PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Words 760 Date August 16,2020

Characters 4336 Exclude Url

0% 100% 0 30
Plagiarized
Plagiarism Unique Sentences Unique Sentences

Content Checked For Plagiarism

6.1. CONCLUSION From the study what have present here, it is seen that RC braced frame structure followed by RC
frame with a shear wall is much more capable in comparison to RC bare frame in reducing moment, storey displacement,
stiffness & drift as well as in axial force whereas in case of a shear force bare frame system is more stable. These
structure components act as a structural member and they distributed the seismic energy effectively over the structure
and made them capable to withstand against earthquake attack, or if the structure fails, It fails with sufficient warning
these components also increase the structure's ductility and try to help in preventing the damage to the main structural
elements such as beams, columns by preventing other members to reach yield point. The analysis is done in the present
study clearly between the soil conditions of the same zone and this comparison is not between the zones. The
conclusions from the results are shown below: 6.1.1. BENDING MOMENT: In the previous chapter shown the different
study results and from that it is clearly observed that RC braced Frame provides a variation in Bending moment of 64% in
zone III with soft soil condition, 70% in zone III with hard soil condition, 63% in zone V soft soil condition and 41% in zone
V with hard soil the comparison is between the soil condition as provided the same size of column and beam for soil
condition for a particular zone while different sizes of beam and column for another zone. 6.1.2. SHEAR FORCE: From the
study, it is evident that the frame with the RC braced frame structure has provided a variation in shear forces compared
to other frames. It shows a variation of about 31% in zone III soft soil condition while in the same zone for hard soil
condition shear force reduces about 36%. Talk about the zone V the shear force reduced about 39% with soft soil
condition while 21% in hard soil condition here the decrease in % is because the value of shear force in the bare frame
also gets reduces and compared the value takes 100% of the bare frame. 6.1.3. AXIAL FORCES: Results shown from the
study in chapter 5 depicts that axial forces are properly managed and distributed in RC braced frame as compared to
other cases under the effect of lateral forces. it is seen that the axial force in zone III with soft soil condition is reduced
up to 26% and 33% for the same zone in hard soil condition which is compared to the bare frame consider it forces as
100%. the reduction in axial forces in zone V saw that it reduces about 16% in soft soil condition while there is a
reduction of 8% in hard soil condition 6.1.4. STOREY DISPLACEMENT: Displacement or drift of top storey in relation to all
other storeys is called as storey displacement due to lateral or seismic forces. Here results show that bare frame shows
maximum displacement while RC braced frame structure and RC frame with shear wall shows a tremendous reduction in
displacement, therefore these two structures are relatively more stable. While comparing RC braced frame and frame
with a shear wall the RC braced frame is more stable in all the above cases. The storey displacement in zone III with soft
soil is reduced by about 87% while in the same zone it reduces about 89% in hard soil condition compare to RC bare
frame. Consider the zone V the storey drift get reduces up to 84% in soft soil condition while 88% in hard soil condition
compared to bare frame displacement. The entire above % shown is related to the top storey. 6.2. FUTURE SCOPE (a) The
present study is done for the square geometry structure and study can be stretched out to different geometrical shapes
of the structure. (b) In this study G + 15 symmetrical structures has been considered and the study can be extended to
more tall skyscrapers. (c) This study performed on the seismic load analysis and in further study wind load analysis can
be included which is also induced a lateral forces over the structure. (d) In this study uses the equivalent static load
analysis for seismic analysis as per the IS code 1893 (part1)-2002. Also, use the response spectrum method and time
history method of analysis. (e) Also done a study about how the construction can be
done monolithically. Which is the main problem when talk about the composite structure like RC braced frame.
Similarity
Sourc
es