Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weitzman Model
Weitzman Model
Weitzman Model
MCpollution = 5Q
D = 0.5*D1 + 0.5*D2
D = 0.5 *(60 – 10Q) + 0.5*(40 – 10Q)
D = 30 – 5Q + 20 – 5Q
D = 50 – 10Q --------- True marginal benefit curve.
Consider the case in which the regulator has full knowledge of MC, but is uncertain about the
true value of D. Suppose that the true Demand is D, but that:
(1)
Set D1 = MCpollution
60 – 10Q = 5Q
60 = 15Q
Q=4
The quantity level associated with a standard using the “high” marginal benefit curve is 4
And
Set D2 = MCpollution
40 – 10Q = 5Q
40 = 15Q
Q = 2.67
The quantity level associated with a standard for the “low” marginal benefit curve is 2.67
And
(2)
The quantity level associated with a standard using the “high” marginal benefit curve is 4
MCpollution = 5Q
MBpollution = 20
Hence, the tax level associated with the “high” marginal benefit curve is 20
And
The quantity level associated with a standard for the “low” marginal benefit curve is 2.67
MCpollution = 5Q
MCpollution = 13.35
Hence, the tax level associated with the “low” marginal benefit curve is 13.35
(3)
Note: See the introduction part of this question for the derivation of true marginal benefit
curve.
The tax level associated with the “high” marginal benefit curve is 20
D = 50 – 10Q
Put D = 20
20 =50 – 10Q
Q = (50 -20) /10
Q =3
The quantity level associated with a tax for the “high” marginal benefit curve is 3
And
The tax level associated with the “low” marginal benefit curve is 13.35
D = 50 – 10Q
Put D = 13.35
13.35 =50 – 10Q
Q = (50 -13.35) /10
Q =3.665
The quantity level associated with a tax for the “low” marginal benefit curve is 3.665
And
(4)
50 – 10Q = 5Q
50 = 15Q
Q = (50/15)
Q* = 3.33
Optimal Q is 3.33
Range of pollution quantities associated with a standard is (2.67 to 4)
Range of pollution quantities associated with a tax instrument is (3 to 3.665)
As we can see, the imposition of tax leads to smaller deviation from the true social optimum,
Q*