Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Common Cause of Spinal Cord Dysfunction in Older Persons

A patient information handout on cervical WILLIAM F. YOUNG, M.D., spondylotic myelopathy, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania written by the author of this article, is provided on page 1073. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. The aging process results in degenerative changes in the cervical spine that, in advanced stages, can cause compression of the spinal cord. Symptoms often develop insidiously and are characterized by neck stiffness, arm pain, numbness in the hands, and weakness of the hands and legs. The differential diagnosis includes any condition that can result in myelopathy, such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and masses (such as metastatic tumors) that press on the spinal cord. The diagnosis is confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging that shows narrowing of the spinal canal caused by osteophytes, herniated discs and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. Choice of treatment remains controversial, surgical procedures designed to decompress the spinal cord and, in some cases, stabilize the spine are successful in many patients. (Am Fam Physician 2000;62:1064-70,1073.)

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common spinal cord disorder in persons
more than 55 years of age in North America and perhaps in the world. As the number of older persons in the United States increases, the incidence of CSM will most likely increase. In a prospective study designed to more accurately define the incidence of CSM, 23.6 percent of 585 patients with tetraparesis or paraparesis admitted to a United Kingdom regional neuroscience center had CSM. The overall prevalence in this population is unknown.
1

Pathophysiology of CSM
Spondylosis refers to the degenerative changes that occur in the spine, including degeneration of the joints, intervertebral discs, ligaments and connective tissue of the cervical vertebrae. There are three important pathophysiologic factors in the development of CSM: (1) static mechanical; (2) dynamic mechanical; and (3) spinal cord ischemia. Static mechanical factors result in the reduction of spinal canal diameter and spinal cord compression. With aging, the intervertebral discs dry out resulting in loss of disc height. This process puts greater stress on the articular cartilage of the vertebrae and their respective end plates. Osteophytic spurs develop at the margins of these end plates (Figure 1).
2

FIGURE 1. Axial computerized tomography scan showing ventral osteophytes pressing into the spinal canal.

Osteophytes stabilize adjacent vertebrae whose hypermobility is caused by the degeneration of the disc.
3

The disc also calcifies, further stabilizing the vertebrae. Osteophytes increase the weight-bearing surface of the end plates and, therefore, decrease the effective force being placed on them. In addition to osteophytic overgrowth, the ligamentum flavum may stiffen and buckle into the spinal cord dorsally. Osteophytic overgrowth ventrally and, in some cases, buckling of the ligamentum flavum dorsally can cause direct compression of the spinal cord resulting in myelopathy (clinically evident spinal cord dysfunction). Symptoms are believed to develop when the spinal cord has been reduced by at least 30 percent.
4

Dynamic mechanical factors relate to the fact that the normal motion of the cervical spine may aggravate spinal cord damage precipitated by direct mechanical static compression. During flexion, the spinal cord lengthens, thus stretching over ventral osteophytic ridges. During extension, the ligamentum flavum may buckle into the spinal cord causing a reduction of available space for the spinal cord (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2. Dynamic mechanical factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. (Left) During flexion, the spinal cord is stretched over ventral osteophytic ridges. (Right) During extension, the ligamentum flavum may buckle into the spinal cord reducing space for the cord.

Spinal cord ischemia probably plays a role in the development of CSM, particularly in later stages. Histopathologic changes in the spinal cord consistent with ischemia have been observed in patients with CSM. However, the precise mechanism for spinal cord ischemia is not completely understood. Other factors associated with the development of spondylosis include heavy labor, posture and genetic predisposition. Also, 70 percent of patients with Down syndrome have an increased incidence of spondylosis by 50 years of age.
5,6 7,8 9

Clinical History
Common complaints of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy include neck stiffness, crepitus in the

Patients with CSM will generally have these symptoms: neck with movement, brachialgia, a dull "achy" feeling in the arm, and neck stiffness; unilateral or bilateral deep, aching neck, numbness or tingling in the hands. arm and shoulder pain; and possibly stiffness or clumsiness while walking (Table 1). CSM usually develops insidiously. In the early stages of CSM, complaints of neck stiffness are common because of the presence of advanced cervical spondylosis. Other common complaints include crepitus in the neck with movement; brachialgia, which is characterized as a stabbing pain in the pre- or postaxial border of the arm, elbow, wrist or fingers; a dull "achy" feeling in the arm; and numbness or tingling in the hands.
10

Pain following a stereotypical dermatomal distribution is referred to as a radiculopathy rather than a myelopathy. For example, in patients with a disc herniation between the sixth and seventh vertebrae, pain radiates into the shoulder, upper arm, elbow, and index and middle fingers. It is typically unilateral. Numbness and weakness follow the same distribution. Some patients will exhibit signs and symptoms of radiculopathy and myelopathy. The hallmark symptom of CSM is weakness or stiffness in the legs. Patients with CSM may also present with unsteadiness of gait. Weakness or clumsiness of the hands in conjunction with the legs is also characteristic of CSM. Symptoms may be asymmetric particularly in the legs. Loss of sphincter control or frank incontinence is rare; however, some patients may complain of slight hesitancy on urination.
10,11

TABLE 1 Clinical Presentation of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy


Common symptoms Clumsy or weak hands Leg weakness or stiffness Neck stiffness Pain in shoulders or arms Unsteady gait Common signs Atrophy of the hand musculature Hyperreflexia Lhermitte's sign (electric shock-like sensation down the center of the back following flexion of the neck) Sensory loss

Physical and Neurologic Examination


The physical and neurologic examination is used to confirm the presence of spinal cord dysfunction. Flexion of the neck may cause a generalized "electric shock-like" sensation down the center of the back, referred to as Lhermitte's sign (Table 1). Atrophy of the hands, particularly the intrinsic musculature, may be present.
10

Sensory abnormalities have a variable pattern on examination. Loss of vibratory sense or proprioception in the extremities (especially the feet) can occur. Superficial sensory loss may be asymmetric and persons are variably affected. The sensory examination may be confounded by the presence of diabetes mellitus and a concurrent peripheral neuropathy.

A characteristic physical finding of CSM is hyperreflexia. The biceps and supinator reflexes (C5 and C6) may be absent, with a brisk triceps reflex (C7). This pattern is almost pathognomonic of

cord compression because of cervical spondylosis at the C5-C6 interspace. Ankle clonus and Babinski's sign (pathologic extension of the great toe elicited by stroking the foot) in the feet may also be revealed. Hoffmann's sign (a reflex contraction of the thumb and index finger after nipping the middle finger) is a subtle indicator of spinal cord dysfunction. A stiff or spastic gait is also characteristic of CSM in its later stages.
12

When cervical spondylosis is isolated to the C6-7, C7-T1 spinal levels, the arm reflexes may be normal. A hyperactive pectoralis muscle reflex elicited by tapping the pectoralis tendon in the deltopectoral groove causing adduction and internal rotation of the shoulder is a sign of cord compression in the upper cervical spine (C2-3, C3-4 spinal levels). The "dynamic" Hoffmann's sign (when a typical Hoffmann's sign is elicited after having the patient flex and extend the neck multiple times) may be an indicator of early CSM. Hyperreflexia may be absent in CSM patients who have concurrent diabetes, causing a peripheral neuropathy (Table 1).
13 14

Imaging and Diagnostic Studies


Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine is the procedure of choice during the initial screening process of patients with suspected CSM. MRI is noninvasive and provides images of the spine and spinal cord in several planes (Figure 3). In addition to giving an assessment of the degree of spinal canal stenosis, an MRI can identify intrinsic spinal cord lesions that can also present with myelopathy (e.g., tumors). High signal changes seen in the spinal cord of patients with CSM may indicate myelomalacia or permanent spinal cord damage.
15

Computed tomography (CT) is showing narrowing of the spinal canal as a result of complementary to MRI (Table 2). CT may anterior herniated discs/osteophytes (left) and posterior buckling of hypertrophied ligamentum give a more accurate assessment of the flavum (right). [corrected] amount of canal compromise because it is superior to MRI in evaluating bone (osteophytes). Myelography or the intrathecal injection of a contrast agent is used in conjunction with CT. Since the advent of MRI, the use of myelography has decreased; however, it still provides useful information in some instances for surgical planning. Plain radiographs alone are of little use as an initial diagnostic procedure.
16

FIGURE 3. Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging

Electromyography is rarely useful in most patients with CSM; however, it may help in the exclusion of specific syndromes such as peripheral neuropathy. Somatosensory evoked potentials

(SSEPs) provide a more direct assessment of spinal cord function (e.g., dorsal column function) than electromyography. However, SSEPs are nonspecific and therefore their use as a diagnostic tool is undetermined.
17

The presence of myelopathy on neurologic examination is not unique to CSM. Therefore, it is important to exclude other diagnoses that present in a similar fashion. In one study, it was found that 14.3 percent of patients who underwent surgery for CSM were later found to have other diagnoses. This finding could be an explanation for the lack of neurologic improvement after surgery in some cases.
18

A characteristic physical finding of cervical spondylotic myelopathy is hyperreflexia.

Differential Diagnosis

Because cervical spondylosis is a universal finding in the elderly population, it is important to correlate cervical spondylotic changes with sensorimotor abnormalities identified on examination. If there is a lack of correlation, there may be a demyelinating process (e.g., multiple sclerosis). MRI is useful in this situation for identifying areas of demyelination in the spinal cord and cerebrum. In addition, a cerebrospinal fluid examination (e.g., oligoclonal bands) and visual evoked responses are important diagnostic adjuncts.
10

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is another neurodegenerative disorder that can be confused with CSM. The absence of extremity sensory abnormalities on neurologic examination of a patient with myelopathy should alert the physician to the possibility of ALS. The presence of fasciculations on examination and a denervation pattern on electromyography serve as confirmatory evidence for ALS (Table 3). Other conditions that can mimic CSM on presentation are primary spinal cord tumors, syringomyelia, extramedullary conditions (e.g., metastatic tumors), subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord (vitamin B deficiency), hereditary spastic paraplegia, normal pressure hydrocephalus and spinal cord infarction (Table 4). Most of these conditions can easily be distinguished from CSM based on characteristic MRI findings.
12 10

TABLE 2 Diagnostic Criteria for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy


Characteristic symptoms (leg stiffness, hand weakness) Characteristic signs (hyperreflexia, atrophy of hands) MRI or CT (showing spinal stenosis and cord compression as a result of osteophyte overgrowth, disc herniation, ligamentum hypertrophy)

MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; CT = computed tomography.

Treatment
Evaluating the efficacy of any particular treatment strategy for CSM is difficult because reports show that as many as 18 percent of patients with CSM will improve spontaneously, 40 percent will stabilize and approximately 40 percent will deteriorate if no treatment is

given. Unfortunately, the current understanding of CSM does not allow physicians to predict the course of a patient. Also, the literature regarding various treatment strategies (surgical and nonsurgical) for CSM is flawed because of a lack of prospective controlled studies.
19

TABLE 3 Differential Diagnosis: CSM vs. ALS


Feature Age MRI findings Fasciculations Atrophy of arms Atrophy of legs Denervation CSM Older than 55 Spondylosis Absent Present Absent Absent ALS

TABLE 4 Conditions That Mimic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy on Presentation


Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Older than 55 Spondylosis Present Present Present Present

Extrinsic neoplasia (metastatic tumors) Hereditary spastic paraplegia Intrinsic neoplasia (tumors of spinal cord parenchyma) Multiple sclerosis Normal pressure hydrocephalus Spinal cord infarction Syringomyelia Vitamin B deficiency
12

CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

Nonsurgical Treatment In patients who are mildly affected by CSM, a "careful watching" approach can be taken. A variety of nonsurgical strategies have been used with variable success for the treatment of CSM. These include cervical traction, cervical immobilization (collar or neck brace), skull traction and physical therapy. Cervical immobilization is the most commonly used treatment in the United States. Some studies demonstrate the benefits of wearing a brace, while other studies show that immobilization does not improve the patient's condition. It has also been reported that symptomatic patients may deteriorate neurologically during bracing, causing many to advocate earlier surgical intervention. A nonsurgical approach is usually inadvisable.
20 20,21

Surgical Treatment Once frank myelopathy occurs, surgical intervention is necessary. The primary goal of surgery is to decompress the spinal cord, thus giving the neural elements more room. Traditionally, cervical laminectomy, a posterior approach, has been used for surgical treatment of CSM. However, over the past 20 years, it has been increasingly recognized that

The primary goal of surgery is to decompress the spinal cord, thus giving the neural elements more room.

laminectomy is not appropriate for all patients. Further neurologic deterioration after laminectomy is attributed to a development of latent instability of the spine with development of kyphotic spinal deformities and to the inability of posterior approaches to directly address anterior vector compression secondary to osteophytic overgrowth. For this reason, anterior approaches to the spine have been increasingly used. Through an anterior cervical approach, one can directly address and remove osteophytes and disc material for decompression of the spinal cord. Also, with the addition of interposition bone grafts and, in some cases, cervical plates (instrumentation) to promote spinal fusion, the development of instability of the neck can be prevented. A variety of factors must be considered when deciding whether to use an anterior or posterior approach, but the primary goal of both approaches is to provide adequate space for the spinal cord (Figure 4).
22

FIGURE 4. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of patient in Figure 3 showing adequate decompression of the spinal cord after multilevel posterior laminectomy.[corrected]

Many surgical series show "improvement," or at least stabilization of symptoms with posterior and anterior approaches. After reviewing the surgical literature, one investigator found that the rate of successful outcome after surgery was at best 50 percent with the potential for significant postsurgical morbidity. The older surgical literature has been criticized because of the uncertainty of whether nonspondylotic myelopathy conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, ALS) had been sufficiently excluded before surgery.
22 22

A variety of factors determine success after surgery. Factors that may portend a less than satisfactory surgical outcome include severe preoperative neurologic deficits, abnormal signal changes within the spinal cord and/or spinal cord atrophy seen on MRI, and severity of cord compression seen on radiographic studies.
23-25

Final Comment
CSM is a common cause of disability in older persons. Because spondylosis is a universal finding as patients age, it is important to correlate clinical history and neurologic findings with radiographic studies. MRI is the most useful radiographic study for quantifying the degree of stenosis and excluding other pathologies. Current treatment remains controversial with regard to surgical and nonsurgical management. In the future, prospective randomized trials may be required to definitively establish treatment guidelines. Currently, surgical decompression is appropriate for many symptomatic patients.

This is a corrected version of the [article] that appeared in print.

Cervical spondylosis is a common degenerative condition of the cervical spine. It is most likely caused by age-related changes in the intervertebral disks. Clinically, several syndromes, both overlapping and distinct, are seen. These include neck and shoulder pain, suboccipital pain and headache, radicular symptoms, and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). As disk degeneration occurs, mechanical stresses result in osteophytic bars, which form along the ventral aspect of the spinal canal. Frequently, associated degenerative changes in the facet joints, hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament occur. All can contribute to impingement on pain-sensitive structures (eg, nerves, spinal cord), thus creating various clinical syndromes. Spondylotic changes are often observed in the aging population. However, only a small percentage of patients with radiographic evidence of cervical spondylosis are symptomatic. Treatment is usually conservative in nature; the most commonly used treatments are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical modalities, and lifestyle modifications. Surgery is occasionally performed. Many of the treatment modalities for cervical spondylosis have not been subjected to rigorous, controlled trials. Surgery is advocated for cervical radiculopathy in patients who have intractable pain, progressive symptoms, or weakness that fails to improve with conservative therapy. Surgical indications for cervical spondylotic myelopathy remain somewhat controversial, but most clinicians recommend operative therapy over conservative therapy for moderate-to-severe myelopathy.

Cervical spondylosis is the result of disk degeneration. As disks age, they fragment, lose water, and collapse. Initially, this starts in the nucleus pulposus. This results in the central annular lamellae buckling inward while the external concentric bands of the annulus fibrosis bulge outward. This causes increased mechanical stress at the cartilaginous end plates at the vertebral body lip. Subperiosteal bone formation occurs next, forming osteophytic bars that extend along the ventral aspect of the spinal canal and, in some cases, encroach on nervous tissue.[1, 2] These most likely stabilize adjacent vertebrae, which are hypermobile as a result of the lost disk material. [3, 4] In addition, hypertrophy of the uncinate process occurs, often encroaching on the ventrolateral portion of the intervertebral foramina.[1] Nerve root irritation also may occur as intervertebral discal proteoglycans are degraded.[5] Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, a condition often seen in certain Asian populations, can occur with cervical spondylosis. This condition can be an additional contributing source of severe anterior cord compression.[6] Cervical spondylotic myelopathy occurs as a result of several important pathophysiological factors. These are static-mechanical, dynamic-mechanical, spinal cord ischemia, and stretchassociated injury. As ventral osteophytes develop, the cervical cord space becomes narrowed; thus, patients with congenitally narrowed spinal canals (10-13 mm) are predisposed to developing cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Age-related hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum and thickening of bone may result in further narrowing of the cord space.[2, 7, 8] Additionally, degenerative kyphosis and subluxation are fairly common findings that may further contribute to cord compression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.[6, 9] Dynamic factors relate to the fact that normal flexion and extension of the cord may aggravate spinal cord damage initiated by static compression of the cord. During flexion, the spinal cord lengthens, resulting in it being stretched over ventral osteophytic bars. During extension, the ligamentum flavum may buckle into the cord, pinching the cord between the ligaments and the anterior osteophytes.[7, 10]

Spinal cord ischemia also most likely plays a role in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Histopathologic changes seen in persons with cervical spondylotic myelopathy frequently involve gray matter, with minimal white matter involvementa pattern consistent with ischemic insult. Ischemia most likely occurs at the level of impaired microcirculation.[11] Stretch-associated injury has recently been implicated as a pathophysiologic factor in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.[12] The narrowing of the spinal canal and abnormal motion seen with cervical spondylotic myelopathy may result in increased strain and shear forces, which can cause localized axonal injury to the cord.

You might also like