Information Retrieval and Optimization in Distribu

International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management
Volume 16 • Issue 1
Information Retrieval and Optimization in

Distribution and Logistics Management
Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Li Yang, College of Economic Management, Henan Polytechnic Institute, China*
Sathishkumar V. E., Sunchon National University, South Korea
Adhiyaman Manickam, Research Institute for Future Media Computing, College of Computer Science and Software
Engineering,China
ABSTRACT
Resource balance is one of the most critical concerns in the existing logistic domain within dynamic
transport networks. Modern solutions are used to maximize demand and supply prediction in
collaboration with these problems. However, the great difficulty of transportation networks, profound
uncertainties of potential demand and availability, and non-convex market limits make conventional
resource management main paths. Hence, this paper proposes an integrated deep reinforcement
learning-based logistics management model (DELLMM) to increase and optimize the logistic
distribution. An optimization approach can be used in inventors and price control applications. This
research methodology gives the fundamentals of information retrieval and the scope of blockchain
integration. The conceptual framework of use cases for an efficient logistic management system with
blockchain has been discussed. This research designs the deep reinforcement learning system that can
boost optimization and other business operations due to impressive improvements in generic self-
learning algorithms for optimal management. Thus, the experimental results show that DELLMM
improves logistics management and optimized distribution compared to other methods with the
highest operability of 94.35%, latency reduction of 97.12%, efficiency of 98.01%, trust enhancement
of 96.37%, and sustainability of 97.80%.
Keywords
Blockchain, Cryptography, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Logistics Management, Optimized Distribution
1. INTRODUCTION
Resource balance management is the primary factor to success, particularly in managing the supply
chain (Wieland, 2021). Effective logistics management includes different factors like automation and
perfect coordination (Ranjan et al., 2020). However, the process can always be improvised. If the business
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSCM.316166 *Corresponding Author

This article published as an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and production in any medium,
provided the author of the original work and original publication source are properly credited.
1
increases, one needs to facilitate logistics planning to improve output (Gao et al., 2020). The length of
time it takes from placement to delivery is one of the most critical aspects of customer experience. Other
parameters – time, costs, and transport are apart from these (Jiang et al., 2017). A supply chain operator
should design the entire flow chart (Gaoet al., 2020). Many researchers target various approaches to
maximize profits and price control applications (MK et al., 2021). The management of logistic products is
the backbone of each company because it ensures shipping, supply, and supply chain (Kumar et al., 2021).
Cost, environment, energy, and quality considerations must be considered while planning and
implementing a logistic management design. Scheduling logistics management systems must consider
sustainability pillars and model uncertainty (Lotfi et al., 2021). When the model is based on a realistic
scenario that considers uncertainties, the product’s cost and quality are enhanced, and pollution and energy
usage are reduced. The first step towards increasing operational efficiency and productivity is to improve
the logistics management process for companies that want to compete (Suifan et al., 2020). Planning is the
first step towards any task or project. Now, there are different factors for project planning. In logistics, it
requires the acquisition of goods, storage, and supply to the correct place (Lotfi et al., 2017). Technology
plays a major role in improving the efficiency of an organization in the automation age. An intelligent
transportation system is one of the areas of logistics management that companies are concentrating on to
enhance profitability. Various levels of information can have on transportation practices and are processed
to ensure corporate profitability. Such information is gathered, processed, and disseminated via intelligent
transportation systems, assisting the effective logistics of goods and materials (Wiseman, 2021). Automation
is an essential part of business process optimization (Rouari et al., 2021). An optimization approach can
be used in inventory and price control applications (Srivastava et al., 2021). The time it takes from order
placement to delivery is of the most critical aspects of customer experience and the main decisive factor
(Xu et al., 2020). In the motive to reduce logistics company expenditure, the transportation department
can be analyzed and, at the same time, upgraded for quick delivery of products (Acevedo et al., 2015).
Transport is often the most significant expense of logistics if not adequately planned and
implemented (Rodríguez et al., 2020). It significantly impacts delivery periods and returns, particularly
if goods are damaged during transit (Khamparia et al., 2020). The objective is to improve operative
efficiency, guarantee customer satisfaction and productivity in efficient logistics management. These
methods and strategies are required for process optimization (Kumar et al., 2019). A logistics company
should choose the shortest and most secure route (Luhach et al., 2014). The route planning must be
implemented with energy-efficient strategies. Researchers employ bi-level programming techniques
and game theory for ensuring energy-efficient location mapping systems (Lotfi et al., 2021). This is
a great way to save time and money. Economic packaging ensures low investments and the security
of goods for end-users (Indumathi et al., 2020; Lotfi et al., 2017). Efficient logistic management can
effectively handle customer demands and thereby meet improved sales. An increase in efficiency
can allow the organization to take on more orders than ever before. Customer service should be fast
and precise, and companies should deliver on their promises. All such services can be achieved by
delivering intelligent logistic management schemes (Lotfi et al., 2021; Wamba et al., 2020). An
advent technology of an integrated deep reinforcement learning-based logistics management Model
(DELLMM) has been proposed to manage logistics better and optimize the logistic distribution to
address the challenges like planning, pricing, time, transportation, and the warehouse’s optimization.
To optimize for better management of logistics, the research contribution in the proposed method is:
a. Design framework of Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Logistics Management Model

(DELLMM) to increase and optimize the supply chain’s logistic distribution
b. Conceptual framework of logistic management model with blockchain technology use cases for
efficient management of logistics and deep network optimization focusing on the time to delivery
and cost per transaction
c. Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Logistics Management Model (DELLMM) design with
mathematical formulations for different supply chain delivery and time management situations
2
d. Experimental results by measuring the output when deploying new strategies in the system show that
DELLMM improves logistics management and optimized distribution compared to other methods
This paper is structured: Section I: Basics of resource balance management and logistics planning
procedures to improve the business’s output. Section II: Related work on the management of logistic
products. Section III: DELLMM is designed in the proposed approach, Section IV: Experimental
evaluation by generic self-learning algorithms, and Section V: Results and conclusions by measuring
the output when deploying new system strategies.
2. RELATED WORKS
(Wamba et al., 2020) were given the benefits, challenges, and future research opportunities in
operations and supply chain management (OSCM) and identified how firms could create and capture
business value with blockchain. As a result of their investigation, it is hoped that more light could be
shone on how blockchain interacts with and influences new business models, how it alters relationships,
and how it enhances OSCM performance and competitive advantage.
(Thakasen et al., 2020) extended the capabilities of facilitating the establishment and acquisition
of new value by integrating information across intelligent supply chain processes and applying
machine intelligence governance and moral frameworks. They suggested the new paths to value
through digitization combined with synchronicity based on optimization algorithms and dynamic
orchestration with hybrid multi-cloud as a strategic advantage in de-stressed supply chains.
(Zhang et al., 2020) suggested profound strengthening of data reinforcement learning (DRL)-based
information recovery techniques that can update the information. Recovery strategies based on user
feedback in real-time optimize users’ expected long-term cumulative satisfaction to talk about the
principles, limitations, and applications of DRLs.It could collect information and promote research
on innovative algorithms, new DRL applications, and new techniques for information retrieval.
(Banawan et al., 2020) proposed private information retrieval (PIR) to minimize download
costs in the PIR phase; the purpose of the proposed work is to plan the content placement and the
retrieval phase jointly. As a linear program, they characterize the optimum cost of PIR download.
By demonstrating the feasibility of solving a simple problem where all available storage space is
consolidated in a summary storage space, they have shown the equivalent of the heterogeneous PIR
capacity with the appropriate homogeneous PIR capacity.
(Pandey et al., 2019) approach towards the hybrid support vector machine (HSVM) model is
proposed to find the fitness function to optimize document retrieval ranking. It can be defined as
controlled learning because it produces an ideal hyperplane of new models labeled training data. This
hyperplane separates a plane into two sections, where there were two-dimensional spaces in each class
on either side. Because the system is hybridized, it resolves all previous weaknesses in data collection
classification and improves ranking system performance, as shown in our assessment tables and graphs.
(Bruch et al., 2019) designed approximate metric optimization (AMO), smoothly approximating
all metric rankings. Deep neural networks have allowed a significant step forward in many machine
learning applications, such as natural language processing and image processing. One of the factors
that put neural networks in the lead in machine learning research is our capacity to build deep scalable
networks that handle more minor features such as text. However, the harvesting of these logistics
system capabilities remains a challenge as the classification functions are discontinuous.
Implementing the distributed as the decision process of Markov and a new depth approach to solve
this problem is strengthening learning. (Luo et al., 2020) introduced multi software-defined networking
(MSDN) distributed blockchain-enabled to sync local views with different software-defined network
(SDN) controllers and reach a global perspective. Three different blockchain protocols are compared
in simulation results to show the efficiency of the improved system.
3
The first two references in this section identify the scope for integrating machine intelligence
and blockchain technology in logistic management. Based on the above Table 1, without integration
between measurement, analysis, and feedback, the challenges of optimizing the logistics network are
not well addressed. Measuring the results when deploying new system strategies for better logistics
management and to increase logistic distribution, and integrated DELLMM is designed to address the
challenges like planning, pricing, time, transportation, and warehouse optimization. The following
section discusses the proposed model briefly.
3. SYSTEM MODEL ARCHITECTURE
Section III presents the system model architecture and the blockchain overview, the framework
description, and resource optimization in the logistic distribution. An optimization approach can
be used in inventory and price control applications. Deep reinforcement learning can greatly boost
optimization and other business operations due to impressive improvements in generic self-learning
algorithms for optimal management.
3.1 Fundamentals of Information Retrieval

Integrating the full-text information recovery (IR) database with efficiency and scalability is not a
trivial case. Information recovery (IR) techniques such as online search, advice, and advertising,
the satisfaction of information needs by providing users with the appropriate time and place for
personalized objects to reduce information overload problems play a critical role.With recent
significant developments in deep enhancement learning (DEL), there is growing interest in developing
DEL-based information recovery technologies, which could continually update information recovery
strategies following user feedback in real-time and optimize users expected cumulative satisfaction.
In particular, this applies in such a context to query optimization.
As seen in Figure 1, blockchain is formed from several connected blocks, making transactions
history transparent and trustworthy through previous blocks. Each block has a unique identity and an
earlier block hash that ensures the security of transactions. The users within this network validate and
Table 1. Pros and cons of existing models
Models Pros Cons

DRL (Wamba et al., 2020) Significant feedback ratio for information retrieval Network optimization is not implemented
Shows the strength of DRL in logistics
PIR (Thakasen et al., 2020) Gives a better feasibility ratio of privacy scheme in Failed to improve the information processing
logistics management with lower cost and improved productivity
HSVM (Zhang et al., 2020) Improves data collection classification and ranking Uncertainties in demand handling are
system performance unaddressed
AMO (Banawan et al., 2020) Better feature extraction and selection in Failed in handling discontinuous classification
classification learning functions
MSDN (Pandey et al., 2019) Improves efficiency in security enhancement Energy and cost efficiency is not ensured
Figure 1. Basic working operation of the transaction through blockchain
4
record all transactions and, once they have been added to the network, are stamped and chronologically
arranged and connected to the previous block. Relevancy is a critical factor in determining the
efficiency of relevance, and it is crucial to receive this information. This can be done using the user
feedback on documents retrieved, indicating relevant documents. Relevance is a standard measure
used in IR to evaluate an IR system’s efficiency using retrieved documents. The idea of the context
for personalization concerns that human preferences are heterogeneous, multiple, and varied and
should be understood in user objectives.
3.2 Optimization Metrics Management in Blockchain and Logistics

Blockchain adoption has been extended to the government administration, the transport sector, and
the logistics sector. Different advanced technology for cross-border transport management has been
introduced and implemented. Face system recognition, biometrics, artificial intelligence, robotics,
laser, and infrared laser technologies are among the technologies. In these cases, Blockchain can play
a key role in high-value transportation. The Blockchain support paradigm of cross-border management
is price volatilities to blockchain data analysis and upscaling. Building trust through blockchain
technology through information transparency, dependability, centralization, and traceability.
Figure 2 depicts the optimization metrics management in blockchain and logistics by technology-
driven deep learning in industrial sectors and society. Deep reinforcement learning techniques
optimized the logistic distribution to address the challenges like planning, pricing, time, transportation,
and warehouse optimization.
Figure 2. Optimization Metrics Management in Blockchain and logistics
5
3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Logistics Management Model

The management of logistic products is the backbone of each company because it ensures shipping, supply,
and supply chain power. There is a primary storage room in the warehouse and smaller rooms like carousels.
It is connected to a lobby area in which all logistics processes begin. Figure 3 gives the process undergoing
in network architecture. The described transmission process includes several activities at different levels
of decision-making. For example, it is strategic to decide whether direct supplies should pass through the
warehouse since this affects the warehouse size. Planning is the first step towards a job at the operational
level. There are now various planning factors. It requires goods to be acquired, stored, and delivered to
the right place. Technology plays a key role in improving the efficiency of an organization during the
automation age. In optimizing business processes, automation plays a crucial role.
Figure 3 illustrates the logistic management model with blockchain benefits and its applications.
Indirect delivery routes are generally scheduled in advance. An employee collects goods from the
warehouse, carries them on the road, and visits departments. He leaves the supplies at the entrance or
Figure 3. Logistic Management Model with Blockchain use cases
6
stacks the shelves when he arrives at the stockroom. Then he comes back to the store. The employees
typically determine direct supply routes. Supplies for cart-closed units and employees select the order
of the deliveries are placed on the same cart. These products are usually delivered to the unit’s main
office, and the employee must expect a signature.
3.3.1 Deep Reinforcement Learning Q Model Network

Deep reinforcement learning can greatly boost optimization and other business operations due to
impressive improvements in generic self-learning algorithms for optimal management. By considering
relational equations from databases with non-linear sizes, the storage system with N messages. The
Nth message is of length L binary bits given by
H (P1 ….PN ) = KL; H (Pk) = L; n ∈ (N

 ) (1)
As given from Equation (1), the non-linear storage functions P1 ¼.PN

The storage bits’ length is assumed from the data centered as L , with the maximum number of
messages N and the total number of messages given as N . k is the non-linear efficient to fetch the
news from the data center.
H (Yn )< M P NL;k 2 (K 

 ) (2)
As assumed from Equation (2), The data memory system consists of k non-colliding 0 < M P < 1
database. The memory size of the k database is limited to M P NL bits, for some. Specifically, denote
the contents of the k database by H (Yn ) with homogenous H equation with L as the length of
the messages in the system.
The proposed system operates with two different phases, placement of messages and time
management. Having the following message size constraint,
N N
1
H (Yn ) ∑∑SH (Yn , S )
KL ∑
1= (3)
n =1 n =1 K =1
From the inference of Equation (3), Yn , S indicates S is the set of Yn bits that appear in the
1
database. denotes the L length of binary messages in the kth term of the database. From
KL
database two, the uncoded homogenous equation d (t ) from the messages can be obtained from H(
Yn ) probabilistic methods.
axt + 2N + 3 (F − 2) ∝ N + 2 (N − 2) ∝ +θ (∑ n =1bn (F − 2) ∝
N
δ (t ) = + + (4)
axt (t ) S +1 axt (t ) (S + 1)
As derived from equation (4), the S + 1 protocol replica instance runs each blockchain node
locally by forwarding all transactions and entering the subsequent phases the same as the existing
method. axt This encryption technique is used to calculate the cost per protocol instance in the
7
following way: initiates theprotocolinstances with 𝑁ripples. 𝑁gives the maximum number of message
signals in the system. 𝑆indicates the set of bits with correlation factor 𝐹. 𝜃refers to the angle projection
and µ is the subfactor for the cost productivity.
bxt (t ) + 2N ∑ bn (F − 2) + S (F + 1) ∝ (∑ bn (F + 1) ∝
N N
P (t ) = n =1
+ n =0
(5)
bxt (t ) bxt t (S + 1) ()
Equation (5) implies the pricing rate for one transaction where P (t ) is the pricing factor of bits
per ratebxt (t ) . (F − 1) is F times the entire protocol run. (F + 1) is set for the immediate next
transaction in the blockchain nodes. N is the number of turns in cost per unit, and n is the cost per
single entity.
While the cryptographic operation is not one type of computing task, other non-cryptographic functions
occupy the resources. From Figure 4, generic self-learning algorithms for optimal management by deep
reinforcement learning can significantly boost transport’s optimization ability, Time to delivery sources,
transactions, export delivery, and end-users. Experimental results by measuring the output when deploying
new strategies in the system show that DELLMM improves logistics management and optimized distribution
compared to other methods. Two phases for forming the target network are given by G (T ) and C (T )
Figure 4. Optimized Deep Reinforcement Learning Q Model Network
8
concerning cryptographic and normalized functions in the network. The matrix of both phases forms the
optimized Q model-based network to obtain the cryptographic space region with key. The encrypted nodes
are forwarded to the authenticated center to proceed with the resource transformation. The simulation
graphs give the maximum recovery of the information from the targeted space region. Non-cryptographic
transformations have been made with the network operator’s available data; hence, trust and confidentiality
are important factors for any supply chain business network. The Optimized Q model network is designed
for efficient energy to retravel from the resources. Assume that S is selected to be performed simultaneously
among all the non-cryptographic functions in a domain.
C (T ) = ∑S (C tcrpto (t )atot (t ) (p + ρτ 3 ( emcrypto (t)T 3 )) (6)

n =1
As indicated by equation (6) whereC tcrpto represents the computational resources with the period
t for cryptographic functions in blockchain network n at time slot s . The total time taken for the
slots is indicated by atot (t ) . Besides, since the controller is not part of the Blockchain, emcrypto is
deducted in the non-linear algorithms. The calculation of C (T ) gives the cryptographic operation
on the period of T cycles.
εncrpto (t ) + ∑εSsnormal
,l
≤ εωtC crpto ∇ (7)
I =1
As explained by equation (7), The transition probability is given by encrpto . Cryptographic formulation
calculations are given by C crpto with S as the subset of the function. The cryptography with a period
is denoted by C crpto . Ñ is the empirical relation for the transitions. Ssnormal
,l
is normalized transitions
with length. To improve the system’s energy efficiency, consider the trust characteristics of network
controllers as a state of the problem and make sequential decisions based on distribution property.
 a (t ) a2 (t )……….. an (t ) 
 1
 ea crpto t eaNcrpto (t ) 
 1 () ea2crpto (t )…….. (8)
 normal 
 ea1
 (t ) ea2normal (t )………. eaNnormal (t )
From the matrix (8), the cryptographic relation in domain n with period t is described. The
batch rate of the a1 (t ) is the computational allocation for the cryptographic co-efficient eaNcrpto (t ) .
The individual’s cryptographic relations are calculated from ea1crpto (t ) . The normality co-relations
are related as eaNnormal (t ) with period t .
To use the energy efficiently in the cryptographic region, the entire Location is set as G (T ) is
described as follows,
r(t )
G (T ) = (9)
E (T )
9
From equation (9), G (T ) denotes the located area in the cryptographic region, r is non-linear
co-efficient in the time slot T . The utilized energy is designated as E (T ) with total optimized energy
retrieval. Deep reinforcement learning to optimize information retrieval can be enhanced in the long
term by including G (T ) with cryptographic relations.
ρn (t ) = (εmcrpto (t ) + ∑S εmnormal
,l (t ) − εtot (t ), 0) ∇n (10)
m =1
As described in Equation (10), For the challenges in feature of high-dimensional spatial Equation
S with cryptographic functions (emcrpto (t ) ) added to the correlation function rn (t ) With period T ,
emnormal
,l (t ) the normalized equations with coefficient Length L of the system are extended for the
large capacity region by addingG (T )
G (t ) = (ϕmcrpto (t ) + ∑S ϕmnormal
,l (t ) − εtot (t ), 0) ∇n (11)
m =1
The predecessor equation (11), (jmcrpto (t )) is the cryptographic relation with normalized equations
with the period t . etot (t ) gives the total empirical relation value of the system model. jmnormal
,l (t ) to
calculate the normalized function on the time slot, too, with the state-space equation S . G (t ) the
ordinary Equation with the second phase on the system model. The matrix of both state-space equations
can obtain the Productivity of the system,
r (t )……. rn (t )
P (T ) = n (12)
G (t )…….. Gn (t )
Matrix from Equation (12) gives P (T ), the productivity with additional cryptographic
relations. Deep reinforcement learning is an inclusive algorithm and a model-free method for
estimating the recovery information value expected long-term reward. To calculate values and to
select an action in a specific slot, the system status is calculated following this proposed algorithm
in cryptographic functions.
DELLMM is a repulsive method for estimating the recovery information value expected long-
term sustainability with improved energy efficiency to the targeted state-space region. Table 2
summarizes all the equations in this section for better reference. The profound reinforcement model
results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm could improve the existing methods DRL, PIR, and
DMO energy efficiencies while reducing their Efficiency compared to the ideal situation.
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The Experimental and simulation results for the proposed Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based
Logistics Management Model (DELLMM) is presented in this section. Moreover, to be compared
with existing methods, Data Reinforcement Learning (DRL) -based information was increasingly
developed Recovery techniques can update the information continuously.
10
Table 2. Summary of Formulas
Formulas Indices Equation

Number
A storage system 1
H ( P1 ….PN )= KL; H (Pk)= L; n ∈ (N
 ) with N messages
Homogeneous 2
H (Yn )< M P NL; k 2 ( K 
 ) criteria for the
context of Yn bits
N N Message size 3
1
H (Yn ) ∑∑SH (Yn , S ) constraint
KL ∑
1=
n=1 n=1 K =1
N Uncoded 4
a xt + 2 N + 3 ( F − 2) ∝ N + 2 ( N − 2) ∝ +¸ (∑ b ( F − 2) ∝ homogeneity
´ (t ) = + + n=1 n
a xt (t ) S +1 a xt (t ) ( S + 1)
N N
bxt (t ) + 2 N ∑ b ( F − 2) + S ( F + 1) ∝ (∑ b ( F + 1) ∝
P (t ) = n=1 n
+ n= 0 n
Cost factor 5
bxt (t ) bxt (t ) ( S + 1)
N Cryptographic 6
C (T ) = ∑S(C tcrpto (t ) atot (t ) ( p + ÁÄ3 ( µmcrypto (t) T ))
3 operation
n=1
µncrpto (t ) + ∑µS snormal

,l
≤ µÉt C crpto ∇ Crypto Criterion 7
I =1
Cryptographic 8
 a (t ) a2 (t )……….. an (t ) 
 1 relation matrix
 µa crpto t µa Ncrpto (t ) 
 1 () µa2crpto (t )……..
 normal 
 µa1
 (t ) µa2normal (t )………. µa Nnormal (t )
Cryptographic 9
Á(t ) region
(T ) =
E (T )
N Correlation 10
Án (t ) = (µ crpto
m (t ) + ∑Sµ normal
m, l (t ) − µ (t ), 0)∇n
tot
Function
m =1
N Normalized 11
G (t ) = (Æmcrpto (t ) + ∑SÆmnormal
,l (t ) − µtot (t ), 0)∇n Cryptoregion
analysis
m =1
Án (t )……. Án (t )
P (T ) = System productivity 12
G (t )…….. Gn (t )
11
4.1 Identified the Best Route for Delivery Ratio (IBRDR)

Different transport, management, and logistics actions and methods which depend upon various
organizational or data processes can be interconnected in Blockchain. The results of the existing
must be interpreted carefully concerning their limits. The proposed approach creates a controlled
and distributed shipping system that integrates and interconnects all business activities. A system
model for cloud and enterprise platform services aims at gathering multiple services on a single,
cloud-based platform to deliver discrete services to end customers.
As shown in Figure 5, a connected pallet can automatically send the confirmation and date of
shipment and the condition of the goods to a blockchain-based system upon delivery. The system
can then verify delivery automatically and control whether the goods have been delivered on agreed
terms. The correct release payments to the relevant parties, which increase both efficiency and
integrity significantly.
4.2 Transaction Price tracking Analysis Ratio (TPAR)

Table 3 gives the possibilities for supply chain logistics on different vital factors. Supply chain
applications across various critical sectors’ transaction price tracking analysis ratio (TPAR) feature
helps keep the cost of transactions to a minimum by reducing information searching, negotiation,
decision making, control, and transaction adjustment. Blockchain can enable consumers to disclose
all data to the public domain and the prices from raw materials to providers.
Figure 6 shows the transaction price tracking analysis ratio (TPAR)with critical factors like
healthcare, manufacturing, e-commerce, business, food, technology, fashion gate. The traditional price
tracking system has been developed inadequately and shows no end-to-end price variation across the
Figure 5. Identified the Best Route for Delivery Ratio (IBRDR) in different Datasets
12
Table 3. Supply chain applications across different vital sectors
Industrial Sectors Scalability Latency Reliability Security Visibility Transparency

Healthcare x 0 0 x x x
Manufacturing x x x x x x
E-commerce 0 x 0 x x x
Business x x x 0 x x
Food 0 x x 0 x 0
Information x 0 x 0 x 0
technology
Textile x 0 x x x x
Education 0 x x x 0 x
Transportation x x x x x x
Figure 6. Transaction Price tracking Analysis Ratio (TPAR) with key factors
supply chain. It gives the consumer only in case of transactions the final price of the item. A logistics
supplier should take the quickest and most secure route. That’s good for saving both time and money.
Low investment and security of the goods are guaranteed by economic packaging. Packaging should
be optimized to lower the volumes and not increase the package weight.
4.3 System Efficiency Analysis Ratio (SEAR)

As shown from the above Table 4, the system’s efficiency with different vital factors such as security,
privacy, pricing, operability, latency, efficiency, sustainability, transport, and confidentiality are prime
13
Table 4. Efficiency of the system with different vital factors
Key Factors DRL PIR HSVM DMO MSDN DELLMM

Security 68.89 70.12 75.56 82.46 89.79 94.23
Privacy 70.27 71.21 76.15 85.65 92.00 96.21
Pricing 72.23 75.56 79.21 80.00 85.54 89.12
Operability 81.04 85.12 89.21 90.24 91.18 94.35
Latency 79.12 84.69 86.09 90.13 94.54 97.12
Efficiency 81.12 83.26 86.29 87.65 95.12 98.01
Trust 74.69 76.89 77.41 84.36 90.65 96.37
Sustainability 78.47 81.69 84.97 89.55 93.77 97.80
Transport 74.23 76.62 79.21 84.00 90.54 98.47
Confidentiality 75.84 76.28 82.19 90.23 94.02 98.45
factors for a successful business model. Blockchain technology has different ethical, trust, and privacy
concerns. Specific persons and staff may lose their privacy depending on the information given in the
blockchain. Depending on the level of detail attached to processes and transactions, workers’ rights
can degrade. Wages, information identifying, and performance may be available to the public; care
should be taken in these situations. These are mostly issues of personal privacy. It is an open question
of whether blockchains can make for more ethical transport and logistics. Like most stresses, like
secretary of state versus model transparency, operations versus modern economic systems are likely
to continue, with obstacles and paradoxes.
Graphical representation in Figure 7 of system efficiency analysis ratio (SEAR) with prime
key factors shows the performance improvements in system management over existing models. As
technology diffuses, it will be necessary to identify the best ethical and responsible practices. The
traditional efficiency analyzing system is non-transparently developed and has not demonstrated
improvement throughout the entire supply chain. DRL, PIR, HSVM, DMO, MSDN are the existing
methods that the authors concentrate on research related to the design of new frameworks, algorithms,
results, architecture, graphs, etc. There are signs of the actual implementation and prototype. Although
the reviews mentioned above have been published, in various aspects, DELLMM is different. Initially,
an overview of the architecture in the blockchain is designed. In the second phase, many key takeovers
are identified, and the following challenges and opportunities are proposed. In particular, undertaken
a carefully examined application of blockchain technology in various industrial operations, including
education, medicine, energy, textile, food, finance, government services, and the environment.
4.4 Overall Comparison Analysis Ratio (OCAR)

Table 5 inferred that logistics management for optimized information recovery gives analysis ratio and
performance improvements over existing methods. Logistics management can be a time-consuming
and complex process and more manageable and more cost-effective using the right tools. By following
a more inclusive approach in logistics, unlike DRL, PIR, HSVM, DMO, MSDN with 93.5%, 73.5%,
78.6%, 84.21%, 85.4%, our proposed method DELLMM gives the frequent energy consumption
with optimized information recovery with 98.92% contributes to the energy efficiency of blockchain
applications recognizes the broader picture referring to an established framework that will enable
future researchers to examine blockchain technology studies existing, within and beyond logistics in
more detail. The results of the existing must be interpreted carefully concerning their limits.
14
Figure 7. System Efficiency Analysis Ratio (SEAR) with key factors
Table 5. Logistic Management for Optimised Information Recovery
Factors DRL PIR HSVM DMO MSDN DELLMM

Transportation cost 25.6 38.5 42.5 47.6 50.9 58.4
Administration Costs 31.5 32.4 32.4 42.5 45.6 64.21
Product Management 31.2 34.23 49.62 62.02 65.9
Service metric Management 46.3 34.8 39.6 46.3 47.4 68.6
Pricing Management 54.4 38.6 42.5 47.5 48.6 69.4
Warehouse Management 58.6 41.8 48.4 48.2 54.4 70.7
Productivity Cost 75.3 45.3 49.3 40.4 54.6 81.5
Energy Optimization 86.4 57.6 58.5 61.6 67.5 94.4
Time cycles Management 93.5 73.5 78.6 84.21 85.4 98.92
Figure 8 depicts the overall comparison analysis ratio (OCAR); without integrating
measurement, analysis, and feedback, the logistics network’s optimization is incomplete. One must
measure the output when using new strategies in the system. This is important because it shows
that the process is successful or failed. Excellent feedback helps to improve. The employees’ ideas
and proposals should be regularly recorded. It ensures that a bunch of ideas is created and that all
system defects are revealed.
15
Figure 8. Overall Comparison Analysis Ratio (OCAR) with key factors
5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
The energy efficiency optimization framework builds a real case to test different processes with a
simulation model and incorporates an algorithm to detect the best distribution routes. The same cart is
used with various supply types to reduce the number of routes, reduce the frequency of distribution for
specific care facilities, and optimize routes to minimize transport times. The efficient management of
supply chains aims to improve operational efficiency to ensure customer satisfaction and productivity.
This proposed DELLMM resolves all previous challenges in data collection classification and
improves system performance, as shown in our assessment tables and graphs. The results illustrate
the possible concrete improvements.
Deep reinforcement learning techniques optimized the logistic distribution to address the
challenges like planning, pricing, time, transportation, and warehouse optimization. Here, a probability
integrated ratio system is implemented where a data center places content available in heterogeneous
irrational databases, from which a user privately recovers an archive. The original problem with
individual storage limitations demonstrates the achievability of solving a simple question, where all
available storage space is combined into a total storage space. Therefore, this research has shown no
loss in storage capacity as long as the database storage space heterogeneity optimizes the placement
16
phase. Transport efficiency is improved significantly by the generic deep learning algorithms, and
efficient logistics management improves operational efficiency, ensuring customer satisfaction and
productivity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Henan Institute of Technology, No. 1888, Kongming Road, Nanyang City, Henan Province
13783778982.
17
REFERENCES
Wieland, A. (2021). Dancing the supply chain: Toward transformative supply chain management. The Journal
of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 58–73. doi:10.1111/jscm.12248
Ranjan, G., Nguyen, T. N., Mekky, H., & Zhang, Z. L. (2020, December). On virtual id assignment in networks
for high resilience routing: a theoretical framework. In GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Communications
Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE. doi:10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9322538
Gao, Q., Guo, S., Liu, X., Manogaran, G., Chilamkurti, N., & Kadry, S. (2020). Simulation analysis of supply
chain risk management system based on IoT information platform. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(9-10),
1354–1378. doi:10.1080/17517575.2019.1644671
Jiang, F. C., & Hsu, C. H. (2017). Fault-tolerant system design on cloud logistics by greener standbys deployment
with Petri net model. Neurocomputing, 256, 90–100. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.134
Gao, J., Wang, H., & Shen, H. (2020). Task failure prediction in cloud data centers using deep learning. IEEE
Transactions on Services Computing.
MK, M., Srivastava, G., Somayaji, S. R. K., Gadekallu, T. R., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2020).
An Incentive-Based Approach for COVID-19 using Blockchain Technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01468.
Kumar, G., Saha, R., Buchanan, W. J., Geetha, G., Thomas, R., Rai, M. K., Kim, T.-H., & Alazab, M. (2020).
Decentralized accessibility of e-commerce products through blockchain technology. Sustainable Cities and
Society, 62, 102361. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102361
Lotfi, R., Yadegari, Z., Hosseini, S. H., Khameneh, A. H., Tirkolaee, E. B., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A robust
time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study
for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization.
Suifan, T., Saada, R., Alazab, M., Sweis, R., Abdallah, A., & Alhyari, S. (2020). Quality of information sharing,
agility, and sustainability of humanitarian aid supply chains: An empirical investigation. International Journal
of Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 1–13.
Lotfi, R., Nayeri, M., Sajadifar, S., & Mardani, N. (2017). Determination of start times and ordering plans for
two-period projects with interdependent demand in project-oriented organizations: A case study on molding
industry. Journal of Project Management, 2(4), 119–142. doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2017.9.001
Wiseman, Y. (2021). Intelligent Transportation Systems along with the COVID-19 Pandemic will Significantly
Change the Transportation Market. The Open Transportation Journal, 15(1).
Rouari, A., Moussaoui, A., Chahir, Y., Rauf, H. T., & Kadry, S. (2021). Deep CNN-based autonomous system
for safety measures in logistics transportation. Soft Computing, 1–14.
Srivastava, G., Singh, A., & Mallipeddi, R. (2021). NSGA-II with objective-specific variation operators for
multiobjective vehicle routing problem with time windows. Expert Systems with Applications, 176, 114779.
doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114779
Xu, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Anandhan, P., & Manickam, A. (2020). A novel approach for scene
classification from remote sensing images using deep learning methods. European Journal of Remote Sensing,
1–13.
Acevedo, Y. V. N., Marín, C. E. M., Garcia, P. A. G., & Crespo, R. G. (2018, April). A proposal to a decision
support system with learning analytics. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)
(pp. 161-168). IEEE. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363223
Rodríguez, A. O. R., Riaño, M. A., García, P. A. G., Marín, C. E. M., Crespo, R. G., & Wu, X. (2020). Emotional
characterization of children through a learning environment using learning analytics and AR-Sandbox. Journal
of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(11), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01887-2
Khamparia, A., Singh, A., Luhach, A. K., Pandey, B., & Pandey, D. K. (2020). Classification and identification
of primitive Kharif crops using supervised deep convolutional networks. Sustainable Computing: Informatics
and Systems, 28, 100340. doi:10.1016/j.suscom.2019.07.003
18
Kumar, A., Mukherjee, S., & Luhach, A. K. (2019). Deep learning with perspective modeling for early detection
of malignancy in mammograms. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 22(4), 627–643.
doi:10.1080/09720529.2019.1642624
Luhach, A. K., Dwivedi, S. K., & Jha, C. K. (2014). Designing and implementing the logical security framework
for e-commerce based on service oriented architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.2421.
Lotfi, R., Mardani, N., & Weber, G. W. (2021). Robust bi-level programming for renewable energy location.
International Journal of Energy Research, 45(5), 7521–7534. doi:10.1002/er.6332
Dhiman, G., Chang, V., Kant Singh, K., & Shankar, A. (2021). ADOPT: Automatic deep learning and
optimization-based approach for detection of novel coronavirus COVID-19 disease using X-ray images. Journal
of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 1–13. PMID:33475019
Indumathi, J., Shankar, A., Ghalib, M. R., Gitanjali, J., Hua, Q., Wen, Z., & Qi, X. (2020). Block Chain Based
Internet of Medical Things for Uninterrupted, Ubiquitous, User-Friendly, Unflappable, Unblemished, Unlimited
Health Care Services (BC IoMT U 6 HCS). IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 216856–
216872. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040240
Lotfi, R., Mehrjerdi, Y. Z., & Mardani, N. (2017). A multi-objective and multi-product advertising billboard
location model with attraction factor mathematical modeling and solutions. International Journal of Applied
Logistics, 7(1), 64–86. doi:10.4018/IJAL.2017010104
Lotfi, R., Mehrjerdi, Y. Z., Pishvaee, M. S., Sadeghieh, A., & Weber, G. W. (2021). A robust optimization
model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at
risk. Numerical Algebra. Control & Optimization, 11(2), 221. doi:10.3934/naco.2020023
Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2020). Blockchain in the operations and supply chain management: Benefits,
challenges, and future research opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 52(June),
102064. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102064
Thakasen, K., & Naq, A. (2020). Increased sustainability through the use of artificial intelligence and blockchain
technology in the digitization of supply chains. Operational Supply Chain & Logistics Management Research, 9.
Zhang, W., Zhao, X., Zhao, L., Yin, D., Yang, G. H., & Beutel, A. (2020, July). Deep Reinforcement Learning
for Information Retrieval: Fundamentals and Advances. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 2468-2471). doi:10.1145/3397271.3401467
Banawan, K., Arasli, B., Wei, Y. P., & Ulukus, S. (2020). The capacity of private information retrieval from
heterogeneous uncoded caching databases. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 66(6), 3407–3416.
doi:10.1109/TIT.2020.2964762
Pandey, S., Mathur, I., & Joshi, N. (2019, February). Information retrieval ranking using machine learning
techniques. In 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AICAI) (pp. 86-92). IEEE.
doi:10.1109/AICAI.2019.8701391
Bruch, S., Zoghi, M., Bendersky, M., & Najork, M. (2019, July). Revisiting approximate metric optimization in
the age of deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research
and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 1241-1244). doi:10.1145/3331184.3331347
Luo, J., Chen, Q., Yu, F. R., & Tang, L. (2020). Blockchain-enabled software-defined industrial internet of things with
deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(6), 5466–5480. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2020.2978516
Sathishkumar V. E. is now with the Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Sunchon National
University, South Korea. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Information Technology from Madras Institute of
Technology, Anna University in 2013 and Master’s degree in Biometrics and Cyber Security from PSG College of
Technology in 2015. He worked as a Research Associate in VIT University from 2015 to 2017. He has been awarded
Korean Government Scholarship in 2017 for pursing one-year Korean Language Program in Inha University and Doctoral
degree in Sunchon National University. He has published more than 20 research articles in reputed conferences and
journals. His current research interests include Big data analytics, data mining, cryptography, and digital forensics.
19

Information Retrieval and Optimization in Distribu

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Information Retrieval and Optimization in Distribu

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Information Retrieval and Optimization in Distribu

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management

Information Retrieval and Optimization in

DOI: 10.4018/IJISSCM.316166 *Corresponding Author

a. Design framework of Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Logistics Management Model

3. SYSTEM MODEL ARCHITECTURE

3.1 Fundamentals of Information Retrieval

Table 1. Pros and cons of existing models

Models Pros Cons

Figure 1. Basic working operation of the transaction through blockchain

3.2 Optimization Metrics Management in Blockchain and Logistics

Figure 2. Optimization Metrics Management in Blockchain and logistics

3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Logistics Management Model

Figure 3. Logistic Management Model with Blockchain use cases

3.3.1 Deep Reinforcement Learning Q Model Network

H (P1 ….PN ) = KL; H (Pk) = L; n ∈ (N

As given from Equation (1), the non-linear storage functions P1 ¼.PN

H (Yn )< M P NL;k 2 (K 

Figure 4. Optimized Deep Reinforcement Learning Q Model Network

C (T ) = ∑S (C tcrpto (t )atot (t ) (p + ρτ 3 ( emcrypto (t)T 3 )) (6)

4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Table 2. Summary of Formulas

Formulas Indices Equation

µncrpto (t ) + ∑µS snormal

4.1 Identified the Best Route for Delivery Ratio (IBRDR)

4.2 Transaction Price tracking Analysis Ratio (TPAR)

Table 3. Supply chain applications across different vital sectors

Industrial Sectors Scalability Latency Reliability Security Visibility Transparency

4.3 System Efficiency Analysis Ratio (SEAR)

Table 4. Efficiency of the system with different vital factors

Key Factors DRL PIR HSVM DMO MSDN DELLMM

4.4 Overall Comparison Analysis Ratio (OCAR)

Figure 7. System Efficiency Analysis Ratio (SEAR) with key factors

Table 5. Logistic Management for Optimised Information Recovery

Factors DRL PIR HSVM DMO MSDN DELLMM

Figure 8. Overall Comparison Analysis Ratio (OCAR) with key factors

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

You might also like

H (P1 ….PN ) = KL; H (Pk) = L; n ∈ (N

H (Yn )< M P NL;k 2 (K 