Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reading Response Week 3
Reading Response Week 3
Both Stefanie Davis and Rosalind Gill explore the crucial themes of
media and the college experience. Stefanie Davis' Objectification, Sexualization, and
Misrepresentation: Social Media and the College Experience and Rosalind Gill's From
Bodies in the Media shed light on the harmful effects of media portrayal on women's
literatures, one may compare and contrast the main arguments of both authors,
ultimately emphasizing the urgent need for critical awareness and cultural change
Stefanie Davis' article explores the impact of social media on college students'
platforms amplify the objectification of women when she states, “Young women can
actively participate in this sexual conversation via sexting and sexual messaging
through apps like Snapchat. These experiences can shape a woman's gender
construction and self-expectations of sexuality as early as 12 years old (Davis 2). These
apps target young kids through whacky filters and get them engaged in challenges
through the fear of missing out, which later transcends into the sexualization we see all
over the internet. Another example of these challenges is when Davis says, “Their
backs are to the camera, each topless, wearing only thong bikini bottoms with a
spotlight shining across their lower backs” (4). These photos garner lots of attention
through likes and views, which further perpetuate such trends. Also, such posts promote
unrealistic beauty standards, foster a culture of comparison and judgment, and enable
the circulation of sexualized images. Examples of this are riddled all over homepages
on social media apps. Tiktok targets younger children, Snapchat is aimed at young
teens, and Instagram encourages hand-picked snippets of one’s day, creating a toxic,
among college women. Davis calls for media literacy education and critical engagement
Rosalind Gill's work delves into the transformation of women's bodies from being
media. Gill argues that the media perpetuates the illusion of sexual liberation while still
maintaining control and power over women's bodies. She discusses the complex ways
traditional gender roles and perpetuating inequalities. Gill does this by analyzing a
popular t-shirt with the print, “Fit Chick Unbelievable Knockers,” and how clever
marketing has infiltrated the minds of young women into buying such t-shirts that
objectify them (Gill 1). Gill's analysis sheds light on the need to recognize and challenge
the subtle forms of control and exploitation inherent in contemporary media portrayals.
Although not explicitly mentioned by Gill, this should be done by not restricting free
speech, but silently vowing against objectifying content such as the derogatory t-shirt
listed above. This can be done through simply educating women on why such t-shirts
are actually harmful, which is a better strategy than outright banning the degrading
t-shirts since all opinions should be heard, and free speech is valuable for inclusivity.
Comparing the perspectives of Davis and Gill, we observe both similarities and
agency, while Gill highlights the structural and systemic aspects of women's
objectification. Together, these authors underscore the urgent need for a cultural shift
The works of both Stefanie Davis and Rosalind Gill provide critical insights into
analyzing their arguments, one is able to recognize the common theme of the harmful
effects of media portrayal on women's self-perception and societal treatment, and pose
possible solutions. Davis's work focuses on social media and college experiences,
which complements Gill's broader analysis of media representation. Both Davis and Gill
push for a greater understanding of the media's dangerous influence and advocate for
change through media literacy education, individual agency, and collective action. To
combat the pervasive objectification of women, it is crucial to foster a culture that values
women's rights, challenges traditional gender norms, and promotes diverse and
and in colleges, society can strive toward a society that respects and empowers
women, free from the damaging influences of objectification and sexualization in the
media.
Challenging Cultural Relativism and Embracing Humanity
cultural relativism, and challenging preconceived notions of human rights in the context
the struggles of women in the material, one may gain a deeper understanding and find
saving from their own cultures. She further explains that this is done through dumbing
down Islam into a misogynistic religion. In an interview, she was asked almost rhetorical
questions “on the meaning of Ramadan and another time on Muslim women in politics.
One was in response to the bombing “ (Abu Lughod 784). Abu-Lughod argues that this
complexities and rich culture of Muslim women's lives. The author emphasizes the
empower women all around the world within their own contexts.
explores the transformative power of humanity amid conflict and war. Tadiar contends
that war disrupts the very essence of being human and presents opportunities for
resistance. However, this power can also be abused as Tadiar states, “ever-greater
powers to the state that can and will be used against the people, are passed: measures
such as the practical suspension of habeas corpus for foreigners- that is, the state's
assumption of the license to detain without lawful charge” (Tadiar 93). The text then
delves into the cost of war as Tadiar states, “Collateral damage. Whether the objects of
hate crimes, or the target of bombs and food embargoes, or niche markets for the
international traffic in drugs, people of color are that collateral from the outset” (95).
Tadiar shows that there are more than just 2 sides to war (winning and losing), but a
multitude of factors that are at play, including the everyday citizen. Reading into Tadiar's
Comparing the perspectives of Abu-Lughod and Tadiar, one may find a shared
assumptions. Both authors critique the harmful inclination of imposing Western values
Abu-Lughod focuses on the portrayal of Muslim women, Tadiar delves into the broader
human experience within the context of war and the period of 9/11. Tadiar also
discusses the abuse of power the United States exercised during this time period.
However, both works call for a nuanced understanding of cultural relativism, respecting
the agency, and autonomy of individuals within their respective cultures and traditions.
Another common theme in both texts is the need to dismantle oppressive structures
trying to save people who are not in need of saving. Abu-Lughod highlights the dangers
their resilience and resistance in the face of violence and war. Both authors invite
readers to critically engage with prevailing narratives and strive for a more inclusive and
The works of Lila Abu-Lughod and Neferti Tadiar provide valuable insights into
the complexities of cultural relativism, women's agency, and the human experience in
the context of war. By synthesizing their arguments, one may observe a shared
that undermine human agency. Abu-Lughod calls for an anthropology that resists
cultural imperialism, while Tadiar urges readers to recognize the oppression and abuse
of state power during times of conflict. Embracing both cultural diversity and shared
humanity, society can work toward a more inclusive and compassionate world that
celebrates human agency and resists the forces of oppression and violence.