Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RPK 210 Opsomming
RPK 210 Opsomming
Preamble
Regulates the profession in the public interest
Ensures the Constitutional values
Ensures affordable legal services
Provides a legislative framework REEPER
Ensures accountability of the profession
Removes barriers for entry into profession
Right of appearance
Legal practitioners are entitled to practice throughout South Africa
Right of appearance in HC, SCA and CC if in practice for longer than 3 years and has an LLB degree
Candidate attorneys may only appear in the regional division of the Magistrate Court if previously practiced as an advocate for
a year or completed a year of vocational training
Trust monies
Must be in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificate
Every attorney must operate a trust account
Interest accrued must be paid to the Fund
Accounting records
Remuneration
Every candidate attorney undergoing practical vocational training shall be entitled to reasonable remuneration, allowances or
stipends for their service under the practical vocational training contract as may be determined from time to time by the
Council, which shall be payable at least monthly
Every pupil undergoing practical vocational training in terms of a practical vocational training contract shall be entitled to
reasonable remuneration, allowances or stipends (if any) as may be determined by the Council and as may be appropriate
having regard to the nature of the pupil's activities in terms of the practical vocational training contract
Legal services which may be rendered by advocate in possession of Fidelity Fund certificate
An advocate who is in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificate may render legal services which advocates were entitled to
render before the commencement of the LPA
Instruction of attorneys
Instructions by a client to an attorney may be in writing or verbal
When written instructions are given by a client to an attorney, the attorney must ensure that they set out the intended scope of
the engagement with sufficient clarity to enable the attorney to understand the full extent of the mandate
If attorney is uncertain as to scope of the mandate, they must seek written clarification of the intended scope of the instruction
Where the client instructs the attorney verbally, the attorney must as soon as practically possible confirm the instructions in
writing and in particular must set out their understanding of the scope of the engagement
Also applies to an advocate who is in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificate
Disciplinary proceedings
The Council shall have disciplinary jurisdiction over all members no matter where the misconduct which is perpetrated
The Council is empowered to enquire into and deal with any complaint of misconduct
Practical vocational training requirements pupils must comply with before being admitted by court as legal practitioners
A person intending to be admitted and enrolled as an advocate must—
- serve under a practical vocational training contract for 12 months after having satisfied all the requirements for a degree
- prior to or during service under a practical vocational training contract, complete a programme of structured course work
An advocate may not have more than one pupil
Pupil may be engaged or retained under a practical vocational training contract by an advocate who have practised as an
advocate for at least 3 years
Court held that s 22 of Constitution preserves rights of citizens to choose their trade, occupation or profession freely and
empowers State to enact legislation to regulate freedom of trade, occupation and profession
Through enactment of s 24(2) of LPA, regulatory competence of state has been exercised in a manner that is consistent with a
citizen’s right to choose their profession
Regulatory competence exercised cannot be said to extend to non-citizens and their choice of profession as s 22 is a right in
the Constitution, that does not extend to them
Fact that non-citizens do not have rights that accrue under s 22, does not mean they are not entitled to enter into certain
professions in South Africa
Differentiation between citizens and permanent resident on one hand and foreign nationals on the other does not amount to
unfair discrimination
Citizenship is not one of listed grounds in s 9(3) of Constitution nor was Court convinced that citizenship may be classified as
falling under the listed ground of social origin
Limitation created by s 24(2) is tailored to admission of legal practitioners and does not operate as a blanket ban to
employment in profession
Activity which applicants sought constitutional protection for is enjoyment to choose one’s vocation, which does not amount
to unfair discrimination, because this right is not protected by a constitutional right available to foreign nationals
Ethics
What are professional ethics?
Concerned with the rules of conduct regulating the Attorneys’ profession
Provide the norms in terms whereof practitioners are judged to be fit and proper persons to practice
Standards of right and honourable conduct which should be observed by members of learned professions in their dealings with
each other and in protecting the interests and handling the affairs of their clients
Designed to provide lawyers with an understanding of ethical context in which law operates and teach them to become aware
of limitations of rules determining ethical behaviour
Legal Practice Council, an independent regulatory body, plays a substantial role in control of professional standards
Among main principles of ethical conduct expected of a lawyer are that, in relation to his client, he will maintain confidential
about everything revealed to him during professional relationship, will always use his skills and knowledge to best of his
ability to secure client’s interests, but will not knowingly be a party to any fraud, dishonesty or underhand dealings
In relation to other members of the profession, a lawyer must deal honestly with them and implement undertakings to them
In relation to courts, a lawyer should not participate in any fraud on court as by putting forward false evidence or withholding
evidence, should not put forward any misleading arguments or misrepresent or conceal any authorities, relevant to his case,
whether in favour of or against his client, and must honour any undertakings he gives on behalf of his client
They fulfil a dual function by assisting the client and by promoting justice in society
The two functions may come into conflict
Constitution enshrines rights of all people in country and affirms democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom
There is a great need for lawyers to ensure that a proper balance between human rights and the more general interests of
society and the state is maintained
The public is entitled to a fair administration of the judicial system, to insist that lawyers act responsibly and ethically in the
public interest and that they will not abuse the law for the benefit of their clients
Lawyers must not take unjust advantage either of the opponent’s or of the public purse
To ensure that public will have confidence in administration of justice, a high standard of these qualities must be maintained
The purpose of ethical training is to develop:
- an understanding of the foundations of the ethical standards applicable to the legal profession
- moral reasoning skills aimed at empowering professionals to develop moral autonomy and moral decision-making skills
that withstand scrutiny
- ethical awareness and a heightened ethical consciousness of impact and consequences of one’s actions, both personally
and professionally, on the broader society.
What is a profession?
A profession is a career (occupation) which complies with six requirements:
- an intellectual basis
- a private practice
- an advisory function
- a tradition of service
“Fit and proper” means fit and proper in every respect and not only honesty and reliability
An attorney’s avowed intention of contravening the law in future does not square with the requirement
Needs to be contextualised within context of legal challenges, for example where courts are called upon to consider whether
‘extent to which laws that prohibit use of cannabis and possession, purchase of cultivation thereof for personal consumption
exclusively are valid’
- Prince v President Cape Law Society & Others
Legal practitioners serve the interests of their clients, which require a case to be presented fearlessly and vigorously
On other hand, as officers of Court, they serve interests of justice by acting as bulwark against admission of fabricated
evidence
Both professions have strict ethical rules aimed at preventing their members from becoming parties to deception of Court
Unfortunately, the observance of rules is not assured, because what happens between legal representatives and their clients or
witnesses is not a matter for public scrutiny
The preservation of a high standard of professional ethics has been left almost entirely in hands of individual practitioners,
thus absolute personal integrity and scrupulous honesty are demanded and a practitioner who lacks these qualities cannot be
expected to play his part
- Kekana v Law Society of Advocates of South Africa
An attorney is unfit to practise if the misconduct in question is of such serious nature that it manifests character defects and a
lack of integrity rendering the person unfit to be on the roll
Instances where the Courts have ruled that a practitioner is not a fit and proper person to practise:
Attorney has failed to be frank and open in their dealings with their (Law) Society and with the Court, and had attempted to
deceive her Society and the Court (Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope and Another v Holmes)
An applicant for admission as an advocate cannot on the one hand plead they were wrongly convicted, or that they had
reformed. Reformation can only begin when a person acknowledges that he has committed the wrongful act (Ex parte
Ngwenya: In re Ngwenya v Society of Advocates, Pretoria and Another)
Where a person having two previous convictions for the possession of cannabis declared their intention of continuing to break
the law due to their religious beliefs (Prince v President, Cape Law Society and Others)
Where an attorney, apart from instances of under-banking trust monies, also stole monies by convincing an insurance company
to pay proceeds due under a life insurance policy to himself instead of beneficiary and then withdrew money for personal
purposes and denied doing so despite clear evidence to the contrary (Vassen v Law Society of the Cape)
An attorney convicted of a criminal offence, and who during the course of trial not only committed perjury in raising a false
alibi, but also suborned another to do so to support his alibi and who persisted in lies for four years during the appeals process
was found unfit to practise as such conduct constituted a protracted attempt to deceive the courts . (Jasat v Natal Law Society)
If an attorney, by what they have done, evidences that they do not understand nature and extent of obligations to clients which
profession imposes, or if they do not observe them, then, given sufficient gravity of impropriety, they may be held guilty of
unprofessional conduct
Prokureursorde van Transvaal v Kleynhans
General Council of the Bar of South Africa v Van der Spuy
If client proposes to break the law, legal practitioner must alert client to consequences of such action and seek to dissuade
them
However, it is not improper for a legal practitioner to advise a client on how to take advantage of a loophole in the law
A legal practitioner’s responsibility towards his client can never override their duty to uphold the law
Legal practitioner must not do anything that is dishonourable, even if it is in interests of client and they are pressed to do it
HEG Consulting Enterprises (PTY) Ltd and Others v Siegwart & Others
Personal life
The standards of behaviour expected of a legal practitioner are very demanding and extend also to his personal life. Rationale
is that if you do something which brings you into disrepute, then profession will be brought into disrepute and further, the
administration of justice – of which you are an integral part – will be brought into disrepute
Even though personal misconduct may have less weight than professional misconduct, it may still be a ground for striking a
practitioner off the roll of attorneys because it may show that they are not a fit and proper person to practise law
Transvaal Law Society v Kleynhans
Cape Law Society v Reyneke
Law Society, Transvaal v Blumberg
A practitioner is under no obligation to accept a client’s instructions and before doing so he must consider following aspects:
- Potential conflicts of interest
- Competence
Ebersohn v Prokureursorde van Transvaal: attorney should have necessary knowledge and expertise, and in executing his
mandate, he should display the care that is to be reasonably expected of the average attorney.
Must also have a sound knowledge of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001 (FICA)
FICA’s aim is to combat organised crime and deter money laundering activities and in introducing this legislation, South
Africa has joined those countries that are facing similar threats to their economies
It places onerous duties on all Accountable Institutions which are prerequisites for establishment of business relationships or
for conclusion of transactions
Identification and verification requirements not limited to client, but extend to each person with whom transaction is
concluded
Once accepting instructions, discuss with client costs as well as all ethical implication, which could arise from the acceptance
of your mandate
Provide them with an example in simple terms. If you are charging an hourly rate, make the client sign an agreement
Apart from wisdom of acting for one client only, it is also necessary at outset to define clearly to all concerned, when dealing
with more than one party, who your client is and for whom you are acting
This is necessary to avoid “non-clients” incorrectly assuming you are protecting their interests
Leite v Leandy & Partners: legal practitioner who is drawing a contract between a client and an unrepresented party has a duty
to act fairly to both parties
Although your client may not prescribe manner in which services are to be rendered, you must at all stages of the matter act
according to his instructions (subject to the limitation that you must not carry out improper instructions)
Attorney-client relationship imposes a duty on an attorney to advance interests of his client, even where such a course of
action will cause harm to the opposite party
This relationship and duty owed to client do not protect attorney civilly or criminally against unlawful conduct such as fraud
The attorney is not entitled nor obliged to advance his client’s interests at all costs.
However, where an attorney failed to counsel his client on the benefits of mediation and, in the course of the pre-trial
conference positively rejected its use, he was severely criticised for failing to properly serve the client’s interests as mediation
would have been a better alternative and should have been tried
Consequently court limited attorney’s fees and ordered that he could only recover from his client his taxed party and party
costs:
- Goodricke & Son v Auto Protection Insurance
Road Accident Fund v Shabangu and Another
It is particularly important to observe this rule when it comes to settlements
Obtain written instructions from client to accept an amount in settlement and explain to him exactly what settlement offer
entails
Washaya v Washaya
- no instructions to settle had been given and counsel had settled on his own initiative
- In an application for the setting aside of the judgment it was held as to the conduct of counsel that he had acted in an
irresponsible and grossly negligent or reckless manner, misleading the Court and needlessly wasting its time
Professional negligence
If we are unable to contain the incidence of claims, the continuing increase in professional indemnity premiums will diminish
the profession’s capacity to service clients effectively and threaten the very viability of some practices
Professional negligence claims are often caused by a poor flow of information between attorney and client or between
attorneys, with the result that the decisions made are not the right one
Letters of engagement containing the following essentials/checklist:
- Identity of client. Engagement letter should be backed by required FICA process in case of new clients. Make sure you
know and record whether client is acting in their personal or a representative capacity
- Primary responsible attorney and any other attorneys/assistants to be associated with the matter
- Details of mandate/scope of work to be done. Specific areas to be included in order to avoid any misunderstanding about
responsibilities and deliverables. Any unusual or specific instructions should be recorded
- Mouton v Die Mynwerkersunie: attorney can be guilty of negligence where error of judgement is due to lack of required
degree of knowledge, skill or care
Pretorius v McCallum: can be held liable toward non-clients if they suffered damages based on your lack of duty of care and
knowledge
When client’s case prescribed, you must inform the client – never admit negligence!
Confidentiality
Implied term of contract between you and client that you will preserve confidentiality of all communications between you and
client
The confidence of the client is absolute and must be preserved by his attorney except to the extent that disclosure may be
rendered necessary or permissible
It embraces all oral and documentary information respecting the client’s affairs gained in acting for him whether from the
client himself or from any other source whatsoever
Information covered by ethical duty of confidentiality must be regarded as confidential by client and lawyers are advised, if in
doubt, to regard even matters that are generally known as confidential unless client advises legal practitioner to the contrary
Revealing a client’s whereabouts to a third party without their permission can be a breach of confidentiality and as such may
constitute professional misconduct
Confidentiality continues to remain in existence after termination of attorney-client relationship. Can only be waived by client
Legal professional privilege
Doctrine in our law that confidential communications between you and your client are “privileged” from disclosure.
Whereas FICA does not protect confidential communications between attorney and client, it does expressly protect attorney
and client privilege
It is important that practitioners are fully conversant with precise nature and scope of professional privilege, and of
confidentiality, and, most importantly, with distinction between the two and the differing protection afforded to each in law
Privilege is the protection from evidential use of certain confidential matter
It has its true basis in a fundamental right to give and take legal advice with complete confidence that communications
between legal practitioner and client are protected
Legal professional privilege applies to confidential communications passing between client and legal adviser (counsel,
attorney or in-house professionally qualified legal adviser), for the purpose of giving and receiving legal advice generally; or
for the purpose of existing or contemplated litigation
Legal Professional privilege can also lawfully be claimed in respect of confidential communications between Government and
its salaried legal advisers when they amount to the equivalent of an independent adviser’s confidential advice
It applies to disclosure in judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings, and to all forms of compulsory disclosure – such as search
warrants and statutory notices to produce documents – except where clear language in a statute overrides such privilege
Information is protected by privilege. If such information is contained in a document, the document is privileged
If the document is contained in a file containing a number of documents, the entire file does not become immune to protection
Professional privilege does not apply to:
- Documents which are not otherwise privileged. They do not become privileged merely because your client hands them to
you
- Communications made for purpose of facilitating a crime or fraud ( Harksen v Attorney-General Cape and Others)
- The name of your client – you can be compelled to disclose it
- Facts learned by you with your own senses and where a statute expressly or by implication provides that privilege is
inapplicable
- Where confidentiality of oral evidence is destroyed when such evidence, or confidentiality is likewise destroyed
Without prejudice
Statements without prejudice are usually said to be privileged, but this involves a rather different use of the word “privilege”
from its usual meaning in the law of evidence
Privilege generally means the right of a witness to refuse to disclose evidence, but in connection with statements without
prejudice, it means the right of a party to make statements which cannot be proved against them
Negotiations conducted without prejudice are designed to encourage parties to a dispute to avoid litigation and all expenses,
delays, hostility and inconvenience it usually entails, by resolving their differences amicably in full and frank discussions
If the negotiations result in a settlement, then evidence about the settlement and the negotiations leading up to it should be
made available to the trial Court because the whole basis for non-disclosure has fallen away.
Mere fact that a communication carries words “without prejudice” does not per se confer upon it privilege against disclosure
Conflict of interest
A conflicting interest is one which would affect judgment of lawyer on behalf of or his loyalty to a client or prospective client
Virtually all difficult ethical problems arise from a conflict between a lawyer’s duty towards his client and legal system and his
own interests in remaining an upright person while trying to earn a satisfactory living. In other words by putting his personal
interests ahead of his professional responsibilities.
By virtue of privilege attaching to communications between practitioner and their client, existence or gravity of a conflict will
not, in many cases, become known to anyone besides himself and his client and, in some cases, to the practitioner alone
Examples of conflict of interest situations are:
- Where practitioner is requested to act for both plaintiff and defendant. You cannot act for 2 opposing parties in actual or
contemplated litigation, but in most jurisdictions there is no absolute rule precluding you from acting for both parties in
non-litigious matters
- Not proper to act for both parties to a transaction because they consent or even insist that you act for both of them. A
client can never be arbiter of what professional propriety requires. Knowing problems involved, you should decline to act
for both parties
- Where the instructions or versions of the clients differ ( S v Hollenbach) (S v Jacobs and Another)
- In certain circumstances where different relief is sought
- Where from alleged facts the conclusions drawn favour the one client and do not favour the other
- You should not act for a person in a transaction to which you are yourself a party with an adverse interest. E.g., do not
borrow from a client, or arrange a loan from a client to a person or a company with which you are associated unless your
client obtains independent advice or is in business of money lending
- Where a lawyer acts for a client and it appears that there is a conflict of interest with regard to another client for whom the
lawyer or his partner is acting. (The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Tobias and Another )
- Where you may be sued by a client
- You should not act contrary to interests of a prior client because, apart from fact that you have a duty not to disclose
confidential information you obtained while acting for X, you also have a duty to do best for your new client which
includes reliance on any relevant information in your possession, irrespective of its source
- Becoming sexually intimate with a current client, because it may involve unfair exploitation of lawyer’s fiduciary position
and impairs lawyer’s ability to represent client adequately
- It is undesirable for an attorney appointed as a curator ad litem for purpose of conducting legal proceedings to handle
those legal proceedings themself or through their firm
- Represent both employer and employee simultaneously
Affidavits
Commissioner of oaths shall not administer an oath or affirmation relating to a matter in which he has an interest ( Radue Weir
v Galleus Investments)
Carolus and Another v Saambou Bank Ltd; Smith v Saambou Bank Ltd : independence and objectivity of counsel was
compromised if they identified themselves with issues by also being a witness. The proper and desirable practice required
practitioners to have and maintain an arm’s length association with merits of matters handled by them
Affidavits must be signed in the presence of a Commissioner of Oath
Once you are admitted as an attorney, you become a Commissioner of Oath – remember you cannot take the oath of your
clients because of conflict of interest. Otherwise affidavit is null and void.
Cannot charge fees for acting as Commissioner of Oath
Non-payment of fees
Deposit
Issue summons when they fail to pay your fees. Last resort
Right of retention over the file until compensated for work done (when they terminate your mandate)
- Botha v Mchunu: if entitled to charge a fee, entitled to exercise right of retention
- Free State Agri v Mthembu & Mohammed: followed the Botha decision
Sworn translations
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Horsch: undesirable that attorney of record for plaintiff in an action for provisional
sentence should translate documents to be used on behalf of his client in litigation, even though attorney is a sworn translator
of the Court
Where a practitioner is faced with a conflict of interests, it will be his duty to avoid it
Termination of mandate
The relationship between an attorney and his client is based on mandate
The client can terminate his mandate at any stage, but after an attorney has accepted his brief, he cannot withdraw without
sound reasons
When there is good cause for an attorney to withdraw:
- Improper conduct on the part of the client
- Where client does not accept his attorney’s advice and persists in pursuing or defending an action when his attorney most
strongly advises settlement
- Illness
Witnesses: Criminal
Shabalala v Attorney-General (Tvl):
- Have a right to consult a state witness
- Must approach the Attorney-General for consent
- Someone from attorney-general’s office entitled to be present and record what transpired
Content of Publicity
May not compare the quality of your services with that of another firm
May not criticise other law firms
May not refer to your success rate
May only refer to the name of a client with their consent
Attorney to be identified in every advertisement
May state categories of work
Attorneys are prohibited from any reference to them having been rated by “Best Lawyers”
Directories – Yellow Pages, Hortors
Newsletters
May inform clients of new developments in the law, case law, legislation etc.
Specialisation
A firm may hold itself out as a specialist or expert in any branch of the law
Caution: Higher standard of expertise & skill required
Brochures
May be displayed in reception
May not be misleading
May not claim or imply superiority
May be sent to existing clients
May be sent to former clients only if you know that they are likely to return
Statements as to charges
May not state specific kinds of work for a specific charge
May only specify basis of charges (R2000 per hour)
May not compare your fees with other attorney’s fees
Legal Costs
Magistrates’ Court Rule 33 and Annexure 2; High Court Rules 67, 68, 69, 70
Dates of tariff changes for the HC, MC, and SCA according to Magistrate’s Court Rules and High Court Rules
24 February 2015 – 30 October 2017
1 November 2017 – 10 September 2020
11 September 2020 – 7 July 2022
8 July 2022 – present
Legal Practice Act section 35
Until the investigation of SALRC has been completed and recommendations have been implemented by Minister, fees in
respect of litigious and non-litigious legal services rendered by legal practitioners, juristic entities, law clinics or Legal Aid
South Africa must be in accordance with the tariffs made by s 2 of Rules Board for Courts of Law Act
Rules Board for Courts of Law must, when determining tariffs, consider –
- the importance, significance, complexity, and expertise of the legal services required
- the seniority and experience of the legal practitioner concerned
- the volume of work required, and time spent in respect of the legal services rendered
- the financial implications of the matter at hand
P.116 - HC Rule 70 C 1
Can charge R72 per page for attending the receipt, entry, perusing, considering and filing of—
(a) any summons, petition, affidavit, pleading, advocate's advice and drafts, report, important letter, notice or document;
(b) any formal letter, record stock sheets in voluntary surrenders, judgments or any other material document not elsewhere
specified;
(c) any plan or exhibit or other material document which was necessary for the conduct of the action,
Wasted costs
Costs are “wasted” when the services for which those costs are charged are of no use anymore to the parties to the action.
E.g. Where a party serves a notice of set down for trial on the counterparty and the matter is then postponed, the current notice
of set-down serves no purpose anymore
Preparation costs for the trial also becomes wasted costs.
Non-litigious matters
Where no tariff is prescribed by any law, a legal practitioner may negotiate any reasonable fee structure to be paid by the client
Government Official not empowered to tax or assess:
- Legal Practice Council may assess fees and disbursements to be paid to their members.
Sometimes no statutory tariff is prescribed.
- Registration of a Company;
- Appearance before Tribunals;
- Estate planning;
- Draughting of Contracts;
- Agreements for the Transfer of Shares;
- Other correspondence or negotiations.
- Interrogations Section 73 of the Insolvency Act Enquiries ito Section 417 & 418 of the Companies Act.
- Criminal Court
- Maintenance Court
- Children’s Court
You may agree to a fee (structure) with client
However, LPC may interfere with agreed fees: “Assessment”.
Balancing duties
Ethical duties of practitioner to:
- Client (and non-clients)
- Profession
- Interests of justice (public interest)
- Public
- Colleagues
- Employees
Legal Practitioner’s right: to charge reasonable money for professional services rendered.
Mandate
Preferably written.
Malcolm Lyons & Munro v Abro and Another
Written fees agreement.
Insert your own specific higher tariffs for certain items of work done, or raise the party and party tariff by a percentage.
Deposit
May ask cover for fees and disbursements.
A deposit may not exceed reasonable costs for the case.
Contingency fees
Common law agreement: never allowed
- Fees only if the case is successful and part of the amount recovered in the case.
- Pactum de quota litis; or champerty [agreement to finance litigation] – this was a crime until 1997.
- Unenforceable: Unprofessional conduct
Now a contingency fees agreement i.t.o Contingency Fees Act is allowed.
Tjatji and others v RAF: Contingency fee agreement that does not comply with the Act is invalid.
Contingency Fees Act:
- Fees only recoverable if the case is finalised successfully.
- Criminal Law and Family Law cases are excluded.
- Normal attorney and own client tariff is placed on record and the higher tariff is also recorded in writing.
- Normal fee would be normal attorney and own client fee that could be taxed in absence of a contingency fee agreement
- Higher fee may not exceed the attorney’s normal fees by 100%
- Higher fee may not exceed more than 25% of the total capital obtained with the claim
- Advocates if used, must also sign and become party to the agreement
- Copy of the agreement must be delivered to the client on the date of signing.
- Legal Practice Council promulgated a specific set of rules
The agreement may not provide for an alternative fees agreement in event that main agreement is found to be invalid: Such an
agreement is not authorised under the CFA. The alternative agreement in itself is based on an inflated fee because the quoted
fee is R 2 000.00 per hour, regardless of whether the work is performed by an attorney or any other staff member
There is no basis in law for services of people who are not legal practitioners to be charged for as if they were qualified legal
practitioners. The provision is unreasonable and departs from an important principle that applies to the professional fees of
attorneys described as “the age old approach of reasonableness assessing chargeable fees”.
Office administration
File notes of what?
- Consultations; meetings; phone calls
- Date, duration, nature of attendance, summary of issues dealt with, telefax receipts, e-mail confirmations (read receipts?)
Overreaching
Deliberate excessively high fees = misconduct.
Undercharging
Lower fees than normal is "touting” which is prohibited
But only if a prescribed fee exists
Only pro Deo / pro amico / pro bono may be free
Fee sharing
“ALLOWANCE" to a correspondent attorney is allowed. Usually one third off your fee. (Not compulsory though.)
No sharing (discounts/allowances) allowed with a non-practitioner
Keep accounting records
Criteria to be considered
Criteria for assessment of non-litigious work:
- the amount and importance of the work done;
- the complexity of the matter or the difficulty or novelty of the work or the questions raised;
- the skill, labour, specialised knowledge and responsibility on the part of the member;
- the number and importance of the documents prepared or perused, without necessarily having regard to length;
- the place where and circumstances in which the services or any part thereof were rendered;
- the time expended by the member;
- where money or property is involved, its amount or value;
- the importance of the matter to the client;
- the quality of the work done;
- the experience or seniority of the member;
- any tariff of fees approved by the society for the sole purpose of serving as a guide to the members;
- any tariff or fees prescribed by the Council in accordance with the provisions of the LPA;
- whether the fees and disbursements have been incurred or increased through over-caution, negligence or mistake on the
part of the member.