Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF Etextbook PDF For Contemporary Business Law 8Th Edition Full Chapter
Ebook PDF Etextbook PDF For Contemporary Business Law 8Th Edition Full Chapter
vii
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Critical Legal Thinking Case • Exclusionary Rule • Arizona v. Gant . . . . 122
Negligence Per Se . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination . . 123
Res Ipsa Loquitur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Miranda Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Attractive Nuisance Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Attorney–Client Privilege and Other Privileges . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
Case 5.4 • State Court Case • Negligence • Immunity from Prosecution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Choate v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company . . . . . . . . . . 98 Other Constitutional Protections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Good Samaritan Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 Fifth Amendment Protection Against Double Jeopardy . . . . . . 125
Defenses Against Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Sixth Amendment Right to a Public Jury Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Superseding or Intervening Event . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Eighth Amendment Protection Against Cruel and
Assumption of the Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Unusual Punishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Case 5.5 • State Court Case • Assumption of the Risk • Global Law • France Does Not Impose the Death Penalty . . . . . . . 126
Lilya v. The Greater Gulf State Fair, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Contributory and Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Strict Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 7 Intellectual Property and
Cyber Piracy ���������������������������������� 130
Introduction to Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy . . 131
6 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes�� 105 Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Introduction to Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes . . . . . . . 106 Trade Secret . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
Definition of a Crime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 Reverse Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
Penal Codes and Regulatory Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 Civil Trade Secret Law: Misappropriation of a Trade Secret . . . 132
Parties to a Criminal Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Criminal Trade Secret Law: Economic Espionage Act . . . . . . . 133
Classification of Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Ethics • Coca-Cola Employee Tries to Sell Trade Secrets
Intent Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 to Pepsi-Cola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Nonintent Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Contemporary Environment • Criminal Acts as U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
the Basis for Tort Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Patent Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
Criminal Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Subject Matter That Can Be Patented . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
Arrest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Requirements for Obtaining a Patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
Indictment or Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Case 7.1 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Patent • Association for
Arraignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Plea Bargain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Patent Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Criminal Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Provisional Patent Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Common Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Patent Infringement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Murder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Design Patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Case 6.1 • State Court Case • Murder • State of Ohio v. Wilson . . . 113 Contemporary Environment • Leahy-Smith America
Robbery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Invents Act (AIA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Burglary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Larceny . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Tangible Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Theft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Registration of Copyrights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Receiving Stolen Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Copyright Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Arson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Civil Copyright Law: Copyright Infringement . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
Business and White-Collar Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Critical Legal Thinking Case • Cyber Piracy • BMG Music v. Gonzalez . . . . 141
Forgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Fair Use Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Embezzlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Case 7.2 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Copyright •
Bribery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Extortion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Criminal Copyright Law: No Electronic Theft Act . . . . . . . . . . 142
Criminal Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Digital Law • Digital Millennium Copyright Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 Trademark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Money Laundering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 Registration of a Mark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) ����117 Types of Marks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Criminal Conspiracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Distinctiveness or Secondary Meaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Business Environment • Corporate Criminal Liability . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Trademark Infringement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Cyber Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Case 7.3 • Federal Court Case • Trademark Infringement • Intel
Information Infrastructure Protection Act (IIP Act) . . . . . . . . . 119 Corporation v. Intelsys Software, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Digital Law • Internet and Identity Theft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Generic Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud Diluting, Blurring, or Tarnishing Trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
and Abuse Act (CFAA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Case 7.4 • Federal Court Case • Dilution of a Trademark • V Secret
Case 6.2 • Federal Court Case • Computer Crimes • Catalogue, Inc. and Victoria’s Secret Stores,
United States v. Barrington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Inc. v. Moseley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Search and Seizure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Global Law • International Protection of Intellectual Property . . . . 151
Exclusionary Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
Case 6.3 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Search • Maryland v. King . . 121 Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Searches of Business Premises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
xii Contents
Case 11.1 • State Court Case • Mental Capacity • UCC Statutes of Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Campbell v. Carr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 Formality of the Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Intoxicated Persons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 Required Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Legality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 Integration of Several Writings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Contracts Contrary to Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Interpreting Contract Words and Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Usury Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Parol Evidence Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Contracts to Commit Crimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Merger, or Integration, Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
Gambling Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
Effect of Illegality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Case 12.3 • State Court Case • Parol Evidence Rule • Yarde
Ethics • Illegal Gambling Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 Metals, Inc. v. New England Patriots Limited Partnership . . . . 230
Contracts Contrary to Public Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 Equitable Doctrine: Promissory Estoppel . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
Critical Legal Thinking Case • Murder and Life Insurance • Global Law • Seals Used as Signatures in Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
Flood v. Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company . . . . . . . 209 Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
Special Business Contracts and Licensing Statutes . . . 209 Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
Contract in Restraint of Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Licensing Statute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
Case 11.2 • District of Columbia Court Case • Licensing Statute •
Sturdza v. United Arab Emirates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
Exculpatory Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Case 11.3 • Federal Court Case • Release Contract • 13 Third-Party Rights and
Lin v. Spring Mountain Adventures, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 Discharge���������������������������������������� 235
Business Environment • Covenants Not to Compete . . . . . . . . . . . 212 Introduction to Third-Party Rights and Discharge . . . . . . 236
Unconscionable Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 Assignment of a Right . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
Elements of Unconscionability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 Form of Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
Case 11.4 • State Court Case • Unconscionable Contract • Personal Service Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
Stoll v. Xiong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 Assignment of a Future Right . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 Contract Where an Assignment Would Materially
Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Alter the Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 Assignment of a Legal Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
Effect of an Assignment of a Right . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Notice of Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
12 Genuineness Of Assent And Anti-Assignment Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Statute Of Frauds�������������������������� 217 Approval Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Introduction to Genuineness of Assent and Statute Successive Assignments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
of Frauds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 Delegation of a Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
Mistake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 Duties That Can and Cannot Be Delegated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
Unilateral Mistake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 Effect of Delegation of Duties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Mutual Mistake of a Material Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Anti-Delegation Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Mutual Mistake of Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Assignment and Delegation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Third-Party Beneficiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Elements of Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Intended Beneficiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
1. Misrepresentation of a Material Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Donee Beneficiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
2. Intent to Deceive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Creditor Beneficiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
3. Reliance on the Misrepresentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Incidental Beneficiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
4. Injury to the Innocent Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Case 13.1 • Federal Court Case • Third-Party Beneficiary •
Fraud in the Inception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Does I-XI, Workers in China, Bangladesh, Indonesia,
Fraud in the Inducement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Swaziland, and Nicaragua v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. . . . . . . . . 244
Fraud by Concealment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Covenants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
Silence as Misrepresentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Misrepresentation of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Condition Precedent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Innocent Misrepresentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Condition Precedent Based on Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Case 12.1 • State Court Case • Fraud • Krysa v. Payne . . . . . . . . . . 222 Business Environment • “Time Is of the Essence”
Duress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
Equitable Doctrine: Undue Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 Condition Subsequent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
Statute Of Frauds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 Concurrent Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
Writing Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 Implied Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Contracts Involving Interests in Real Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 Discharge of Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Equitable Exception: Part Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 Discharge by Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Critical Legal Thinking Case • Doctrine of Part Performance • Discharge by Impossibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
Sutton v. Warner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 Force Majeure Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
One-Year Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 Statute of Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
Ethics • Bonus Lost Because of the Statute of Frauds . . . . . . . . . . 226 Global Law • Negotiation of Contracts
Guaranty Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 in Foreign Countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
Case 12.2 • State Court Case • Guaranty Contract • Page v. Gulf Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
Coast Motors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
Agents’ Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
Promises Made in Consideration of Marriage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
xiv Contents
17 Title To Goods And Risk Of Loss �� 300 Right to Obtain Specific Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
Introduction to Title to Goods and Risk of Loss������������� 301 Contemporary Environment • Buyer’s and Lessee’s
Identification of Goods and Passage of Title . . . . . . . . . 301 Right to Cover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
Identification of Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 Right to Replevy Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
Passage of Title to Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 Right to Cancel a Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
Shipment and Destination Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 Right to Recover Damages for
Delivery of Goods Without Moving Them . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 Nondelivery or Repudiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
Business Environment • Commonly Used Shipping Terms . . . . . . . 303 Right to Recover Damages for Accepted
Risk of Loss Where There Is No Breach of the Sales Nonconforming Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303 Additional Performance Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
Carrier Cases: Movement of Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 Assurance of Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
Noncarrier Cases: No Movement of Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 Statute of Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
Goods in the Possession of a Bailee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 Agreements Affecting Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Risk of Loss Where There Is a Breach of Liquidated Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
the Sales Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 Ethics • UCC Doctrine of Unconscionability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Seller in Breach of a Sales Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Buyer in Breach of a Sales Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
Risk of Loss in Conditional Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 Ethics Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
Sale on Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
Global Law • United Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods (CISG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306 19 Warranties and
Sale or Return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
Consignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 Product Liability���������������������������� 326
Risk of Loss in Lease Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 Introduction to Warranties and
Business Environment • Insuring Goods Against Risk of Loss . . . . 307 Product Liability����������������������������������������������������������� 327
Sale of Goods by Nonowners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 Express Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Stolen Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 Creation of an Express Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Fraudulently Obtained Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 Statement of Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Entrustment Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 Damages Recoverable for Breach of Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Case 17.1 • State Court Case • Entrustment Rule • Implied Warranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Lindholm v. Brant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309 Implied Warranty of Merchantability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 Ethics • Implied Warranty of Merchantability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose . . . . . . . . 330
Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 Warranty Disclaimers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
Conspicuous Display of Disclaimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
Case 19.1 • State Court Case • Warranty Disclaimer •
Roberts v. Lanigan Auto Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332
18 Remedies for Breach of Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332
Sales and Lease Contracts . . . . . 312 Product Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
Introduction to Remedies for Breach of Sales Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
and Lease Contracts ��������������������������������������������������� 313 Strict Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
Seller and Lessor Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 Liability Without Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
Place of Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 All in the Chain of Distribution Are Liable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
Perfect Tender Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314 Parties Who Can Recover for Strict Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
Contemporary Environment • Seller’s and Lessor’s Right to Cure . . 314 Damages Recoverable for Strict Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
Installment Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 Product Defects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
Destruction of Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 Defect in Manufacture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
Ethics • UCC Imposes Duties of Good Faith and Reasonableness . 315 Case 19.2 • State Court Case • Defect in Manufacture •
Buyer and Lessee Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Dolinski . . . . . . . . 336
Right of Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 Defect in Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
Acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 Critical Legal Thinking Case • Strict Liability •
Payment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 Domingue v. Cameco Industries, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
Revocation of Acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 Crashworthiness Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
Seller and Lessor Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 Failure to Warn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
Right to Withhold Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 Case 19.3 • State Court Case • Failure to Warn •
Right to Stop Delivery of Goods in Transit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 Patch v. Hillerich & Bradsby Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Right to Reclaim Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 Defect in Packaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Right to Dispose of Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 Other Defects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Unfinished Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 Defenses to Product Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
Right to Recover the Purchase Price or Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 Case 19.4 • Federal Court Case • Generally Known
Right to Recover Damages for Breach of Contract . . . . . . . . . . 318 Danger • Thompson v. Sunbeam Products, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . 341
Right to Cancel a Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 Statute of Limitations and Statute of Repose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
Business Environment • Lost Volume Seller . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 Plaintiff Partially at Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
Buyer and Lessee Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Right to Reject Nonconforming Goods or Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Improperly Tendered Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
Right to Recover Goods from an Insolvent Seller or Lessor . . . 320 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
xvi Contents
Part VII Government Regulation And Global Law • United Nations Biosafety Protocol for
Genetically Altered Foods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610
Employment Law . . . . . . . . . 587 Regulation of Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
Regulation of Cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
33 Antitrust Law And Unfair Trade Regulation of Medicinal Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
Practices���������������������������������������� 588 Product and Automobile Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
Medical and Health Care Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
Introduction to Antitrust Law and Unfair
Landmark Law • Health Care Reform Act of 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
Trade Practices����������������������������������������������������������� 589
Unfair and Deceptive Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
Federal Antitrust Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 589
False and Deceptive Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612
Landmark Law • Federal Antitrust Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 589
Contemporary Environment • Do-Not-Call Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613
Government Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
Consumer Financial Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613
Private Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613
Effect of a Government Judgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
Truth-in-Lending Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614
Section 1 of the Sherman Act: Restraints
Consumer Financial Protection Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 614
of Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 591
Business Environment • Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Business Environment • Rule of Reason and Per Se Rule . . . . . . . 591
Consumer Protection Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 615
Horizontal Restraints of Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592
Ethics • Credit CARD Act of 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 616
Price Fixing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592
Environmental Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 616
Division of Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592
Environmental Protection Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 616
Group Boycotts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592
Environmental Impact Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617
Other Horizontal Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
Air Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617
Vertical Restraints of Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
National Ambient Air Quality Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617
Resale Price Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
Water Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618
Nonprice Vertical Restraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594
Point Sources of Water Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618
Case 33.1 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Contract,
Case 34.2 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Water Pollution •
Combination, or Conspiracy • American Needle,
Decker, Oregon State Forester v. Northwest
Inc. v. National Football League . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594
Environmental Defense Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618
Unilateral Refusal to Deal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595
Thermal Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619
Conscious Parallelism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595
Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619
Noerr Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595
Safe Drinking Water Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619
Section 2 of the Sherman Act: Monopolization . . . . . . . 595
Ocean Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619
Attempts and Conspiracies to Monopolize . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 597
Ethics • BP Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620
Defenses to Monopolization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 597
Toxic Substances and Hazardous Wastes . . . . . . . . . . . 620
Section 7 of the Clayton Act: Mergers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 597
Toxic Substances Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620
Horizontal Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 598
Insecticides, Fungicides, and Rodenticides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 621
Vertical Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599
Hazardous Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 621
Market Extension Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599
Landmark Law • Superfund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 621
Conglomerate Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599
Nuclear Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 622
Defenses to Section 7 Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599
Endangered Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 622
Premerger Notification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600
Critical Legal Thinking Case • Endangered Species •
Section 3 of the Clayton Act: Tying Arrangements . . . . . 600
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill,
Section 2 of the Clayton Act: Price Discrimination . . . . 600
Secretary of the Interior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623
Price Discrimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601
State Environmental Protection Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623
Defenses to Price Discrimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601
Global Law • International Environmental Protection . . . . . . . . . . 624
Federal Trade Commission Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602
Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624
Exemptions from Antitrust Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602
Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 625
State Antitrust Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602
Ethics Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 626
Global Law • European Union Antitrust Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 626
Key Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603
Critical Legal Thinking Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604
Ethics Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605 35 Labor, Worker Protection, and
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605
Immigration Laws�������������������������� 628
Introduction to Labor, Worker Protection, and
34 Consumer Safety and Immigration Laws��������������������������������������������������������� 629
Environmental Protection ���������� 606 Workers’ Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 629
Introduction to Consumer Safety and Workers’ Compensation Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630
Environmental Protection��������������������������������������������� 607 Employment-Related Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630
Food Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607 Exclusive Remedy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630
Case 34.1 • Federal Court Case • Adulterated Food • United Case 35.1 • State Court Case • Workers’ Compensation •
States v. LaGrou Distribution Systems, Incorporated . . . . . . . 608 Kelley v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630
Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 Occupational Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631
Landmark Law • Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 Specific Duty Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631
Regulation of Food . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 General Duty Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 631
Food Labeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 Fair Labor Standards Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632
Ethics • Restaurants Required to Disclose Child Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632
Calories of Food Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610 Minimum Wage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632
xxii Contents
xxv
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
New To The Eighth Edition workers not intended beneficiaries of Wal-Mart’s con-
tracts with foreign suppliers)
This edition of Contemporary Business Law is a significant • Chanel, Inc. v. Banks (Internet seller found subject to per-
revision of Professor Cheeseman’s business law and legal sonal jurisdiction)
environment textbook that includes many new cases, statutes, • McPadden v. Sidhu (directors of Delaware corporation not
and features. liable for negligence because of liability waiver in corpo-
rate documents)
• V Secret Catalogue, Inc. and Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc. v.
New U.S. Supreme Court Cases Moseley (tarnishment of a senior mark by a junior mark)
More than 12 new U.S. Supreme Court cases, including: • Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme (casino marker is a nego-
tiable instrument)
• Shelby County, Texas v. Holder (Voting Rights Act) • Mitchell v. Fortas Insurance Company (bad faith tort com-
• United States v. Windsor (federal Defense of Marriage Act mitted by insurance company)
violates equal protection clause) • Rainey v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC (franchisor not liable for
• Maryland v. King (taking DNA of person at time of an accident caused by franchisee’s delivery person)
booking is reasonable search) • Intel Corporation v. Intelsys Software LLC (trademark
• Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (Alien Tort infringement found)
Statute does not permit lawsuit in federal court for alleged • Stoll v. Xiong (unconscionable contract not enforced)
crimes against humanity committed in another country) • Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA (arbitration clause in auto-
• Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP (employer retalia- mobile purchase contract enforced)
tion violates Title VII) • Menendez v. O’Neill (sole shareholder of corporation not
• Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. Bartlett (federal liable for corporation’s liabilities)
drug labeling law preempts state law) • In re Estate of Haviland (undue influence on elderly man
• Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (state law in preparing estate documents)
regulating violent video games violates free speech) • Yarde Metals, Inc. v. New England Patriots Limited
• Walmart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes (certification of a class Partnership (parol evidence not admitted to change terms
denied) of a ticketholder’s contract)
• Snyder v. Phelps (picketing near veteran’s funeral is pro-
tected free speech) New Statutes
• Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
(naturally occurring segments of DNA is a product of na- Coverage of recent federal statutes, including:
ture and is not patentable) • Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act) of 2012
• Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act
(STOCKS Act) of 2012
New State and Federal Court Cases • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) of 2011
More than 40 new state and federal court cases, including: • Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009
xxvii
xxviii Preface
• Sexual Harassment (Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders) • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
• Exclusionary Rule (Arizona v. Gant) • Law in the Digital Age
• Cyber Piracy (BMG Music v. Gonzalez) • E-Commerce and the Commerce Clause
• Strict Liability (Domingue v. Cameco Industries, Inc.) • International Protection of Intellectual Property
• Eminent Domain (Kelo v. City of New London,
Connecticut)
• Assisted Suicide (Gonzales, Attorney General of the
United States v. Oregon)
Supplements That
More than seventy-five new “Critical Legal Thinking
Accompany The Eighth
Questions” have been placed in the margins. Edition
New Special Features on Ethics, Digital Law, For Instructors
Contemporary Environment, Business Environment, We offer a variety of supplements to meet the unique
and Global Law teaching needs of each instructor. Electronic versions of
More than 20 new special features, including: the supplements that accompany this text are available for
• Facebook’s IPO download at our Instructor Resource Center (www.pear-
• Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court) sonhighered.com) and include the following:
• Crowd Funding and Funding Portals
• Emerging Growth Company (EGC) Instructor’s Manual
• Is Outsourcing of U.S. Jobs Ethical? Test Item File
• Delaware Corporation Law TestGen
• Veterans and Military Personnel Employment PowerPoint Presentation
Protections
Preface xxix
To the Students
C ontemporary students have different needs than previous generations.
Having been exposed to the electronic world for your entire lives, you think,
learn, and process information in different ways than prior generations. This new
eighth edition of Contemporary Business Law and its electronic supplements have
been designed especially for your needs.
Many of you may be apprehensive about taking a law course because it may
seem daunting or different from studying many of your other courses. But it is
not. As you embark on your study of the law, you will know that this course pres-
ents the “real world,” that is, real legal disputes involving real people like your-
selves. The course also offers you an opportunity to develop your critical thinking
skills that will serve you in addressing legal and other issues that you may encoun-
ter. And lastly, learning the subject matter of this course will help you make more
informed and confident decisions in your business and personal life.
Each semester, as I stand in front of a new group of students in my business
law and legal environment classes, I am struck by the thought that I draw as much
from them as they do from me. Their youth, enthusiasm, and questions—and
even the doubts a few of them hold about the relevance of law to their futures—
fuel my teaching. They don’t know that every time they open their minds to look
at an issue from a new perspective or critically question something, I have gotten
a wonderful reward for the work I do.
I remind myself of this every time I sit down to work on writing and revising
Contemporary Business Law, as well. My goal is to present business law, the legal
environment, business ethics, and digital law in a way that will spur students to
ask questions, to go beyond rote memorization.
Business law is an evolving outgrowth of its environment, and the legal en-
vironment keeps changing. This new eighth edition of Contemporary Business
Law emphasizes coverage of online law and e-commerce as key parts of the legal
environment. In addition, this book covers social, ethi-
cal, and global issues that are important to the study of
business law.
It is my wish that my commitment to these goals
shines through in this labor of love, and I hope you
have as much pleasure in using it as I have had in cre-
ating it for you.
Henry Cheeseman
This page intentionally left blank
Acknowledgments
When I first began writing this book, I was a solitary figure, researching cases online and
in the law library and writing text on the computer and by hand at my desk. As time
passed, others entered upon the scene—copy editors, developmental editors, research as-
sistants, reviewers, and production personnel—and touched the project and made it better.
Although my name appears on the cover of this book, it is no longer mine alone. I humbly
thank the following persons for their contributions to this project.
Personal Acknowledgments
My family
I would like to dedicate this book to my wife, Jin Du.
I thank my parents—Henry B. and Florence, deceased—who had a profound effect on
me and my ability to be a professor and writer.
I also thank other members of my family, particularly my twin brother, Gregory, with
whom a special bond exists. And the importance of the rest of my family, including my
sister, Marcia, deceased, Gregory’s wife, Lana, my nephew, Gregory, and niece, Nicky,
and their children, Lauren, Addison, and Shelby.
Colleagues
Certain people and colleagues are enjoyable to work with and have made my life easier as
I have endeavored to write this new eighth edition of Contemporary Business Law. I would
like to thank Kerry Fields, my colleague in teaching business law courses at USC, who
is an excellent professor and a wonderful friend. I would also like to thank Helen Pitts,
Debra Jacobs, Terry Lichvar, and Jean Collins, at the Marshall School of Business, who do
so much for me and are always a joy to work with.
Reviewers
The author and publisher would like to acknowledge the following reviewers for their time
and valuable feedback:
xxxi
xxxii Acknowledgments
1
1 Legal Heritage
and the Digital Age
▲ Statue of Liberty, New York Harbor The Statue of Liberty stands majestically in New
York Harbor. During the American Revolution, France gave the colonial patriots substantial
support in the form of money for equipment and supplies, officers and soldiers who fought in the
war, and ships and sailors who fought on the seas. Without the assistance of France, it is unlikely
that the American colonists would have won their independence from Britain. In 1886, the
people of France gave the Statue of Liberty to the people of the United States in recognition of
the friendship that was established during the American Revolution. Since then, the Statue of
Liberty has become a symbol of liberty and democracy throughout the world.
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define law. 4. List and describe the sources of law in the United States.
2. Describe the functions of law. 5. Discuss the importance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
3. Explain the development of the U.S. legal system. decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
Chapter Outline
➤ Introduction to Legal Heritage and the ➤ Schools of Jurisprudential Thought
Digital Age Global Law • Command School of Jurisprudence of Cuba
➤ What Is Law? ➤ History of American Law
Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case • Brown v. Board Landmark Law • Adoption of English Common Law in America
of Education Global Law • Civil Law System of France and Germany
2
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.