Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annex-11-Layout-And-Design-Evaluation-Tool 4
Annex-11-Layout-And-Design-Evaluation-Tool 4
Annex-11-Layout-And-Design-Evaluation-Tool 4
Guidelines, Tool and Summary of Findings Template for Layout and Design Evaluation
of DepEd-Developed ADM Modules
Mechanics
1. Terms of Reference. The Learning Resource Evaluators (LREs) shall perform the following roles
and responsibilities:
1.1 Evaluate and check the assigned DDLRs for physical attributes, design and layout,
typograpical organization, visuals, and other types of format errors.
1.2 Write specific comments and findings on the margins of the assigned modules and prepare
an evaluation report that shall guide the development team in making needed revisions.
1.3 Discuss with the development team to clarify the comments and findings made on the
layout and design of assigned ADM modules (if needed).
2. You will receive the following materials:
Assigned set/s of ADM modules to be evaluated
Guide in the Evaluation of Layout and Design of DepEd-developed ADM Modules
Evaluation Tool for Layout and Design (see Annex 1) – digital copy to be provided
Summary of Findings template (see Annex 2) – digital copy to be provided
3. Allot sufficient time to evaluate and accomplish the Individual Content Evaluation tool and
Summary of Findings for each assigned ADM module.
4. Evaluate the assigned modules one at a time. First, scan the material in order to appreciate
quickly its organization, coverage, and general approach. Then, evaluate the LRs in its entirety to
determine if there are errors in layout and design.
5. Use the following criterion items found in the Evaluation Tool template (Annex 1) as your guide
in writing marginal notes:
A. Physical Attributes
Check the LRs for:
Appropriateness of cover
Completeness of required elements
B. Design and Layout
The LRs should:
Observe consistent use of elements
Have simple and attractive design
Contain adequate illustrations in relation to text
Have harmonious blending of elements
Be suitable to the target users
C. Typograpical Organization
Instructions:
1. Carefully read the learning resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance
to standards indicated in the criterion items under the four (4) factors below.
2. Put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer
is NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.
4. Based on the number of criterion items marked “YES” under each factor, mark the
appropriate column to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.
5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items
and multiply this with 70% to determine the cutoff for compliance.
Factor IV. Visuals (e.g., illustrations, photographs, maps, tables, graphs, etc.)
11. Line drawings are not shaded to avoid poorly and blotchy printed pages /
12. Illustrations of animals and people are facing inside the page /
13. Illustrations of a process involving separate steps or actions have /
individual pictures or frames
Complied Not
Note: At least 9 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to Complied
this factor.
For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO
corrections.
I / We certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report
are my / our own and have been made without any undue influence from others.
Signature: ______________________________
Specific
Paragraph / Line /
Brief description of Errors/ recommendations for
Page number
Findings/ Observations improving the identified
(in chronological order)
criterion
__________________________________ ____________________________
Name and Signature of the Evaluator