Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

5 TOP READS

Biden and the Terrible, Horrible, No


Good, Very Bad Year
The U.S. president’s foreign-policy strategy came undone in 2023.
By Cameron Abadi, a deputy editor at Foreign Policy.

U.S. President Joe Biden prays after delivering a speech at the Dail Eireann, the lower house of the Irish Parliament, in
Dublin on April 13, 2023. JIM WATSON/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

My FP: You are currently not opted in. To begin receiving My FP email digests based on your interests click here.

DECEMBER 30, 2023, 6:00 AM

Joe Biden has always aimed to shape the post-Cold War era—but in 2023, the post-Cold
War era began to shape the fate of his administration. This became the year that Biden’s

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 1/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

foreign-policy strategy reached its fruition and its potential obsolescence.

That’s because political events, in the United States

2023
and abroad, began to expose unresolved
ambiguities at the heart of Biden’s strategy. His
foreign policy has been motivated by the idea that
The year's best stories
great-power rivalry was inevitable—and that
Washington could master any such competition.
Biden hasn’t shirked from the challenge of confronting Russia’s aggression in Ukraine or
China’s economic and technological rise.

But this year revealed the limits that the United States faces. As Ukraine’s spring
counteroffensive stalled despite backing from the Biden administration and its allies in
Europe, boasts of Ukrainian victory gave way to resignation about the potential
inevitability of negotiations with Russia. And, as the extent of U.S. economic
dependence on China revealed itself, the Biden administration’s tough economic talk
took on conciliatory tones.

The flipside of Biden’s great-power framework has been the idea that the United States
could avoid distraction from conflicts that did not directly involve great powers. That
assumption, too, has come undone this year as Israel and Hamas produced a war that
immediately involved the United States—and in some ways, that involvement may be
serving to intensify the conflict. Biden clearly judged it prudent, politically and
strategically, to invest in Israel’s victory. But that seems to have come at the expense of
making the war deadlier for Palestinian civilians—and riskier for U.S. interests.

Common to both assumptions at the heart of Biden’s foreign policy—the ability to assert
primacy in great-power competition and preside passively over all other conflicts—is a
vision of American power, and its relationship to global order, that might be too fragile
to realize in any sustained way. Biden acknowledges we are in an era of new global
competition but assumes it will be defined by American leadership. He imagines an
America powerful enough to intervene everywhere but never obliged to intervene

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 2/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

anywhere. In 2023, some of those commitments came due, to the detriment of Biden’s
foreign-policy agenda—and potentially his legacy. These five contemporaneous Foreign
Policy pieces chart how the United States got here—and where it might end up next.

1. America Has Dictated Its Economic Peace Terms to China

By Adam Tooze, April 24

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s speech in April on Washington’s economic


relationship with China was widely interpreted as an accommodating gesture in the
competition between the world’s two largest economies. For FP columnist Adam Tooze,
this only seemed to underscore the overreach of the Biden administration’s economic
strategy. “Judged by the tone, her message is intended to clarify and calm the waters of
speculation and debate about motives and intentions,” he writes. “In the current
situation, however, it is far from clear whether clarity actually contributes to calm.”

Yellen said that China can freely grow without threatening American economic
leadership. For Tooze, this is less a concession than a veiled threat. “So a strong and self-
confident America has no reason to stand in the way of China’s economic and
technological modernization except in every area that America’s national security
establishment, the most gigantic in the world, defines as being of essential national
interest,” he writes. “For this to be anything other than hypocrisy, you have to imagine
that we live in a Goldilocks world in which the technology, industrial capacity, and trade
that are relevant to national security are incidental to economic and technological
modernization more broadly speaking.”

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 3/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

2. The End of Biden’s Middle East Mirage

By Matt Duss, Oct. 19

The Biden administration’s strategy for Palestine, to the extent it had one, was based on
the assumption that its conflict with Israel need not be resolved. Instead, Palestinian
interests would be folded into a broader peace deal between Israel and Saudi Arabia—a
de facto “shunt[ing] aside” of a lasting two-state solution, as Matt Duss, executive vice
president at the Center for International Policy, puts it in an article for Foreign Policy.
That strategy was exposed as a fantasy on Oct. 7 and the weeks afterward, leaving the
Biden administration grasping for an alternative.

“The overriding imperative of Biden’s approach to the Middle East has been to limit U.S.
attention to it in order to enable greater focus on strategic competition with China as
part of the long-desired ‘pivot to Asia,’” Duss writes. “The United States has
now dispatched two Navy carrier strike groups to the eastern Mediterranean to try to
contain any potential escalation beyond Gaza, and especially an intervention by
Lebanese militant group Hezbollah or its patron, Iran. This is clearly a security concept
that has failed.”

3. Biden’s Unquestioning Support for Israel Could Be a Costly Error

By Howard W. French, Oct. 19

Few doubted that Biden’s emotional response toward Israel in the immediate aftermath
of Hamas’s attack was authentic. There was a lively debate, however, over whether it was
wise. FP columnist Howard W. French offered reasons to think that the unconditional
quality of Biden’s support for Israel in the early stages of its war against Hamas may
“come to be seen as a costly error for the United States.” That’s in part because it

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 4/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

undermined Washington’s status as an honest broker as it pursues diplomacy in the


Middle East.

The second reason highlighted by French “is closely related to the first and has to do
with Washington’s diplomatic standing both in the Middle East and in the broader
world.” What’s at stake in America’s Israel policy is its own moral credibility as a world
leader. “Not a few observers have begun to note,” he writes, “that the biggest collateral
damage to the United States in the recent violence between Israel and Hamas is to
Washington’s image in the world.”

Republican Rep. Brandon Williams holds an Israeli flag as protesters stage a demonstration in support of a cease-fire in
Gaza in the Cannon House Office Building in Washington on Oct. 18. ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES

4. Is America Really ‘Indispensable’ Again?

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 5/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

By Michael Hirsh, Nov. 3

In 2023, as geopolitical instability convulsed the Middle East and Europe, the foreign-
policy debate in the United States organized itself around two archetypal poles. Many
Americans, and their representatives in Congress, reverted “to their default mode going
back to the Founding Fathers, which is to avoid too many foreign entanglements,”
writes FP columnist Michael Hirsh. Biden, meanwhile, presented the United States as
the world’s “indispensable nation,” a critical part of the solution to any given global
problem. In his article, Hirsh describes how both visions for American strategy are
incoherent in the face of present circumstances.

“It’s probably healthy that these debates are happening now. With Israel’s war against
Hamas recently added to the mix, the United States is once again seriously entangled
abroad,” Hirsh writes. “And this at a time when its defense-industrial base is shrunken
and ill-prepared, its economy is sluggish, and its politics at home are polarized and, far
too often, paralyzed.”

5. For Biden and Modi, Interests Prevail Over Ideology

By C. Raja Mohan, June 21

Conflicts involving China, Russia, and Israel received most of the headlines this year.
But it was U.S. policy toward India—precisely because it was largely out of the spotlight
—that may prove the most clarifying about the state of U.S. foreign policy. The Biden
administration’s relationship to India has been freighted with ideological baggage, with
the White House embracing Prime Minister Narendra Modi as leader of the world’s
largest democracy—and critics decrying Modi’s democratic backsliding at home. But, as
FP columnist C. Raja Mohan argues, the public debate in both India and the United

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 6/7
1/15/24, 1:35 PM 2023's Top Articles on Biden's Foreign Policy

States about the other generates “a noise that drowns out the signals on changing Indo-
U.S. relations.”

“The problem is a reluctance to correctly read the trends driving the United States and
India into a strategic embrace,” Mohan writes. “The main source of their convergence is
by now familiar: Both nations feel challenged by China. After much hesitation and
reluctance over the last two decades, the United States has finally come around to the
clear proposition that China represents a persistent, long-term threat to U.S. interests.”
My FP: You are currently not opted in. To begin receiving My FP email digests based on your interests click here.

Cameron Abadi is a deputy editor at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @CameronAbadi

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/12/30/biden-united-states-foreign-policy-china-israel-india-2023/ 7/7

You might also like