1

Decolonization

Name

Instructor’s Name

Subject

Date
 2

Introduction:

Decolonization refers to the process when European countries gave up control over their

colonies after World War II. This era was characterized by a swift transformation of the global

political landscape, as a multitude of new nations emerged from the remnants of imperial rule.

However, was decolonization inevitable? In addition, how did newly decolonized states fare after

they were liberated from colonialism? This essay delves into the questions at hand by

scrutinizing the factors that contributed to the disintegration of colonialism and the obstacles

encountered by freshly sovereign nations in the wake of imperial rule. By referencing particular

occurrences in various regions globally, we will appraise if the dissolution of colonialism was an

inevitable outcome and how newly liberated countries coped in their pursuit of stability and

affluence.

Was decolonization inevitable?

Decolonization occurred through different approaches such as civil war, negotiated

independence through foreign pressure, and violent incomplete decolonization. The majority of

European colonies gained independence during this time. The disintegration of colonialism was

an period of radical zeal that fundamentally restructured the global landscape. This

transformation was propelled by an array of elements, including the debilitation of European

powers in the aftermath of the war (Fernandez-Armesto, 28.3.4). The conflict had depleted their

resources and rendered them incapable of retaining their grip on their extensive colonial

territories.

An additional factor that facilitated the disintegration of colonialism was the emergence of

nationalist movements in colonized nations (Fernandez-Armesto, 28.3.4). These campaigns were

 3

invigorated by an aspiration for self-determination and sovereignty, and they contested the

validity of colonial governance. In many cases, local resistance efforts that had formed during

the war to fight against foreign occupation continued after the war to advocate for independence.

International pressure and the evolution of perspectives towards colonialism were also

instrumental in the disintegration of colonialism. The United States, for instance, impelled its

European confederates to bestow independence upon their colonies, partially due to

apprehension that the Soviet Union would wield its influence in these territories (Fernandez-

Armesto, 28.3.4). The newly established United Nations also put pressure on colonial powers to

grant independence to their colonies. As an increasing number of former colonies attained their

sovereignty, they utilized their influence to advocate for the independence of other nations.

In light of these factors, it can be contended that the disintegration of colonialism was an

inevitable outcome. The combination of debilitated European powers, rising nationalist

movements, and international coercion rendered it increasingly hard for colonial powers to retain

their control on their territories.

The aftermath of decolonization:

The aftermath of the disintegration of colonialism proved to be a formidable period for newly

independent nations. One of the main obstacles they encountered was economic and political

instability (Fernandez-Armesto, 29.5.1). Numerous countries emerged from colonialism with

scant infrastructure and were heavily reliant on trade with their former colonial rulers. This

rendered them vulnerable to external economic shocks and left them with limited alternatives for

developing their own economies.

 4

In addition to economic challenges, newly decolonized states also faced political instability.

Many of these countries possessed limited familiarity with self-governance and lacked trained

and seasoned leaders. The boarders that had been imposed on them by colonial powers often did

not reflect the ethnic or societal landscape on the ground, causing tensions between different

groups within the country (Fernandez-Armesto, 29.5.1).

External factors also influenced the outcomes for freshly liberated nations. The Cold War

politics of the era signified that numerous countries were ensnared in a conflict between the

United States and the Soviet Union, with both parties contending for influence (Fernandez-

Armesto, 28.3.4). Global economic structures also had an impact, with numerous freshly

sovereign nations striving to establish their position in a worldwide economy dominated by the

developed countries of the West.

Newly decolonized nations also grappled with other issues such as climate change, water

scarcity, biodiversity loss, desertification, low resilience to natural disasters, energy crisis, food

crisis, and limited benefits from globalization. These challenges were exacerbated by their

colonial history, which occasionally placed them at odds with European countries and rendered

them skeptical of European-style governmental structures, political ideologies, and economic

institutions.

The trajectories of these liberated countries differed hugely. Certain states were able to erect

steady and affluent democracies, whereas others descended into cycles of instability and conflict.

The capacity of these countries to surmount the hurdles they faced was shaped by various

influences, encompassing their domestic political dynamics, their colonial past, and their

international relationships. For instance, in 1957, Ghana gained freedom from British colonial

rule and instituted a democratic administration (Fernandez-Armesto, 28.3.4). Notwithstanding

 5

this major achievement, the new nation grappled with countless difficulties in its initial years,

comprising financial turmoil and political disorder.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while decolonization led to the emergence of independent nation states around

the world and marked the end of oppressive foreign rule, the aftermath of decolonization proved

challenging for newly sovereign countries. Although independence was craved and fought for,

nascent nations were faced with instability and vulnerability on multiple fronts.

Economically, most new countries were heavily dependent on their former colonizers and ill-

equipped to develop self-sustaining economies. They lacked infrastructure, skilled labor forces,

and diversified trade relationships that could support economic growth. Politically, many new

leaders and governments were inexperienced with governance and state-building. Borders that

arbitrarily divided ethnic groups caused internal tensions and conflict.

Externally, global politics and economics were dominated by the agendas of Western

developed nations. New countries often became pawns in Cold War power struggles and were

disadvantaged in a global market system that benefited former colonizers. Environmental and

resource challenges further hampered development for nations that were already starting from a

point of disadvantage.

Decolonization produced a far more just global system of independent nation states. At the

same time, it left a legacy of challenges for new countries working to overcome the political,

economic and social inequities that were the hallmarks of imperial rule. The full promise of

decolonization would take decades more to achieve. However, freedom from foreign rule was a
 6

necessary first victory on the long road to self-determination and equality within the global

system.