Personality PROFILE

(BIG 5 )

Big Five Personality Test (openpsychometrics.org)

PNLT
Factor I was labelled as Extroversion by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM. Factor I is
sometimes given other names, such as Surgency or Positive Emotionality.

Extraversion is typically characterized by an individual's tendency to seek out social

interaction and stimulation, as well as their level of enthusiasm and assertiveness in social
situations. Individuals who score high on this dimension tend to be outgoing, sociable, and
talkative. They enjoy being around others and seek out social situations. They are often
described as having a high level of energy, enthusiasm, and assertiveness. They may also
be more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors, such as partying, drinking, or other forms
of excitement-seeking.

In contrast, individuals who score low on extraversion are more introverted and reserved.
They may prefer to spend time alone or in small groups, and may feel uncomfortable in large
social gatherings. They may also be less assertive and more cautious in their interactions
with others.

Research has shown that extraversion is linked to a range of outcomes, including job
performance, social support, and well-being. For example, individuals who score high on
extraversion tend to be more successful in careers that involve social interaction and
communication. They may also have more social support networks and experience higher
levels of subjective well-being.

Factor II was labeled as Emotional Stability by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM. Factor II
is often referred to by its low end, Neuroticism.

Individuals who score high on emotional stability are characterized as being emotionally
resilient, calm, and even-tempered. They tend to experience fewer negative emotions and
are better able to cope with stress and adversity. They are also more likely to exhibit positive
emotions, such as happiness, contentment, and enthusiasm.

In contrast, individuals who score low on emotional stability tend to be more prone to
negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and anger. They may be more reactive to
stress and may find it difficult to cope with challenging situations. They may also exhibit a
range of maladaptive behaviors, such as substance abuse or self-harm.

Research has shown that emotional stability is linked to a range of outcomes, including
mental health, physical health, and interpersonal relationships. For example, individuals who
score high on emotional stability tend to have better mental health outcomes, such as lower
rates of depression and anxiety. They may also have better physical health outcomes, such
as lower rates of cardiovascular disease. Additionally, they tend to have more stable and
supportive relationships with others.
Factor III is labeled as Agreeableness.

Individuals who score high on agreeableness are characterized as being warm, kind,
and considerate. They tend to be cooperative and are motivated to maintain harmonious
social relationships. They may also have a strong sense of empathy and concern for the
welfare of others.

In contrast, individuals who score low on agreeableness tend to be more competitive

and skeptical. They may be less motivated to maintain social harmony and may be more
likely to express their opinions forcefully, even if they may conflict with others.

Research has shown that agreeableness is linked to a range of outcomes, including

interpersonal relationships, job performance, and mental health. For example, individuals
who score high on agreeableness tend to have more positive and supportive relationships
with others. They may also be more successful in careers that require teamwork and
collaboration. Additionally, they tend to have better mental health outcomes, such as lower
rates of depression and anxiety. However, it is important to note that excessively high levels
of agreeableness can also have negative consequences, such as being overly compliant or
lacking assertiveness.

Factor IV is labeled as Conscientiousness.

Individuals who score high on conscientiousness are characterized as being reliable,

hardworking, and efficient. They tend to be well-organized and responsible, and are
motivated to achieve their goals. They may also exhibit a strong sense of self-discipline and
perseverance.

In contrast, individuals who score low on conscientiousness tend to be more

impulsive and disorganized. They may have difficulty setting and achieving goals, and
may be more likely to engage in behaviors that are not in their best interest.

Research has shown that conscientiousness is linked to a range of outcomes, including

academic and job performance, health behaviors, and longevity. For example, individuals
who score high on conscientiousness tend to have better academic and job performance, as
well as lower rates of absenteeism and turnover. They may also be more likely to engage in
health-promoting behaviors, such as exercising regularly and maintaining a healthy diet.
Additionally, they tend to live longer than individuals who score low on conscientiousness.

However, it is important to note that excessively high levels of conscientiousness can also
have negative consequences, such as being overly perfectionistic or rigid.
Factor V was labeled as Intellect/Imagination by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM but it is
also most commonly known in the literature as Openness to Experience.

Individuals who score high on openness to experience are characterized as being

imaginative, curious, and open to new ideas and experiences. They tend to be
intellectually curious and enjoy exploring new concepts and ideas. They may also exhibit a
preference for creativity and aesthetics.

In contrast, individuals who score low on openness to experience tend to be more

traditional and conservative. They may have a preference for familiar and predictable
experiences, and may be less likely to seek out novel experiences.

Research has shown that openness to experience is linked to a range of outcomes,

including creativity, innovation, and cultural competence. For example, individuals who score
high on openness to experience tend to be more creative and innovative, and may be more
successful in careers that require these skills. Additionally, they tend to be more open-
minded and accepting of diverse cultures and perspectives.

However, it is important to note that excessively high levels of openness to experience can
also have negative consequences, such as being overly impulsive or having difficulty with
routine tasks.
PURDUE NON
LANGUAGE TEST
DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST
Age level: 13 years old and above
Time: 25 minutes to answer
Content:

 Each item consists of five designs or geometric shapes.

 There are two parallel forms, A and B, both consisting of 48 items.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST

 It is mainly an abstract reasoning which is known as the most accurate

indicator of fluid intelligence and the skill to learn new things quickly.
 Its nature is to determine the underlying logic of pattern and devise a
solution.

 The test consists entirely of geometric forms which made it effective in

assessing the fluid intelligence available of persons having markedly
different cultures or educational backgrounds.

EVALUATION

ADMINISTRATION

 The test in many ways falls short of generally accepted standards and at
present there is not enough supportive evidence for the test user to prefer
this to other non-language or culture fair tests that are available.
 More research is necessary and a satisfactory pattern of correlation with
other measures must be presented.

After the tests have been distributed, the people should be instructed as follows:
1. Print your name on the test booklet.
2. Do not open the test booklet until told to do so.
3. On the front page, look at sample A. Notice the drawing that is different in the
sample of 5 drawings has been crossed out.

PURPOSE OF THE TEST

INTERPRETATION OF THE TEST

 The Purdue Non-language Test (PNLT) is aimed to measure the mental

ability of the examinee. Furthermore, it is applicable to all and can be used
effectively to people with different cultural and educational background.
To interpret the raw score, the scores will then be checked with the
corresponding percentiles.
43-47: High
38-42: Above Average
35-37: Below Average
26-34: Low

ADMINISTRATION
DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEST
SCORING OF THE TEST

 Purdue Non-Language Test was published in 1958, as an experimental

"CULTURE FAIR" test on mental ability.

4. In sample B, one of the 5 drawings is different from the other 4. Cross out the
different drawing with a big X.
5. Look at sample C. In this sample, cross out the drawing that is different from
the other 4 with a great big X.
The score is simply the number of item correctly crossed out. To score the PNLT,
one has to refer to the scoring key provided in the manual and check the items
that were crossed out correctly.

 According to Robert Stack he reviewed the test and he had called attention
to its gross inadequacies but he would have probably encouraged further
research.

HISTORY
Publishers:

 Joseph Tiffin
 Alin Grubner
 Kay Inaba

Year of Publication: 1958

ADMINISTRATION
6. In taking the test, you will find sets of 5 drawings opposite each number. In
each set of 5 drawings, cross out the different one with a good big X.
7. You may not be able to identify the different drawings in all of the sets, but do
the best you can. It will not pay you to spend a great deal of time on any one set.
You will have 25 minutes - which is plenty of time if you don't spend too much
time on some of the tests.

VALIDITY
  No situational studies of the test are yet available. However, the test
correlates r = .65 with scores on Adaptability Test for 184 industrial
salaried employees, and r = .55 with 99 laborers.
 These studies clearly show that PNLT is tapping a significantly proportion
of the variance covered by a standard mental test.

ADMINISTRATION
RELIABILITY
8. Don't skip around. Take the sets in order.
9. Are there any questions? If none, open your test and go ahead.
At the end of exactly 25 minutes, say:
10. STOP. Please pass in your test booklet.
The reliability of PNLT has been estimated by:
1. Coefficients of equivalence between the two forms, and;
2. Internal consistency coefficients
Raztine Mae B. Paeste
MP-CP