Eisenhower and Khrushchev had differing approaches that impacted the Cold War. Eisenhower continued Truman's containment policy but emphasized nuclear weapons. He formed NATO and other alliances. Khrushchev initially improved relations by ending the Korean War and occupying Austria. However, he damaged relations by crushing the Hungarian Revolution. Both leaders participated in summits but also had confrontations like the U-2 incident and Cuban Missile Crisis that increased tensions.
Eisenhower and Khrushchev had differing approaches that impacted the Cold War. Eisenhower continued Truman's containment policy but emphasized nuclear weapons. He formed NATO and other alliances. Khrushchev initially improved relations by ending the Korean War and occupying Austria. However, he damaged relations by crushing the Hungarian Revolution. Both leaders participated in summits but also had confrontations like the U-2 incident and Cuban Missile Crisis that increased tensions.
Eisenhower and Khrushchev had differing approaches that impacted the Cold War. Eisenhower continued Truman's containment policy but emphasized nuclear weapons. He formed NATO and other alliances. Khrushchev initially improved relations by ending the Korean War and occupying Austria. However, he damaged relations by crushing the Hungarian Revolution. Both leaders participated in summits but also had confrontations like the U-2 incident and Cuban Missile Crisis that increased tensions.
Eisenhower
(1953-‐1962)
Khrushchev
(1953-‐1964)
-‐ Ran
on
a
platform
of
being
harder
on
Communism
(during
-‐ As
soon
as
he
and
a
collective
leadership
took
over
from
the
late
McCarthyism)
and
became
the
first
Republican
president
in
20
Stalin,
there
were
immediate
positive
changes
to
the
Cold
War
years
o 1953:
Signed
an
armistice
with
Korea
-‐ Introduced
the
New
Look
o 1954:
Arranged
peace
conference
in
Geneva
to
deal
with
o Still
supported
Truman’s
policy
of
containment,
the
Indochina
War
under
USSR
and
British
leadership
although
his
Secretary
of
State,
John
Foster
Dulles,
o 1955:
Power
summit
in
Geneva
between
USSR,
US,
expressed
a
desire
for
a
rollback
policy
Britain,
and
France
o Regarded
nukes
as
the
first
resort,
implementing
a
policy
§ First
time
they
met
since
Potsdam
in
1945
–
of
massive
retaliation
“spirit
of
Geneva”
o Scaled
down
the
size
of
the
conventional
military
and
o 1955:
Occupational
forces
of
Austria
decided
to
end
the
increased
number
of
nuclear
weapons
occupation
and
re-‐establish
full
independence
of
the
§ 1953-‐1960;
1,534-‐871
size
of
US
army/thousands
country
–
not
possible
in
Germany/Korea
-‐ Formed
many
alliances
§ Also
withdrew
from
Finland
o 1954:
SEATO
with
US,
France,
Britain,
Australia,
New
o Khrushchev
reduced
the
size
of
the
Red
Army
(without
Zealand,
the
Philippines,
Thailand,
and
Pakistan,
the
other
side
doing
it)
preventing
communist
expansion
o 1955:
Khrushchev
went
to
Yugoslavia
to
heal
the
rift
and
o 1955:
Baghdad
Pact,
aim
of
preventing
the
USSR
to
get
show
that
the
USSR
could
accept
a
communist
state
not
a
foothold
in
the
Middle
East
–
US
didn’t
join,
but
stood
under
the
control
of
Moscow
behind
it
-‐ Claimed
in
his
Secret
Speech
in
1956
that
he
believed
in
o 1955:
Offered
Germany
a
full
membership
of
NATO
peaceful
coexistence
with
the
capitalist
states
§ Allowed
German
forces
again
-‐ When
Hungary
announced
free
elections,
Khrushchev
wanted
to
-‐ Testing
of
the
extent
of
Eisenhower’s
commitment
to
rollback
make
sure
it
didn’t
go
too
far,
so
he
moved
in
the
Red
Army
–
o 1953:
Revolt
in
East
Berlin
against
communist
rule
–
no
crushing
the
Hungarian
Uprising
US
support
o Strained
relations
with
Mao
o 1956:
Hungary
revolted
against
Soviet
control
–
no
US
o Brought
an
end
to
the
“spirit
of
Geneva”
support
o Showed
the
emptiness
of
Eisenhower’s
“rollback”
o 1956:
Suez
Crisis
–
US
refused
to
support
Britain,
France,
rhetoric
and
Israel,
making
them
on
the
same
side
as
the
USSR
o Damaged
reputation
of
USSR
internationally
o 1958:
2nd
Berlin
Crisis,
Eisenhower
declared
he
wanted
-‐ 1956:
Suez
Crisis
–
gave
Khrushchev
the
opportunity
to
expand
to
avoid
conflict
over
Berlin
Soviet
influence
past
the
Satellite
states
and
into
Latin
America
-‐ Times
he
used
it
legitimately
and
the
Middle
East
o 1954:
There
was
a
coup
d’état
in
Guatemala,
which
was
o Escalation
of
tensions
and
departure
from
Stalin
Eisenhower
(1953-‐1962)
Khrushchev
(1953-‐1964)
Organized
by
the
CIA
–
deposed
democratically
elected
-‐ Participated
in
many
summit
meetings,
although
left
the
Paris
President
Jacobo
Arbenz
who
seemed
to
be
leaning
summit
in
1960
in
anger
when
Eisenhower
refused
to
apologize
towards
Communism
too
slightly
for
the
U2
Incident
o 1956:
Eisenhower
allowed
spy
planes
over
Russian
-‐ 1958:
Put
pressure
of
West
to
find
solution
to
Berlin
–
6-‐month
territories
ultimatum
–
if
not,
then
the
USSR
would
recognize
East
o 1954-‐55:
Eisenhower
committed
the
US
to
defend
Germany
and
hand
over
control
of
Berlin
to
the
DDR
(which
the
Taiwan
during
the
Taiwan
Straits
Crisis
West
didn’t
recognize)
o US
supported
Diem
in
Vietnam
after
France
left
–
o This
is
the
2nd
Berlin
Crisis,
and
failed
for
Khrushchev
execution
of
Domino
Theory
when
he
extended
the
time
limit
o 1957:
Eisenhower
Doctrine
–
stated
that
the
US
would
o Erected
Berlin
Wall,
and
was
seen
as
a
symbol
of
defend
any
state
in
the
Middle
East
threatened
by
Communist
repression
Communist
aggression
-‐ 1962:
Cuban
Missile
Crisis
–
provided
Cuba
with
nukes,
brought
o 1961:
Planned
the
Bay
of
Pigs
invasion
in
Cuba
the
world
to
the
brink
of
nuclear
war
o Communist
Cuba
would
provide
the
USSR
with
a
foothold
in
Latin
America,
and
reduce
Soviet
nuclear
inferiority
o Had
sobering
effect
on
both
powers,
establishing
the
Hot
Line
between
the
Kremlin
and
the
White
House,
and
led
to
the
signing
of
the
Test
Ban
Treaty
in
1963
-‐ Brought
détente
and
confrontation
to
the
Cold
War
o Talked
about
making
“many
Vietnams”
o Contrasted
with
“peaceful
coexistence”
–
impulsive
-‐ Both
contributed
to
confrontation
but
also
détente,
while
Stalin
and
Truman
were
more
Cold
Warriors
-‐ Khrushchev
was
more
unpredictable
–
see
Secret
Speech
and
Cuba