AGRESSION IN SELF DEFENSE

I think It would be crazy to think that every act of

aggression is allowed with the sole justification of having
been attacked first. This can cause many people, due to
their nervousness, to take up the weapon and the rest
could be a fatal outcome.

Not all cases are the same, although we must have the
right to act to defend ourselves, we cannot say that the
aggressors are purely evil and the victims totally
peacemakers.
It could be a either a thief who is very hungry or someone
eager to harm anyone or a victim who was clueless or
looking for any reason to pull out the gun.
I consider that it is necessary to keep people's mental
health regulated, where we set the limit if, at the slightest
interaction, a person wants to respond to any attack with
a gunshot. Imagine the consequences of a stray bullet.