scale production, mechanical harvesting may be used where the production is intended for
processing. To preserve quality, cabbage may be stored for several months at high relative

humidity (95 %) and low temperature (0oC) (George, 2002). Quality is also one of the important
factors in cabbage production. Cabbage growers aim to harvest their crop with the least possible

13
number of cuts. To achieve this, good cultural methods are necessary at all stages of production.
Careful attention to size of transplants, fertilizing, irrigation and pest and disease control helps to
ensure even maturity. Cell- produced transplants are more uniform in their maturity than are
seedbed- produced plants. This in one of the major reasons grows are using this method of
producing seedlings (Murison and Nipier, 2006).After trimming outer wrapper leaves, cabbage
heads should be a color typical of the cultivar (green, red, or pale yellow-green), firm, heavy for
the size and free of insect, decay, seed stalk development and other defects. Leaves should be crisp
and turgid.

14
3. MATERIAL AND METHODE

3.1 Description of the Study Area

The study will be conducted at Legambo irrigation Scheme in south wollo Ethiopia particularly at
Gimba vegetable research site during the irrigation season of 2019/2020EC. Legambo is in
Amhara national regional state, in south Wollo at about 501 km away from Addis Ababa and 372
km from Bahirdar, with an altitude of 1500 to 3700 meters above sea level in the rift valley.

Its annual rainfall ranges from 700 to 1200 mm and has a temperature of between 0°C to 13°C.
Major crops grown in Gimba irrigation command area include: - wheat and barley during the main
cropping season and lettuce, beet root, carrot, potato, garlic and cabbage during the irrigation
season.

3.2 Experimental Treatments and Design

Treatments will be consisting of four levels of nitrogen fertilizer rate (0, 50, 100, 150 kg) and three
level of intra row spacing (40cm, 50cm, 60cm). The experiment will be laid out using Randomized
Complete Block Design (RCBD) in a factorial arrangement with three replications (Fig 1).A total
of 12 treatments combinations will be used in this experiment (Table 1).

Copenhagen market variety, one of the most popular and reliable early round- headed cabbages,
will be used for this experiment. This vigorous variety is widely adopted and requires 80-90 days
of maturity after transplanting. Copenhagen market will be used for this experiment, because it is
produced widely in high altitude of Ethiopian. In Ethiopia it is well grown in an altitude of 1500-
3000 m.a.s.l (Girma, 2002).It is the most important cash crop in the central highlands of Ethiopia,
including surrounding of legambo. The variety will be obtained from Adet Agricultural Research
center.

The width and length of each experimental plot will be 2.4m x 2.4 m. Each plot has five rows of
which each row holds 6, 5, and 4 plants per row for the 40, 50m and 60cm intra-row spacing,
respectively. The gross plot size of 2.4m x 2.4 m (5.76 m 2) and the space between blocks and plots
1m and 0.5m respectively will be used.

15
Table 1: Details of the treatment combinations used in the study

Treatment Intra-row Treatment combination Replication

I II II
Nitrogen 0 (N1) 40 (R1) N1R1 = T1 9 14 25
50 (R2) N1R2 = T2 6 18 36
60 (R3) N1R3 = T3 4 16 34
Nitrogen50(N2) 40 (R1) N2R1 = T4 2 19 35
50 (R2) N2R2 = T5 10 21 31
60 (R3) N2R3 = T6 5 17 27
Nitrogen 100 (N3) 40 (R1) N3R1 = T7 7 24 29
50 (R2 N3R2 = T8 12 23 33
60 (R3) N3R3 = T9 3 20 32
Nitrogen 150 (N4) 40 (R1) N4R1 = T10 11 13 26
50 (R2 N4R2 = T11 1 22 30
60 (R3) N4R3 = T12 8 15 28

16
Randomizations and field layout (Fig 1)

→ Rep-1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

T11 T4 T9 T3 T6 T2 T7 T12 T1 T5 T10 T8

→ Rep-2
24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13

T7 T8 T11 T5 T9 T4 T2 T6 T3 T12 T1 T10

→Rep-3
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

T1 T10 T6 T12 T7 T11 T5 T9 T8 T3 T4 T2

3.5 Procedures and Management of the Experiment

Seedlings will be raised on a seed bed and transplanting to main field after one month. The field
will be well prepared and irrigated three days before transplanting. Then it will be transplanted to
the main field according to the experimental design and layout .Phosphorus fertilizer (triple super
phosphate) will be applied once during planting at the rate of (1.6 kg) and the four rates of nitrogen
(0, 50, 100 and 150 kg/ha) in the form of urea will be applied in split, half at transplanting and half
at forty five days after transplanting. It will be plowed, weeded and hoed three times. It will be
irrigated in five days interval until the plant matures.

17
3.6 Data Collected
To evaluate the effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate and intra row spacing on cabbage yield and yield
components, five samples will be taken from the two middle rows per plot. On the basis of five
sampled plant head from each experimental unit, gross yield, marketable and unmarketable yield
will be weighed and converted in to t/ha. Plant whole fresh weight, days to maturity, head diameter
and height, leaf number and area, and harvest index will be also taken from five samples per plot.

3.6 .1 Growth parameters

Number of leaves per plant:

The numbers of leaves of five randomly selected plants will be counted from net plot area at 45
dates and the average number of leaves per plant will be calculated.

Days to maturity (DMt) - When the cabbage head will be compacted and firm to the touch it is
matured. The other indicator of maturity of head cabbage is the arrangement of wrapped leaves.
When they will be spread and the head is exposed it is usually matured. A very loose head is
immature and should not be harvested (Semuli, 2005). Cabbage heads will be harvested based on
these indicators when 50 % of the samples will be matured at the days of 91, 101 and 109 after
transplanting.

Head height (HH) (cm) - Cabbage head height (HH) will be measured from selected plant
samples from the central rows of the plot and their mean will be recorded. The measurement will
be done with ruler from the tip head to down the collar at maturity and it will be expressed in
centimeter.

Head diameter (HD) (cm)-At harvest, randomly taken samples of cabbage heads from the central
row will be taken and the head diameter (HD) will be measured at widest part using Caliper.

Outer leaf number (OLN) - Total numbers of fully developed outer leaves from each sample
head will be counted at time of harvesting.

18
3.6.2 Yield parameters

Head weight (HW) (kg/plant) - At time of harvesting (91, 101 and 109 days) after translating
randomly selected samples will be taken from each treatment and their head weight will be
measured using analytical balance.

Marketable yield (t ha-1):

Heads which will be free from any damages and decay as well as those which haven’t loose and
open heads will be considered as marketable. Heads which fulfilled these characteristics will be
harvested from net plot area and expressed as tone per hectare and used for further analysis.

Unmarketable yield (UMY) (t/ha) - Cabbage such as non-headed, split (burst), disease affected

And under sized head (below 0.45 kg) will be recorded as unmarketable NAARR (1986) and
calculated on the basis of t /ha. Continuous use of symbols t ha-1 or t /ha

Total head yield (TY) (t/ha) - Total number of heads and their weight will be recorded as sum of
marketable and unmarketable head yield and calculated on the basis of t/ha.

3.6.3 Soil analysis

Representative soil samples will be taken using an auger at 0-20 cm depth from different places of
experimental field before planting to make one composite sample. Soil samples will be collected
from each plot after crop harvest. The collected soil samples will be air dried in wooden tray,
ground and sieved. The soil analysis made before planting included total nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, organic matter, soil pH, CEC and soil texture. All the soil samples will be analyzed in
Laboratory.

3.6 Data Analysis

Data will be analyzed statistically using SAS version 9.0 software computer package program
(SAS, 2004, version 9.0). Least Significant Difference (LSD) procedure will be used to determine
differences between treatment means whenever the treatments will be significantly different.

19
4. Beneficiaries of the research project

The project will have the potential to benefits large numbers of societies, both directly and
indirectly. Users include the cabbage production operators themselves; individuals, community
organizations, farmer groups, corporate or private customers, government and non-governmental
organizations.

The project operators: They will obtain satisfaction and engages different research activity
following the project success.

Community: Obtain benefits like job opportunity, demonstration, the agronomic practice, its
consumable use, as an income source from the new technology.

Government and non-government organization: use it as informal education center and

experience sharing site.

5. Dissemination plan

Cabbage production with the recommended rate of nitrogen and intra raw spacing and should be
disseminate and shared with intended users and beneficiaries. The project operators and other
research groups have high potential for technology dissemination though extension linkage
because of their farmer-friendly atmosphere. For farmers by different trainings readily share new
technologies among themselves. Governmental and non- governmental institution also have a
moderate capacity for disseminating technology and for the world it will disseminate with
documentation.

20
6. Study team roles and responsibilities in undertaking and managing the study

 Differentiate the best nitrogen rate and intra raw spacing for cabbage
 Create awareness about cabbage production to farmers

7. Expected outcome of the study

 Optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate of cabbage (Copenhagen variety ) will be identified

 Optimum intra-row spacing of cabbage (Copenhagen ) will be determined

 Yield and yield components of cabbage ( Copenhagen) will be evaluated

 The interaction effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate and intra row spacing of cabbage will be
found out.

21
8. WORK PLAN
Table 2: Time Schedule for Field Experiment.
No Activities Time line
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
1 Proposal
preparation
1 Seed purchase
2 Site selection
3 Seed bed
preparation,
Sowing
4 Main field
preparation
5 Transplanting
to the main
field
6 Cultivation and
weeding
7 Data
collection
8 Harvesting
9 Data
organization
10 Data analysis
11 Manuscript of
write up
12 Report
circulation for
comments

22
13 Submission

14 Thesis defense

9. Logistics and budget

Table 3: Personal cost

No Activities Unit Number Daily Total

1 Consultation(at different Man days 1 800/per day 800.00
stages of the research)
2 Land preparation and Man days 10 20 birr/m2 21297.6.00
plowing/3/times
3 Bed preparation Man days 10 15birr/m2 7099.2.
4 Transplanting of seedling Man days 15 200 3000.00
5 Data collection Man days 10 200 2000.00
Sub-total 34196.2

Table 4: Equipment’s and input cost

No Item/material/ Unit Quantity Unit cost Total cost

1 Cabbage seed G 500 1600 1600.00
2 Fertilizer(Urea and Kg 25 40 1000.00
TPS
3 Rope Role 6 130 1080.00
6 Shovel No 6 100 600.00
5 Sack No 45 25 1125.00
6 Rakes No 6 80 480.00
7 Hoe No 6 80 480.00
8 Meter No 1 300 200.00
Sub-total 6565.00

Table 5: Laboratory Cost

No Item Cost(Birr)
1 Oven to dry measurements 3000.00
2 Soil sample test 5000.00
Sub total 8000.00
Table 6: Transport expense
23
 No Person Departure Destination No. of Cost per one Total cost
round way trip (birr) (birr)
1 researcher Gimba Segno 56 90 (at the 5040
required stages
of the research
work)
2 Advisor Ginma Segno 5 30 (at the 150
required stages
of the research
work)
Subtotal 5190

Table 7: Budget summary

No Item Subtotal( birr)

1 Personal cost 34196.2
2 Equipment cost 6565.00
3 Laboratory cost 8000.00
4 Transport cost 5190.00
5 Contingency 5395.12
Grand Total 59346.32

REFERENCES

24
Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI). 2005. Horticultural crops
production training manual (in Amharic) for Developmental Agents volume 3. Amhara
agricultural research institute. July, 2005 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Available at (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legambo)accession date: 27/11/2019.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). 2009. Year Book of Agriculture. Statistics of Bangladesh
.Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry or Planning Govt. of the Peoples Republic of'
Bangladesh, Dhaka.

Beecher C. 1994. Cancer preventive properties of varieties of Brassica oleracea: a review. Am J.

Clin.Nutr. 1994; 59 (suppl): 1166S – 70S 1994.

Bok I, Madisa M, Machacha D, Moamogwe M, More K. (Revised). 2006. Manual for Vegetable
Production in Botswana. Department of Agriculture Research, Gaborone, Botswana. Pp57

Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey, 2016. Report on Area and Production of
Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season).

Chadha B. 2006. Hand Book of Horticulture. Fifth Reprint Indian Council of Agricultural
Research New Delhi published by kuldeep Sharma, New Delhi (Infdia).

Dhemre J.K. And Desale S.B. 2009. Impact of front line demonstration on production technology
of cabbage var. Wonder ball in dhule district of Maharashtra. HIND AGRICULTURAL
RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE Agriculture Update | February & May 2010 |
Vol. 5 | Issue 1 & 2| 243-244|

Dragan N. 2007. Yield and Quality of Early Cabbage in Response to within Row Plant Spacing.
Journal of Acta agricultural REA, 89:15-23.

Endale, G. and Gebremedhin W, 2001.Effect of Spatial Arrangement on Tuber Yield of some

Potato Cultivars. African Crop Science Journal, 9 (1): 67-76

FAO, 2012. Crop Water Information: Cabbage. Journal of natural resource and environment
department, 1:991-2.

25
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2014. The Food and Agriculture
Organization database (FAOSTAT). http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2000. Statistical database. Food
and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Frezer A, 2007. Effect of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Yield and Yield
Components of Potato at Enderta, Southern Tigray, Ethiopia .MSc. Thesis presented to
Haromaya University. pp 18-27.

George A. 2002. Horticulture: Principle and Practice. Second Ed. Newdelhi.364-366.

Ghanti, P., Sounda, G., Jana, P. K. and Som, M. G., 1982.Effect of Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus
and Spacing on Yield Characters of Cabbage.Veg. Sci. 9, 1-4.

Girma A.2002.Horticultural Crop Production in Ethiopia.bbuild.Knu.ac.

ka/iatc/report/Ethiopia.doc.accessed on December 2011.

Grubben G.J.H., Denton O.A, Messiaen C.M and Schippers R.R. 2004.Plant resource of Tropical
Africa and vegetables.PROTA foundation, Wageningen, Netherlands / Backlmys
Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands / CTA Wageningen, Netherlands. 668 pp

Gupta, A., 1987. Effect of Nitrogen and Irrigation on Cabbage Production.Indian J. Hort.44, 241-
244.

Hirel B. Jaeques Le gous, Betrand Ney and AnareGallas, 2007. The Challaege of Improving
Nitrogen use Efficiency in Crop Plants. Journal of experimenalt Botany, 58(9): 2369-2387.

Ijoyah M.O. and Rakotomavo, 2001. Yield Performance of five Cabbage Varieties Compared with
the Local variety under field condition in Seycelles. J. of Sustainable Development in
Agricluture and environmet, 3:76-80.

Jahiruddin, M. and Rijpma, J., 2004. Strategy and plan for use of soil nutrient balance in
Bangladesh. Final report of short time Assignment.SFFP/DANIDA.

Jerry E. M., L. G. Cury, W. D. Demichele and N. D. Beker, 1980. Light penetration in Row Crop
with Random Plant Spacing. Agronomy Journal, 72: 1431-1439

26
Kamiyama, K. S., Fujiwara and Funahahsi, H., 1995. Effect of Successive Application of Cow
Manure Compost on Growth Crops and the Chemical Properties of the Soil.Bulletin of
Agricultural Research Institute of Kanagawa Prefecture. 136: 31-42.

Meena M.L, Ram R.B. Rubee L. and Shama S.R.R. 2010.Determining Tield Components in
Cabbage (Brassica oleraceavarcapitata L.)Through Correlation and Path
Analysis.International journal of Science and nature, 1(1): 27-30.

MollaTefera. 2009. Determination of the Levels of Essential and Non - Essential Metals in
Commercially Available Ethiopian Red Pepper (capsicum annuum). MSc Thesis, Addis
Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

More K. 2006.Response of Cabbage Transplants to Nitrogen, phosphorus and Potassium nutrition.

MSc Thesis., University of Pretoria, 12-24.

Nina K.M. 2011. Qualty of White Cabbage, Yield And Potential Risk of Ground Water Nitrogen
Pollution, As Affected By Nitrogen Fertilization And Irrigation. Journal science food
Agric, 92(10): 92-98.

Norman, JC. 1992. Tropical vegetable crops. Arthur H. Stockwell Ltd, Ilfracombe, Great
Britain.Pp.52-77.

Parmar, H.C., Maliwal, G.L., Kaswala, R.R. & Patel, M, L., 1999. Effect of Irrigation, Nitrogen
and Spacing on Yield of Cabbage.Indian J. Hort. 56 (3), 256- 258.

Peck, N.H., 1981. Cabbage Plant Response to Nitrogen Fertilization.Agron. J. 73, 679- 684.

Rai, N. and Asati,B.S, 2005. Correlation Path Coefficient Analysis for the Yield and its Trait in
Cabbage.The Orissa Journal of Horticulture, 33(1): 31-34.

Rail N. and Yadav D.S. 2005. Advanced in Vegetable Production. Indian Council of Agricultural
Research New Delhi, India Pp

Razawlah K. Sher A., Salimulah K., Fayan A., MerZ.and Bashir A, Kahan, 2002. Effect of
Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorusond Potassium on the Growth and Yield of
Cabbage. Asian Journal of plant science, 1 (5): 548-549.

27
Richards T., I.E. Smith and R. Bennett, 2016.Nitrogen fertilization of cabbages in Natal. South
African Journal of Plant and Soil

Sarker, M.Y, Azad, A.K., Hasun.M.K, Nasreen. A Naher.Q and Baset, M.A. 2002.

Semuli, K L H. 2005. Nitrogen Requirements for Cabbage Transplant and Crop Response to
Spacing and Nitrogen Top-Dressing. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa,
32-42.

Simret, K/YesusMusajarso, Dibaba Damesa, WorkuBurayu, Asrat, 1994. Vegetable, root and tuber
crops extension package manual.unpublished manual, ministry of agriculture.

Singh N., Shubhadeep Roy, Pradip K, Chaurasia, S.N.S., Gupta, S. and Singh, B. 2015.Improved
Production Technologies in Vegetable Crops.IIVR Training Manual No. 59.ICAR-Indian
Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India, Pp 268.

Singh, R. V &Naik, L.B. 1988.Response of Cabbage to plant Spacing, Nitrgen and Phosphorus
Levels.Indian J.Hort. 45:325-328.

Uddin, M. J., Islam, M. M.And Naher, M. N. A., 2009.Basic Agriculture, Part Ι. 74/4, Upashahar,
Rajshahi.379 P.

Westerveld, S.M., Mcdonald, M.R., Mckeown, A.W. & Scott-Dupree, C.D., 2003. Optimum
nitrogen fertilization of summer cabbage in Ontario.ActaHortic. 627, 211-215.

Westeveld, S.M. Donald M.R. and McKeown.A.W. 2003. Optimum Nitrogen Fertilization of
Summer Cabbage in Ontario.Act hort, 627:2-5.

Yano M, Ito H, Hayami A. and Obama S. 1999.Effect of cultural practices on the quality of
vegetables. Sugar contents of cabbage and carrot. Bulletin of National Institution of
Vegetable and Tea Science, Pp: 53–67.

Zebarth, B.J., Freyman, S. and Kowalenko, C.G., 1991. Influence of N Fertilization on Cabbage
Yield, Head Nitrogen Content and Exchangeable Soil Organic N at Harvest.Can. J. Plant
Sci. 71, 1275-1280.

28
Zhibin Guo1, Chuanlong He1,2#, Youhua Ma3, Hongbin Zhu1,2, Feng Liu1,2, Daozhong
Wang1,2, Li Sun3, 2011. Effect of different fertilization on spring cabbage (Brassica
oleraceaL. var. capitata) production and fertilizer use efficiencies*Agricultural Sciences.

29