This document provides reflections from a student on several literary criticism theories covered in their English 23 class, including psychoanalytic criticism, romanticism, reader response criticism, and Marxist criticism. For each theory, the student discusses what they initially understood about the theory, what they learned during the class discussion, and how their understanding developed. They found psychoanalytic criticism examines the author's unconscious mind and experiences. For romanticism, they learned it emphasizes imagination, emotion, and individualism. Regarding reader response criticism, the student realized the reader actively creates meaning from a text. Finally, they understood Marxist criticism focuses on socioeconomic relationships and class struggles within societies.
This document provides reflections from a student on several literary criticism theories covered in their English 23 class, including psychoanalytic criticism, romanticism, reader response criticism, and Marxist criticism. For each theory, the student discusses what they initially understood about the theory, what they learned during the class discussion, and how their understanding developed. They found psychoanalytic criticism examines the author's unconscious mind and experiences. For romanticism, they learned it emphasizes imagination, emotion, and individualism. Regarding reader response criticism, the student realized the reader actively creates meaning from a text. Finally, they understood Marxist criticism focuses on socioeconomic relationships and class struggles within societies.
This document provides reflections from a student on several literary criticism theories covered in their English 23 class, including psychoanalytic criticism, romanticism, reader response criticism, and Marxist criticism. For each theory, the student discusses what they initially understood about the theory, what they learned during the class discussion, and how their understanding developed. They found psychoanalytic criticism examines the author's unconscious mind and experiences. For romanticism, they learned it emphasizes imagination, emotion, and individualism. Regarding reader response criticism, the student realized the reader actively creates meaning from a text. Finally, they understood Marxist criticism focuses on socioeconomic relationships and class struggles within societies.
This document provides reflections from a student on several literary criticism theories covered in their English 23 class, including psychoanalytic criticism, romanticism, reader response criticism, and Marxist criticism. For each theory, the student discusses what they initially understood about the theory, what they learned during the class discussion, and how their understanding developed. They found psychoanalytic criticism examines the author's unconscious mind and experiences. For romanticism, they learned it emphasizes imagination, emotion, and individualism. Regarding reader response criticism, the student realized the reader actively creates meaning from a text. Finally, they understood Marxist criticism focuses on socioeconomic relationships and class struggles within societies.
English 23 Instructress Psychoanalytic Criticism Theory Reflection: To be honest, at first, I was not really familiar with the psychoanalytic criticism theory, but from the word psychoanalytic, I came up with the idea that it is more in the mind of the author, the unconscious and conscious mind of an individual. When the class started, I found out that psychoanalytic criticism is mainly focused on the personality of an author since we are talking about literature. As the discussion continued, I learned that this theory examines the author's personality through his or her literary work, so I think that it deals with the author's personal experiences, desires, and emotions. This theory captures my attention and I got interested to learn more about psychoanalytic theory because it can challenge our understanding of a literary piece since it is an analysis of an authors unintended message. It was also mentioned during the discussion that psychoanalytic criticism focuses on the mind of the author, the mind of the characters, the mind of the audience and the text itself. It’s important for us to consider these things when we do a critic of a literary piece and we use the psychoanalytic approach since it is a big help for us to understand ourselves by exploring desires and impulses that are often hidden in our unconscious. On the other hand, Sigmund Freud thought of dreams as the ultimate insight into an individual's unconscious mind, and he states that dreams have two types of content: the manifest and the latent. Speaking of dreams, last week I had a very bad dream that all of my teeth were falling, and that was exactly 3:00 a.m. I woke up because I got nervous because I thought that the meaning of that dream was negative, so when I woke up, I did some research on that dream to see what the meaning of it was, and I found out that a vivid dream of teeth falling out can symbolize a recent loss of something important like a job or a loved one. That experience of mine is an example of manifest content because those are the memories that have materialized in my dream, and the latent content is the symbolic or underlying interpretation of that dream. As we went along with the discussion, I learned that the unconscious mind stores all the thoughts, memories, and feelings that are traumatic, links our behavior to our childhood experiences, and is part of our mind that we are not aware of. While exploring Sigmund Freud's theory, I learned that the id is like our inner child, always seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, while the ego is our rational side, helping us make balanced decisions based on reality, and the super ego is our moral compass; it is a guide for us towards what is right and what is wrong. Romanticism Reflection: During the first day of our English 23 subject, I was a little bit nervous because this subject is all about literary criticism, and the first thing that came to mind was that this subject is all about literature. The reason why I was nervous was because I am not really fond of reading books, and this subject will be talking about different literature and written works. We all know that literature is concerned with writing, what we read is written by an author who’s aimed is to give us his or her perspective about something. By reading literature we can visualize what the writer is trying to convey and it can broaden our knowledge about the literary piece. As a student, I realized that it's important to know and understand what literary criticism is all about because it can widen our understanding of an author's work by evaluating, summarizing, interpreting, and exploring its value. I found out that the purpose of literary criticism is to help us readers better engage with literature. My chosen theory among the different literary theories is romanticism. When I heard this theory, the first thing that came to mind was that this literature deals with romantic feelings or love stories. I instantly connected the word romanticism with romance and love. But listening to the reporter and taking down notes, I found out that this topic is literally different from what I think. The father of Romanticism is Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and this theory is all about a literary movement that emphasized imagination, emotion, and individualism. Through the handouts provided by the reporter, I gained an understanding of this theory and the different ideas that were discovered about romanticism. Romanticism took place in Europe and America around 1780–1850. During the discussion, I learned that there are different elements of romanticism, and I got interested because I wanted to learn more about this theory. Romantic writers found out that most of their readers understand and enjoy their works because people can relate to the characters they created and they will represent certain female characters as innocent and naive bundles of perfection, and their admirers will be more interested in them. Romantic writers also include individuality in that they give the readers access to the characters innermost thoughts and desires. Nature is also an important element of romanticism because it is a source of inspiration for romantic writers. I learned that the main ideas concerning romanticism were individuality, emotions, the beauty of nature, and imagination. I'm excited to read novels or stories that deal with romanticism since I can already determine what elements are used in the story, and it can expand our imagination, knowledge, and perspective about a literary piece. It can improve our critical thinking skills and reading comprehension as well by interpreting what we are reading, and we can also acquire insights and learn to appreciate every literary piece. After reading, we can apply what we have learned to a real-life situation based on our interpretation of the literary piece. Reader Response Criticism Reflection: Way back in my junior and senior high school years, when our teacher would give us a task to make a reaction paper or reflection paper on the story that we read, we would write about our understanding of the text, our interpretation of the story, and most importantly, the lesson that we could get from the story and how we could use it in a real-life scenario. When I heard reader response criticism, I directly came up with the idea that it was all about expressing the reader's understanding and interpretation of what he or she read. Giving his or her opinion about the text and explaining his or her personal reaction to the text. Well, I found out that reader response criticism believes that a reader's interaction with the text gives its meaning. I personally believe that a text cannot exist without the reader, because the reader's interaction and interpretation of the text are very important since they are the ones who can give a text sufficient meaning based on their own understanding of what they read. I learned that reader response critics are more focused on looking for meaning in the act of reading a literary piece. Based on what I understand about this theory, a successful reader response critic does not just simply respond to a text because anyone can do that, I but we also need to analyze our responses carefully and the responses of others as well. I also got the idea of the difference between subjective and objective reader response criticism. When we say subjective reading of a text, it is one that emphasizes the attitude, mood, and opinions of the readers, while objective reading of a text is one that is influenced by emotion or personal prejudices. Additionally, in this theory, there is an interaction between the structures of the text and the reader's response to a text because every individual will interact with the text differently and we have different interpretations of the text. To sum everything up, reader response criticism is all about when the reader creates meaning in the text rather than just finding it. It is more focused on the readers understanding and interpretation of the text, how they create meaning from it, and how they explain their personal reaction to the text. As a student, I realized that we readers are not just passive readers of a text's meaning, we should actively engage in the creation of meaning in a text. Readers can create their own unique meaning of a text, but that doesn't mean they can just give random interpretations; they should always consider that the response should be connected to the text that they are reading and that the thought is still there, or that we should have a textual support. Marxist Criticism Reflection: At first, I didn’t have any idea what Marxist criticism was all about since this was new to me. I just heard this word in our English 23 class. When the reporter introduces this topic, I am like an empty can. I am really clueless what this is all about. As the discussion continued, I found out that Marxist criticism is all about the uncovering of relationships of domination and exploitation, even when they are disguised in idealistic terms. It's very important for us to understand the social world since Marxist criticism focuses on socioeconomic relationships. Marxist criticism emphasizes how social class establishes hierarchical power structures. I also learned that societies have been characterized by class struggles. During that time, the class struggle is between the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class) and the proletariat (the working class). The bourgeoisie are the capitalist-owning class, and they control the means of production and hold economic and political power, while the proletariat are the working class, who sell their labor to the bourgeoisie in exchange for wages. In conclusion, Marxist criticism is a tool for us to analyze literature and culture, emphasizing the socioeconomic and class dynamics that shape the narratives and characters of a literary piece. Marxist criticism encourages us to think critically about the broader implications of literature and to examine the power structure, inequalities, and societal issues present in the literary works so that we can also reflect on the real world that we are facing right now.