Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10-2011-Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Shrouded Blade of Aero-Engine Subjected To Combination Effect of Impact and Friction
10-2011-Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Shrouded Blade of Aero-Engine Subjected To Combination Effect of Impact and Friction
10-2011-Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Shrouded Blade of Aero-Engine Subjected To Combination Effect of Impact and Friction
213
system in the tangential direction and axial direction are coupled equation of motion of shrouded blade with
displayed consideration of nonlinear resilient force.
[M]{& }+[K]{x} ={F(t, x, x&,δ )}+{Q(t)}
}+[C]{x&
x& 4
B. Equation of Motion with Nonlinear Springs and
Where [ M ] [C ] [ K ] are respectively mass matrix, Combination Effect of Impact and Friction
damping matrix and stiffness matrix. {F (t , x, x&, δ )} is When the contact angle of shrouds (the contact angle of
nonlinear force caused by effect of impact and friction shrouds refers to the angle between interface of shrouds and
between shrouded blades, the displacement vector is tangential direction) is not vertical, there is a combination
{x} = { y z} effect of impact and friction on interface of shrouds. Let the
T
⎪ Z ′′ + 2ξ Z ′ + 1 Z + ε Z 3 = − K1 (Y ± 1) cos θ − µ K 2 (Y ± 1)sin θ
⎪⎩
A. Equation of Motion with Nonlinear Springs
2 2 k
Ω22 Ω12 Ω22
(10)
The equation of motion of the system with nonlinear Where dot (‘) represents the derivative with respect to
springs can be written as dimensionless time parameter τ . This is the dimensionless
&+ c1 y&+ k1 y + α1 y3 = fn + f0 sin(ωt) + f1 sin(3ωt)
⎧⎪my& (7) coupled equation of motion of shrouded blade with
⎨
&+ c2 z&+ k2 y + α2 z3 = fτ
⎪⎩mz& consideration of nonlinear resilient force and combination
Where dot on the head of letter denotes the derivative effect of impact and friction.
with respect to time parameter t; f n and fτ are the III. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
dimensionless components of the interface force in the The presented dynamic model is exemplified by the
normal and tangential directions of interface, respectively. numerical analysis of shrouded blade coupled by adjacent
Introduce the dimensionless variables and define the shrouds shown in Figure 2 (a) and Figure 3. Numerical
following dimensionless coefficients calculations based on Equations (7) – (10) with nonlinear
c1 c k k ω ω
ξ1 = , ξ 2 = 2 , ω n21 = 1 , ω n22 = 2 ,τ = ω t , Ω1 = = Ωκ1 , Ω 2 = = Ωκ 2 resilience or piecewise are carried out. The first half of the
2 mω 2 mω m m ω n1 ωn 2
data which have been gotten from calculation are
y z kb k f0 f1 αδ2 α δ2
Y= ,Z = , K1 = , K 2 = b , F0 = , F1 = , ε1 = 1 2 , ε 2 = 2 2 deliberately excluded from the nonlinear dynamic
δ δ k1 k2 mδω 2
mδω 2
mω mω
investigation so as to ensure that the data used is under the
Equation (7) is divided by mδω 2 and then dealt with non-di steady state.
mensional method; the equation can be expressed as follows There are usually some methods in the nonlinear
⎧ 1 K1
dynamic field to verify chaotic motion of the system, such
⎪Y ′′ + 2ξ1Y ′ + Ω 2 Y + ε1Y = − Ω 2 (Y ± 1) + F0 sin(τ ) + F1 sin(3τ )
3
⎪
⎨
1 1
as bifurcation diagram, phase portrait, Poincaré maps, and
⎪ Z ′′ + 2ξ Z ′ + 1 Z + ε Z 3 = − µ K 2 (Y ± 1)
⎩⎪
2
Ω2 2 2
(8)
k
Ω 22 waveform and so on. In order to study the complex
Where dot (’) represents the derivative with respect to nonlinear features, bifurcation diagrams, phase portraits and
dimensionless time parameter τ . This is the dimensionless Poincaré maps are chosen as tools to investigate the
nonlinear dynamic behavior of the system. Bifurcation
214
diagrams provide a summary of the essential dynamics. 12
13
-2
-4
-6
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Y(nT)
(a)
13
15
10
0
′
Y
-5
Figure 4. Bifurcation diagram of response of the shrouded blade system
as a function of rotating speed -10
shown in Figure 4. Figure 5 (e) and (f) are the motive orbit ′
0
215
16.3
25
20
15
10
0
Z
-5
-10
-15
-20 (c)
-25
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Figure 6. Bifurcation diagram of response with various nonlinear factor of
(e)
Y
spring groups(a) ε1 =0.07, ε 2 =0.04; (b) ε1 =0.7, ε 2 =0.4; (c) ε1 =7, ε 2 =4.
35
25
20
The dimensionless rotating speed factor Ω varies in the
15 range from 0 to 40; nonlinear factor of spring ε1 and ε 2 are
10
chosen to be three groups respectively: (a) ε1
5
Z
0 =0.07, ε2 =0.04; (b) ε1 =0.7, ε2 =0.4; (c) ε1 =7, ε2 =4.
-5 Figure 6 shows the bifurcation diagrams of dynamic
-10 response of the shrouded blade system. It can easily be seen
-15 from Figure 6 (a) that when the rotating speed is in the
-20 ranges from2.5 to 9.3 and 11.2 to 17.2, the system shows a
-25 chaotic motion; Figure 6 (b) and (c) exhibit the motion state
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Y of system is transforming between chaos and period as
(f)
rotating speed increases. It can be seen from Figure 6 (a)-(c)
Figure 5. Poincaré maps and phase portraits of system :(a)-(d); orbit of that nonlinear factor of spring ε changes the system show
centroid: (e)-(f)
different nonlinear traits. In short, Figure 7 illustrates that
B. Nonlinear Factor of Spring nonlinear factor of spring ε has a significant effect on
nonlinear dynamic behavior of shrouded blade system in
certain range of parameter.
C. Bifurcation as a Function of Amplitude of Gas
Excitation Force
(a)
216
as a function of amplitude of gas excitation force. It can Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power OCTOBER 2001 Vol.
123 -901
easily be seen that the system shows chaotic motion when [5] Christian Siewert, Lars Panning, Jörg Wallaschek, Christoph
the amplitude of gas excitation force is in the range from 2.8 Richter, “Multiharmonic Forced Response Analysis of a Turbine
Blading Coupled by Nonlinear Contact Forces”, Journal of
to 3.7 and the system shows period motion when amplitude Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power AUGUST 2010,Vol. 132 /
of gas excitation force in other range. In short, Figure 7 082501-1
illustrates that amplitude of gas excitation force has [6] Pankaj Kumar S. Narayanan Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamics,
Chaos, and Reliability Analysis for a Single Degree of Freedom
significant effect on nonlinear dynamic behavior of Model of a Rotor Blade Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines
shrouded blade system in certain range of parameter. and Power JANUARY 2009 Vol. 131 / 012506-1
[7] B. O. Al-Bedoor Reduced-Order Nonlinear Dynamic Model of
Coupled Shaft-Torsional and Blade-Bending Vibrations in Rotors
IV. CONCLUSIONS Transactions of the ASME JANUARY 2001 82 /Vol. 123
[8] D. M. T ANG AND E. H. D OWELL NONLINEAR RESPONSE
In this paper, considering the combination effect of
OF A NON-ROTATING ROTOR BLADE TO A PERIODIC GUST
impact and friction, the effects of several parameters of Journal of Fluids and Structures (1996) 10 , 721 – 742
shrouded blade system, including rotating speed, nonlinear [9] J.M.L.M. Palma F.A. Castro L.F. Ribeiro A.H. Rodrigues A.P.
factors of spring and amplitude of gas excitation force, on Pinto Linear and nonlinear models in wind resource assessment and
wind turbine micro-sitting in complex terrain Journal of Wind
the nonlinear dynamic responses of the system are
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 96 (2008) 2308– 2326
addressed. Numerical results indicate that the adding shroud [10] J. Szwedowicz Th. Secall-Wimmel P. Dünck-Kerst Damping
to blade generates rich and complex nonlinear dynamic Performance of Axial Turbine Stages With Loosely Assembled
behaviors for certain parameter range, such as the 3-period, Friction Bolts: The Nonlinear Dynamic Assessment Journal of
the multi-period, jump and chaotic motions. The results can Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power MAY 2008, Vol. 130 /
032505-1
be helpful in understanding physically the nonlinear [11] J.W. Larsen, R. Iwankiewic S.R.K. Nielsen Nonlinear stochastic
phenomena of a shrouded blade system of aero-engine with stability analysis of wind turbine wings by Monte Carlo simulations
multiple nonlinear factors, and the bifurcation results are Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 22 (2007) 181–193
practically meaningful for parametric design of shrouded [12] H. A. van Essen H. C. de Lange Nonlinear Model Predictive
Control Experiments on a Laboratory Gas Turbine Installation
blade. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power APRIL 2001,
Vol. 123 / 347
ACKNOWLEDGMENT [13] Szwedowicz, J., Slowik, S., Mahler, A., and Hulme, C. J.,
“Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a Gas Turbine Blade for
The author acknowledges the support of Professor Ren
Attainment of Reliable Shroud Coupling,” ASME Paper 2005 No.
X.M. and associate Professor Yao M. H., for this work. GT2005-69062.
[14] Siewert, C., Krack, M., Panning, L., and Wallaschek, J., “The
REFERENCES Nonlinear Analysis of the Multi-harmonic Forced Response of
[1] J. Szwedowicz, R. Visser, W. Sextro, P. A. Masserey, On Nonlinear Coupled Turbine Blading,” Proceedings of the 12th International
Forced Vibration of Shrouded Turbine Blades, ASME Journal of Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating
Turbomachinery, JANUARY 2008, Vol. 130 / 011002-1 Machinery 2008, Honolulu, HI.
[2] Griffin, J. H., and Labelle, R. F., “A Rational Method for Optimizing [15] Yang, B. D., Chu, M. L., and Menq, C. H., “Stick-Slip-Separation
Shrouded Damping,” ASME Paper 1996, No. 96-GT-402 Analysis and Non-Linear Stiffness and Damping Characterization of
[3] Yang, B.-D., and Menq, C.-H., “Modeling of Friction Contact and Friction Contacts Having Variable Normal Load,” J. Sound Vib.,
Its Application to the Design of Shroud Contact,” ASME J. Eng. Gas 1998 210 -4, pp. 461–481
Turbines Power, Oct. 1997, 119, pp. 958–963.
[4] J. J. Chen, C. H. Menq, , “Periodic Response of Blades Having
Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Shroud Constraints”, Journal of
217