Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF A Manual of Mammalogy With Keys To Families of The World 3Rd Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF A Manual of Mammalogy With Keys To Families of The World 3Rd Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF A Manual of Mammalogy With Keys To Families of The World 3Rd Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
B RIEF C ONTENTS
vii
….
mar06433_fm.qxd 5/31/01 11:18 AM Page ix
C ONTENTS
ix
mar06433_fm.qxd 6/6/00 11:46 AM Page x
X CONTENTS
Contents xi
P REFACE
xiii
mar06433_fm.qxd 6/6/00 11:46 AM Page xiv
XIV PREFACE
name Xenarthra, for the sloths, armadillos, and anteaters. with tissues and other special preparations. A new figure
The toothed whales and allies, and the baleen whales are illustrates how to determine the sex of mammals by exam-
grouped as suborders of the order Cetacea, rather than as ination of external genitalia. Chapter 32, “Collecting
separate orders. The “Key to Living Orders” and the Ectoparasites of Mammals”: The text and the “Key to
“Comments and Suggestions on Identification” have been Arthropod Ectoparasites of Mammals” were extensively
completely rewritten to reflect all of these taxonomic revised and updated by Eric H. Smith. Many figures are
changes. Chapter 11, “The Marsupials”: The chapter on added to provide a convenient single reference for identi-
marsupials is extensively rewritten to reflect that these fication of these arthropods. Chapter 33, “Age
mammals are now included in seven orders. Chapter 12, Determination”: Extensive revisions include four new
“The Insectivores”: This chapter now includes only the figures, plus new sections on how to determine the ages of
families Solenodontidae, Tenrecidae, Chrysochloridae, live mammals. Chapter 34, “Diet Analysis”: New meth-
Erinaceidae, Soricidae, and Talpidae. The “Key to Living ods for determining the diets of mammals are provided, as
Families” and portions of the text are rewritten to reflect well as four added figures. Chapter 35, “Analysis of
that only these mammals are now treated as members of Spatial Distribution”: New material is presented on the
this order. Chapter 15, “The Tupaiids”: The tupaiids use of computer programs to get estimates of home-range
were formerly treated in the chapter on Insectivora. size and characteristics, along with many other changes.
Consistent with current taxonomy, the tupaiids, order Chapter 36, “Estimation of Abundance and Density”:
Scandentia, are now discussed in a separate chapter. This chapter includes an abbreviated subset of material
Chapter 16, “The Primates”: This text and key are that was previously in a separate chapter on populations.
extensively revised. Chapter 19, “The Carnivores”: Because population biology is normally treated in a sepa-
Extensive revisions have been made to the text and key. rate course or as a major component in a course in ecology,
Chapter 20, “The Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises”: we shortened this section in the current edition. Still
These mammals are included in a single order, Cetacea, included is information on estimating relative abundance
with baleen whales discussed under the suborder and density, including references to computer programs
Mysticeti, and with toothed whales, dolphins, and por- for estimating density. Chapter 37, “Literature
poises treated in the suborder Odontoceti. Four figures are Research”: The new name for this chapter indicates that
added. Chapter 21, “The Macroscelideans”: These ani- there are many ways to find literature pertaining to mam-
mals were formerly included in the chapter on Insectivora. mals. The list of journals is updated, and new sections are
Chapter 23, “The Rodents”: Extensive revision made to added on computerized literature databases and on com-
the text and to the keys, with five figures added. For the puterized literature search strategies, including how to per-
Muridae, many subfamilies are keyed out. As in previous form Boolean searches. One new figure is added.
editions, there is a “Key to Living Families of the World” Glossary: Obsolete terms are deleted, and many new
and a “Key to Living Families of North America.” terms are added. Definitions of most terms are rewritten to
Chapter 25, “The Subungulates”: In this edition, the improve clarity and understanding.
subungulates are considered to include only the orders
Proboscidea, Hyracoidea, and Sirenia. Two illustrations
are also added. Chapter 27, “The Artiodactyls”:
Extensive revisions are made to the text and the key,
A CKNOWLEDGMENTS
including the addition of one figure. Chapter 28, “Sign Over 20 years have passed since the manuscript for the
and Habitat Analysis”: The section on identifying mam- second edition was prepared. In the interim, users have
mal sign is updated, and the illustration on beaver sign is inquired as to when the third edition would appear, and
revised. A new section on quantitative methods for analy- we, as authors, could not provide an answer that was sat-
sis of selected habitat features is added, along with three isfactory to us or to the loyal adopters of the book. In
figures. Chapter 29, “Recording Data”: This chapter is 1998, with the strong encouragement of our Sponsoring
extensively revised, with obsolete methods deleted. New Editor, Marge Kemp, and a renewed sense of purpose, we
material is added on working with map coordinates and set about to jump-start the revision. This current edition
finding your position by use of global positioning (GPS) is the culmination of those efforts.
receivers. Information is included on the latest documen- For this edition, Ronald H. Pine joined the team and
tation standards for museum specimens. Chapter 30, helped with all aspects of the revision, provided detailed
“Collecting”: Extensive revisions include the addition of comments on the second edition, and revised many of the
specific guidelines and references on how to work safely chapters dealing with orders and families of mammals.
with mammals in both the field and in the laboratory, and Tony DeBlase, despite a change in authorship sequence,
how to obtain the latest information on laws and regula- nonetheless did much of the work on this edition, and his
tions governing the capture, care, and handling of mam- vision for the book is still apparent.
mals. Chapter 31, “Specimen Preparation and In response to a questionnaire about mammal text-
Preservation”: New material is added on how to work books that you received, many of you made comments
mar06433_fm.qxd 6/6/00 11:46 AM Page xv
Preface xv
and suggestions on how to improve the second edition of First Edition Reviewers
the book. For these comments, we thank Rick A. Adams, Our special thanks to the individuals, listed below, who
David M. Armstrong, Kathleen B. Blair, William Caire, provided inspiration and professional contributions for
David Chesemore, Bruce E. Coblentz, Jack A. Cranford, the development of the first edition. Sydney Anderson,
David Ekkens, Carl H. Ernst, G. Lawrence Forman, John Robert J. Baker, Marge Bell, Dale L. Berry, Craig C.
D. Harder, Graham C. Hickman, Carl W. Hoagstrom, C. Black, Janet Blefeld, Alberto Cadena, Andrew Chien,
H. Hocutt, Kay E. Holekamp, Robert W. Howe, Jerome Milton R. Curd, Walter W. Dalquest, Alyce M. DeBlase,
A. Jackson, Gary Kwiecinski, Tom Lee, James A. Luis de la Torre, André Dixon, Patricia Gaddis, Barbara
MacMahon, V. Rick McDaniel, Peter L. Meserve, Chris Garner, Hugh H. Genoways, Bryan P. Glass, Edward
Norment, Jon C. Pigage, Edward Pivorun, Roger A. Gray, David L. Harrison, Theodore A. Heist, J. E. Hill,
Powell, Robert K. Rose, Christopher Sanford, Michelle Philip Hershkovitz, Stephen R. Humphrey, Robert
Pellissier Scott, Steven A. Smith, Don Spalinger, Glenn Ingersol, John Jahoda, Lee A. Jones, Karl F. Koopman,
R. Stewart, Michael Stokes, Michael D. Stuart, Gerald E. Thomas H. Kunz, Karl Liem, L. Patricia Martin, Pegge
Svendsen, Gene R. Trapp, Renn Tumlison, Dallas Luken, Kenneth G. Matocha, WIlliams Mohs, George A.
Wilhelm, and Kenneth T. Wilkins. Moore, Joseph Curtis Moore, John A. Morrison, Guy G.
Laurie Wilkins made substantial revisions to the sec- Musser, Hans N. Neuhauser, Robert L. Packard, Steven
tion on cleaning skeletal material in Chapter 31, Rissman, Richard Roesner, George Rogers, Stanley
“Specimen Preparation and Preservation.” Eric Smith Rouk, J. Mark Rowland, C. David Simpson, Terry A.
completely revised and updated the text, keys, and figures Vaughan, James P. Webb, John Whitesell, Robert W.
in Chapter 32, “Collecting Ectoparasites of Mammals.” Wiley, Daniel R. Womochel, and Donna Womochel.
At Texas Tech University, Richard Monk and Janie
Milner provided information on how to take tissue sam-
ples from animals, and Raegan D. King provided infor- Second Edition Reviewers
mation on a method to store and access specimen data. The persons listed below provided valuable help and sug-
Michael Gilliland and Terry C. Maxwell prepared gestions during the development of the second edition.
several new line drawings. Kenneth T. Matocha revised We wish to thank again the following: Sharon Adams,
one of the figures in Chapter 29, “Recording Data.” Elmer C. Birney, Keith Carson, Mary Ann Cramer, Sara
Randall Zavodny reviewed all of the illustrations in the Derr, Jerran T. Flinders, Patricia Freeman, George Fulk,
second edition of the book and made suggestions on how Robert J. Izor, Laurel E. Keller, Karl F. Koopman, Cliff
to improve the illustrations for the present edition. Linda A. Lemen, Larry C. Marshall, L. Patricia Martin, Chris
White, presently with the Texas Natural Resource Maser, Peter L. Meserve, Dale Osborn, Pamela Parker,
Conservation Commission, and Beverly Morey provided Ronald H. Pine, Linda Porter, Eric H. Smith, James D.
editorial comments and typed much of the text for this Smith, Mike Smolen, Sandra L. Walchuk, and Laurie
edition. Wilkins.
We were prodded to action by the rhetoric of our A number of people provided detailed comments on
Sponsoring Editor, Marge Kemp, gently led with encour- the second edition of the manual and made suggestions
agement by our Developmental Editor, Donna Nemmers, on how to revise the third edition. We greatly appreciated
and kept on task by Project Manager, Mary Powers. these detailed comments, although we were not able to
These and many other individuals helped to bring this accommodate all of the suggestions. Our thanks to these
book to completion. reviewers of the second edition: Richard Buchholz,
We owe our loyal users a debt of gratitude for sticking Northeast Louisiana University; A. Christopher Carmi-
with us when the book was out of date and in need of a chael, Michigan State University; Elissa Miller Derrick-
major revision. Your loyalty has been humbling to us, and son, Loyola College; Margaret Haag, University of
we hope that the third edition will meet your needs. Alberta; Kay E. Holekamp, Michigan State University;
Joshua Laerm, University of Georgia; Peter L. Meserve,
Northern Illinois University; Dorothy B. Mooren,
University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee; and Bruce A.
Wunder, Colorado State University.
….
mar06433_ch01.qxd 6/6/00 9:55 AM Page 1
I NTRODUCTION
1
1
mar06433_ch01.qxd 6/6/00 9:55 AM Page 2
2 CHAPTER 1
Hierarchies of Classification
Animals and plants are arranged into taxa. These taxa, in
turn, are ranked according to a hierarchy of categories. The
categories generally used for animals are shown in Figure
1.3. The categories printed in all uppercase letters are the
major categories used in the classification of all animals. In
Figure 1.2 Anterior or ventral view of the mammalian this ranking, the least inclusive categories and taxa are at
heart with the chambers exposed. Note that the aorta exits
from the heart and arches to the animal’s left.
(Chiasson 1969)
Introduction 3
the bottom. Thus a species may be composed of several that share a common recent exclusive origin and gener-
subspecies, and a genus may be composed of one or more ally exhibit marked differences from genera in other fam-
species, etc. If a taxon at any level contains only a single ilies. An order is an assemblage of one or more related
taxon at the next lower level, the taxon is termed mono- families, and a class contains one or more related orders.
typic. Thus, the genus Antilocapra is monotypic because it In the class Mammalia, there are 26 living orders.
contains only one living species, Antilocapra americana,
and the order Dermoptera is monotypic because it includes
Zoological Nomenclature
only one family, Cynocephalidae. A taxon containing more
than one taxon at the next lower level is polytypic. Zoological nomenclature is the system of scientific names
applied to taxa of animals, living and extinct. Ideally, any
system of nomenclature should promote names that are
Species and Subspecies unique, only one name for only one given taxon; univer-
To most systematists, the species is the basic unit of tax- sal, written in a single language accepted by all zoologists;
onomy. The most widely accepted current definition of and stable, free of unnecessary or arbitrary name changes.
species is that of Mayr (1969), “Species are groups of The 10th edition (1758) of Systema Naturae, written by
interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively the Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus (the Latinized ver-
isolated from other such groups.” Thus, species are natu- sion of his name, Carl von Linné), is the starting point for
rally occurring groups of organisms that a systematist zoological nomenclature. Linnaeus consistently used, in
attempts to discover, define, and delimit but does not cre- the 10th and later editions, a system of headings consisting
ate. If two sorts of animals are sympatric (i.e., have of abbreviated names made up of two Latin or Latinized
overlapping geographic ranges and do not interbreed), words, the binomen, for species. The Linnaean system,
they are thereby demonstrated to be species. Similarly, if termed binomial nomenclature, has been adopted as the
they are parapatric (i.e., have contiguous but not over- standard for the formation of scientific names of species.
lapping ranges) and do not interbreed along this line of The name of a species is a binomen consisting of a
contact, they are considered distinct species. However, if capitalized generic name (the first word of the binomen)
morphologically very similar populations are fully and an uncapitalized specific name (the second word of the
allopatric (i.e., have nonoverlapping and noncontiguous binomen). The species name, as opposed to the specific
geographic ranges), potential reproductive isolation is name, is always a binomen. For example, the species name
usually not easily demonstrated. If it seems likely that the for humans is Homo sapiens, not just the specific (or name
allopatric populations would interbreed if they were sym- of the species) sapiens. The name of a subspecies is a tri-
patric or parapatric, they are considered to be conspecific nomen consisting of the generic, specific, and subspecific
(members of a single species), but if it seems likely that names. The subspecific name, like the specific name, is
they would not interbreed they are usually considered to never capitalized (e.g., Lynx rufus baileyi).
be distinct species. Sibling species are sympatric species A subgeneric name, if used, is a single word placed
that are reproductively isolated but morphologically in parentheses between the generic and specific names
indistinguishable (or very difficult to distinguish). (e.g., Microtus (Pitymys) pinetorum). The subgeneric
A subspecies is a relatively uniform and genetically name is capitalized but is not considered a part of the
distinct portion of a species, representing a separately or binomen or trinomen. The names of taxa at higher levels
recently evolved lineage with its own evolutionary ten- (e.g., families, orders) are also single words. Generic,
dencies, definite geographic range, and a narrow zone (if subgeneric, specific, and subspecific names are always
any) of intergradation (i.e., zone of interbreeding, usually printed in italics (or underlined to indicate italics), and
inferred by presence of local, linear steepening in char- the formation and emendation of these names must con-
acter gradient) with adjacent subspecies (Lidicker 1962). form to the rules of the International Code of Zoological
A subspecies may be a unit of evolution, but speciation Nomenclature and Latin grammar.
(i.e., splitting off of a new species) occurs only when a According to the Code, the names of families and
group of interfertile individuals become geographically subfamilies are formed by the addition of the suffixes
and then reproductively isolated. -idae and -inae, respectively, to the stem word of the type-
A higher taxonomic group contains one or more genus (i.e., a genus that is designated as the type of a fam-
related species that differ sufficiently from other such ily or subfamily). The Code further recommends that the
groups and share a common lineage. Just what consti- terminations -oidea and -ini be added to the stems of type-
tutes a sufficient difference, especially at the generic genera to form the names of superfamilies and tribes,
level, is somewhat arbitrary. Ideally, a genus is a group respectively. Thus, the family and subfamilies for the
containing a single species or several species that differ type-genus Sciurus would be Sciuridae and Sciurinae.
from species in other genera by marked discontinuities The names for the corresponding superfamily and tribe
(e.g., different morphological features, behavior, or other would be Sciuroidea and Sciurini. The names of taxa
features). A family is a group of closely related genera higher than the genus are capitalized but not written in
mar06433_ch01.qxd 6/6/00 9:55 AM Page 4
4 CHAPTER 1
italics. A writer may thus refer in lowercase letters to the Africa to the southern edge of the Sahara, and Asia north
sciurid rodents or to the sciurids, but must capitalize the of the south slope of the Himalayas. Because of the great
family Sciuridae. similarities between the Nearctic and Palearctic faunas,
these regions are frequently grouped as a single region,
the Holarctic. The Ethiopian Region includes Africa
D ISTRIBUTION south of the Sahara and most of the Arabian Peninsula.
Mammals were originally four-footed terrestrial animals, Madagascar, here considered a portion of the Ethiopian,
and most living mammals retain this basic plan. But over is sometimes considered a distinct region. The Oriental
the millennia of their development, mammals have diver- Region extends south and east of the Himalayas to
sified to fill a great variety of niches—they are now found Wallace’s Line, which passes through Indonesia. The
underground, in marine and fresh waters, and in the air, Australian Region includes the Australian continent,
as well as on the surface of the earth. They exist on all New Guinea, and the Indonesian islands south and east of
continents, including Antarctica (some seals) and in all Wallace’s Line. New Zealand and other islands of
oceans. Ignoring humans and the commensals that fol- Oceania and the Antarctic continent are not placed in
low them, mammals are absent only from a few remote named faunal regions.
oceanic islands.
Because of this widespread distribution, it is con- 1-F What are the major barriers separating each of
venient to refer to ranges of particular mammal groups in the faunal regions from neighboring regions?
terms of faunal regions (Fig. 1.4). The faunal regions are
based upon broad similarities in animal life. The bound- 1-G List at least three kinds of mammals that may be
aries of these regions are generally formed by barriers, considered characteristic of each region.
such as the Himalaya Mountains and the Sahara Desert,
which have restricted the distribution of mammals. 1-H In which faunal region, or regions, is each of the
The Neotropical Region includes all of the South following situated?
American continent, the islands of the Caribbean, and Bali Iceland Japan Tunisia
extends north to central Mexico. The Nearctic Region Bolivia India Malaysia Uganda
includes the remaining portion of the North American China Indonesia Mexico Yemen
continent. The Palearctic Region includes all of Europe, Greenland Jamaica Monaco
Introduction 5
2T HE S KULL
6
mar06433_ch02.qxd 6/6/00 9:52 AM Page 7
Figure 2.1 Skulls of Canis. (A) dorsal view; (B) ventral view; and (C) lateral view of cranium; (D) lateral view of mandible.
(A. F. DeBlase)
7
mar06433_ch02.qxd 6/6/00 9:52 AM Page 8
8 CHAPTER 2
occipital condyles, which articulate with the atlas, the ing a postorbital bar. The postorbital bar separates the
first of the neck vertebrae. In young mammals, four bones orbit or eye socket from the temporal fossa, through
fuse to form the single occipital bone of the adult. The which some of the muscles of the lower jaw pass. On the
names for these are used to designate regions of the occip- ventral side of the base of each zygomatic process of the
ital. Around the foramen magnum, these are the ventral squamosal, the mandibular fossa provides an articula-
basioccipital, the dorsal supraoccipital, and the lateral tion surface for the lower jaw.
exoccipitals. The occipital crests extend laterally from Between the jugal and frontal bones, at the anterior
the sagittal crest. Branches of the exoccipitals, the paroc- root of each zygomatic arch, is the small lacrimal bone.
cipital processes, extend ventrally in close association The foramen in this bone is for passage of the tear, or
with the auditory bullae. The entire posterior region of the lacrimal, duct. Anterior to the squamosal, and posterior to
skull is termed the occiput. the frontal and orbitosphenoid, is the alisphenoid bone.
The tooth-bearing bones of the upper jaws are the Ventrally on this bone, near its suture with the basisphe-
paired premaxillae and maxillae. The premaxillae, noid, is a small arch of bone surrounding the alisphenoid
which meet at the anterior end of the skull, have two canal.
major branches. The palatal branches of the premaxillae The bulbous structures between the mandibular fos-
meet along the midline of the skull and form the anterior sae and the occipital condyles are the auditory bullae.
portion of the hard palate; the nasal branches of the The opening in the side of each bulla is the external
premaxillae project dorsally and posteriorly to form the auditory meatus across which the tympanic membrane,
sides of the anterior nares (also called external nares). or eardrum, is stretched. In Canis, the tympanic bone is
Posterior to the premaxillae, the maxillae form the major the only bone visible on the external surface of the bulla,
portions of the sides of the rostrum. A large foramen in but in some mammals the entotympanic bone is also
each maxilla is the anterior opening of the infraorbital visible externally. Within each bulla is the middle ear
canal. Each canal terminates in the orbit and serves for chamber containing the three ossicles, the incus,
passage of blood vessels and nerves. In some mammals, malleus, and stapes. The otic capsule, which houses the
this opening is not elongated into a canal and is termed structure of the inner ear, is covered by the tympanic in
the infraorbital aperture or infraorbital foramen. Canis, but it is visible in primitive mammals that have
The palatal branches of the premaxillae and maxillae incomplete auditory bullae. A portion of the periotic, one
together with the paired palatine bones form the hard of the bones forming each otic capsule, is frequently
palate that separates the buccal cavity (mouth) from the exposed between the squamosal and occipital bones. The
nasal passages at this level. A pair of openings at the distal exposed portion of the periotic forms a distinct
suture between the premaxillae and maxillae are the ante- mastoid process in many mammals, but this is not a con-
rior palatal foramina (also termed the incisive foram- spicuous structure in Canis. In some mammals (including
ina). Posterior and dorsal to the palatine bones are the cats and higher primates), the tympanic and squamosal
proximal openings of the nasal passages, the internal bones fuse to form a single structure termed the tempo-
nares. The vomer is an unpaired bone forming a septum ral bone.
between the two nasal passages. The highly convoluted
bones within these passages are the turbinals. Posterior
to the internal nares and the palatine bones are the paired
pterygoids. Between the paired pterygoids and posterior
T HE M ANDIBLE
to the vomer is the unpaired presphenoid. This complex Compared to the cranium, the mandible is a very simple
bone passes beneath the pterygoid, palatine, and maxil- structure. It is composed of left and right dentary bones.
lary bones to reappear dorsally in the wall of each orbit The anterior surface of contact between the paired den-
where it is termed the orbitosphenoid and is perforated taries is the mandibular symphysis. This suture is
by the optic foramen. The medial basisphenoid lies attached fairly firmly in Canis, in most other Carnivora,
between the basioccipital and the ventral visible portion and in many other mammals, and completely fused in
of the presphenoid. primates. But in rodents, most artiodactyls, and many
The conspicuous bony arches forming the ventral other forms, the two dentaries become easily disarticu-
and lateral borders of the orbits and temporal fossae are lated. The horizontal portion of each dentary, the portion
the zygomatic arches. Three bones contribute to each that normally bears teeth, is termed the body, and the ver-
zygomatic arch. Anteriorly, the jugal bone articulates tically projecting portion is the ramus. The mandibular
with the zygomatic process of the maxilla. Posteriorly, condyle is the portion of the mandible that articulates
the jugal articulates with the zygomatic process of the with the mandibular fossa of the cranium. Dorsal to the
squamosal bone. A short process on the dorsal edge of condyle, the coronoid process extends up to fit into the
the zygomatic arch marks the posterior edge of the orbit. temporal fossa and provides a surface for muscle attach-
In some mammals (but not in Canis), this process is con- ment. Ventral to the condyle, the angular process pro-
tinuous with the postorbital process of the frontal, form- trudes posteriorly. The shallow depression near the bases
mar06433_ch02.qxd 6/6/00 9:52 AM Page 9
The Skull 9
of these processes is the masseteric fossa. In some mam- g. Compare the structure of the auditory bullae
mals (but not in Canis), this depression is very deep and in a hedgehog, human, Canis, kangaroo rat,
occasionally completely penetrates the mandible, form- bear, porpoise, and deer.
ing a masseteric canal. h. Compare the placement of the foramen mag-
num in an opossum, monkey, and deer.
2-B Locate on a Canis mandible each of the struc-
tures listed above in boldface type. Label these
on Figure 2.1D. Check your identifications with D ETERMINATION OF M ATURITY
the key at the end of this chapter.
There are several methods of determining the absolute or
relative age of an individual. These are discussed in
detail in Chapter 33. Because most identification keys,
VARIATION including the ones in this manual, are only for adult
mammals, it is necessary for you to be able to distinguish
The skulls of species of Canis may be considered to rep-
between immature and adult animals. Two cranial char-
resent a “typical” mammal skull. From this “typical”
acteristics are especially helpful in identifying immature
structure are many deviations. The postorbital bar, mas-
specimens, but neither of these always works. An indi-
toid process, and other structures conspicuous in some
vidual in which it is evident that certain teeth are not yet
mammals, but absent in Canis, have already been men-
fully erupted is usually an immature specimen. The
tioned.
degree of fusion of cranial sutures is generally also an
The relative lengths of braincase and rostrum vary
indication of age. An immature specimen will have
considerably. Mammals such as certain whales and
poorly fused sutures, and a very old adult can have
anteaters have relatively short braincases and long rostra,
sutures that are almost indiscernible. If a skull has a fully
whereas other species, such as humans, Homo sapiens,
erupted dentition and fully fused cranial sutures, it should
have large braincases and virtually no rostra.
be possible to identify it using the keys in this manual.
The orbits may be directed anywhere from laterally,
The keys may or may not correctly identify a specimen
as in the pronghorn, to anteriorly, as in humans. They may
that does not meet these criteria.
be low on the head, as in raccoons, or high on the skull, as
in woodchucks.
Nasal bones may be absent, short and broad, or long
and narrow. Palatal, nasal, or both branches of the pre-
M EASUREMENTS
maxillae may be enlarged, reduced, or lost. Several more or less standardized measurements are used
Zygomatic arches may be incomplete, weak, or in gaining information about mammalian skulls. Because
amazingly robust. Auditory bullae may be complete, skulls are complex structures that can vary in many ways,
incomplete, inflated, or compressed. different sets of measurements are used for different
Many other such variations can and do exist but are groups of mammals. The 10 most frequently taken mea-
far too numerous to list. surements for a Canis skull would not be the same as the
10 for a porpoise or a rodent.
2-C To get an idea of the range of variation that exists Skull measurements are taken in a straight line
in mammalian skulls, make as many of the fol- between two points (or lines or combinations thereof)
lowing comparisons as possible. and are recorded in millimeters. Calipers are customar-
a. Compare the degree of separation of the orbit ily used for taking these measurements. Dial calipers are
and temporal fossa in a shrew, human or mon- the easiest and most efficient type to use. Although vari-
key, raccoon, cat, and horse. ous brands and models differ in design, in most models
b. Compare the bone structure of the temporal the centimeters are read directly from the bar, and mil-
region in Canis, a cat, and Homo. limeters and tenths of millimeters are read directly from
c. Compare the relative lengths and sizes of the the dial mounted on the movable slide. Vernier calipers
rostrum and braincase in an opossum, shrew, are equally accurate but are slightly more difficult to
human, coyote, cat, horse, and elephant. read. Again, models vary in precise design, but in most
d. Compare the position of the orbits in a models centimeters and millimeters are read directly
human, raccoon, otter, woodchuck, and deer. from the bar, and tenths of millimeters are determined by
e. Compare the size and proportion of the nasal the best match between gradations on the bar and one of
bones in an opossum, human, porpoise, ele- the lines on the sliding scale.
phant, horse, tapir, and moose. When using calipers, take care not to damage spec-
f. Compare the zygomatic arches of an opos- imens. Calipers should be closed to fit snugly against
sum, shrew, human, Canis, rat, North the bone but be careful not to crush, scratch, or puncture
American porcupine, porpoise, and horse. the bone.
mar06433_ch02.qxd 6/6/00 9:52 AM Page 10
10 CHAPTER 2
The following measurements are some of those most *Least interorbital breadth. Least distance
frequently taken. An asterisk (*) indicates those that are between the orbits (Fig. 2.3, B).
taken on most species. Mastoid breadth. Greatest distance across mastoid
bones, on a line perpendicular to the long axis of
Measurements of the Entire Skull the skull (Fig. 2.3, D).
All measurements of length are taken along the midline *Postorbital constriction. Least distance across
of the skull. the top of the skull posterior to the postorbital
process (Fig. 2.3, C).
Basal length. From the anterior edge of the pre-
maxillae to the anteriormost point on the lower bor- Rostral breadth. Least breadth of rostrum between
der of the foramen magnum (Fig. 2.2, A–B). designated points on opposite sides of the skull.
Basilar length. From the posterior margin of the *Zygomatic breadth. Greatest distance between the
alveolus of either of the median upper incisors to outer margins of the zygomatic arches (Fig. 2.3, E–F).
the anteriormost point on the lower border of the
foramen magnum (Fig. 2.2, C–B). Measurements of Palate and Upper Dentition
*Condylobasal length. From the anterior edge of Alveolar length and width. Greatest length or
the premaxillae to the posteriormost projections of width of the alveolus of any specified tooth.
the occipital condyles (Fig. 2.2, A–D).
Diastema length. When diastema present, from
Condylocanine length. From the anterior edges of posterior margin of alveolus of last incisor present
the alveoli of the upper canines to the posterior to anterior margin of alveolus of first cheek tooth
edges of the occipital condyles. (Usually taken present.
instead of condylobasal length in forms in which the
Incisive foramen length. Greatest length of ante-
premaxillae are frequently lost.) (Fig. 2.2, E–D)
rior palatal foramen (Fig. 2.2, H–I).
*Greatest length of skull. From the most anterior
*Maxillary tooth row. Length from anterior edge
part of the rostrum to the most posterior point of
of alveolus of first tooth present in a maxilla to
the skull (Fig. 2.3, L–M).
*Breadth of braincase. Greatest width across the
braincase posterior to the zygomatic arches (Fig.
2.3, A).
Figure 2.2 Felis skull showing points and lines for taking Figure 2.3 Felis skull showing points and lines for taking
measurements of the ventral side. measurements of the dorsal side.
(A. F. DeBlase) (A. F. DeBlase)
mar06433_ch02.qxd 6/6/00 9:52 AM Page 11
The Skull 11
12 CHAPTER 2
T EETH
3
13
mar06433_ch03.qxd 6/6/00 10:10 AM Page 14
14 CHAPTER 3
Incisors
Incisors are the teeth rooted in the premaxillary bone and
the corresponding teeth in the lower jaw. Placental mam-
mals never have more than three incisors in each jaw
quadrant, but marsupials may have up to five in each half
of the upper jaw and up to four in each half of the lower
jaw. These are usually unicuspid teeth with a single root,
but in some groups of mammals, accessory cusps, addi-
Figure 3.1 Diagrammatic cross section of a mammalian tional roots, or both may be present.
tooth. a, enamel; b, dentine; c, pulp; d, root canal; e, cemen- Incisors are generally chisel-shaped teeth that func-
tum; f, crown; g, root. tion primarily for nipping (e.g., a human biting an apple
(L.P. Martin)
or a horse cropping grass). In cattle, deer, and their rela-
tives, this nipping action has been modified by the loss of
the upper incisors. Instead of nipping the vegetation
between upper and lower incisors, these animals use their
highly mobile lips and prehensile tongue to draw vegeta-
tion across the lower teeth, which cut it off in much the
same way that a tape dispenser cuts tape. In rodents (see
Fig. 23.2), lagomorphs (see Fig. 22.3), and certain other
specialized forms, the number of incisors has been
reduced, but the first incisors are stout chisel-edged teeth
used in gnawing. These incisors are rootless and grow
continually as they are worn away at the tips. In vampire
bats, the first pair of incisors has a long, sharp edge (see
Fig. 14.6B). These teeth are used to shave away a layer
of skin to expose blood vessels. The blood that flows to
Figure 3.2 Diagram of tooth replacement in an elephant the surface is then ingested. Elephants have incisors that
jaw. A, portion of tooth worn away; B, portion exposed; C, are enlarged to form tusks (see Fig. 25.1). These are root-
portion still embedded in the jaw. Arrow indicates direction of less and evergrowing and may be used for digging and
tooth replacement. removing bark from trees. Shrews have incisors that proj-
(A.F. DeBlase) ect anteriorly (see Fig. 12.1) and act as forceps in catch-
ing and holding insects and other prey.
Examine a similar specimen from which the
3-E Examine the incisors of a shrew, vampire bat,
teeth have been removed. How many roots does
monkey, rodent, horse, and cow, sheep, or deer.
each tooth have? How many cusps?
What can you deduce about the diet or feeding
habits of each of these mammals?
3-C Examine skulls of mammals that are in the
process of shedding their deciduous teeth. How
does replacement occur? 3-F Examine the pectinate (comblike) lower incisors
of a colugo (Dermoptera: Cynocephalidae).
3-D Examine an elephant jaw. How many cheek teeth Compare these incisors with those of the ringtail
are present? Can you notice any difference in lemur (Primates: Lemuridae). In what way are
wear between the first and last tooth in each jaw the incisors similar? How do they differ? What is
(excluding tusks)? their function?
Canines
T HE K INDS OF T EETH Canines are the most anterior teeth rooted in the maxillae
An individual mammal usually has two or more mor- and the corresponding teeth of the lower jaw. They never
phologically different kinds of teeth, a condition termed number more than one per quadrant. Canines are usually
heterodont. This contrasts with the homodont dentition long, conspicuous, unicuspid teeth with a single root.
mar06433_ch03.qxd 6/6/00 10:10 AM Page 15
Teeth 15
However, some mammals may have canines with acces- Placentals are regarded as having a “late primitive”
sory cusps, additional roots, or both. maximum of four premolars and three molars.
Canines are usually used to capture, hold, and kill Marsupials have only a single tooth in each quadrant of
prey. In herbivorous species, they are frequently reduced the milk dentition. This milk tooth corresponds to the
or absent. In some groups, such as the hogs and some third premolar, above and below, in the adult dentition.
deer, they are very long and sharp and used for fighting. Marsupials are regarded as having a “late primitive”
Pig “tusks” are rootless and in some species arranged so maximum of three premolars and four molars. Teeth are
they do not fully occlude. This minimizes wear and absent in adult monotremes.
allows at least the upper tusks to grow very long. Because cheek teeth do the major job of masticating
Walruses have been said to use their elongated canines to food, they are the teeth that exhibit the greatest diversity
scrape the mollusks that they feed upon from the ocean correlated with diet. Cheek teeth occur that are adapted
floor, but evidence indicates that these conspicuous teeth for such a variety of foods as mollusks, meat, soft vege-
are not used in this way (Miller 1975; Ray 1973). tation, tough grasses, hard-bodied insects, worms, and
Frequently canines and/or other teeth are absent, krill. The structure of the cheek teeth is one of the most
leaving a wide space between the anterior teeth and the important criteria in mammalian classification.
cheek teeth. Any such wide gap between teeth is termed A standardized terminology for dental crown ele-
a diastema. ments that is acceptable to all paleontologists and mam-
Note! In some species, the most conspicuous unicus- malogists is not presently available. The greatest obstacles
pid tooth in the anterior part of the jaw is not the canine. to the development of a generally accepted terminology
Occasionally the last incisor is large and caniniform, and are questions of homology of cusps between early and
the canine is absent or small and resembles a premolar. later groups of mammals. Our terminology is derived, in
Conversely, the first premolar is occasionally caniniform, part, from information presented by Patterson (1956), Van
and the canine is small and incisiform. In the upper jaw, Valen (1966), Szalay (1969), and Hershkovitz (1971).
these teeth are easily identified by locating the suture
between the premaxilla and maxilla. Simple Tribosphenic Cheek Teeth
The earliest known tribosphenic cheek teeth were present
3-G Examine the canines of the following pairs of in early marsupials and placentals of the Cretaceous. A
mammals. Can you suggest functions (if any) for simple tribosphenic upper molar (Fig. 3.3A) has a trigon,
the specializations? whereas the lower molar (Fig. 3.3B) has both a trigonid
a. Peccary (Tayassu) and warthog (Phaco- and a talonid. The triangle-shaped trigon of an upper tri-
choerus) bosphenic upper molar has three main cusps with the pro-
b. Canis and Felis tocone at the apex along the labial edge of the crown (Fig.
c. Human and baboon (Papio) 3.3A). The other cusps are an anterior paracone and a pos-
terior metacone (Fig. 3.3A). The stylar shelf, a broad
ledge situated labial to the paracone and metacone, has
Premolars and Molars several cusps, including the most anterior, the parastyle,
Premolars are situated just posterior to the canines and which provides a convenient reference point to orient a
generally some of all of them in each species differ from tooth for study.
molars in having deciduous predecessors in the milk The lower tribosphenic molar (Fig. 3.3B) consists of
dentition. In all placentals (with the exception of tapirs) a high-cusped trigonid and lower-cusped talonid, the
in which there are four premolars, the first premolar latter of which helps to square the outline of the tooth.
never has a deciduous precursor. In certain other mam- Three of the cusps of the talonid enclose a depression
mals, in which there are fewer than four premolars, the known as the talonid basin that receives the protocone of
first premolar in the sequence is also not replaced the trigon during occlusion.
(Slaughter, et al. 1974). Molars are situated posterior to
the premolars and never have deciduous predecessors. Modified Tribosphenic Cheek Teeth
Authorities disagree as to whether molars are permanent The simple tribosphenic cheek tooth has been modified
teeth for which there are no corresponding milk teeth, or in various lineages of mammals. For convenience, some
whether they are milk teeth that erupt late and are not authors (Butler 1941; Hershkovitz 1971; Turnbull 1971)
replaced. Premolars are usually smaller than molars and divide the simple and derived tribosphenic molars into
have fewer cusps. However, without embryological three main groups: zalambdodont, dilambdodont, and
investigation or a knowledge of the milk dentition of the euthemorphic. Although these modifications apply to
species being studied, it is frequently impossible to dis- molars and some premolars, particularly the most poste-
tinguish between premolars and molars in an adult mam- rior premolars in a series, the discussion that follows is
mal. Therefore, these two tooth types frequently are based on molars. A zalambdodont upper molar (Fig. 3.4)
referred to together as cheek teeth, postcanine teeth, or is characterized by a V-shaped ectoloph. An ectoloph is
molariform teeth. a series of cristae, or crests, connecting the paracone
mar06433_ch03.qxd 6/6/00 10:10 AM Page 16
16 CHAPTER 3
(and sometimes the metacone) with cusps on the stylar 3-K Examine upper and lower euthemorphic molars
shelf. Typically the zalambdodont molar lacks a proto- of a pig, human, various rodents, and a horse. In
cone, and the paracone (sometimes combined with the which species do molars show well-defined
metacone) is located at the lingual apex of the crown. cusps? In which are the molars quadritubercular?
This type of molar is found in many Insectivora and in In which are the molars quadrate?
mar06433_ch03.qxd 6/6/00 10:10 AM Page 17
Teeth 17
18 CHAPTER 3
cristas are useful in cutting and crushing the hard chiti- molar. Which, if any, smaller cusps are present?
nous exoskeletons of insects. Similar specializations are Compare the occlusion of these teeth with those
present in the teeth of many Insectivora. of an opossum.
Many fish-eating mammals such as sea lions and por-
poises have cheek teeth reduced to a series of sharp uni- 3-N Examine the dentition of as many of the follow-
cuspids for holding their slippery food (see Figs. 19.8 and ing mammals as possible. Identify the kinds of
20.26). The sea otter, Enhydra lutris, that feeds primarily teeth in each species and ascertain the probable
on mollusks and echinoderms, and the walrus, Odobenus diet associated with each dentition.
rosmarus, that feeds on mollusks, both have flat brachyo-
dont cheek teeth that crush their food (see Figs. 19.4 and Mammal Order Genus Probable Diet
19.5). A highly specialized cheek tooth is found in the Based on
Antarctic crab-eating seal, Lobodon carcinophagus. This Dentition
species feeds upon krill, small planktonic shrimp-like Shrew Insectivora
crustaceans, in the cold Antarctic waters. Each cheek
tooth of L. carcinophagus has three to five long, curving Vampire bat Chiroptera Desmodus
cusps in a straight line reminiscent of the teeth of mem- Nectar-feeding Chiroptera
bers of the †Triconodonta. These teeth collectively form a bat
sieve (Fig. 3.9) for straining krill from the ocean. Vespertilionid Chiroptera
Many diverse groups of mammals have adapted to bat
diets in which teeth serve little or no major function. In
Anteater Xenarthra
many of these—including bats (e.g., Leptonycteris nivalis)
and marsupials (e.g., Tarsipes spenseral) that feed upon Armadillo Xenarthra
pollen and/or nectar, sloths that feed upon soft buds (see Fig. Sloth Xenarthra
17.6), and armadillos (see Fig. 17.5) and aardwolves (see
Fig. 19.12) that feed upon soft-bodied insects—the entire Rabbit Lagomorpha
dentition is degenerate, and frequently the teeth are reduced Rat Rodentia
to a series of simple flat-topped or unicuspid pegs. The
Deer mouse Rodentia
echidnas (see Fig. 10.4), anteaters (see Fig. 17.4), and pan-
golins (see Fig. 18.2), all of which feed on large numbers of Vole Rodentia
small insects, and the platypus (see Fig. 10.3), which feeds Sea otter Carnivora Enhydra
on aquatic invertebrates, tadpoles, and small fish (Nowak
1999), are edentulate (i.e., lack teeth entirely). The baleen Mink Carnivora
whales are also edentulate and instead use baleen plates to Cat Carnivora
filter krill from the ocean water (see Figs. 20.3 and 20.4).
Crab-eating Carnivora Lobodon
seal (see Fig 3.9)
3-L Examine a Canis skull and identify the incisors,
canines, premolars, and molars. For what func- Sea lion Carnivora
tion is each type of tooth modified? Walrus Carnivora Odobenus
Elephant Proboscidea
Deer Artiodactyla
D ENTAL F ORMULAS
The dental formula is a shorthand method used by
Figure 3.9 Skull of a crab-eating seal, Lobodon car- mammalogists to indicate the numbers of each kind of
cinophagus, showing teeth that resemble those of the †tricon- tooth in a particular mammal. The complete dental for-
odonts. mula for Canis, showing the number of each kind of
(Hatt 1946) tooth in each half of each jaw, is written:
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.