Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 ASK-2019 UFF Final
8 ASK-2019 UFF Final
1
M.Sc. André Leonhardt,
2
Dr.-Ing. Amar Al-Obaidi,
3
Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Kunke,
4
Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Verena Kräusel,
Professorship for Forming and Joining, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Processes,
Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz
5
Dr.-Ing. Gerrit Kurz,
6
Dr. rer. nat. Dietmar Letzig,
Magnesium Innovation Centre, Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht,
Geesthacht
1
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
1 Introduction
The trend of higher product individuality accompanied by decreasing batch
sizes and increasing variety of designs also takes place in the field of sheet
metal forming. Hence, there is a great demand for flexible forming technolo-
gies like single point incremental forming (SPIF). The potential of SPIF
technology is the shaping of individual sheet metal parts in small lot sizes
using low cost tooling and fixtures. Furthermore, it can be applied on con-
ventional CNC milling machines. In SPIF the sheet metal is formed locally in
a progressive, kinematic process. In the last decades the incremental sheet
forming of steel and aluminium was investigated in several research projects
[1]. Further innovative products can be obtained by applying this technology
on additional lightweight materials like magnesium or composites requiring
an adaptation of the conventional forming processes.
Magnesium is the lightest used engineering metal, being 75% lighter than
steel and 35% lighter than aluminium [2]. Due to the high specific strength
and its almost inexhaustible availability it could be used for lightweight
structural parts in the automobile and aircraft industry. Due to its structure
the formability of magnesium sheets is low at room temperature restricting
its applications in industry. Intensive research has been carried out on the
SPIF of magnesium with different heating methods. Radiation heating was
investigated using halogen lamps [3] and a heating band was used in [4].
Furthermore, the SPIF of AZ31 was tested with heating by hot air blowers
[5] and by global [6] as well as local [7] electrical resistance heating. As a
result, the optimum formability of magnesium sheets was found in the
temperature range between 150 °C and 300 °C by activating the slip sys-
tems on the prismatic and pyramidal planes of the hexagonal close packed
(HCP) structure in magnesium sheets [5].
Another promising light weight material is glass-fiber reinforced polymer
(GFRP) which is widely applied in the production of lightweight structures
due to its high strength and corrosion resistance. Thermoforming is a typical
production process for GFRP being cost-intensive in case of production of
2
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
prototype parts or small lot sizes. Major challenges in the GFRP forming
process are the poor rigidity, its specific characteristic of being hard to form
into complex shapes and the necessity of heating. The heating process in
SPIF can be applied globally [3] or locally [8]. Furthermore, PVC polymer
sheets were also formed at room temperature by SPIF as demonstrated in
[9]. The overall aim of this work is to successfully form the magnesium and
GFRP sheets into cone shape by applying the hot SPIF process.
2 Investigated materials
Commercial AZ31 sheets of 2 mm thickness are utilized for the SPIF tests.
These sheets were produced by the twin roll casting process and then rolled
down to the final gauge. Further information about the material can be found
in [10]. The glass-fibre reinforced polymer PA6GF47 was tested in SPIF
experiments. The glass fibres are arranged as twill weave in the matrix of
polyamide 6 (PA6). The thickness of the glass-fibre reinforced thermoplastic
polymer is 2.5 mm. The mechanical and thermal properties of PA6GF47 are
listed in Table 1.
3
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
plates with 10 mm thickness to fix the material during forming. The support-
ing plate has a working area with a diameter of 110 mm to reduce the
bending effect of the specimen edge. Furthermore, a second supporting
plate of 5 mm steel sheet was placed exactly under the workpiece and
slotted (Figure 1a). Due to this setup the hot air flows through the channels
to the outside at the top of the device near the sheet material. The result is a
faster and more homogenous heating of the sheet.
(a) (b)
Figure 1: (a) SPIF set-up with hot air heating, (b) experimental equipment
The applied hot air blower (4.5 kW) provides a maximum air temperature of
650 °C and a variable air flow up to 400 l/min. A closed loop PID controler is
installed controlling the sheet temperature (Figure 1b). The temperature of
the material is measured by three thermocouples (type K) welded on the
supporting steel plate at the corner of the working area. Two thermocouples
are used to record the temperature and the third one provides the input for
the PID controller. At first, the air from the hot air blower has a temperature
of 650 °C. When the desired sheet temperature is reached, the air tempera-
ture is continuously reduced to obtain a constant sheet temperature. This
system offers an effective thermal control and avoids high thermal gradients.
4
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
5
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
experiments supported by hot air heating. This shows the relevant role of
the temperature in the forming of magnesium sheet. No cracks were detect-
ed through the sheet thickness for all forming tests. Whereas, an orange
peel effect appeared on the outer surface being not in contact with the
forming tool. For this reason, it is very difficult to determine the maximum
forming angle because the abort criterion has to be defined by the amount
or the characteristic of the orange peel effect. The highest wall angle being
formed without cracks is 50° at 300 °C showing a large amount of orange
peel and surface cracks on the outer surface (Figure 3b).
(a) (b)
Figure 3: Inner and outer surface of a cone with a wall angle of (a) 20°
formed at room temperature and (b) 50° formed at 300 °C
The inner and outer surfaces of the cones were scanned by the optical
measurement system GOM ATOS. The distance between the two surfaces
is analysed in order to obtain the thickness distribution. Furthermore the
sheet thickness after forming is compared to the sine law, which is a theo-
retical formula for the calculation of the final sheet thickness t1 as function of
the initial sheet thickness t0 and the wall angle α:
∗ sin 90° (1)
Figure 4 shows the sheet thickness distribution as an example. At first the
sheet thickness is higher than the theoretical thickness (area II), which is
due to the distance between the backing plate and the starting point of the
forming process on the sheet. For this reason the sheet can bend freely in
this sector, causing less sheet thinning.
Figure 4: Sheet thickness distribution compared with sine law for 30° wall
angle cone formed at 300 °C
6
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
The thickness decreases steeply in this area until a nearly constant sheet
thickness is reached which is in acceptable agreement with the sine law for
all formed wall angles (area III). Furthermore, there is a severe reduction of
sheet thickness at the top of the cone due to the tool path (area IV).
7
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
that the upper steel sheet temperature was 45 °C lower than the PA6GF47
temperature.
Subsequently, the cone-shaped parts were formed with wall angles ranging
from 25° to 55°. Furthermore, numerous experiments were performed to
produce a cone with a wall angle of 56°, but all of these tests failed and
resulted in severely cracked cones. Figure 6a shows the cone shape with a
55° wall angle being formed with the above mentioned method. The sliding
of PA6GF47 during forming is very important allowing the PA6GF47 to flow.
It is not necessary to compress the PA6GF47 by the fixing clamps during
the clamping the workpiece combination. The geometry of the formed parts
was measured by GOM ATOS optical scanning measuring device. In
addition, the average sliding distance was optimized for all formed cones, as
indicated in Figure 6b. It can be seen that the sliding distance rises with
increasing wall angle at first, but sharply decreases after reaching the wall
angle of 50°. The glass fibres arranged as twill weave moved freely in the
PA6 matrix during SPIF for all cones until a wall angle of 50°. For higher
wall angles wrinkling of the PA6GF47 occurred.
(a) (b)
Figure 6: (a) Formed cone with a wall angle of 55°, (b) relation between
wall angle and sliding distance
The SPIF process is well known for its high strains and excessive thinning in
sheet metal parts after forming. The analysis of the formed cones made of
PA6GF47 focusses on cracks and voids in the material. Therefore, micro-
scopic pictures were taken from different formed zones of the PA6GF47
(Figure 7a). The microscopic sample taken from zone I shows that the
cracks were concentrated in the bottom area near the bending radius
(Figure 7b). In addition, the largest cracks in the samples were found in the
50° and 55° wall angles because of the increased compressive stresses of
the woven fibres caused by higher displacements. In contrast, no cracks
were found in the wall area zone II. Whereas, many voids can be found in
zone III of the formed PA6GF47. These voids are called air voids and
originated in the GFRP sheet during heating and forming as investigated in
[13]. These voids are also presented in vacuum bagging as presented in
[14]. Moreover, the void measurement showed that the number and size of
voids increases with increasing part wall angle.
8
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
(a) (b)
Figure 7: (a) Cross sectional view of the formed cone, (b) microscopic
pictures of PA6GF47 taken from the 55° wall angle cone
6 References
[1] W. C. Emmens, G. Sebastiani, and van den Boogaard A.H., “The
technology of Incremental Sheet Forming—A brief review of the
history,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 210, no. 8, pp. 981–997,
Jun. 2010.
[2] M. . Avedesian and H. Baker, “ASM Specialty Handbook: Magnesium
and Magnesium Alloys,. 1999: Asm International.,” pp. 1–4, 1999.
9
33. Aachener Stahlkolloquium Vortrag 1.2
10