Writing coursework, especially in a subject like Mathematics, can be a challenging task for many

students. Maths C3 coursework, specifically from the Mei syllabus, often involves complex
mathematical concepts, detailed analysis, and rigorous problem-solving. Students may find it difficult
to navigate through the intricacies of the coursework, which can include topics like numerical
methods, algebraic methods, and differential equations.

The difficulty of Maths C3 coursework lies not only in understanding the underlying mathematical
principles but also in effectively applying them to real-world scenarios or problems presented in the
coursework. Students are expected to demonstrate a deep understanding of the mathematical
concepts involved, use appropriate methodologies, and present their findings in a clear and concise
manner.

For those who may find themselves struggling with the complexity of Maths C3 coursework, seeking
assistance can be a viable option. Online platforms like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can provide valuable
support by connecting students with experienced writers who have expertise in the field of
Mathematics. These services can offer customized solutions, ensuring that the coursework meets the
specific requirements and standards set by the educational institution.

While seeking help online can be a beneficial resource, it's essential for students to approach such
services with caution. It's crucial to choose reputable platforms that prioritize originality, quality, and
confidentiality. Additionally, utilizing external assistance should be seen as a supplement to one's
learning process rather than a substitute.

In conclusion, writing Maths C3 coursework can be a daunting task, and students facing difficulties
may consider seeking assistance from reliable online platforms like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔.
However, it's important to approach such services responsibly and view them as a supportive tool to
enhance understanding and learning rather than as a shortcut.
The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again. A
decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer.
OCR MEI Paper 3 A Level Maths Predictions Need help on what to do to improve on my a levels.
Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x
1, the second guess. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. Register Number:
04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd
Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB. But regarding the speed of
convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated and requires human interaction
after each set of results and is very repetitive. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure
chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right
software is used. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you
sub in the x values. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root.
This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level
of accuracy. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real
solution but more easily. Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use
as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many
times. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Each boundary is tested for sign change
which indicates that a root exists between them. Although making the tables can be repetitive, any
faults can easily be rectified. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are
harder and more complex. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above
and so the root will not be found. However the need for much manual computation can make the
process quite laborious and time consuming. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less
accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many
decimal places as needed. This makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of the method and
makes the speed of convergence much faster. It is shown that the root lies between -1.53407035 and
-1.53407025. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one
cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy
to use. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown
below. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph visual basis. But whichever bit
of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. This makes
it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as
excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed.
For example sing the same rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as
the starting point, the iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. The x where the sign change
occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again. Then we look at where the
tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). If we take a look at the Newton
Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). Looking at the graph you can see
that the root is between -2 and -1. OCR mega link for a level papers ocr mei or edexcel maths a level
Ocr mei 2023 Predicted papers Best textbook to self teach A level maths from best exam board to
self study a levels URGENT A level NEEDED. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will
not converge to the root but will diverge away. It is shown that the root lies between -1.53407035
and -1.53407025. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you,
which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. This makes it very
easy to work out the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster.
So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. Although
making the tables can be repetitive, any faults can easily be rectified. This is the only hard part of the
method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. Taking x 0 as
the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second
guess. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For
Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level
Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical
methods. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. This shows that generally
the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods.
This method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when
harder formulas are introduced. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software
that solves the roots of an equation after entering the formula in. But whichever bit of software you
use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. But after the 4 th iteration,
we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal
places. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. Both make good use
of Autograph software visually interpret equations before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the
calculations to find each root. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out
initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. To start the process,
we have to select two points on the graph visual basis. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it
down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. I can only obtain an
approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function. Join
our team of reviewers and help other students learn.
But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the
fact that this was to 4 decimal places. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you
don’t even have to work out the gradient function. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level
Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful
0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print
Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. After 19 iterations, I
found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Despite this, it is a very effective method
as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the
right software is used. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. However,
this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily.
The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. I am going to use the
inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to
more decimal places. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for
you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. The
downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a
chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the
root but it will diverge away. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts
repeating or reached enough significant levels). Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the
root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made
available to everyone. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is
very simple with the use of the formula. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the
point as well. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using
a computer. However the need for much manual computation can make the process quite laborious
and time consuming. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will
repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. This process is then repeated on the new x
values until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. It was not hard to use but
tricky, due to the different options available. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less
accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many
decimal places as needed. OCR MEI Paper 3 A Level Maths Predictions Need help on what to do to
improve on my a levels. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested
for sign change again. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. Here the root had
been found to 5 significant figures. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the
method above and so the root will not be found. As for the speed of convergence, it would be slower
that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-arrange the equation but it is faster than
Decimal search. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and
more complex. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered
Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB. This
makes it particularly useful if computer software is not available.
So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out
the value of f(x). A change of sign will always indicate a root if the function is continuous. Each
boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. I am going to use
the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root
out to more decimal places. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the
method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and
it is very easy to use. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the
real solution but more easily. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way
of finding the roots of an equation. Here the root had been found to 5 significant figures. This shows
that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other
two methods. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root. Report
this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1)
100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework
Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical methods. With the
use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient
function. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and this process is repeated to
converge on the root. Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as
once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times.
This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. To start the process, we have to
select two points on the graph visual basis. This process is then repeated on the new x values until
they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. So when I substitute the incremented
values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following results. It was not hard to use
but tricky, due to the different options available. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can
also be seen in the graph. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and
that is an impossible fraction. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes
could let to the wrong route. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you
do not have software to automate the iterations. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x),
I find that the root is - 1.961703555. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the
point as well. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the
root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed.
Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x
1, the second guess. However, this method is very tiresome to calculate by hand and the tiniest
mistake can result in a wrong answer. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the
values of y when you sub in the x values.
Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. This is the only hard part of
the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. I am going
to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the
root out to more decimal places. OCR mega link for a level papers ocr mei or edexcel maths a level
Ocr mei 2023 Predicted papers Best textbook to self teach A level maths from best exam board to
self study a levels URGENT A level NEEDED. As a result of this no change of sign will be found
using the method above and so the root will not be found. To do this, we need to find the gradient at
that point. So when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I
get the following results. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). The
downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a
chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the
root but it will diverge away. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the
method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and
it is very easy to use. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. The fact that
the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. This repeats until we find the root
of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). This makes it
particularly useful if computer software is not available. Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the
tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. But whichever bit of
software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. The Newton-
Raphson method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three
iterations. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have
software to automate the iterations. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you
would be able to spot the sign change easily. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s
denominator is the gradient function of f(x). I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of
0.00001. I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the
exact value of the function. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. The diagram above
shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found. This shows that
generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two
methods. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the
wrong route. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework
For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level
Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical
methods. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. Despite this, it is a
very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many
decimal places if the right software is used. Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the
root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made
available to everyone.
I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value
of the function. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of
rearrangements fail. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y
values for various points of x. Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root
exists between them. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root but
will diverge away. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low
and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. Compared to the
change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been
entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times. But with Computers being able to
do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very
close approximate to the real solution but more easily. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge
away from the point as well. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067
22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1
3XB. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph visual basis. This will mean that
the gradient function will equal to zero. OCR mega link for a level papers ocr mei or edexcel maths a
level Ocr mei 2023 Predicted papers Best textbook to self teach A level maths from best exam board
to self study a levels URGENT A level NEEDED. This method is slightly complex even on easy
formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced. Care must be
taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. This process is
then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. A
decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer.
Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also
the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. Taking x 0 as the first guess at
the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. This
makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence
much faster. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100%
found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful,
Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page
1 of 18 Search inside document. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value
will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the
different options available. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and
tested for sign change again. Second was the Decimal Search, which took five iterations and last
was the Rearrangement Method, which took the most number of iterations, 6. This was often very
time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route. Also, the formula is
iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5
decimal places.
Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the point where the
signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to many places. This is because the tangent
crosses the asymptote, as shown below. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret
equations before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. This
method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder
formulas are introduced. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that
solves the roots of an equation after entering the formula in. Here the root had been found to 5
significant figures. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of
rearrangements fail. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let
to the wrong route. As for the speed of convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson
because of the extra time needed to re-arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. The
x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again. A
decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. Out
of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than
others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. But with Computers being
able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is
between -2 and -1. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to
spot the sign change easily. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps
and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. The Newton-Raphson method was the quickest, finding the
root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three iterations. A change of sign will always indicate
a root if the function is continuous. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the
iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search.
In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached
a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places. So I
used the formula to work out the values in excel. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value
and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN)
Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. This makes it particularly
useful if computer software is not available. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using
the method above and so the root will not be found. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the
equation as from then on, it repeats. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001.
However, this method is very tiresome to calculate by hand and the tiniest mistake can result in a
wrong answer.