Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is Organizational Development
What Is Organizational Development
O.D. is a comprehensive strategy for organization improvement. O.D. is a long range effort to
improve an organization’s problem solving and renewal processes, particularly through a more effective
and collaborative management culture.
It is known as both a field of scientific study and inquiry and a field of science that focuses on
understanding and managing the systematic changes of organizations.
1. Problem identification—Diagnosis:
O.D. program starts with the identification of the problem in the organisation. Correct diagnosis of the
problem will provide its causes and determine the future action needed.
O.D. consultant attempts to transform diagnosis of the problem into a proper action plan involving the
overall goals for change, determination of basic approach for attaining these goals and the sequence of
detailed scheme for implementing the approach.
0. D. is a long-term process. So there is a great need for careful monitoring to get process feedback
whether the O.D. programme is going on well after its implementation or not. This will help in making
suitable modifications, if necessary. For evaluation of O.D. program, the use of critic sessions, appraisal
of change efforts and comparison of pre- and post-training behavioral patterns are quite effective.
Plus, models are not static and will change over time – by solving one set of problems you create another
down the line, you’ll rely on rules until they no longer become workable and efficient relationships will
eventually become inefficient.
With OD it’s vital to remember it’s not about finding the Holy Grail. There is no one finite answer but
rather a series of small wins over a period of time. However, there are three defined models that are useful
to look at:
Lewin’s Model
This model is based on the idea that before you introduce a change your organisation must be prepared
for change and motivated to change. Lewin has defined it as unfreezing, changing and refreezing.
Unfreezing - In order to change, old behaviours must be unlearned and individuals within your
organisation should be encouraged to shake things up. Lewin calls this unfreezing – motivating and
preparing people for change while at the same time minimising resistance to change.
Changing – Having unlearned old behaviours and becoming receptive to new behaviours individuals are
now ready to substitute new attitudes and methods of working for old ones.
Refreezing - New attitudes and behaviours are established as the new status quo. Those new ways of
operating are stabilised and reinforced.
In this model change occurs when management is stimulated by outside pressures. This motivates
management to introduce change and then it follows a sequential course of action: pressure on top
management, diagnosis of the problem, invention of a solution and reinforcement of new habits through
positive results.
Leavitt’s Model
Leavitt’s model is based on the premise that all systems – structure, people, technology and tasks -
interact with one another so if there is pressure or change in one system it will have an effect on all the
others. In essence, it means you can’t introduce change in one area without considering what the
implications are for all other areas.
Different models will suit different business and at different times. What works for one challenge you’re
facing may not be suitable for another. For example, if you’re facing a technical problem this can be dealt
with by a top-down approach – the use of analytical models and expertise will help resolve a technical
issue and it has a definitive answer. The problem is identified, it is analysed, the solutions are found and
they are implemented, much like Griener’s model.
Complex issues aren’t dealt with well with this analytical approach because there isn’t a single right or
wrong answer. Instead, Lewin’s model which works to increase the adaptive capacity of an organization
would be better – an adaptive challenge may require a sea change in your staff thinking or culture before
it can be dealt with, there might be multiple solutions which could apply and even if you resolve that
issue, it will eventually lead to another problem, which is then solved and then leads onto another
problem.
Organizational Development Practitioners are people who are entrusted with the job to carry
out the planned change process in the organization. These are the people with the ultimate
responsibility to development and create organizational wide effectiveness through challenging and
changing its current practices. OD Practitioner normally refers to people who do Organizational
Development.
Organizational Development Practitioners are people who are entrusted with the job to carry
out the planned change process in the organization. These are the people with the ultimate
responsibility to development and create organizational wide effectiveness through challenging and
changing its current practices. OD Practitioner normally refers to people who do Organizational
Development. These are the people who support in favor of the change initiative and assist others to
implement Organizational Development interventions. Normally the Organizational Development
Practitioners are either the OD Specialist or Leaders and Managers who bring change in their work
domain.
REFERENCES:
https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/management/organisation-management/
organisational-development-o-d-meaning-objectives-and-steps/9150
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/organizational-development-definition-
meaning/
http://www.mnestudies.com/human-resource/organizational-development-practitioners