Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF Through The Lens of Anthropology An Introduction To Human Evolution and Culture 1St Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF Through The Lens of Anthropology An Introduction To Human Evolution and Culture 1St Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF Through The Lens of Anthropology An Introduction To Human Evolution and Culture 1St Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
List of Illustrations X lV
Acknowledgments xx
About the Authors XXl
Preface XXll
CHAPTER 5 Human Cultural Evolution from 2.5 Million to 20,000 Years Ago 91
Glossary 343
References 364
Index 37 1
- Cont ents
Contents
Preface XXll
REVIEW QUESTIONS 23
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 23
Contents
SUMMARY
REVIEW QUESTIONS
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
CHAPTER s Human Cultural Evolution from 2.5 Million to 20,000 Years Ago 91
LEARNING OBJECTIVES 91
Introduction 91
1he Archaeological Record 92
The Problems of Archaeological Visibility and Bias 94
Overview of Cultural Evolution to 20,000 Years Ago 96
Expanding Territories 108
SUMMARY 109
REVIEW QUESTIONS 110
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 110
Contents
CHAPTER 7 Archaeology of the Last 5,000 Years 1 37
LEARNING OBJECTIVES l 59
Introduction 1 59
Ethnolinguistics 1 97
Contents
REVIEW QUESTIONS 209
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 209
Contents
CHAPTER 13 Supernaturalism 293
LE ARN ING OBJEC T IVES 293
Int rod uction 293
Stud ying Belief Systems 294
Sacred Role s 301
Religious Pr actitioner s 3°5
Religious Re sistance 306
Superna tur al Beliefs and Cultural Expression 3°9
SUMMARY 314
REVIEW QUESTIO NS 3 15
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 3 15
CHAPTER 14 Anthropology and Sustainability 3 17
LE ARN ING OBJECTI VES 3 17
Int roducti on 3 17
Hi story of Human-Environmental Issues 318
Definin g Sustainability 321
Anthropological Approaches to Sustainability Studies 327
Issues in Sustainability Studi es 33 2
How Can Ant hrop ologists Help? 337
SU MMA RY 340
REVIEW QUESTIONS 341
DISC USS IO N QUESTIONS 341
Glossary 343
References 363
Index 37 1
Contents •
Illustrations
Figures
1.1 1he Branches of An throp ology 7
1.2 Indigenous Men in the Kalah ari 8
1.3 Times Square 8
1.4 Doing Archaeology 9
1.5 A Macaque Eating 9
1.6 Homo floresiensis Skull IO
1.7 Totem Pole I4
1.8 Indigenous W omen Doing Archaeology rs
1.9 Indiana Jones 20
2.1 Primate Taxon omy 28
2.2 Capuchin 30
2.3 Mandrill 3r
2.4 Young Gorilla 38
2.5 Chimpanzee 40
2.6 Bonobo 4r
3.1 Milk 50
3.2 Charles Darwin 54
3.3 "Tree of Life" Drawing by Darwin 58
3.4 Statue of Alfr ed Wa llace 58
4.1 Olorgesailie, Kenya 69
4.2 The Human Skeleton 72
4.3 Male and Female H um an Pelvis 72
4.4 Reconstructed Head of Homo erectus 83
4.5 Neanderta l in a Business Suit 85
5.1 Projectile Point s 92
5.2 Fire IOI
5.3 Ac heulean H and Axes ro4
5.4 Spearthrower in Use ro5
5.5 Upper Palaeolithic Figurine ro6
6.1 Beer and Cultural Evolution 127
6.2 Pastoralists 128
6.3 Examples of Pottery I3 I
6.4 Turkana Village 133
6.5 Rock Art at Kakadu, Austr alia 134
7.1 Rosetta Ston e 139
7.2 Egyptian Pyramid 139
Illust rations
7.3 Terra Cotta Warriors 140
7.4 Machu Picchu, Peru 140
7.5 Statues of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) 144
7.6 Stonehenge 148
7.7 Excavating a Historic Site in North America 149
7.8 Waste Audit Archaeology l 5l
Illustrat ions
12.2 Huli Big Man, Papua New Guinea 270
12.3 "Sacrifice/Poker" by Speed Bump 272
12.4 "King" Mickey Johnson of Illawarra, c. I 89 6 277
12.5 Political Protest Near the Tour Eiffel 278
12.6 Egyptian Woman Wearing the Abaya 281
12.7 Bank of the River Nile 283
13.1 Golden Buddha, Burma 294
13.2 Men Washing Their Feet before Entering a Mosque for Prayers 297
13.3 Dervish Dancer, Cairo 299
13.4 Oracle Bones JOI
13.5 Dias de las Muertos Altar 303
13.6 Llama Fetus as Talisman 304
13.7 Body-Piercing Ritual among Tamil Hindu 305
13.8 Medicinal Leeches for Sale, Istanbul 312
14.1 Fishing on the Tonle Sap, Cambodia 320
14.2 The Three Pillars of Sustainability 323
14.3 Concentric Model of Sustainability 324
14.4 Glacier Bay 331
14.5 111eInverse Relationship between Economic Growth and
Environmental Degradation 333
14.6 Street Scene: Alexandria with Marlboro Billboard 334
Tables
1.1 History of Anthropology in North America 13
2.1 Differences betwe en Strepsirhini and Haplorhini 30
2.2 Differences betw een Platyrrhini and Catarr hini 32
2.3 Differences betw een Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea 33
2.4 Alternate Classification Schemes for Homino idea 34
2.5 Human Taxonomy 35
2.6 Overview of Primate Evolution 65 Million Years Ago (MYA) to Present 36
3.1 Principles and Methods of Science 53
4.1 Basic Osteology 71
4.2 Bipedalism-Why and How 79
4.3 The Hominins (Splitter's View) Sr
5.1 Principal Cultural Periods 2.5 Million to 20,000 Years Ago 96
5.2 Principal Cultural Developments Prior to 20,000 Years Ag o 97
6.1 Cultural Periods 20,000 to 5,000 Years Ago II5
- Illustrat ions
6.2 Major Cultural Developments 20,000 to 5,ooo Years Ago II6
6.3 Significant Archaeological Sites in North America Older than 5,ooo Years 121
6.4 Criteria for Distinguishing Domestic versus Wild Plants and Animals 129
7.1 Explanations for the Collapse of Civilizations 140
7.2 Significant Archaeological Sites in North America Less than 5,ooo
Years Old 146
7.3 Selected World Heritage Sites from the Last 5,ooo Years 150
7.4 Criteria for Evaluating Explanations about the Past 154
8.1 Linnaeus's Four "Varieties" of Humans 167
8 .2 Assessing the Adaptiveness of Culture 173
9.1 Proxemic Zones for People in the United States 196
9.2 Categories of Touch 197
9.3 Laughing Online around the World 204
10.l New World Crops 229
11.l Trobriand Islanders' Exchange of Marriage Gifts 253
11.2 Talking about Families 257
11.3 "Masculine" and "Femin ine "Traits of North A meri can Men and Women 259
12.l Comparison of Class and Caste 280
13.l Excerpt from Cantar es Mexicanos #20 by Aztec Poet Nezahualcoyotl 302
13.2 Plants Used in Modern Pharmaceuticals 3 13
14.l Human Impacts on the Biosphere 321
14.2 World Population Growth 33 2
Maps
5 .1 Migrations and Expanding Territories around the Globe ro9
6.1 Possible Entry Routes to the Americas during the Last Ice Age II8
6.2 Significant Archaeological Sites in North America 120
Illustrations
Boxes
Boxes
10.3 The Potlatch 23 I
11.1 AAA Response to Proposed Constitutional Amendment 245
11.2 Comfort Food and the Fami ly 249
11.3 Arranged Marriage in Mumbai 255
11.4 Remov ing the Rings 263
12 .1 Kayapo and the Belo Monte Dam Project 275
12.2 The Samoan 'ava Ce remony 276
12.3 Talking about War 286
12.4 Eating One of Us- Endo-Cannibalism 288
13.1 Religious Food Taboo s 300
13 .2 Disappearing Forest of the Yanomamo 307
13.3 Talking about Religiou s Speech 3rr
14.1 The Guarani and Commercial Agroforestry 326
14.2 Chocolate Production 335
14.3 Talking about the Connection between Language Diversity and Biodiversity 338
Boxes -
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the con trib ut ions of m any. We appreciate our fami -
lies for their patience, and for not comp lain ing too much while we were wr iting .
Laura would like to express her love and gra titude especially for the suppor t of
her hu sband, Luis; and daughters, Maya and Liren; and her two dogs, Moch i and
Ginger, for accompanyi ng her in th e office while writing . She wo uld also like to
dedicate her writing to her father Larry, who inspired her to write by examp le. Bob
expresses appreciation for the support of his wife, Victoria , and his yours-mi ne-
and-our s children: Miriam, Esther, Jonathan, Cody , Tomas, and Anna . He doe s
no t feel he received any suppo rt from his cat, Whisky; dog , Rosie; or any of the
finches, all nam ed Darwin .
W e are very appr eciative of all those friends, colleagues, and former stud ents who
have contribut ed pho tos at no cost, in order to keep the cost of production low and
ultimately mak e th e book affordable to student s. Thi s includes Gillian Crow ther,
Em ma Kimm-Jones, Nadine Ryan, Miche lle Ma lh am, Sashur He nnin ger, Luis A.
Go nzalez, Angel Piedad, Barbara Zaragoza, Daniel Chit, Caro le Counihan, the
Mays-Agate family, Anabel de Krogstad, and Tad Mcllwraith. We are also indebted
to our good fri end and colleague Barry Kass, owner of imagesofanthropology.com,
who h as provid ed many pho to s at a deep discount.
Of course we thank the goo d people at the Univer sity of Toronto Press, espe-
cially executive editor Anne Brackenbury who h as guided us through the process
from proposal to publication. We also thank those in the production process, proof-
readers, and designers, including Ashley Rayner, Megan Pickard, Beate Schwir tlich ,
and copyeditor s Beth McA uley, Barbara Kamien ski, and Chris Cameron of The
Edi tin g Company. They make us look like better writers than we really are. We also
thank the good work of those in market in g, sales, an d shipping. Wi th out those
folks, there is really no point in writing the book, becau se no one would ever see it .
Acknowledgments
About the Authors
Each auth or has prim ary responsibility for several chap ters, but there was consid-
erable discu ssion an d contributions that overlap. Bob M uckle had primary
responsibility for th e introduction and th e chapt ers on evolutionary th ought, archae-
ology, and biological anthropology (Chap ter s 1-7). La ura Gonzalez had primary
responsibility for the chapters on cultural anthrop ology and sustainability, inte grat-
ing linguistic anthropolo gy throu ghout (C hapt ers 8-14) .
Robert (Bob) Muckle is a professor in the anthropology department at C apilano
University in Nor th Vancouver, Canada. He has been practic in g, teaching, and
writin g about anth ropo logy since th e 1980s. His primary teachin g an d research
interests are in archaeology, biological anthrop ology, and the Indi genou s peoples
of North America. He also is int ereste d in app lying archa eology to help solve
issues related to sustainability . He ha s worked on dozens of field projects in North
America and Afri ca, including working collaboratively with Indigen ous peoples of
North America. Publications include Introducing Archaeology, Second Edition (2014),
I ndigenous Peoples oJNorthAmerica :A ConciseAnthropological Overview (2012), and
The First Nations of British Columbia: An Anthropological Overview, Third Edition
(2014). He also edit ed a volume of readings for student s titled Reading Archaeology
(2008). If h e could live anywhere at any time in th e past, he would choose No rth
America about ro,ooo years ago. This is because he prefers low population densi -
ties, enjoys using an atlatl, and would like to taste fresh mammoth. Alternatively, he
would like to be han ging out aroun d Stonehenge about 4,000 years ago, drinking a
drink we now call beer. As long as he remembers, h e's had a thing for Stonehenge .
Laura Tubelle de Gonzalez is a professor in the anthropology department at
San Diego Miramar College in Southern California. She has taught cultural anthro -
pology, physical anthropology, and the Cultures of Mex ico courses for 15years. She
specializes in cultural anthr opology, having done ethnographic fieldwork in Mexico
and India. Her current research interest is in food studi es wit h a focus on sustain-
able food systems, and she is involved in sustainability initi atives on campu s. She
is also a past president of the Society for Anthropology in Community Coll eges,
a section of th e American A nthropol ogical Association that focuses on teach ing
anthropology. Currently she admini str ates th eir Face book page and twitter feed
(@SACC_L). If Laura had limitl ess funds, she woul d travel the wo rld with the
express purpose of tastin g every local cuisine, preferably with a bo ok, a camera,
and some dancing shoes. Alternatively, sh e wo uld like to pilot a diri gible an d be
addressed as "Ca pt ain. "
Preface
humans participating in cultural life. We recognize ourselves in her. Second, today
we live in a globally connected world. People in all societies use cultural artifacts-
such as smart phones-in new and creative contexts. Culture is constantly changing,
and anthropologists are interested in how and why. This book shows how anthro-
pology seeks to understand, and help provide solutions for, human issues at a time
of rapid change to cultures, economies, and the environment.
Preface
Note to Instructors
We have designed th e book so that topical coverage is not restricted to the sequence
of the chapters as laid-out. Following the introductory chapter, the sequence leads to
the primate background (Chapter 2), followed by evolutionary thought (Cha pter 3),
human biological evolution (Chapter 4), archaeology (Chapter s 5, 6, and 7), and then
cultural anthrop ology and linguistic anth ropo logy (Ch apters 8-14 ). We know that
some instructor s prefer to begin with cultural anthropology, for exampl e. Similarly,
some may choose to cover evoluti onary thought befor e prim ates. On e of the ways
we have accomm oda ted alt erna te coverage sequen ces is to bo ld im portan t glos-
sary terms multipl e times in th e book, for instan ce, th e first time it appears in th e
archa eology section and th en again the first time it appear s in the cultu ral anthro -
pology section. This way, the book doesn't assume the student knows th e term when
it appears in th e latter half.
Although different parts of the book have different foci (i.e., biological an thro-
po logy, archaeo logy, and cult ural anthropo logy with lin guis tic s), we strive to
integrate the four-field approach where appro priate. Our primary th emes of food
and sustainability , for example, are one way of showing th e integration, and the
incorporation oflin guistics into various contex ts another. In add ition , when a topic
is addressed multiple tim es in th e book, we cross-refer ence the chapt ers .
Each chapt er includes a list oflearning objectives, a chapter summ ary, and ques-
tions to guid e stud ent s' reading and pro vid e a frame work for thinking abo ut the
issues covered. In addition, the authors and the Univer sity of Toro nt o Press provide
a full set of ancillaries for instructors adopting the text. These ancillaries include
an in structor' s manual with chapter outlines and key points, lecture sugges tions,
assignme nt s and activities, answers to th e review qu estions found in the book, lists
of key term s with page references, fur th er reading, Web links, Power Point slides,
and a test bank. For more inform atio n about the in stru ctor's ma nual, Powe r Point
slid es, and test bank, and to downl oad th e images, map s, figures, and tab les from
the book, instructors shou ld visit www.lensofa nthrop ology.com.
We wanted to keep the book in a concise format for two mai n reasons: First, the
concise form at brings th e cost of the book down for stud ents; the high cost of text-
books is a concern for many instructor s, including us. Second, we know that you,
the instructor, have your own kn owle dge, experience, and goa ls for your cour ses.
We have provided th e basic stru cture up on which we hope you will build, utili zing
examples of your own that will make th e course come to life.
Note to Instructors
Note to Students
More than 300 words in the text appear in boldface, indicating that they are in the
glossary . Students are encouraged to check the glossa ry to see how these words
are defined. Many of them have a particular meaning in anthropology th at may
be different from the way they are used in common conversation (words such as
theory or gender, for example). Many words are boldfaced two or three times in the
text . This accommodates course s that follow a different sequence of chapters th an
that laid out in the book. We also encourage you to use the learning objectives to
guide your reading, as well as the review and discussion questions to reflect an d
apply what you have read to your own experience.
The term North America is used frequently throughout this book. We recognize
that there are multiple ways of defining North Amer ica, but when we use North
America in this book, we are primarily referring to the United States and Canada.
There are free online learning resources that can greatly enhance each student's
engagement wit h the book's content. Visit www.lensofanthropology.com for self-
study questions, chapter outlines, Web links, further reading, and to download the
images, maps, figures, and tables con tained in the book.
Note to Students -
PLACES MENTIONED IN CHAPTER 1
Introduction
How, why, and when did humans come to be? W hy do various groups of people
around the world have different physical characteristics, and why do so many people
speak, th ink , and do things differently than those you are most familiar with?
The short answer is that science in general, and anthropology in particular, tells
us that hum ans have been around a very long time. Habitually walking on two legs
was the first important thing to occur in the human lineage, intelligence the second.
Differences in languages, thoughts, and customs arise from many things, but are
usually the result of humans' successful adaptation to the environment and other
people around them. A longer, more thorough, answer requires some knowledge
of anthropology. This text is designed to give students some of that fundamental
knowledge and the anthropological thinking skills to address these questions and
others like them.
To make sense of the world around us and our place in it, it's useful to have a
framework. Frameworks help organize thoughts and guide our understanding of
both the natural and cultural worlds. Many frameworks exist. Traditional main-
stream religions offer one major kind of framework, Indigenous ideologies another.
Science and academic enquiry are frameworks as well.Just as there are many differ-
ent religious and Indigenous frameworks, there are also different kinds of scientific,
academic, and scholarly frameworks. All frameworks are valid.
It is important to have a framework for understanding phenomena. Frameworks
help people work toward explanations. Frameworks narrow down the kinds of infor-
mation to consider. What constitutes a framework is a set of principles, methods,
theories; and knowledge to investigate, understand, and explain phenomena.
Anthropology is one such framework, a way of understanding how humans
came, and continue, to be. It isn't the only way, but it is one way. In practical terms,
this means that anthropology has a particular set of characteristics that distinguish
it from other ways of knowing. These characteristics are clarified later in this and
subsequent chapters.
In this book we refer to the anthropological framework as the lens of anthro-
pology. As with any framework, it provides a basic structure to help organize our
thoughts. It provides focus and clarity. The lens is a particular set of ideas, meth-
ods, theories, ethics, views, and research results.
This book introduces the discipline of anthropology, mostly in the context of
the academic world, but also from the perspective of practical applications. Mostly,
it informs readers about the human world as seen through the lens of anthropol-
ogy. This opening chapter outlines the nature of anthropology, the anthropological
perspective, the history of anthropology, how anthropology is situated within the
world today, and the importance of anthropology in an increasingly connected
world. Subsequent chapters turn the lens toward our place in the world of primates,
human biological evolution, cultural evolution, and the wide range of cultural diver-
sity among the world's populations today. Where appropriate, the chapters include
references to underlying anthropological methods and theories as well as research
findings and insight.
Chapter 1: Introduction : Viewing the World through the Lens of Anthropo logy
Box 1.2 From th e time of homini n evolution, through
Anthropology and more recent prehistory , to the rise and fall of
civilizations, anthropolo gists have sought to
Sustainability understand the reasons for successes and
It has been clear to scienti sts for some t ime t hat failu res in all of the ecosystem s on earth.
lif e on our planet is becom ing unsustain able.
Today, anthropo log ists study some of the
Louder and more urgent calls to action
most margina lized peopl e living on th e planet,
emerge every few years. In 1992, the scientific
including Indigenous people living in sma ll-
commu nit y pub lished the "World Scient ists'
scale, trad itional societ ies. As the wor ld
Warning t o Human ity ." In 2000, t he Unit ed
becom es mor e connect ed throu gh globa lization
Nat ions Mill enn ium goa ls we re published ; th ey
and industr y, these groups are ofte n the most
included specific targe t s to aim for by 2015 in
oppressed. At the same t im e, these gro ups
social, environmental, and economic realm s to
hold vast amoun ts of tr ad ition al know ledge
mitigate som e of the most detrimenta l effects.
about the ecosystems in wh ich they live. Thi s
Seeing that we hadn't yet reached thes e target s,
knowl edge appears to be mor e import ant than
in 2014, the Inter gove rnmental Panel on Clim ate
ever to save t he biodiver sity of the plan et. As
Change (IPCC) published their synt hesis report,
these small-sca le cu lt ures disappea r, so do the ir
wh ich state s blunt ly that if we don't act now
know ledge, languages, under stand ing and use of
to cut carbon po llut ion, there wil l be severely
flor a and fauna, and pre-industria lized ways of
dam aging and "irreversib le imp acts" that w ill
makin g a livi ng.
hamper our abi lit y to survive as a spec ies.
It is here among the people who are on the
Clearly, the sustainabil ity of people and lif e on
edges of the modern Western wor ld th at anthro-
eart h is an issue that we cannot ignore. Why
pologists discover the kinds of connections
include anthropo logy in a discuss ion about
w ith the natural wor ld that mode rnizat ion has
sustainability7 Anthro polo gy, across its fields , is
largely discarde d in th e quest for status and
uniquely positioned as a field of study to provide
pow er that characteri zes the conte mp orary
the kinds of broad and deep und erstandin gs
wor ld. Therefore, anthropolo gy can not only
about peopl e in the ir environments-
provid e hol istic and long-term views of why
und erstandin gs that can lead to soluti ons. Since
cultures succeed or fai l in t heir ecosystems but
the beginnin g of the discip line, anthropologist s
also illumin ate th e kinds of hu man connections
have sought to learn about th e long -term
to one anothe r and to the nat ural wo rld that
int eract ions of people in their environm ents.
characterize our specie s.
Through the Lens of Ant hropology: An Introduction to Human Evolution and Cultu re
Defining Anthropology, Defining Human, and Definin g Culture
Three of the most important words a student of anthropology should become famil-
iar with, at least in regard to how they are used in anthropology, are anthropology,
human, and culture. There is a good chance most students already have some idea
of the meaning of these words, but they may not be aware of specific meanings and
how they may vary depending on context . There is little consensus, even among
anthropologists, about what these words mean, but this is not necessarily a bad
thing.111ere are some genera l understandings of what each word means in anthro-
pology, but it isn't necessary that everyone use the same definition in every context.
There are many definitions of anthropology. The one constant in all valid defini-
tions is that anthropology involves the study of humans. Beyond this, however, how
one defines the discipline depends on context. Outside of North America, anthro -
pology is often considered to focus on peoples and cultures of contemporary times
(or the very recent past) . In North America, however, anthropology is usually consid-
ered to include studies of human cultures and human biology, past and present .
In many instances, such as when genera l distinctions between various fields
of study are being made, a simple definition such as "anthropology is the st ud y
of humans" may be sufficient . There are many disciplines that focus on humans,
however; so it is often desirable to distinguish between the particular kinds of
things about humans that anthropologists are interested in, such as human culture
and human biology, or methods or perspectives.
The inclusion of the "evolutionary, comparative, and
holistic perspectives," for example, distinguishes Defining Anthropology
anthropology. Other uniquely anthropo logical Anthropology is ...
perspectives are included later in this chapter.
• The study of humans
Human has a distinct meaning in anthropol -
• The study of human cult ure
ogy and may be used in ways that are unfamiliar.
• The study of humans, in all places and at all
For many people, human equates wit h Homo sapi- times
ens, the genus and species to which we all belong . • The study of human culture and biology
For anthropologists interested in the human past, • The study of humans, focusing on the
however, Homo sapiens is insufficient. As will be description and explanation of human
clarified and expanded upon in subsequent chap- cultures and human biology , and including
the scholar ly collection , analysis, and
ters, many anthropologists equate human with a
interpretation of data related to humans,
certain kind of primate whose normal means of past and present
moving around is walking on two legs (bipedal- • The scholarly study of humans through
ism) and who emerged several million years ago. evolutionary, comparative , and holistic
Those who accept that bipedalism is the distin - perspectives
guishing characteristic of humans therefore equate
Chapter 1: Introduction : Viewing the Wor ld through the Lens of Anthropo logy
human with the biological family Homininae, which includes the genus Homo
as well as other genera (plural of genus) existing between seven million and one
million years ago. Some anthropologists, espec ially those focusing on the past
cultures, equate human with the genus Homo, for the simple reason that it is with
the emergence of the genus Homo more than two million years ago that we have
first undeniable physical evidence of human culture. In sum, some anthropologists
equate human with Homo sapiens, some equate human with the gen us Homo (which
include s sapiens as well as other now extinct species), and some equate human with
the biological family Homininae.
Culture, too, has a di stinct meaning in ant hropol ogy, which may not corre-
spond to its usage in other contexts. Cu ltur e is a core concept in anthropo logy
and is covere d more fully in Chapter 8. As with th e definitions of anthropo logy
and human, there are many different ways to define culture, even within the disci-
pline of anthropology. Some definitions focus on the mental templates that govern
peoples' behavior; other s focus on customs . The authors of this textbook consider
culture to includ e aspects of ideology and behavior, as well as the products of
those thoughts and behaviors (i.e., material culture). Thus, we define culture as the
learned and shared things that people think, do, and have as members of a society.
"Th ings that people think" refers to ideology, which includes belief systems and
value s. "Things that people do" includes behaviors th at are commonly referred to
as customs. "Things that peop le have" is commonly referred to as material culture.
There are many components of culture including those relating to
subsistence, diet, technology, comm unication, economies, social and politi-
Components of cal systems, ideology, arts, and health. All cultures have these components,
Culture and each is discussed more fully in later chapters. When anthropologists
• Subsistence/ speak of subsistence, food procurement, or foodways, they are usually
food-getting/food referring to the met hods by which people get their food, such as foraging
procurement (also known as hunting and gathering), pastoralism, horticulture, agri-
• Diet
culture, or indu stria lism . Diet refers to the specific kinds of food eaten.
• Technology
• Language and
Technology refers to the way people have made or used things, including
commu nication such thin gs as making and using tools, cooking, harvesting, and building.
• Sett lement patterns Communication refers to all ways people have of communica ting, including
• Economic systems speech, sounds, gestures, art, and writing. Settlement patterns refer to the
• Social systems movements of people within their territories, and the ways in which they
• Politica l systems
create their living spaces. Economic system s focus on the way people obtain
• Belief systems and
and distribute resources. Social systems includ e the methods by which order
ideology
• Arts is maintained within a comm unity or group, and politica l systems involve
• Health and healing the processes in which order is maintained with other groups. Ideology
include s shared beliefs and values. Art includ es both visual and performing
Th rough t he Lens of A nt hropo logy : An Introduct ion to Human Evolut ion and Cultu re
arts, and health and healing refers to both physical and mental health, illnesses, and
methods of treatment.
It is important to understand that culture is dynamic, fluid, and ever-ch anging .
All components of culture do not change at the same rate, and the components do
not change in the same order, but they all do eventually change.
It is possible to be part of multiple cultures and subcultur es at the same time.
Based on language alone, there are several thousand distinct cultures in the world
today. This is based on the notion that where languages are distinct, other aspects of
ideology, customs, and material culture are typically distinct as well. Most elements
of any one culture are shared with other cultur es as well. It is the suite of charac -
teri stics that distinguish distinct cultures and subcultur es. Consider, for example,
that readers of this text may identify with North American culture, which has
some distinct values, behaviors, and other things unique to North Amer ican s but
not shared widely with people outside of North America. Beyond that, people may
also identify with other cultures associated with their heritage, country, or geogra -
phy. Although they share many aspects of North American culture, for example,
there are distinct differences between American and Canadian cultures, east coast
or west coast subcultur es, southern and northern subcultures; Indigenous and non-
Indigenous, or corporate and non-corporate subcultures. Readers of this text are
also likely to share the same particular set of values, customs, and items as those Figure 1.1
attending colleges and universities anywhere in Nor th America, as part of college The Branches of
and university subculture. Anthropology
Many people are also often able to operate within multiple cultures . It is This illustration
represents the four
common, for example, for some Indigenous peoples in North America to move main branches of
between their Indigenous culture, especially as it is on their reserves or reservation, anthropology. Each
branch also includes an
and the typically more dominant non-Indigenous cultures in urban areas.
"applied" component.
Thr ough t he Lens of A nt hropolo gy: A n Int rod ucti on to Hum an Evolut ion and Culture
anthropologists stud y skeletal material (e.g., bon es and teeth) as well as DN A and Figure 1.4
work of an throp ology. This includes classifying languages (such as putting them
int o taxonomic categories); deter minin g past migrations and interactions by exam -
inin g languages; and stu dying language change, th e influence oflanguage on other
elements of culture and their influences on it, and language usage. Most linguistic
anthropologists work in academic in stitution s, but there are also career opportu -
niti es elsewhere, such as with Indigenous groups and not-fo r-profits seeking to
document th e rapidly disappearing languag es of the world .
Chapter 1: Introduct ion: View ing the Wor ld through the Lens of Anthropology
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.