Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FCC v. ATT (2011)
FCC v. ATT (2011)
FCC v. ATT (2011)
Syllabus
Syllabus
Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other
Members joined, except Kagan, J., who took no part in the consideration
or decision of the case.
*Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Collaboration
on Government Secrecy by Daniel J. Metcalfe; for the Constitutional Ac
countability Center by Douglas T. Kendall, Elizabeth B. Wydra, and
David H. Gans; for Free Press by Aparna Sridhar and Coriell S. Wright;
for the Project on Government Oversight et al. by Neal Goldfarb, Sandra
Chance, and Cornish Hitchcock; and for the Reporters Committee for
Freedom of the Press et al. by Lucy A. Dalglish, Kevin M. Goldberg,
Jonathan Bloom, David Ardia, David M. Giles, Peter Scheer, Mickey H.
Osterreicher, René P. Milam, George Freeman, Bruce W. Sanford, Bruce
D. Brown, Laurie A. Babinski, David S. Bralow, and Eric N. Lieberman.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Business
Roundtable by Alan Charles Raul and Gordon D. Todd; for the Chamber
of Commerce of the United States of America by Patricia A. Millett and
Robin S. Conrad; and for the National Association of Manufacturers by
Ethan P. Schulman, Clifton S. Elgarten, Jennifer N. Waters, and Quen
tin Riegel.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed for Citizens for Responsibility and
Ethics in Washington et al. by Anne L. Weismann and David L. Sobel; and
for the Electronic Privacy Information Center et al. by Marc Rotenberg.
400 FCC v. AT&T INC.
III
The meaning of “personal privacy” in Exemption 7(C)
is further clarified by the rest of the statute. Congress
enacted Exemption 7(C) against the backdrop of pre-existing
FOIA exemptions, and the purpose and scope of Exemption
7(C) becomes even more apparent when viewed in this con
text. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U. S. 418, 426 (2009) (“statu
tory interpretation turns on ‘the language itself, the specific
context in which that language is used, and the broader con
text of the statute as a whole’ ” (quoting Robinson v. Shell
Oil Co., 519 U. S. 337, 341 (1997))). Two of those other ex
emptions are particularly relevant here.
The phrase “personal privacy” first appeared in the FOIA
exemptions in Exemption 6, enacted in 1966, eight years be
408 FCC v. AT&T INC.