Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thoeries of Crime Causation
Thoeries of Crime Causation
E
O
RI
M
ES A
N
OF U
E
C L
B
RI .
L
M O
M
Learning Objectives
Module Overview
Introduction
Crime in its legal sense are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that can
be punished by imprisonment and/or fine. While in its behavioral definition of crime focuses on
criminality, a certain personality profile that causes the most alarming sorts of crimes. The
explanation why crime was committed or the causes of crime is not an easy thing to do because
there are so many factors and circumstances to consider thus making it complex. This
statement is supported by SCCJR emphasizing that “There is no one ‘cause’ of crime. Crime is
a highly complex phenomenon that changes across cultures and across time”. Crime does not
evolve from any single source and there are several reasons behind a person’s criminal
behavior (Pratap, 2016). Scholars pointed out their own views on the causes of crimes and it
has been observed that there are agreements and disagreements which would give an idea of
confusion to everyone. Many theories have common traits, but differences among them still
exist. Understanding these differences is key to understanding the often contradictory views of
crime and deviance they purport to explain (Akers, Sellers, See and Kieser, 2013).
New generations of criminology scholars brought new insights based on what they
observed in their society and the outcomes of crime commission. The pioneers in the field of
sciences and criminology established the foundation and served as a basis of having further
studies on crime causation. Their contributions had been appreciated and had shown relevance
in the modern society more specifically in dealing with crimes.
LESSON 1. Crime its Concepts and Theory: It’s Concept and Relevance
Theory
S t r a i n t h e o r y :
S o c i a l c o n t r o l
t h e o r y :
Most people would commit crime if
not for the controls that society places on
individuals through institutions such as
schools, workplaces, churches, and families.
L a b e l i n g t h e o r y :
People in power decide what acts
are crimes, and the act of labeling someone a
criminal is what makes him a criminal. Once a
person is labeled a criminal, society takes
away his opportunities, which may ultimately
lead to more criminal behavior.
Key Concepts 1. Theories are useful tools that help us to understand and explain the
world around us. In criminology, they help us to understand the workings of the criminal
justice system and the actors in the system. 2. Theories suggest the way things are, not
the way things ought to be. They are not inherently good or bad; however, they can be
used for good or bad purposes. 3. A theory can try to explain crime for a large social unit
or area (macro), or it can attempt to explain crime at the individual or smaller unit level
(micro). 4. Because we are dealing with human behavior, the social sciences will never be
like the hard sciences. In the hard sciences, the theory of relativity will not change. In the
social sciences, however, we deal with probabilities. The social scientist will say things
such as, “A severely neglected child will probably commit, or tend to commit, delinquent
acts.” 5. To be used for maximum effectiveness, theories must make sense (logical
consistency), explain as much crime as possible (scope), and be as concise as possible
(parsimony). Most important, the theory must be true or correct (validity). Having 4 met
these basic goals, the theory must then have some real world applications and policy
implications. 6. Many theories have common traits, but differences among them still exist.
Understanding these differences is key to understanding the often contradictory views of
https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199844487/
guide1/study_guide.pdf