Writing coursework, especially on a challenging topic like the C3 Coursework Mei Comparison, can

be a daunting task for many students. This type of coursework typically requires a deep
understanding of mathematical concepts, analytical skills, and the ability to effectively communicate
findings. Here are some reasons why writing coursework on such a topic can be difficult:

1. Complexity of the Topic: The C3 Coursework Mei Comparison likely involves intricate
mathematical concepts and calculations. Understanding and applying these concepts
correctly can be challenging, requiring a high level of mathematical proficiency.
2. Time-Consuming Research: To produce a comprehensive coursework, extensive research is
often necessary. This involves gathering relevant data, analyzing it, and drawing meaningful
conclusions. The time required for such research can be a significant hurdle for students,
especially when balancing coursework with other academic and personal commitments.
3. Analytical Skills Requirement: The coursework may demand strong analytical skills to
compare and contrast different mathematical approaches or solutions. Expressing these
analyses coherently in writing is an additional challenge.
4. Writing Proficiency: Communicating complex mathematical ideas in a clear and coherent
manner is a skill in itself. Many students struggle to articulate their thoughts effectively in
writing, making the coursework writing process even more demanding.

Given these challenges, seeking assistance is a reasonable option. Online writing services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ can provide valuable support. Here are some benefits of using such services:

1. Expert Writers: These services often have experienced writers with expertise in various
subjects, including mathematics. They can produce high-quality content that meets the
requirements of the coursework.
2. Time-Saving: By outsourcing the coursework, students can save valuable time, which can be
redirected towards other academic pursuits or personal activities.
3. Customized Solutions: Writing services can offer personalized solutions tailored to the
specific requirements of the C3 Coursework Mei Comparison, ensuring that the content is
relevant and meets the academic standards.
4. Reduced Stress: Delegating the coursework to professionals can alleviate the stress
associated with tight deadlines and challenging topics, allowing students to focus on other
aspects of their education.

While seeking external help can be beneficial, it's important for students to use these services
responsibly and ethically, ensuring that the final work aligns with their own understanding and
learning goals.
So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between
which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such. This is the
only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the
formula. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change
again. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right
resource. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the
root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. Second was the Decimal
Search, which took five iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the most
number of iterations, 6. OCR mega link for a level papers ocr mei or edexcel maths a level Ocr mei
2023 Predicted papers Best textbook to self teach A level maths from best exam board to self study
a levels URGENT A level NEEDED. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier
to calculate the y values for various points of x. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have
the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so
to many places. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. The downside
of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that
when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it
will diverge away. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is
an impossible fraction. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to
the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. This
repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough
significant levels). In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). So this means that there
will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. The Decimal search method enables you
to get a very close approximate to the real solution but more easily. Also, the formula is iterative,
therefore, it is not very time consuming. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. This
makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places
where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. The Newton-Raphson
method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three iterations.
I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value
of the function. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub
in the x values. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. I repeat this until I get
down to increments the size of 0.00001. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not
converge to the root but will diverge away. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to
work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. Looking at
the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. The iterations are also wrong as they
diverge away from the point as well. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-
level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18
pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework
on the use of numerical methods.
Official: Brunel University A100 2024 Entry Applicants Cambridge postgraduate application:
Decision pending - application is under review Durham or Warwick for maths. But whichever bit of
software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. The value of
g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. Also attached is a
differentiated set of starter tasks linking back to the previous section (the 'rearrangement method').
Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. So I used
the formula to work out the values in excel. The presentation highlights the requirements of the
'comparison section'. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00
(no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later Last updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not
the right resource. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient
function of f(x). The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. But with
Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. Write a review Update
existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. After 19 iterations, I found
the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up
to 50% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of
lessons, in one place. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and
then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. This was often very time-
consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route. However, this method is
best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily. The Newton-
Raphson method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three
iterations. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have
software to automate the iterations. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph
visual basis. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and
the root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. I can only obtain an
approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function. This
resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which,
if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. Also, the formula is
iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that
the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. In some cases you may not be able to
differentiate f(x). This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. Then we look
at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a
tangent. Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to
use than others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone.
But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an
equation after entering the formula in. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the
easier way of finding the roots of an equation. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far
the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three
different methods. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Each boundary is tested for sign
change which indicates that a root exists between them. So when I substitute the incremented values
of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following results. This method is slightly complex
even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced.
The Newton-Raphson method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy
in only three iterations. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. The downside of
the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that
when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it
will diverge away. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating
or reached enough significant levels). So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the
failure of the graph. Official: Brunel University A100 2024 Entry Applicants Cambridge
postgraduate application: Decision pending - application is under review Durham or Warwick for
maths. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value
on the graph for a tangent. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate
to the real solution but more easily. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple
mistakes could let to the wrong route. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths
Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%
0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download
now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. In some cases you may not be
able to differentiate f(x). With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even
have to work out the gradient function. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown
below. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. This
makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal
places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. Some computer
programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you,
can make it easier to use than a decimal search. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point.
But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the
fact that this was to 4 decimal places. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be
seen in the graph. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel
Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. Our customer service team will review your report
and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email
Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest
Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource.
So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean
that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. This was often very time-consuming and
frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route. I want to go to Oxford University, but I'm
not sure if NCEA is good enough Official: Lancaster University A100 2024 Entry Applicants PWC
Flying Start Degree Apprenticeships 2024. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out
the values of y when you sub in the x values. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans.
Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office:
Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB. Second was the
Decimal Search, which took five iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the
most number of iterations, 6. However, this method is very tiresome to calculate by hand and the
tiniest mistake can result in a wrong answer. This repeats until we find the root of the equation,
(when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the
iterations do not converge. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only
gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as
needed. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Upload Read for free FAQ
and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd.
After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Here the root had
been found to 5 significant figures. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and
-1. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again.
As for the speed of convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time
needed to re-arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. But after the 4 th iteration, we
have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal
places. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found
this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark
this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of
18 Search inside document. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the
method is very simple with the use of the formula. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate
f(x). I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use
Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. OCR mega link for a level papers ocr mei or
edexcel maths a level Ocr mei 2023 Predicted papers Best textbook to self teach A level maths from
best exam board to self study a levels URGENT A level NEEDED. Bundle OCR MEI Core 3
Numerical Methods Coursework Slides This is a set of 5 Powerpoints and accompanying materials
for teachers to use in guiding their students through the C3 coursework. Because of this it is the most
difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations. The
presentation highlights the requirements of the 'comparison section'. A decimal search, in contrast,
just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). This makes it very easy to work out
the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. In some cases
you may not be able to differentiate f(x). This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality
for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource
to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to
work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. I want to go
to Oxford University, but I'm not sure if NCEA is good enough Official: Lancaster University A100
2024 Entry Applicants PWC Flying Start Degree Apprenticeships 2024. The iterations are also
wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. This is because the tangent crosses the
asymptote, as shown below. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will
be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have
the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so
to many places. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y
values for various points of x. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can
easily be done using a computer. Here the root had been found to 5 significant figures. However, this
method is very tiresome to calculate by hand and the tiniest mistake can result in a wrong answer. To
do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. The downside of the method is that it is the most
likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and
start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away. As for the speed of
convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-
arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the
equation as from then on, it repeats. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-
level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18
pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework
on the use of numerical methods. This method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when
we get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced. To start the process, we have to
select two points on the graph visual basis. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5
decimal places. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the
roots of an equation after entering the formula in. So the only human interaction needed is to look at
the results and manually looking at between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then
setting the new limits as such. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the
root but will diverge away. I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or
hard to find the exact value of the function. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative
part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. MPhil Politics and International
Studies 2024 Cambridge Land Economy 2024 offer-holders TSR Study Together - STEM vs
Humanities - First Session. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later
100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this document
not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You
are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I
find that the root is - 1.961703555.
Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than
others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. Bundle OCR MEI Core 3
Numerical Methods Coursework Slides This is a set of 5 Powerpoints and accompanying materials
for teachers to use in guiding their students through the C3 coursework. This is because the tangent
crosses the asymptote, as shown below. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. It was
not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available. I can only obtain an approximation
of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function. The value of g'(x) at
this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. Then we look at where the tangent
crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. Using
Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs
change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to many places. Most of the mistakes are made in
this stage by humans. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. OCR MEI
Paper 3 A Level Maths Predictions Need help on what to do to improve on my a levels. Some
methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more complex. OCR mega
link for a level papers ocr mei or edexcel maths a level Ocr mei 2023 Predicted papers Best textbook
to self teach A level maths from best exam board to self study a levels URGENT A level NEEDED.
If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x).
However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign
change easily. Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. I want to go to
Oxford University, but I'm not sure if NCEA is good enough Official: Lancaster University A100
2024 Entry Applicants PWC Flying Start Degree Apprenticeships 2024. Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work
it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. If the gradient
function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. This
method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder
formulas are introduced. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well.
Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if they are
available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. But after the 4 th iteration, we have
reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places.
But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an
equation. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. Our customer service
team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017 Share this
Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share
through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. The Newton-Raphson method
was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in only three iterations. Each
method is explained with examples, and the key element assessed are highlighted. ?5.00 Reviews
Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.