Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)

Name of Student: Tikande Adesh Vilas Enrollment No: 2100800213

Name of Program: CM6I Semester: 6th
Course Title: Computer Technology Code: (22617)
Title of Micro Project: Prepare a report To Devlope A Simple Android Web Browser
Course Outcomes:
CI602.1 Interpret 3 features of Android operating system
CI602.2 Use3 environment for Android and Android development tools
CI602.3 Implement 3 rich user interfaces and android application by using layouts, controls and User
interface components
CI602.4 Execute 3 android application using database.
CI602.5 Demonstrate3 SMS telephony, Location based services and publish android application

Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)

Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Literature review / No reference is used At least one reference At least two
Informationcollection only taken material website or book is references website
from Google and referredto collect or book are referred
copypasted literature or information to collect literature
or information
a) Just assembled / a) Well assembled /
a) Quality ofprototype/ Incomplete fabricated, not in proper fabricated with
model / chart /drawing fabrication / ape, dimensions /average proper shape
b) Quality of project assembly /survey survey dimensions / well
report b) Most of the b) Most of the defined survey
(for studyproject) contentis non- portion in project b) Everything in the
relevant. Report report irrelevant project report is
/ drawing is not and is formatted as per the
formatted as per formatted but someof the instructions
instructions. portion is remaining given.
to format.
No previous review No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely submission. andsubmission after submission on or before submission on or
the given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to
Criteria 2)
B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentationof the micro
not included, information but not well included major
project
information is not organized and not information, well
wellorganized presented well presented
Answer tosample
Could not reply to Replied to considerable
questions Replied most of the
considerable number number of questions but
(Oral) questions properly.
of question. not very properly.
(A) (B)
Process & Product Individual Presentation/Viva(04) Total Marks(10)
Assessment (06)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any)

Name & Designation of the Teacher:

Dated Signature:
 Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)
Name of Student: Joshi Atharva Mukund Enrollment No: 2100800256
Name of Program: CM6I Semester: 6th
Course Title: Computer Technology Code: (22617)
Title of Micro Project: Prepare a report To Devlope A Simple Android Web Browser
Course Outcomes:
CI602.1 Interpret 3 features of Android operating system
CI602.2 Use3 environment for Android and Android development tools
CI602.3 Implement 3 rich user interfaces and android application by using layouts, controls and User
interface components
CI602.4 Execute 3 android application using database.
CI602.5 Demonstrate3 SMS telephony, Location based services and publish android application

Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)

Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Literature review / No reference is used At least one reference At least two
Informationcollection only taken material website or book is references website
from Google and referredto collect or book are referred
copypasted literature or information to collect literature
or information
c) Just assembled / c) Well assembled /
c) Quality ofprototype/ Incomplete fabricated, not in proper fabricated with
model / chart /drawing fabrication / ape, dimensions /average proper shape
d) Quality of project assembly /survey survey dimensions / well
report d) Most of the d) Most of the defined survey
(for studyproject) contentis non- portion in project d) Everything in the
relevant. Report report irrelevant project report is
/ drawing is not and is formatted as per the
formatted as per formatted but someof the instructions
instructions. portion is remaining given.
to format.
No previous review No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely submission. andsubmission after submission on or before submission on or
the given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to
Criteria 2)
B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentationof the micro
not included, information but not well included major
project
information is not organized and not information, well
wellorganized presented well presented
Answer tosample
Could not reply to Replied to considerable
questions Replied most of the
considerable number number of questions but
(Oral) questions properly.
of question. not very properly.
(A) (B)
Process & Product Individual Presentation/Viva(04) Total Marks(10)
Assessment (06)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any)

Name & Designation of the Teacher:
Dated Signature: