SUMMER INTERNSHIP

2023
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT
For the week commencing on 14th JUNE 2023
WPR: 2
Enrolment Number: A3211120228
Program: BA.LLB. (H)
Student Name: MARKANDEY SINGH
Industry Guide’s Name: ADV. MANISHA SHARMA
Project Title: CASE ANALYSIS
Achievements for the week: Section 14&15, 4th schedule of ARBITRATION
AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, section 138, 142 of negotiable
instruments act.

WEEKLY REPORT
For this week, we did the case analysis of “DFCCIL V. TATA ALDESA JV. Delhi
High Court FACTS:
DFCCIL, the petitioner has filed the petition under section 14&15 of A&C
act,1996 against the impugned orders dated 6.08.2022 and 06.10.2022 passed by
the arbitral tribunal.
In this case the petitioner believes that the tribunal has taken jurisdiction in their
hands, as they are not abiding with the rules of 4th schedule of A&C act,1996,
they are not even abiding by the contract that was made between the parties and
is charging a high fee.
In this case the petitioner wants the ICADR rules should apply the present case
as mentioned in their contract to resolve in dispute. But as the ICADR has become
defunct society, arbitral tribunal refuses to use the ICADR rules for the present
case.
The petitioner pleads that in the absence of any other rules ICADR rules should
be held valid, and it was also decided during the contract made between the
parties.
I did a case study of Deepak Sharma v/s Vishal kumar and Anr.
In this case the complainant filed the case against the accused under section 138
of the negotiable instrument act.
Section 138 of the negotiable instrument act deals with the check bounce.
The complainant who runs the company for rooftop saftety filed the case against
the accused who purchased fire safety system from the complainant, over a check
bounce of amount of rupees 13500 that the accused is discharged of his liability
for rupees 13500.
I also did some drafting for the case.