Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Kuchipudi
Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Kuchipudi
Textual verse with diacritics and citation, analyzing how Hermeneutics can be applied
Hermeneutics and Phenomenology are tools in critical academic research in the interpretive
paradigm. Phenomenology is the study of direct and conscious experience of thoughts and ideas
Hermeneutics
Hermeneutics is the study and the philosophy of interpretation. In the field of arts,
philosophy, theology and humanities, hermeneutics plays an important part in interpreting the
Hermeneutics enables us to establish the scope of interpretation and the validity of the
from various perspectives by breaking down the whole (idea or text) into parts that can be stitched
back together into a new, larger whole. The context of the work is very important and it is known to
be ‘unlimited’. Understanding the context of a word used in a text may require linguistic knowledge
which in turn assumes cultural knowledge which requires historical context which might need
This suggests that the expressions of experience and context need to be studied. First, the
established. The success of this depends on educative nature of the interpretation. Education is the
acquisition of knowledge and the enlargement of that knowledge as it was previously known, and
the enlargement of the experience of the person(s) seeking the knowledge in the context of
themselves and the world around them. The final interpretation needs to inform others on the
original idea along with any alternative ideas the interpreter might have on the original idea.
The methodology used to acquire this knowledge, is known to be circular. The Hermeneutics
Circle is a tool that helps break the whole of the idea or text into parts that can be independently
interpreted and brought back into context for an interpretation of the whole. This is in sharp
interpretation come from a foundation of one’s beliefs, hermeneutics calls for a constant revaluation
of these beliefs and the context of these beliefs. The foundations can thus continually shift based on
the understanding of the context. This gives rise to the circularity of interpretation where knowledge
can be renewed by exploring further possible interpretations of the so-called foundational beliefs.
This leads to the concept of whole and parts, where the sum of the parts is not necessarily, in fact
not certainly, equal to the whole. It is equally important to understand an idea, or a literary work, in
its whole, while deriving new interpretations through the parts. Hence, using the Hermeneutics
Circle, one continually moves between the smaller and larger units of meaning to arrive at the overall
interpretation.
In addition to understanding a whole through its parts, interpretation itself can be looked
upon as an art form. Linguistic, grammatical and psychological contexts can inform each other’s
perspectives, while the person(s) performing the interpretation can being in their unique
have applied hermeneutics to philosophy of existence, self-interpretation and that of time. This
drives new areas of study in humanism and art, and the validity of truth and experience. Thus, an
interesting area of impact could be how tradition and language influence prejudice and thus
interpretation of truth. Apart from language itself, linguistic forms such as metaphors, symbols, and
narratives (like proverbs) also form the self-understanding of human experience. This can be
overcome using tools such as the repetitive cycle of interpretation through these parts.
There is a danger that these methods might take the researchers into a recursive exploration
that may never end. Deconstruction and critical theory can stand to lose if guardrails are not put
around this hermeneutical circle of exploration. Also, hermeneutics and the concept of constant
change in understanding leaves little room for dissent and argumentative discussions with a loss in
practical interpretation. Focusing on the educative success and not on the ideological success can
Phenomenology
and significance of objects, concepts and peoples. Phenomenology studies the structure of
experiences including perception, thought, memory, imagination, desire, emotion, awareness, and
action.
It is based on research by Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger in the 20th century CE and
aims to study reality as experienced through our senses, understanding consciousness in its true
form using first hand subjective experience. This is in sharp contrast to the rationalist, who might
look at a concept in pure scientific terms. For example, a rationalist might define time in seconds,
minutes and hours whereas phenomenology may define time with respect to how one may
experience time with respect to another object (running in hot sun) or another person (spending
time with a loved one). Essentially, it describes an objective process to study subjective experience.
phenomenon being studied. Intentionality postulates that consciousness must almost always be
about something, in relation to and in interaction to the contents of experiences. Study of these
reduction, where the phenomenon being studied is reduced to its rawest experience. This enables
the conscious experience to focus on the core phenomenon. Another method called the Eidetic
reduction attempts to find essence of the phenomenon. In this method, the researcher would vary
all possible attributes to understand the basic essence or the imaginary variation of the
phenomenon. This process can get us to the universal essence of such types of phenomenon,
that context cannot be separated from experience, and there cannot be one underlying essence.
others, linguistic awareness, and social interaction. This study of experience is closer to the Eastern
areas of philosophy like the chakra system and meditation (2021, The Living Philosophy).
The challenge is studying the first-person experience is that experience is often not recorded
while it is being felt. This is hence a reflection after the phenomenon has been experienced.
However, the familiarity of common experiences can be studied and characterized. This enables us
to connect the experiences and describe them in relation to other areas of interpretive research in
The study of experiences is related to other areas of philosophy including ontology (study of
what is, what is real and of being), epistemology (how we know and study of knowledge), logic (how
we reason and study of valid reasoning) and ethics (how we should act given a set of knowledge and
For this exercise, I picked a famous poem by Bommera Pothana. Cited by my mother CAS
Lakshmi, this is a poem from the Prahalāda Caritam skanda of the poet’s Śrimad Bhāgavatam.
iṁdu galaḍaṁdu leḍani
Using the hermeneutics circle, the poem can be translated loosely based on the
understanding of the language and context. Since I have personally heard this poem a few times
since my childhood, I have a good understanding of the story and the setting for the verse. This fact,
in of itself, forms a basis for how the interpretation may be approached. The meaning of the first
draft of the whole may be inherent in its familiarity. As we go into the parts, each word can now be
translated for its actual meaning. Interestingly, none of the words are new, except for their diction.
A few nuances also come to the fore, including terms like cakri and dānavāgraņi. These are distinct
references to Viṣņu and Hiraņyakaśpa as the one who holds the discus and the one who is the king of
the asurās respectively. Does this form the whole or the part, that I understand the reference of
these words?
The language used is also another facet of interpretation, where the meaning is relevant in
the modern times as well as when it was written. The context of the story is of course a great factor
in understanding the poem. The poem, which is a part of the whole work, can be used as a basis to
explore the entire chapter or the work, to understand the various monikers used for the two
protagonists. Did the work propagate these monikers to mainstream understanding or vice versa?
This method of interpretation takes us closer to the historical and linguistic context of the
References
Smith, David Woodruff, "Phenomenology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/>.
George, Theodore, "Hermeneutics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition),
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvA9FxsM9G8>.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIEzc__BBxs>.