Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oil Price in A 1 5 Degree World
Oil Price in A 1 5 Degree World
Oil Price in A 1 5 Degree World
5-degree world
September 2022
30
Energy
Consistent with Steady advancement of
Transition Evolution of
25 2.5 to 2.7 ˚C current and nascent
Outlook current policies
global warming technologies
20 (WM ETO)
Bt CO2-e
15
10 Current pledges
0
Consistent with
Aligned with Early peak energy; rapid
1.5 °C 1.5 ˚C warming
-5 most ambitious hydrogen and carbon
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Scenario (Global net zero
goal of Paris removal deployment;
(WM AET-1.5) emissions by
Agreement consumer shift
ETO (base case) AET-1.5 (scenario) 2050)
Electricity dominates, providing 48% of the world’s energy consumption – deployment of wind and solar scales rapidly to account for 61% of a
significantly larger power market
Low-carbon hydrogen production reaches 650 Mtpa, leading to a US$475 billion per annum international traded market
CO₂
12 Bt of carbon removal capacity is in place by 2050, supported by a global carbon price of US$175/tonne. Abundant opportunities to integrate
international credits and offsets and manage price risk
Demand 2021 2050 2050 2021 2050 2050 2021 2050 2050
ETO AET-1.5 ETO AET-1.5 ETO AET-1.5
CO₂ 11.2 9.7 2.6 7.3 8.6 1.9 13.6 8.8 0.4
Bt
Bt Bt Bt Bt Bt Bt Bt Bt
Emissions 2021 2050 2050 2021 2050 2050 2021 2050 2050
ETO AET-1.5 ETO AET-1.5 ETO AET-1.5
Source: Wood Mackenzie Global Energy Transition Service Emissions shown are net emissions (incorporating CCS) 3
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
End-use demand for energy peaks by 2028, and electricity dominates the mix
Gas paired with CCS plays a role in the electricity production as a source of flexibility and dispatchable
generation – this supports global demand for gas relative to oil
Total final consumption (end-use Share of total final consumption by fuel Share of fuel inputs in electricity
demand)
14,000 100%
100%
90%
Share of TFC
60% 60%
8,000 Rapid electrification of 50% 50%
Mtoe
WM has developed a collection of world class models designed to be seamlessly integrated. Our
unique position in the market allows for asset level integration to develop robust scenarios.
Refinery
Global Gas Oil Supply
Supply
Model Model
Model
• The OSM allows for fast and easy analysis of • The RSM is a dynamic model emulating the
• WM’s Energy analytics environment houses flexibility and interconnectedness of the global
the oil market under an infinite number of
our industry leading models including oil, gas, refining system. It evaluates the economic impact
scenarios based on supply/demand/price
refining and coal. of wide-ranging scenarios quickly and
fundamentals. Outputs feed both gas and
refining models. thoroughly, with full commercial implications. 5
Oil
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
AET 1.5 global demand: Drastic fall in transport fuel under a full-blown energy
transition
In this scenario, gasoline and diesel/gasoil falls below our base case by 28 million b/d for 2050
Global oil demand*, AET 1.5 vs. base case Annual demand by product vs. base case
LPG Naphtha
120 AET 1.5 Base Gasoline Jet/kerosene
Diesel/gasoil Fuel Oil
0
100 -1
-2
-3
80 -4
-5
Million b/d
-6
Million b/d
60 -7
-8
-9
40 -10
-11
-12
20 -13
-14
-15
0 -16
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Source: History – IEA, National Statistics; Forecast – Wood Mackenzie; *Demand excludes biofuels. Base case is sourced from the latest Macro Oils short-term outlook and Macro Oils Strategic Planning 7
Outlook in March 2022.
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
In the AET 1.5 scenario, global oil supply remains steady over the next decade
before declining rapidly as oil demand falls
Global supply turns to a race to the bottom with the cheapest sources of supply dominating market share:
Middle East share is 50% and when combined with North America is 75%
Global liquids supply by region
120 World Russia and the Caspian Oceania
North America Middle East Latin America and the Caribbean
Europe Asia Africa
100
Liquids supply (Million b/d)
80
60
40
20
0
2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 2050
While some investment is still required to satisfy demand, technical reserves and
exploration volumes play a minimal role
Low prices do not incentivise exploration or re-investment in “easy” sources of supply such as reserves growth
Global supply by development status Base Case Global supply by development status AET 1.5
120 120
100 100
Liquids capacity (Million b/d)
60 60
Yet-To-find Yet-To-Find
40 Other Discoveries 40 Other Discoveries
Reserves Growth Reserves Growth
Probable Development Probable
Under Development Under Development
20 20
Onstream Onstream
0 0
2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047
The AET- 1.5° scenario requires upstream projects to be developed over the next
decade to offset onstream declines, despite declining oil demand
But post-2035 there is very little economic incentive for new supply to be brought online
Global liquids supply by development status
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
25
2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
15
10
0
2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 2050
40 6
30
4
20
2
10
0 0
Post-2030, declining oil demand and prices leads to limited further investment, with
declines accelerating in high-cost locations
Lack of investment post-2030 hastens onstream declines and early cessation becomes a major factor post-
2040 as prices drop even lower
Global liquids supply by region
2
Liquids Supply Change (Million b/d)
-2
-4
-6
-8
2022-2030 2030-2050
-10
Source: Wood Mackenzie Oil Supply Model 12
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
Source: Wood Mackenzie; base case: Macro Oils Service March 2022 Strategic Planning Outlook 13
Refining
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
AET-1.5 oil demand declines by over 2 million b/d year-on-year post-2030 and almost
3 million b/d year-on-year post-2040, significantly reducing the call on refining
The composition of the demand barrel shifts from gasoline to distillates and petrochemical feedstocks
AET-1.5 demand profile for major product grades AET-1.5 demand composition by major product grades
90 100%
80 90%
70 80%
70%
60
% of total demand
60%
Million b/d
50
50%
40
40%
30
30%
20
20%
10 10%
0 0%
2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050
Fuel oil Middle distillates Gasoline LPG/naphtha Fuel oil Middle distillates Gasoline LPG/naphtha
In AET-1.5, light crudes, condensates and NGLs become the majority of supply, with
refining runs in all regions falling sharply in this scenario
The Middle East outperforms other regions in terms of crude throughput as it remains a key crude oil producer
AET-1.5 crude supply by quality (million b/d) AET-1.5 crude throughputs by region (million b/d)
80
100
90 70
80 60
70
50
Million b/d
Million b/d
60
50 40
40 30
30
20
20
10
10
0 0
2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Heavy/Extra Heavy Medium Light/Extra Light NGL/condensate Asia Pacific Greater Europe Middle East North America
FCC complex refineries are the worst performing “capacity type”. Hydrocracking
configurations perform best, reflecting the demand profile of the different fuels
AET-1.5 refining margins are all weaker, but FCC refiners are particularly challenged by falling gasoline demand
AET-1.5 throughput by capacity type Indicator refining margins by capacity type
(indexed to base case outlook)
$6
1.2
$5
Thgouhtput index (of base case)
1.0
$4
0.8
0.4 $2
Heavy crude and light ends gain in value as refinery supply reduces, spare capacity
grows, and petrochemical share of demand rises
Gasoline hit hardest but demand destruction drags diesel prices down with it
Brent-Dubai differential in base and AET 1.5 AET 1.5 refined product cracks
$0.0 $10.0
-$0.5
$5.0
-$1.0
-$1.5 $0.0
-$2.0
-$5.0
-$2.5
-$4.5 -$20.0
AET-1.5 scenario reduces the volume of crude processed and increased competition
for ever shrinking demand flattens the slope of the margin profile chart
The “average” margin for operational sites declines by US$1/bbl for each decade post 2030 as throughputs fall
and refining capacity undergoes rationalisation (at around one to two sites each and every year)
Illustrative AET-1.5 cumulative throughput vs margin profile chart (million b/d vs gross margin)
$25
$15
$10
US$ per bbl
$5
$0
-$5
-$10
-$15
-$20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Million b/d throughput
Wood Mackenzie offices Wood Mackenzie offices with Power & Renewables presence
21
Oil prices in a 1.5-degree world woodmac.com
License
Ownership Rights
All reports are owned by Wood Mackenzie, protected by United States Copyright and international copyright/intellectual proper ty laws under
applicable treaties and/or conventions. User agrees not to export any report into a country that does not have copyright/inte llectual property laws
that will protect Wood Mackenzie’s rights therein.
Wood Mackenzie™, a Verisk business, is a trusted intelligence provider, empowering decision-makers with unique insight on
the world’s natural resources. We are a leading research and consultancy business for the global energy, power and
renewables, subsurface, chemicals, and metals and mining industries. For more information visit: woodmac.com
WOOD MACKENZIE is a trademark of Wood Mackenzie Limited and is the subject of trademark registrations and/or
applications in the European Community, the USA and other countries around the world.