Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Addeng MIDSEM
Addeng MIDSEM
SECTION – A
1) Draw a comparative analysis of the migratory experiences of the narrator in the
passage and the poem “Migration” by Keki N Daruwala. Substantiate your argument
with necessary examples from both the literary works.
Meena hold on to the past experiences and embrace them with joy and
happiness as all the happy moments rippled in her memory whereas past is the reason of grief
for the poet. The Memoir and The Migrations are the representation of the disparity in reality
and the emotional extremes indeed tugs a couple of heart strings.
3) Write a comparative analysis of how the narrators in “Babus of Nayanjore” and the
passage given here portray the people around them and themselves? What do you glean
about India as a colony and a newly independent nation from their portrayals?
The narrators in both ‘Babus of Nayanjore’ and ‘The memoir’ have inherited a
similar style in describing the characters. The readers are provided with a clear character
sketch and minute details about the behaviour of the people around them and themselves.
Their observational skills and concentration towards small details is very much evident in
both the works. The narrators have followed a specific pattern in portraying the characters by
providing an introduction followed by a description which includes their role in the
narratives’ life enabling the readers to look through the eyes of the narrator.
What we can infer from about India from both ‘The Memoir’ and ‘ The Babus
of Nayanjore’ is that India is land of rich and varied diversities and cultures. Each place has a
different story to tell and the experience we will get from various places of India and the
cultures we get to know from groups of people in various regions are extremely different and
have a unique beauty. In addition, it is a matter of great importance that Colonialism
especially British Colonialism in India had a significant impact on Indian culture. The aspects
of class conflict and the conflict between different generations in both the works ironically
bring together the new and the old, the rich and the poor and the modern and the traditional
people of the colonial and newly independent India.
SECTION-B
4) Comment on the use of humour and paradox in the story “He Said it With Arsenic”.
How does the narrator use his wit to outsmart his uncle?
‘He said it with Arsenic’ by Ruskin Bond is an interesting detective story
whose plot keeps the readers at the edge of their seats. This murder story has been successful
in keeping the readers interested in it because of the various literary devices used by the
author. Ruskin Bond’s subtle use of paradox with an undertone of sarcasm and instances
replete with dark humour is able to challenge the traditional norms of relations between
parents, grandparents and children and even uncle-nephew relationship and ultimately
overhauls the conventional representation of family.
The author begins the story itself with an element of sarcasm and paradox as in
William Jones is a ‘Born Murder’ unlike the most commonly used terms like born musicians,
born artists etc, so the first line itself catches the attention of the readers. The humour part
comes into play when William Jones, our Uncle Bill visits the narrator after a long gap of 15
years since his release from the jail. As the narrator was sceptic about the motive behind the
unwelcomed and sudden visit of his uncle and his intuitions made him conclude at the fact
that the reason behind his visit is to murder him and thereby conquering the assets of the
narrator as he has become a successful author. So one day when uncle Jones came with two
glasses of sherry, the narrator who sensed the poison in one of the glasses and said there was
custom there to revolve the tray as it would bring good luck and thus our narrator made uncle
drink from the poisoned glass. In this way the narrator used his wit to outsmart his uncle.
Kamala Das, Kerala’s very own Madhavikutty is famous for her deeply thoughtful
and insightful works which speaks beyond the realm of words and has a profound hidden
meaning and interpretation. Forest fire is not an exception. In this poem, she wants to convey
to the readers, and portray the constant mental pressure of an artist i.e. the poet’s urge for
creativity and sensory input which is synonymous to a the feeling of hunger which consumes
everything like a forest fire with greed. She has a longing fire inside her which is craving for
creativity and is all consuming. Through Forest Fire, Kamala Das expresses her own
experience of becoming a poet by transcending the barrier of emotional mood swings with a
raging fire of urge for creativity. It is evident and is obviously clear that Kamala used her
poem ‘Forest Fire’ as a liberation to her own sense of suffering of life through her medium of
confession. By comparing her with the forest fire which is all consuming, just like the forest
fire, brighter charm comes her way with each new experience that life throws. A microcosm
been created out of the macrocosm. The woman, who once found herself trapped in the snare
of marital life, constraining herself within the curbs of misogynistic society and almost
succumbed to the disheartening responses of the male-dominated society, now revives back
into life by rising from the ashes like a phoenix She is no more scared of this system; rather
she finds this system as a means to bring out the impulses which helps her in writing poems
and other works as well. She gathers this strength from the poems she writes as she in her
poems raises her voice to post her protest against the humiliation. As a confessional poet,
Kamala Das exposes her own self in some way or other in almost every poem. That is why
her poems often appear autobiographical and “Forest Fire” being one of her best
autobiographical poems on the creative fire that burns within a poet.
THANK YOU