Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AutoNetTV Vehicle Owner Research - Part 1 2020 2021
AutoNetTV Vehicle Owner Research - Part 1 2020 2021
SERVICE REPORT
A Nationwide Survey of Vehicle Owners
PART 1 OF 2
T
he global COVID-19 pandemic he or she personally owns. They were split
has resulted in changes in evenly among male and female. Every
consumer attitudes in many state but North Dakota is represented by
areas. AutoNetTV Media, Inc. and its participants.
customers wanted to understand the Prior to the survey, AutoNetTV polled a
current attitudes of vehicle owner sampling of its service center customers
towards automotive service providers. for questions that they thought would
Of specific interest is why consumers be helpful in better understanding their
choose one provider over another, what customers and potential customers.
offerings attract them to do business Many of their questions were used in the
with a service facility as well as what survey.
helps retain their business. We also This Part 1 release of the survey results
wanted to understand their perceptions covers questions related to consumer
of service recommendations and their attitudes about service centers, including
feelings of trust in service professionals. different facility types, and why they
We explored what actions or tools could choose one facility over another.
be employed to increase customer trust Part 2 release of results will cover
in service recommendations. questions related to consumer attitudes
AutoNetTV engaged Centiment, a regarding Maintenance Services, their
Denver based research company, to Trust in Recommendations, and How
survey 1,031 vehicle owners in the United Service Professionals can Increase Both
States. Participants were over the age of in their activities and/or interactions with
25 and routinely drive an automobile that vehicle owners.
T
he #1 criteria consumers used to
EVERYTHING ELSE
THESE MAJOR FACTORS select a service facility is price.
INFLUENCE CHOICE Assuming a facility is following
best management practices, they are still
subject to fixed infrastructure cost, buy-
ing power constraints, and the prevailing
labor rates in their specific market. Their
prices will reflect an acceptable profit
LOCATION margin, constraining the range in which
pricing can be used to attract customers.
The #2 reason for choosing a location
is expertise. This is something that can be
developed, demonstrated, and communi-
cated prospective customers. Communi-
CREDIBILITY cating the same with current customers
PRICE
will allay concerns and strengthen their
relationship.
The #3 reason is location. Service cen-
EXPERTISE ters tend to draw their customers from a
three-mile radius around their location—
when they move, they will select a facility
within an acceptable distance.
1 PROVIDER 61.7%
T
he survey found that 96% of consumers take tion through training (maintaining high levels of ex-
their vehicles to three or fewer locations for pertise) and customer communications that reinforce
all their service needs. This seems to empha- the reasons for doing business with their particular
size the importance of investing in customer satisfac- facility.
Q
uestion 3 probes how consumers val- nancing (#9), shuttle or valet service (#8), and
ue various offerings. Respondents rat- Touchless vehicle drop-off (#7). We anticipated
ed a parts and service warranty as the that these offerings would have been more highly
#1 offering followed by having a complete range valued during the downturn and safety concerns
of services at one location. The #3 offering was related to COVID-19.
Roadside Assistance, with a network of affiliated The top offerings can be obtained by individual
provider location coming in at #4. Peace of mind facilities. Program or buying group affiliation often
and convenience may be behind these selections. comes with regional or national warranty and ser-
The offerings valued the least were in-store fi- vice availability.
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
4.8%
65.8% 14.2% 19.9% 54.2% 22.2% 23.6% 80.6% 14.5%
0 0 0
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
9.5%
4.8%
83.3% 11.8% 66.6% 12% 21.4% 69.9% 20.6%
0 0 0
T
his question probes respondent’s perception of honesty. The largest response was neutral at 39%
of the honesty of their preferred service pro- revealing an opportunity to be positively influenced by
vider. Less than 15% rated the automotive in- the behavior of and communication with service pro-
dustry, as a whole, as having a Low or Very Low level fessionals.
NEUTRAL 22.1%
T
he percentage of responses rating the pre- customers to building trust. As seen in the question
ferred service provider as having a Very high above regarding the “loyalty” of customers, with
level of honesty is nearly double the same re- 62% taking their vehicle to the same provider for all
sponse for the industry as a whole. This reinforces of their services, the perception of honest behavior
the importance of behaving honestly as well as the by a service provider leads to greater customer re-
impact of open and honest communications with tention and, therefore, more service business.
I
n addition to asking vehicle owners to rank the some areas. For Convenience, Quick Lubes (62.4%)
considerations they had when choosing one edged out Dealerships (62.0%) for the top spot.
location over another, we also wanted to see if For Price, Quick Lubes again take the top spot with
consumers had different perceptions among the 52.8%, with Tire Centers earning second place
primary types of automotive service facilities: with 50.4%. Dealerships remain the top-rated loca-
Quick Lubes, Repair Centers, Tire Centers, and new tion type for the remaining categories (when com-
car Dealerships. For Questions 6-9, we provided a bining Good and Very Good ratings) for Expertise,
randomly chosen picture of each type of location Credibility, Customer Service, and Warranties. The
to aid in identifying the type of service facility. less complex and less time consuming services
Dealerships received the highest number of Very typically offered at a Quick Lube facility likely im-
Good (5) ratings in every category. When also in- pacted the consumers’ perception of Expertise
cluding Good (4) ratings, new rankings emerge in and Warranty for those locations.
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
8.4%
62.4% 29.3% 52.8% 9% 38.1% 50% 13.6% 36.4%
0 0 0
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
6.6%
62% 14.8% 23.3% 44.6% 29.7% 25.7% 74.4% 19%
0 0 0
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
7.9% 7.1%
68.2% 9.2% 22.6% 67.9% 24.2% 69.5% 23.3%
0 0 0
T
100
he percentage of cus- building trust. As seen in the
tomer responses that previous question regarding
80
rate the preferred service the “loyalty” of customers, with
provider as having a high level 62 percent taking their vehicle
60
of honesty is nearly double the to the same provider for all of
same response for the indus- their services, the perception
40
try as a whole. This reinforces of honest behavior by a service
the importance of behaving provider leads to greater cus-
20
honestly as well as the impact tomer retention and, therefore,
of open and honest commu- more service business. 39.8% 32.8% 27.4%
0
nications with customers to
SOCIAL MEDIA
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
7.2%
45.8%
46.5% 19.2% 34.2% 64.4% 28.3% 45.8% 21.6% 32.5%
0 0 0
80 80 80
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
7.4% 9.7%
67.6% 24.9% 61.5% 28.8% 40.3% 27.3% 32.4%
0 0 0
80
40
20
0
% Age 25-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Age 65+
29.1% 32.8% 14.3% 11.3% 12.5%
Survey participants identified as nearly half female (51.4%) and half male (48.6%).