Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enviromental Laws Mla
Enviromental Laws Mla
Mrs Dorman
18 September 2023
Environmental laws play a huge part in protecting our natural resources, habitats, people and
animals. Moreover, without these environmental laws, there would be no control over the
amount of pollution emitted. And with the growing threats to our climate, the need for
environmental laws increases. Many argue that more stringent regulation would cause significant
change to the economy and job production; however, implementing more stringent
environmental laws is actually substantially beneficial and has no adverse effect on the economy
and the job market, it benefits future generations, as well as increasing the planet's health and
Various regulations have been established to aid in the preservation of our planet. These
regulations ensure some limit or control over the pollution emitted. According to the United
Nations, The Paris Agreement is a legal agreement between 196 countries regarding climate
change that was fully established on November 4th, 2016. It was agreed that countries would
work towards lowering the increase in the global temperature caused by climate change down to
1.5-2°C. This agreement has helped new markets flourish and newer solutions to carbon
emissions, such as the Zero-carbon solution, which provided a change in 25% of Carbon
emissions and is estimated to change 70% of emissions globally by 2030 (“The Paris
Agreement”). The Paris Agreement is crucial for climate change as it brought many nations
Galindo Felix 2
together to fight against climate change; with enforcement of this agreement, there will be a
better outcome for our planet. For instance the UN's goal was to lower the increase of global
temperature, reducing the impact of climate change on our environment. The Center for Climate
and Energy Solutions wrote an article about the Montreal Protocol regarding hazardous
chemicals and the reduction in chlorofluorocarbons, which damages the ozone layer. This treaty
has eliminated around 98% of the uses of these compounds since 1985, when the protocol was
put in place (“The Montreal Protocol”). The Montreal Protocol has been leading the works of
environmental regulation and is a critical fight against climate change. As a result, this regulation
has already changed the use of hazardous compounds that endanger the planet and humans. In
addition, the more regulations that are enforced similarly to the Montreal Protocol provide a
higher chance that other hazardous chemicals will be changed to better alternatives being
beneficial to everyone.
Environmental laws benefit not just one country but the entire world population, as they
have the power to reduce carbon emissions in the atmosphere. According to an article published
countries need to limit pollution and keep global warming under 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The
report states that companies in countries with tighter environmental regulations emit lower levels
of CO2 in their home. Take the case of data collected from 1,800 international companies from
2008 to 2016, their firms average around 29% lower emissions in countries with tighter
regulations. Just from those countries with higher regulation, global CO2 emissions were 15%
lower (“When Environmental Regulations Are Tighter”). It has been proven that the global
impact of CO2 does not only affect the world around us but even the environment close to us.
Thus showing how countries that understand the danger and implement laws controlling the
Galindo Felix 3
amount of pollution have improved the emission of CO2. A research article written by the
London School of Economics and Political Science in 2021 gathered data from 133 countries and
found that added environmental laws would lower CO2 emissions by 0.8% in 3 years and 1.8%
in total (“How Well Do Climate Laws Help”). The data above shows that CO2 emissions
lowered significantly due to the addition of environmental laws. These numbers would increase
even more through enforcing these laws and their stringency, significantly changing the negative
There have been many benefits to stringent pollution regulation, including health
improvements, financial benefits and a decrease in premature deaths . The Natural Resources
Defense Council in 2021 reported the benefits of regulations for air pollution, stating that more
control over pollution can avoid a possible 370,000 deaths due to pollutants in the air. It can also
save around 189,000 admissions to hospitals due to illnesses related to air pollution (Mackenzie,
and Turrentine). The evidence reveals how effective the enforcement of these regulations is. In
this case thousands of deaths and reduction of respiratory illness could be prevented if these laws
are not only made but also enforced. A study conducted by the National Library of Medicine
published in 2017 reports that the Clean Air Act has lowered 70% of pollution and has been the
most successful environmental law in the US. In 2015, there was a 5.9 billion dollar cost-benefit
and prevention of around 660 deaths and thousands of hospital admissions due to illnesses
related to air pollution's effects. Moreover, by 2030, it estimates a saving of 45 billion dollars in
health care bills (McCarthy and Burke). Not only do these laws help prevent deaths, but they also
help with the amount of money spent on medical bills and health care expenses. Hence just one
law in the US was able to save money as well as prevent deaths, and it is estimated that more
Galindo Felix 4
will be prevented. Equally important these laws have shown that they are essential whether it be
On the other side of the debate over environmental law, many people claim that more
stringent regulation would be too costly and not worth it; however, studies show how that fact is
simply not true, and the benefit of environmental laws can sometimes have better outcomes than
not. An article by Khan Academy displays the actual cost of the Clean Air Act between 1970 and
1990. The original cost was around 500 billion dollars, but the estimated cost benefits of the Act
also brought in around 22 trillion dollars, which is more than the cost of when it was
implemented. In 2010, the EPA also estimated that the cost-benefits would average around 110
billion dollars (Khan Academy). As it shows, the average profit from the Clean Air Act exceeded
more than 400% of its original cost. Proving the inaccuracy of the claim of a negative cost
because of environmental laws. A study published by Legal Planet in 2019 showed a significant
increase in green jobs due to newer regulations, employing around 9.5 million workers for the
newer green jobs. This is an increase of 20% from 2012-13 and 2015-16. This also brought 1.3
trillion dollars in sales revenue (Legal Planet). The other argument against environmental
regulation is how much it could affect the job market. However the evidence proves that instead
of a negative effect on the market, there was actually a greater increase in green jobs.
In essence, environmental regulations that reduce pollution, improve one's air quality, and
even financial benefits which can be crucial to further progress into our future. These laws, such
as the Paris Agreement and the Montreal Protocol, also nurture the planet's health. These laws
that have been already implemented show a positive increase in global health. In the financial
sense, the Clean Air Act helps portray the substantial savings in health care and improved
economic performance. Regardless of the arguments mentioning the negative views about the
Galindo Felix 5
topic, stating how more rules and regulations would only cause a loss of jobs and a higher cost
than it is worth, the evidence proves that all of those claims are false. The effects of climate
change can be easily ignored in the name of a growing economy; however, implementing laws
Works Cited
Farber, Dan. “Jobs and Environmental Regulation.” Legal Planet. Legal Planet, 5 Sept. 2022,
legal-planet.org/2022/09/05/jobs-and-environmental-regulation/.
“How Well Do Climate Laws Help Reduce Global Warming?” The London School of Economics
www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/how-well-do-climate-laws-help-reduce-glob
al-warming/.
Jillian Mackenzie, Jeff Turrentine. “Air Pollution: Everything You Need to Know.” Natural
www.nrdc.org/stories/air-pollution-everything-you-need-know#ej.
hbr.org/2019/02/research-when-environmental-regulations-are-tighter-at-home-companie
s-emit-more-abroad#:~:text=Our%20research%20finds%20that%20global,domestic%20e
nvironmental%20regulations%20are%20strict.
“The Benefits and Costs of US Environmental Laws (Article).” Khan Academy. Khan Academy,
n.d.www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/market-failure-a
nd-the-role-of-government/environmental-regulation/a/the-benefits-and-costs-of-u-s-envi
McCarthy, Gina, and Thomas A Burke. “We Need a Strong Environmental Protection Agency:
It’s about Public Health!” American Journal of Public Health. U.S. National Library of
Sept. 2023
Galindo Felix 7
“The Montreal Protocol.” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Center for Climate and
“The Paris Agreement.” United Nations Climate Change. United Nations Climate Change, n.d.