Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study - Corporate Finance 2
Case Study - Corporate Finance 2
Investment
Plant and equipment 900.00 €
Variable costs/unit
Manufacturing
Marketing
Total variable costs/unit
Fixed Costs
Overhead
Depreciation
Start-up costs
Total fixed costs
Sales Revenue
(-) Total Variable Costs
(-) Total Fixed Costs
Profit before taxes
(-) Taxes (tax rate 50 %)
Net Operating Profit after taxes
Result overview
NPV
example 1:
Pay-back period
Profitability idex
IRR
0.2
0.08 Sales Price 1.9
0.12
0.16
$ 99 $ 85 $ 74 $ 63 $ 55 $ 47 $ 41
$ -120 $ -35 $ 39 $ 102 $ 157 $ 204 $ 245
Result overview
Result overview
example 4:
29.00 € 30.00 €
N.A N.A
1500 1500
1500 1500
1.90 € 1.90 €
1.30 € 1.30 €
0.10 € 0.10 €
1.40 € 1.40 €
210.00 € 210.00 €
60.00 € 60.00 €
- € - €
270.00 € 270.00 €
2,850 € 2,850 €
2,100.00 € 2,100.00 €
270.00 € 270.00 €
480.00 € 480.00 €
- 240.00 € - 240.00 €
240.00 € 240.00 €
300.00 € 300.00 €
- € - €
- 20.00 € - 20.00 €
280.00 € 280.00 €
381.00 € 381.00 €
$ 22 $ 18
$ 53 $ 71
$ 95 $ 88
$ 1,029 $ 1,117
$ 57 $ 51
$ 591 $ 642
$ 35 $ 30
$ 280 $ 310
nitial outlay
Scenario Summary
Current Values: Changing Price
Changing Cells:
$D$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$E$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$F$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$G$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$H$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$I$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$J$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$K$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$L$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$M$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$N$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$O$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$P$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
$Q$15 1.9 € 1.7 €
Result Cells:
$C$47 $ -1,669 $ -2,070
$C$48 Does not Exist Does not Exist
$C$49 0.12 -0.09
$C$50 14% 9%
$G$47 1,628.30 € 306.93 €
$G$48 9.29613450816 12.7846103306
$G$49 1.86 1.16
$G$50 14% 9%
Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at
time Scenario Summary Report was created. Changing cells for each
scenario are highlighted in gray.
Scenario Summary
Current Values: Changing Price
Changing Cells:
Sales Price 1.9 1.7
Result Cells:
NVP_1 $ -1,669 $ -2,070
Pay_Back_Period_1 Does not Exist Does not Exist
Profitability_Index_1 0.12 -0.09
IRR_1 14% 9%
NPV_2 1,628.30 € 306.93 €
Pay_Back_Period_2 9.29613450816 12.78461033061
Profibality_Idex 1.86 1.16
IRR_2 14% 9%
Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at
time Scenario Summary Report was created. Changing cells for each
scenario are highlighted in gray.
Example 1 Discount rate 0.2
Example 2 (8% discount rate) Discount Rate 0.08
NPV $ -1,669
example 1:
example 2:
overview
overview
Result
Result
example 1:
example 2:
overview
overview
Result
Result
Pay-back period Does not Exist
Profitability index 0.12
IRR 14%
€ 0.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Err:523
Sale Price 1.9
17 € 20 € 24 € 30 € 30 € 30 €
1,597 € 1,757 € 1,933 € 2,125 € 2,125 € 2,125 €
2,000 € 2,000 € 2,000 € 2,000 € 2,000 € 2,000 €
1,597 € 1,757 € 1,933 € 2,000 € 2,000 € 2,000 €
1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 €
Analysis of Capital-Intensive Alternative for Silicone-X (dollars in thousands, except per unit-data)
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Investment
Plant and equipment 900 €
Change in Net Working Capital $ 140.00 $ 14.00 $ 15.00
Demand (thousand of pounds) 1200 1320 1452
Capacity (thousand of pounds) 600 1500 1500
Sales (thousand of pounds) 600 1320 1452
Sales price/unit $ 1.90 $ 1.90 $ 1.90
Variable costs/unit
Manufacturing 1.30 € 1.30 € 1.30 €
Selling 0.10 € 0.10 € 0.10 €
Total variable costs/units 1.40 € 1.40 € 1.15 €
Fixed costs
Overhead $ 210.00 $ 210.00 $ 210.00
Depreciation $ 60.00 $ 60.00 $ 60.00
Start-up costs $ 50.00 $ - $ -
Total fixed costs $ 320.00 270 € 270 €
Sales Revenue 2,508 € 2,759 €
Total variable costs 840 € 1,848 € 1,670 €
Total fixed costs 320 € 270 € 270 €
Profit Before Taxes 390 € 819 €
Taxes (tax rate 50%) 195 € 409 €
Net Operating Profit after taxes 195 € 409 €
Cash Flow from operations
Profit after tax + depreciation $ - $ 241 $ 573
Capital Expenditures $ -1,900 $ -1,400 $ - $ -
Change in Working Capital $ - $ -160 $ -11
Free Cash Flow $ -1,900 $ -1,400 $ 81 $ 562
Terminal Value
NPV
example 1:
overview
Result
example 1:
Pay-back period
overview
Profitability value
Result
IRR
per unit-data)
Year 4 Year 5-15
$ 17.00 $ 20.00
1597 N.A
1500 1500
1500 1500
$ 1.90 $ 1.90
1.30 € 1.30 €
0.10 € 0.10 €
1.15 € 1.15 €
$ 210.00 $ 210.00
$ 60.00 $ 60.00
$ - $ -
270 € 270 €
2,850 € 2,850 €
1,725 € 1,725 €
270 € 270 €
855 € 855 €
428 € 428 €
428 € 428 €
$ 627 $ 687
$ - $ -
$ -17 $ -20
$ 610 $ 667
$ 294 #VALUE!
$ -2,391 #VALUE!
$ 448 #VALUE! $ - $ -
$ -2,232 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Scenario Summary
Current Values: Sales_Price
Changing Cells:
Sales Price 1.9 1.7
Result Cells:
$F$52 - 2,685.19 € - 2,817.82 €
$D$70 $ -868 $ -1,483
$D$72 0.54 0.22
$H$70 1,628.30 € 306.93 €
$H$72 1.86 1.16
$D$76 $ 471 $ -527
$D$78 1.25 0.72
$H$76 -317.23 € -1,091.61 €
$H$78 0.83 0.43
Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at
time Scenario Summary Report was created. Changing cells for each
scenario are highlighted in gray.
Scenario Summary
Current Values: Sales_Price
Changing Cells:
$H$2 1.9 1.7
Result Cells:
$F$52 - 2,685.19 € - 2,817.82 €
$D$70 $ -868 $ -1,483
$D$72 0.54 0.22
$H$70 1,628.30 € 306.93 €
$H$72 1.86 1.16
$D$76 $ 471 $ -527
$D$78 1.25 0.72
$H$76 -317.23 € -1,091.61 €
$H$78 0.83 0.43
Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at
time Scenario Summary Report was created. Changing cells for each
scenario are highlighted in gray.
Discount rate (Example 1) 20%
Discount Rate (Example 2) 8% Sales Price 1.9
Discount rate (Example 3) 12%
Discount Rate (Example 4) 16%
Analysis of Capital-Intensive Alternative for Silicone-X (dollars in thousands, except per unit-da
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
Investment
Variable costs/unit
Fixed costs
Overhead 110 € 110 € 110 € 110 € 110 €
Depreciation 167 € 167 € 167 € 167 € 167 €
Start-up costs 100 €
Total fixed costs 377 € 277 € 277 € 277 € 277 €
example 2:
overview
overview
Result
example 4:
overview
overview
Result
30 € 30 € 30 € 30 € 30 € 30 € 30 € 30 € 30 €
2125 2125 2125 2125 2125 2125 2125 2125 2125
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 € 1.9 €
Conclusion: Comparing both scenarios, It´s able to see that the scenario with
20% interest rate is not viable to the company, because it has a negative NPV (-
868€), which means that it doesn´t have a pay back period and the profitability
index is between 0 and 1. On the other side, the second scenario, the one with
8% looks much more attractive to the company, because the NPV is positive
(+1628,30€), it has a pay back period of 9,3 years and a profitability index of
1,86. However, this method does not match with the return criteria of the
company, because at 16% return rate, the NPV is negative (-317,23€) which can
indicate that the Cappital- intensive method is not a suitable method.
Reynolds tend to demand a higher return for projects
Doesn't like to take a lof of risk wich is good for the stakeholders
However it doens't aproved a lot of projects which can reduce the overall return
eptable however it is
ven