Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ogl 350 Policybrief
Ogl 350 Policybrief
Christopher A. Duree
Executive Summary
Diversity in management and within the workplace has proven to be beneficial for
organizations globally. Diversity, however, can bring uncertainties and breed divisiveness
between members withing groups of all sizes. Incorporating and representing inclusive practices
can make sure all voices are heard and provides, everyone a chance to develop and succeed in
their roles and as a team. Inclusive policies can be implemented to ensure individuals are
respected, while giving them a fair chance to contribute to and benefit from organizations.
Diversity and Inclusion has become an increasingly intertwined term but there needs to be more
attention given to Inclusion policies in order for organizations and their members to thrive.
Without inclusion, diversity can create division. Diversity alone forces the notion that the
individuals within the organization are created different and therefore places titles, names, and
other descriptions on and about each person. Inclusion rounds out diversity by respecting the
individual difference while promoting equality. These individuals should be recognized for who
and what they are without prejudice, but the focus should be on the bringing together of these
characteristics. The very nature of creating a diverse workplace is much needed, but when done
improperly it can create echo chambers, cliques, and ineffective group dynamics. When diverse
teams polarize, they can become destructive to the organization. Leadership teams can mitigate
this by incorporating inclusive practices, policies, and by representing inclusive actions from a
top-down approach.
In the context of the workplace, inclusion is very important. Imagine for a moment that
you are a hiring manager on a mission to create a more diverse team, one that represents a blend
of color, race, ideas, gender, religions, and experiences. You may check all of these boxes when
creating your team, but could unknowingly do so in a way that is non-inclusive and inefficient
for the team dynamic and organization. A person who practices Islam may be the only one in
their environment who does so, and could feel out of place by breaking away for prayer or
requesting specific religious holidays off. Likewise, a person who speaks English as a second
language may be the best candidate for the job technically but feel pressure when trying to
communicate with other team members. Another thing that could happen would be groups of
these individuals sticking with each other and not developing new workplace relationships,
because they are more comfortable working alongside like-minded or similar people.
Another factor that comes in to play is how diversity is spread and represented in an
organization. If the bottom end workers are multicultural, but the entire board is of the same
background, the working-class group may feel underserved and unrepresented. It is important
that diversity and inclusion is represented at all organizational levels while policies on the matter
engulf and guide the actions of all parties. It is essential that the highest levels of leadership are
held to the same standards and approaches if not more when compared to the foundational
workforce.
Forcing interaction between people can create tension and animosity towards one
another. When incorporating policies, it is important to guide the team towards beneficial
practices rather than stipulating punishments for not complying. In the effort of developing
Inclusion policies, an organization should encourage team work, respect, and tolerance, while
4
providing safe avenues for reporting and monitoring of potential toxic or hazardous situations.
The attempt to incentivize inclusion could appear disingenuous and potentially cause more
tension. Policy should focus protecting the individual rights of team members while encouraging
One specific policy option would be to incorporate periodic round tables or group
meetings where each person is able to share or explain their ideas in front of the group without
reprisal. Discussions should not be guided, rather mentored by a senior respected member in the
constructive dialog rather than polar argumentation. Allowing members of all ranks the
opportunity to express concerns, offer solutions, and recognize their peers in a safe setting,
creates a healthy environment where the individuals start to work collectively to accomplish the
Another policy to increase team effectiveness through inclusion would be to divide work
teams up on rotations. This could be structured rigidly or nudged in the right direction by
leadership. Within the same shift, or on a rotating basis, individuals could be split up and
assigned with others on tasks. Allowing multiple groups to problem solve and work together
rather than the same team doing the same job every time. This could be beneficial in many ways.
New ideas and better process could form, friendships will be developed, and interpersonal
connections would grow. As each person on a team is given the opportunity to work with
someone new, eventually all members have experience with each other and the group becomes
more fluid. Breakouts with different sets of individuals will begin to happen naturally and less
Supporting Research
5
A recent study by the McKinsey Company showed that some employees found their
work environments to be diverse but less inclusive. “While overall sentiment on diversity was 52
percent positive and 31 percent negative, sentiment on inclusion was markedly worse, at only 29
percent positive and 61 percent negative. This encapsulates the challenge that even the more
diverse companies still face in tackling inclusion (Exhibit 4). Hiring diverse talent isn’t enough
—it’s the workplace experience that shapes whether people remain and thrive.” (Dixon-Fyle et
al., 2022) The study goes on to show that in three indicators of inclusion—equality, openness,
and belonging, sentiments were overwhelmingly negative in response from the industries
studied. These findings reinforce the idea that diversity as a standalone does not create the type
of environment that most employees want to experience. Employees want to be respected and
In studies by Deloitte Insights, it was found that companies with inclusive cultures are
twice as likely to meet financial targets, three times as likely to be “high performing”, six times
more likely to be “innovative”, and eight time more likely to achieve “better business outcomes.”
They concluded that team members feel included when they are treated equal and with respect.
Their recommendation is that inclusion policies start with equal participation without favoritism
(Bourke, 2018). Furthermore, Deloitte claims that the actions and behaviors of a team’s leader
effects the team’s perception on individual and team performance. They identified the following
traits a leader needs to create a diverse and inclusive environment. Those traits are commitment,
courage, cognizant of bias, curiosity, culturally intelligent, and collaboration. “Clearly, these
traits are much more than just being “nice” to people, or even just being aware of unconscious
biases. Our view is that inclusive leadership is broader and a much more intentional and effortful
process. In essence, inclusion of diversity means adaptation. Leaders must alter their behaviors
6
and the surrounding workplace to suit the needs of diverse talent, ideas, customers, and markets.”
(Bourke, 2018). The choices of who leads, and how, can drastically affect your team’s
The pressure to create diverse workforces is higher now more than ever. Creating an
equal playing field and incorporating diversity is not only the right thing to do, but can also be
highly beneficial for organizations across all industries. The simple fact stands however, that
diversity left to itself in the most basic form creates more tension and divineness. Organizations
and leaders should be focused on a growth mindset that incorporates increasing diversity in all
ways across their domains, but also provides methods to bring the best out of those varied
experiences. Creating policies that drive collaboration, protect individuals, and embody team
It is recommended that that diversity and inclusion is shown at all levels of hierarchy.
Leading by example and showing representation is extremely important to show from the top
down, and the effect leadership has on the team has been highlighted. A leader in today’s
workplace needs to not only understand their biases, but be open to new cultures, ideas, process,
and interactions. Teams will become ever more diverse naturally and through action, and it is up
to change leaders to make sure those diverse voices are heard, understood, and acknowledged. It
is no longer “enough” to just place diverse people in roles out of hitting a target or adhering to
affirmative action plans. Inclusion should be at the forefront of all central policies, and
incoherence to these policies should not be tolerated. Equality felt in the workplace translates to
innovation, process improvement, better product development, and more satisfied teams.
7
Adopting inclusive policies is not only the right way of doing business, but a better way of doing
business.
8
References
Bourke, J. (2018, January 22). The diversity and Inclusion Revolution: Eight powerful truths.
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-22/diversity-and-inclusion-
at-work-eight-powerful-truths.html
Dixon-Fyle, S., Dolan, K., Hunt, D. V., & Prince, S. (2022, April 6). Diversity wins: How
inclusion matters. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-wins-how-
inclusion-matters