Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advocacy Skills For Law School of Tanzan
Advocacy Skills For Law School of Tanzan
Advocacy Skills For Law School of Tanzan
by Solicitor Katura.
ADVOCACY SKILLS
ETHICAL STRUCTURES:-
1. Litigation fairness
2. Competence
3. Confidentiality
4. Charge reasonable fees
5. Loyalty
a) Litigation fairness – This include fairness to your client, Court, your fellow advocates and
fairness to yourself as an advocate, fairness may mean the following:-
1. Preparation of an advocate before he or she goes to Court and arriving to Court on time, this
means fairness to yourself as an advocate.
2. Holding brief for your fellow advocate, this means fairness to your fellow advocate.
3. The habit of not misleading the Court and being honest to the Court this means fairness to
the Court.
c) Confidentiality - This means protecting or keeping a client’s information between you and the
client, and not telling others including co-workers, friends, family, etc. Examples of maintaining
confidentiality include:-
1. Client's files are locked and secured
2. Do not tell other people what is in a client’s file unless they have permission from the client.
3. Do not tell what you have discussed with client about his case or what is going on his case
proceedings.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
Types of informations that are considered confidential can include:-
1. Name, date of birth, age, sex and address, current contact details of family, guardian etc
2. Charges and fees
3. Bank details
4. Medical history or records
5. Service records and file progress notes
6. Individual personal plans
7. Assessments or reports
8. Incoming or outgoing personal correspondence.
d) Charge reasonable fees – Lawyers are allowed to bargain with clients as according to
circumstances and nature of a case though there are laws guiding them to charge reasonable fees.
e.g:- 3%, 5%, 7% and 10%.
e) Loyalty – In order for clients to have confidence in the legal system, lawyers must be free from
conflicting interests, in order to promote effective representation. A lawyer is required to be
committed and to act in the best interest of his client. A lawyer owes the client a duty of candour
(honesty).
A lawyer must be able to provide his client with complete and undivided loyalty, dedication, full
disclosure, and good faith, all of which may be jeopardized (in danger) if more than one interest is
represented.
1. PRE-LITIGATION PHASE
PRE-LITIGATION PHASE – This begins even before the court process starts and attempts to
resolve the case before it goes through court.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
STAGES OF PRE-LITIGATION:-
1. Meeting client stage
2. Research stage
3. Case analysis stage
4. Legal opinion stage
5. Demand letter stage
6. Informal dispute resolution stage
7. Choice of forum stage
8. Drafting pleadings stage
B. CONTRACT
1. Validity of contract
2. Breach of contract
3. Damages suffered
C. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
1. Plaintiff is prosecuted by defendant
2. Absence of reasonable and probable cause
3. Malicious intention
4. Damages and loss
D. DEFAMATION
1. The statement must be defamatory
2. The statement must be directed to the plaintiff
3. The statement must be defamatory.
BETWEEN
LAKE FISHERIES
AND
KATURA LOGISTICS LTD
CASE THEORIES – These are the facts which can be proved or disproved at trial. OR This is
the best explanation of the available evidence logically showing why your client should win the
case.
CASE THEME – This is the convincing thread that explains your theory and inform all aspects of
your case presentation.
The Case theme should have emotional elements and must be memorable to the Court. The
Case theme is that which can make the Court think positive on your emotions. The purpose of the
Case theme is to try to have major impact on the Court.
Relevant case;
MOHAMED KATINDI AND ANOTHER v REPUBLIC (1986) TLR 134 (HC)
LUGAKINGIRA J stated that;
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
“It is an obligation of the Defence Counsel in duty to his client and as an officer of the Court to
indicate in Cross-Examination the theme of his client’s defence”.
2. LITIGATION PHASE
A: ADVERSARIAL SYSTEM
This is the legal system used in common law countries which involves litigation of the
parties' case or position before an impartial person or persons, usually magistrate, a jury or judge,
who attempt to determine or decide the truth basing on the evidences adduced and pass judgment
accordingly.
a) PLEADINGS STAGE
1. Plaint
2. Written statement of defence
3. Counter claim
4. Set-off
1. PLAINT – This is a pleading served by the plaintiff in a Court action containing the allegations
made against the defendant and the relief sought by the plaintiff.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
CONTENTS OF PLAINT
CPC CAP 33 ORDER VII RULE 1.
The plaint shall contain the following particulars;-
(a) the name of the court in which the suit is brought;
(b) the name, description and place of residence of the plaintiff;
(c) the name, description and place of residence of the defendant, so far as they can be ascertained;
(d) where the plaintiff or the defendant is a minor or a person of unsound mind, a statement to that
effect;
(e) the facts constituting the cause of action and when it arose;
(f) the facts showing that the court has jurisdiction;
(g) the relief which the plaintiff claims;
(h) where the plaintiff has allowed a set-off or relinquished a portion of his claim, the amount so
allowed or relinquished; and
(i) a statement of the value of the subject matter of the suit for the purposes of jurisdiction and of
court fees, so far as the case admits.
SAMPLE OF A PLAINT
BETWEEN
DENIS TEMBA............................................................ PLAINTIFF
AND
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD........................................... .................DEFENDANT
PLAINT
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
Opening statement
The Plaintiff above named states as follows:-
The agreement
4. That, on 28th May, 2017 the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into agreement for the
construction of the residential house at the consideration of 500 million. The copy of the
said agreement is hereby attached and marked as “DT-1” and leave of the Court is sought
to form part of the Plaint.
Payment
5. That, the whole amount of 500 million which is subject to the contract was paid in the same
day when the agreement was signed.
The time.
6. That, the completion date of the contract agreed between Plaintiff and Defendant was 19 th
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
April, 2018, to date nothing has been done.
WHEREFORE: The Plaintiff prays for judgement and decree against the defendant as follows,
for:-
1. An order declared that a defendant has breached the contract.
2. An order for payment of Tshs 500 millions being amount paid to the defendant for the
construction of the house.
3. An order for payment of 20% interest for the amount stated of 500 millions and for the time
wastage.
4. An order for payment of general damages to be assessed by the Court.
5. An order for payment of 20% on general damages.
6. An order for payment of costs.
7. Any other relief the Court may deem fit and just to grant.
…........................... ............................
PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF'S ADVOCATE
VERIFICATION
I Denis Temba, being Plaintiff herein do hereby verified that what is stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, and 7 is true to the best of my knowledge, while paragraph 8 is the information I received from
my advocate.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
Verified at MWANZA this...........day of ….........2018
....................................
PLAINTIFF
.........................................
REGISTRY OFFICER
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER VIII RULE 1.-(1) Where a summons to appear has been issued,
the defendant may, and if so required by the Court shall, within seven days before the first hearing,
present a written statement of his defence.
BETWEEN
DENIS TEMBA............................................................ PLAINTIFF
AND
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD........................................... .................DEFENDANT
WHEREFORE, the Defendant prays for dismissal of the suit with costs.
….......................
ADVOCATE FOR THE DEFENDANT
VERIFICATION
I , PETER MABULA, the Managing Director of the Defendant herein, do hereby verified that
what is stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is true to the best of my knowledge.
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER VIIIA RULE 1. The rules provided under this order shall not
apply to the following:-
(a) a suit in which summons to appear is issued to the defendant under paragraph (a) of rule 1
under Order V and no written statement of defence is filed pursuant to the provisions of sub-rule
(1) of rule 1 under Order VIII; or
(b) a suit in a non-contentions matter.
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER VIIIA RULE 3(1) In every case assigned to a specific judge or
magistrate, a first scheduling and settlement conference attended by the parties or their recognised
agents or advocates shall be held and presided over by such judge or magistrate within a period of
twenty-one days after conclusion of the pleadings for the purpose of ascertaining the speed track of
the case, resolving the case through negotiation, mediation, arbitration or such other procedures
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
not involving a trial.
(2) In ascertaining the speed track of the case, the presiding judge or magistrate, shall after
consultation with the parties or their recognised agents or advocates, determine the appropriate
speed track for such a case and make a scheduling order, setting out the dates or time for future
events or steps in the case, including preliminary applications, affidavits, counter affidavits and
notices, and the use of procedures for alternative disputes resolution.
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER VIIIA RULE 3(3). The appropriate speed track of a case shall
be determined as follows-
(a) Speed Track One shall be reserved for a case considered by the judge or magistrate to be fast
cases, capable of being or are required in the interests of justice to be concluded fast within a
period not exceeding ten months from commencement of the case;
(b) Speed Track Two shall be reserved for cases considered by the judge or magistrate to be
normal cases capable of being or are required in the interests of justice to be concluded within a
period not exceeding twelve months from commencement of the case;
(c) Speed Track Three shall be reserved for cases considered by the judge or magistrate to be
complex cases capable of being or are required in the interests of justice to be concluded within a
period not exceeding fourteen months;
(d) Speed Track Four shall be reserved for cases considered by the judge or magistrate to be
special cases which fall in none of the three above mentioned categories but which nonetheless
need to be concluded within a period not exceeding twenty-four months.
ORDER VIIIA OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE does not prohibits the court to hear the
case where Speed Track has not been determined or fixed.
RELEVANT CASE
Mgana v Palav and Others (HC. CIVIL CASE NO. 112 OF 2000)
It was Held that; At any rate, there is no provision under 0. VIII A of the Civil Procedure Code
which prohibits the court to hear the case where no Speed Track has not been determined. In this
particular case, as no Speed Track was ever fixed, it would be unfair to say that such period has
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
expired and to require the plaintiff to apply before this court for extension of time within which this
court should finalize his case.
ORDER VIII A RULE 4. “Where a scheduling conference order is made, no departure from or
amendment of such order shall be allowed unless the court is satisfied that such departure of
amendment is necessary”.
RELEVANT CASES
TANZANIA FERTILIZER CO; LTD. VS NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
LTD. AND ANOTHER (UNREPORTED) COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 71 OF 2004.
Held:-
In which Massati, J. as he then was held inter-alia that if a party finds that the deadline for the
realization of his case is about to expire, he is legally bound to seek extension or amendment of the
Scheduling Order well before its expiry and that if it expires his duty is to apply for extension of
time for filing an application for departure.
Mwanza City Engineer & Another vs Anchor Traders Ltd. High Court Civil Appeal No. 17 of
2005 (unreported)
Held;-
It was held that in which Madame R.M. Rweyemamu, J. declared the proceedings of the District
Court of Mwanza in Civil Case No. 88 of 1998 which were conducted after the expiration of the
Speed Track which had been fixed to conclude the same as a nullity.
Msaka vs Peter Massawe and Another. High Court Civil Case No. 124 of 1998 (unreported)
Held:-
Madame N.P. Kimaro, J. declared that the suit is struck out on grounds that the period scheduled for
finalization of the suit had expired and the plaintiff had not sought leave to extend the same.
c) MEDIATION STAGE
Mediation – This is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in which disputing parties reach
an agreement on their own. There is a neutral third party called the mediator, guiding the entire
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
process.
As under ORDER VIIIC RULE 1. Where negotiation or mediation or other similar alternative
procedure for resolving the matters in dispute between the parties is directed by the court under a
scheduling order made under sub-rule (2) of rule 3 of Order VIIIA or under sub-rule (1) or rule 3 of
Order VIIIB, such negotiation, mediation or similar alternative procedure, other than arbitration,
shall be conducted in accordance with directions issued by the Chief Justice.
As under ORDER VIIIB RULE 3.-(1) Where, after full compliance with the directions made
under sub-rule (2) of rule 3 of Order VIIIA, the case remains unresolved, a final pre-trial settlement
and scheduling conference shall be held, presided over by the judge or magistrate assigned to try
the case for the purpose of giving the parties a last chance to reach an amicable settlement of the
case and for enabling the Court to schedule the future events and steps which
are bound or likely to arise in the conduct of the case, including the date or dates of trial.
(2) In making a final pre-trial conference order, the court shall be guided by the Speed Track to
which the specific case is allocated.
(3) The final pre-trial settlement and scheduling conference shall be held within a period not
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
exceeding thirty days, forty days or sixty days from the time of full compliance with the first pre-
trial conference order in respect of cases allocated to Speed Track One, Two or Three respectively.
(4) Where an amicable settlement of the case is not reached pursuant to the provisions of sub-rule
(1) of this rule, the judge or magistrate presiding at such conference, shall, after consultation with
the parties or their recognised agents or advocates, make a final pre-trial conference order therein
framing the issues according to provisions of Order XVII of this Code, and fixing the trial date or
dates and generally providing for matters necessary for the expeditious trial of the case according
to the relevant Speed Track.
e) HEARING STAGE
Examination of Witnesses – This is the process of adducing relevant evidences from witnesses in a
court of law.
A. EXAMINATION IN-CHIEF – This is the questioning of a witness which is done by the party
who called him or her in a trial to testify for his side. The purposes is to show documentary and
other evidences.
Here is where you obtain evidences from your own witnesses. You need to ensure that your
witnesses give clear evidence and that they do not talk too fast in order that notes can be taken.
Ensure the witness faces the Judge when answering questions and is not looking at you. This will
enhance the quality of their evidence. When asking your witnesses questions, you need to try to
elicit from them only the evidences that are relevant. Always therefore bear in mind why you are
asking your witness a particular question and what is you want to hear from them.
B. CROSS-EXAMINATION – This is the examination of a witness who has already been testified
in order to check or discredit the witness's testimony, knowledge, or credibility compare to
examination in chief.
Purposes of Cross-Examination:-
1. To test the truth, knowledge and credibility of the witness.
2. To destroy and contradict the witness thus letting down the other side.
3. To question the legal competence of the witness to testify and tendering documents.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
4. To weaken the testimony given in the examination in chief.
5. To build and establish your own case
Cross-Examination rules:-
1. Preparations – Advocate must study the whole case to make sure that he is familiar with
the case.
2. Leading questions are allowed – Advocate should prefer to ask leading question in this
stage though non-leading questions are also allowed but they are not advised. Leading
questions are good because they attract the answer of yes or no. Advocate is also advised to
not use questions which start with WHO, WHICH, WHY, WHEN, HOW And WHERE
because they give room to the witness to give explanations.
3. Never allow the witness to explain anything – If you find in Cross-Examination the
witness has been given a chance to explain, mark that the cross-examination has failed.
4. Organize your questions – Advocate supposed to ask series of questions which drive to a
certain conclusion, this means is supposed to ask questions which are related or show a
certain way to go.
5. Never ask questions you don't know the answer – Whatever the answer that witness can
give you, you are supposed to have the ability to challenge.
6. Don't repeat questions – Repeating questions shows the lack of preparations as well lack of
competence before the Court of law, and disgusting your client who is present in the Court
room.
7. Don't argue with the witness – Advocate should not argue with witness until he says Yes
or No and use logical to show the Court that he is wrong through asking him more
questions.
8. Don't ask questions which attacking the personality of a person - In cross-examination
you are allowed to ask any type of questions but subject to the relevant questions which do
not attack the personality of witness e.g:- Abusive questions and privacy of a witness.
9. Strong questions should be at the end – It is advised for the advocate toward the end of
his cross-examination to reserve the strong questions to be asked at the end so that he can
end up with on a high note which can be memorable before the Court.
10. Be logical – Don't just ask questions for the sake of asking, ask questions which are sense
to any reasonable person.
11. Write down the cross-examination questions from other side – It is advised for the
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
advocate to identify or note down the cross-examination questions of opponent so that they
can help him to discover weaknesses of other side and building up his case when it comes
his time to for cross-examination.
12. It is allowed to tender document in cross-examination – Here u may use the witness of
the other side to ask the Court to allow him to tender document which is in his supervision.
C. RE-EXAMINATION – This is the examination of witness for the parties which called the
witness for the purposes of building the case and to cure any damage which was caused in the
Cross-Examination.
Re-Examination rules:-
1. No leading questions allowed.
2. No tendering of documents.
3. Nothing new should be asked here.
4. Ask witness to clarify on his own words certain areas which were damaged or destroyed in
the cross-examination.
Final Submission - This is done after the parties have closed their cases, it is their right to submit.
In most cases the submission are done by lawyers because a layman can not do submission as it
needs citations of different authorities, provisions and cases which are relevant to the matter at
Court.
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER XVIII RULE 2-(1) “On the day fixed for the hearing of the suit
or on any other day to which the hearing is adjourned, the party having the right to begin shall state
his case and produce his evidence in support of the issues which he is bound to prove.
(2) The other party shall then state his case and produce his evidence (if any) and may then address
the court generally on the whole case.
(3) The party beginning may then reply generally on the whole case.”
The above Order of the CPC means that it is a defendant who starts to submit and it is here
whereby provisions and cases will be cited, and these provisions and cases cited must be relevant to
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
the matter at Court. Submissions can either be Orally or Written.
After the Defendant has submitted then it is a Plaintiff to submit and it is a defendant who is
going to make a reply for that submission.
g) JUDGEMENT STAGE
Judgment - As under CPC CAP 33 s.3 “"judgment" means the statement given by a judge or a
magistrate of the grounds for a decree or order.” Judgment is final decision in the disputed case.
b) Frame of issues
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER XX RULE 5. “In suits in which issues has be been framed, the
court shall state its finding or decision, with the reason therefore, upon each separate issue unless
the finding upon any on or more of the issues is sufficient for the decision of the suit.”
3. EXECUTION PHASE
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
EXECUTION - This is a court order granted to put in force a judgment of possession obtained by a
plaintiff from a court. When issuing a writ of execution, a court typically will order Court broker or
other similar official to take possession of property owned by a judgment debtor.
MODES OF EXECUTING
1- Attachment and sale – This is a court order to "attach" or seize an asset and sale. Every sale in
execution of a decree shall be conducted by an officer of the court or by such other person as the
court may appoint in this behalf, and shall be made by public auction in the manner prescribed. The
writ of attachment is issued in order to satisfy a judgment issued by the court.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXI RULE 63. “Any court
executing a decree may order that any property attached by it and liable to sale, or such portion
thereof as may seem necessary to satisfy the decree, shall be sold, and that the proceeds of such
sale, or a sufficient portion thereof, shall be paid to the party entitled under the decree to receive
the same.”
ORDER XXI RULE 64. “Save as otherwise prescribed, every sale in execution of a decree shall
be conducted by an officer of the court or by such other person as the court may appoint in this
behalf, and shall be made by public auction in the manner prescribed.”
2. Seizure and Delivery - This is the act of law enforcement officials taking property, including
cash, real estate, vehicles, etc., that has been used in connection with a matter disputed before the
Court.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXI RULE 77.-(1) “Where the
property sold is movable property of which actual seizure has been made, it shall be delivered to
the purchaser.”
ORDER XXI RULE 80.“Sales of immovable property in execution of decrees may be ordered by
any court.”
3. Arrest and Detention – The arrest and detention is also a mode of enforcing the decree of a civil
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
court. It depends on the decree holder whether he wants to opt for this mode of execution. When the
judgment debtor refuses to pay the money or does not comply with the court’s order, then the
decree holder can enforce it through arrest. Before ordering arrest, a court must record its reasons in
writing for doing so. However, it just be noted that mere inability to pay will not lead to an arrest.
There are also certain restrictions with respect to persons who can be arrested.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXI RULE 35.-(1) “where an
application is for the execution of a decree for the payment of money by the arrest and detention as
a civil prisoner of a judgment debtor who is liable to be arrested in pursuance of the application,
the court may, instead of issuing a warrant for his arrest, issue a notice calling upon him to appear
before the court on a day to be specified in the notice and show
cause why he should not be committed to prison.
(2) Where appearance is not made in obedience to the notice, the court shall, if the decree holder so
requires, issue a warrant for the arrest of the judgment debtor.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXXVIII RULE 1.-(1)
“Where it appears to the court to be just and convenient, the court may, by order, do any of the
following-
(a) Appoint a receiver of any property, whether before or after decree;
(b) Remove any person from the possession or custody of the property;
(c) Commit the property to the possession, custody or management of the receiver;
(d) Confer upon the receiver all such powers, as to bringing and defending suits and for the
realisation, management, protection, preservation and improvement of the property, the collection
of the rent and profits thereof, the application and disposal of such rents and profits, and the
execution of documents as the owner himself has, or such of those powers as the court thinks fit.”
5. A Garnishee Order - This is a common form of enforcing a judgment debt against a creditor to
recover money. Put simply, the court directs a third party that owes money to the judgement debtor
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
to instead pay the judgment creditor. The third party is called a 'garnishee'.
6. Demolition – This is the decision or order of the Court to break down the house built on the land
of decree holder.
EXECUTION PROCEDURE
It is done by filing a prescribed form no.C/3 which is found in Civil procedure
Code(prescribed form 2018). The form must be accompanied by decree, and once this is filed the
will be be given a summons to appear before the Court.
Hearing of the Application is done before the Regional Magistrate in-charge for the
subordinate Courts, and for the High Court is done before the Registrar. The Court brokers are the
one who executing the orders of the Court.
REMEDIES OF EXECUTION
1. Objection proceedings – These are objections which are brought by a third party who was not
involved in the case but his property was attached in the execution. The application for objection is
applied through Chamber summons and affidavit. When the objection is rejected the remedy is not
to appeal but to file a fresh case.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXI RULE 57.-(1) “Where any
claim is preferred to, or any objection is made to the attachment of, any property attached in
execution of a decree on the ground that such property is not liable to such attachment, the court
shall proceed to investigate the claim or objection with the like power as regards the examination of
the claimant or objector and in all other respects, as if he was a party to the suit”.
2. Stay of execution – This is a court order to temporarily suspend the execution of a court
judgment or other court order. This is the remedy which is available to the judgement debtor to stop
execution of a decree pending on an appeal or revision. This application is done through Chamber
summons and Affidavit.
As under THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 33. ORDER XXI RULE 24.-(1) “The court
to which a decree has been sent for execution shall, upon sufficient cause being shown, stay the
execution of such decree for a reasonable time, to enable the judgment debtor to apply to the court
by which the decree was passed or to any court having appellate jurisdiction in respect of the
decree or the execution thereof, for an order to stay execution or for any other order relating to the
decree or execution which might have been made by such court of first instance or appellate court if
execution had been issued thereby, or if application for execution had been made thereto.”
RELEVANT CASE
KHADIJA ABDALLAH v. AJESH VAJA AND TWO OTHERS (1996) TLR 126 (HC)
It was held that:- “No sufficient explanation was given as to why the application for stay of
execution was brought before the executing court. The order of the Resident Magistrate's court
staying execution is therefore ultra vires its powers. The Resident Magistrate's order is quashed, and
execution is permitted until such time as a lawful order for stay of execution is issued.”
3. Set aside the sale – When the execution is done and the property already sold to other party, here
the judgement debtor can apply for set aside the sale, and this application can be done through
Chamber summons and affidavit.
4. Lifting the attachment – A judgement debtor can apply for lifting the attachment of the property
thinks it is incorrect to attach.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
4. APPELLATE PHASE
Appellate - This is a process of re-examination of the judgment and decree, or order or the
decisions passed by the original court is a suit or in a case. The expression “appeal” has not been
defined in the code, but it may be defined as “the judicial examination of the decision by a higher
court of the decision of an inferior court”.
After the lower court judgment is entered into the record, the losing party (appellant) must
file a notice of intention to appeal if the matter is from subordinate Court to High Court and Notice
of Appeal if the matter is from High Court to Court of Appeal. An Appeal must have a decree and
accompanied by the memorandum of appeal, failure to comply the appeal can be struck out.
In appeal, one is not allowed to raise a new matter, but is supposed to raise the issues
occurred during proceeding except the issue of jurisdiction which can be raised at any time.
As under CPC CAP 33 ORDER XXXIX RULE 1.-(1) Every appeal shall be preferred in the form
of a memorandum signed by the appellant or his advocate and presented to the High Court
(hereinafter in this Order referred to as "the Court") or to such officer as it appoints in this behalf
and the memorandum shall be accompanied by a copy of the decree appealed from and (unless the
Court dispenses therewith) of the judgment on which it is founded.
(2) The memorandum shall set forth, concisely and under distinct heads, the grounds of objection to
the decree appealed from without any argument or narrative; and such grounds shall be numbered
consecutively.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
SAMPLE OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAL
AT KINONDONI
Between
MGISHA JABIRI YUSUPH ……..............................................………………….APPELLANT
And
JOHN GEORGE MASAMAKI……………………………..........................…….RESPONDENT
TAKE NOTICE that the above named Appellant being dissatisfied with the whole decision of the
Honourable Mr. Massati Mussa, given at the District Court of Kinondoni at Kinondoni on 26th
April 2018 intend to appeal to the High Court of Tanzania against the whole of the said decision as
decided.
KATURA ATTORNEYS,
8TH FLOOR OF AMANI PLACE,
OHIO STREET,
P.O.BOX 19813,
DAR ES SALAAM
……………………………..
Advocate for the Appellants
…………………….
COURT CLERK
REVIEW
This is done where in the judgment there are some mistakes need to be corrected. The Review is
applied in the same Court and when the Review is rejected you can not have the room for appeal.
As under CPC CAP 33 s.78.-(1) “Subject to any conditions and limitations prescribed under
section 77, any person considering himself aggrieved-
(a) by decree or order from which an appeal is allowed by this Code but from which no appeal has
been preferred; or
(b) by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed by this Code, may apply for a review of
judgment to the court which passed the decree or made the order, and the court may make such
order thereon as it thinks fit.”
j) REVISION – This is re-working and re-writing. Revision, meaning "to see again," takes place
during the entire writing process as we change words, rewrite sentences, and shift paragraphs from
one location to another in our essay. Revision means the action of revising, especially critical or
careful examination or perusal with a view to correcting or improving.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
In case the Primary Court, the Revision can be done by the District Court. Eg:- In case a Primary
Court entertained the Land matter and decide on it, that decision may be subjected to Revision in
the District Court, because the primary Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a Land matter.
As under CHAPTER 11 THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT s.22(1) A district court may
call for and examine the record of any proceedings in the primary court established for the district
for which it is itself established, and may examine the records and registers thereof, for the
purposes of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision or order of
the primary court, and as to the regularity of any proceedings therein, and may revise any such
proceedings.
In case of the District Court, the Revision can be done by the High Court.
As under CHAPTER 11 THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT s.43(2)Subject to the
provisions of any law for the time being in force, all appeals, references, revisions and similar
proceedings from, or in respect of, any proceedings of a civil nature in a district court or a court of
a resident magistrate which are authorized by law shall lie to and be heard by the High Court.
In Case of the High Court, the Revision can be done by the Court of Appeal.
As under THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT, 2009 s.4(2) For all purposes of and
incidental to the hearing and determination of any appeal in the exercise of the jurisdiction
conferred upon it by this Act, the Court of Appeal shall, in addition to any other power, authority
and jurisdiction conferred by this Act, have the power of revision and the power, authority and
jurisdiction vested in the court from which the appeal is brought.
(3) Without prejudice to subsection (2), the Court of Appeal shall have the power, authority and
jurisdiction to call for and examine the record of any proceedings before the High Court for the
purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, order or any
other decision made thereon and as to the regularity of any proceedings of the High Court.
N:B:- If a party has a right to appeal and abandoned it, instead wants to exercise Revision, the
Court will not entertain that Revision.
In Case of the Court of Appeal, the Revision can be done by the Court of Appeal.
As under THE TANZANIA COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009 RULE 66.-(1) The Court may
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
review its judgment or order, but no application for review shall be entertained except on the
following grounds -
(a) the decision was based on a manifest error on the face of the record resulting in the miscarriage
of justice; or
(b) a party was wrongly deprived of an opportunity to be heard;
(c) the court’s decision is a nullity; or
(d) the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the case;
or
(e) the judgment was procured illegally, or by fraud or perjury.
FEATURES OF ADR
I) RECONCILIATION/NEGOTIATION – This is the process of discussing something with
someone in order to reach an agreement.
The negotiation process can essentially be understood as a four-stage process. The four stages of the
negotiation process are preparation, opening, bargaining and closure.
1. Preparations - Preparation is instrumental to the success of the negotiation process. Being
well-prepared generates confidence and gives an edge to the negotiator.
2. Opening Phase - Here the two sides come face to face. Each party tries to make an
impression on the other side and influence their thinking at the first opportunity.
Psychologically, this phase is important because it sets the tone for the negotiation to a large
extent. It involves both negotiating parties presenting their case to each other.
3. Bargaining - The bargaining phase involves coming closer to the objective you intended to
achieve when you started the negotiation. In this phase, the basic strategy is to convince the
other side of the appropriateness of your demands and then persuading the other party to
concede to those demands. For this, one needs to be logical in one’s approach and frame
clearly-thought-out and planned arguments.
Advocacy Skills;
by Solicitor Katura.
4. The closure - closing phase of a negotiation represents the opportunity to capitalize on all of
the work done in the earlier phases. The research that has been done in the preparation
phase, combined with all of the information that has been gained is useful in the closing
phase. It also involves the sealing of the agreement in which both parties formalize the
agreement in a written contract or letter of intent. Reviewing the negotiation is as important
as the negotiation process itself. It teaches lessons on how to achieve a better outcome.
Therefore, one should take the time to review each element and find out what went well and
what needs to be improved.
II) MEDIATION – This is the process in which the third party helps parties in disputes to resolve
the problem which is between them. In mediation, the decision is done by the parties themselves but
the mediator is there to facilitate.
ROLES OF A MEDIATOR:-
To conduct a mediation in a fair and unbiased manner;
To decline or withdraw from a mediation if the mediator cannot remain impartial;
To avoid a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest during and after a
mediation;
To make reasonable inquires to determine any potential conflicts;
To maintain the confidentiality of a mediation;
ASANTE SANA.
By SOLICITOR KATURA.