Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxation Law Week 6
Taxation Law Week 6
Taxation Law Week 6
3. Compare the decisions in Scottish Australian Mining and Whitfords Beach. How may the
facts in Whitfords Beach be distinguished from Scottish Australian Mining?
● Fishermen formed a company which had acquired land to provide fishermen with
access to fishing shacks on the beach. (no intention for carry-on a business, just
wanted access).
● Land value subsequently increased. Developers bought shares in the company (ie,
change of control), and had the company develop/subdivide and sell the land. Court
found that following the change of control, the company had ventured into a land
development business. Taxpayer was assessed on the profit
● Isolated transaction can give rise to income (not the realisation of a capital asset as
opposed to Scottish Australian Mining)
5. Explain the reasons for the different outcomes in the decisions in McCauley v FCT and
Stanton v FCT?
6. Compare the decisions in Egerton-Warburton and Foley v Fletcher. How may the facts in
Egerton-Warburton be distinguished from Foley v Fletcher?
● Foley and fletcher are about annuities
● Whether there is ;(a return of capital) or (payment of interest)- the first one is not
taxable the second one is.