Writing coursework, especially in a challenging subject like mathematics, can indeed be a demanding

task. It requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, strong analytical skills, and the ability to
articulate complex ideas coherently. Many students find themselves struggling with coursework due
to various reasons such as time constraints, lack of resources, or difficulty grasping specific concepts.

For those facing difficulties in completing their Maths C3 coursework, seeking assistance can be a
viable option. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ is one such platform that offers academic support services,
including coursework help. Ordering coursework assistance on this site can provide several benefits:

1. Expert Assistance: ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ likely has experienced professionals who are

well-versed in mathematics and can provide expert guidance on your C3 coursework.
2. Timely Delivery: Meeting coursework deadlines is crucial, and professional services often
guarantee timely delivery, helping you submit your work on time.
3. Quality Content: Professionals can ensure that the coursework meets high-quality standards,
with accurate calculations, clear explanations, and a structured format.
4. Customized Solutions: Each coursework assignment is unique, and ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
may offer customized solutions tailored to your specific requirements and the given topic.
5. Reduced Stress: Delegating the coursework to experts can alleviate the stress associated
with academic assignments, allowing you to focus on other aspects of your education.

However, it's essential to approach external assistance with caution. Make sure to thoroughly review
the terms and conditions of the service, and ensure that you're using it as a supplement to your
learning rather than a replacement.

Remember that seeking help is not uncommon, and many students benefit from external support to
enhance their understanding of the subject matter. If you decide to use a service like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔, be sure to communicate clearly about your expectations and requirements for
the coursework.

Always prioritize academic integrity and use external assistance responsibly to enhance your learning
experience rather than compromise it.
This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level
of accuracy. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). The downside of the method is
that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you
rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will
diverge away. This makes it particularly useful if computer software is not available. Taking x 0 as
the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second
guess. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Otherwise, it is
possible for us to miss the other roots. You can then plug both of these values into an equation which
equals 0. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph visual basis. But with
Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. A change of sign will always
indicate a root if the function is continuous. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is
relatively low as it is not completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of
results and is very repetitive. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save
for later Last updated 17 January 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews
Not the right resource. Here's an example if others are wondering. 0 Report Reply Quick Reply
Submit reply Related discussions Can you get an A in A-Level Maths just by working hard. With the
use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it
down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. However the
need for much manual computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. This
will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. A Level Maths Modules Best textbook to self
teach A level maths from My journey to 3A's blog A level maths help. So I used the formula to work
out the values in excel. Bundle As and A2 Mathematics resources for all topics C1, C2, C3 and C4. I
am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to
work the root out to more decimal places. All powerpoints include in-depth information and
diagrams with lesson activities. See other similar resources ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Difference between A level maths (mechanics
and statistics) Show 10 more Latest Annoying Red Cheeks urgent query, I would really appreciate
your help. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x
value on the graph for a tangent. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually
are harder and more complex. Isaac Senior Physics Challenge 2024 Senior Physics Challenge 2021
Senior physics challenge Cambridge residential (Isaac physics) best way to revise maths Senior
Physics Challenge Isaac Physics Senior Physics Challenge 2022 How to join SPC Isaac Physics.
Chewings method is known as the further iterations method. 0 Report Reply Reply 5 5 years ago
MayoJack 12 Original post by lolokmatewe both of these methods are accepted in the mark schemes.
This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use
of the formula. But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached a point where the x value started
repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places.
For example sing the same rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as
the starting point, the iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. With the use of excel, it is
every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells
as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. Writing the formula in a cell and
dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. Some computer
programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you,
can make it easier to use than a decimal search. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by
humans. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. See other similar resources
?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
Chewings method is known as the further iterations method. 0 Report Reply Reply 5 5 years ago
MayoJack 12 Original post by lolokmatewe both of these methods are accepted in the mark schemes.
This makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places
where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. The downside of the method
is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you
rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge
away. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated
and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. C3 Coursework -
different methods of solving equations. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first
one. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and this process is repeated to
converge on the root. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the
x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. Using Autograph is
much, much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the
point on the X-axis, and can do so to many places. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function
will not converge to the root but will diverge away. Boys (Part 46) a level chemistry Nursing
students Failed my elective looking for summer london accom 15 june - 25 aug Official: University
of Glasgow A100 2024 Entry Applicants Amazon Apprenticeships 2024 graduate entry medicine
Trinity College Cambridge 2024 offer-holders Graduate Medicine I need advice How to channel
rejection (University) I'm almost 21 and have never been in a relationship PPE uni application 2024
Can they cancel insurance if I’ve already cancelled it. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level
Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful
0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print
Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. If that g’(x) 1, then
we know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. Our customer service
team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 17 January 2017 Share this
Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share
through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews Not the right resource. What you have to for these
questions is take the 2 outermost numbers that round to your value - eg if your value is 1.465 you
would take 1.4645 and 1.4655 (which both round to 1.465 essentially - technically 1.4655 doesn't
but you're just looking at the values in between). As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign
will always indicate a root. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. Writing
the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of
x. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root
can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. But with Computers being able to
do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. But among the three methods, I think change of signs
method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. But with Computers being able to do even
that, it makes it even easier to use it. A Level Maths Modules Best textbook to self teach A level
maths from My journey to 3A's blog A level maths help.
Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can
be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. The fact that the solution lies between
-3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. Hope this helps! 2 Report Reply Reply 3 5 years ago
Chemicist OP 13 Original post by MayoJack What Chewing said is wrong. After 19 iterations, I
found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. This is not accurate enough as I want it to
be to 5 decimal places. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the
root to the required level of accuracy. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low
as it is not completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very
repetitive. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3
decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. To start the
process, we have to select two points on the graph visual basis. This makes it much easier than excel
but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be
configured to as many decimal places as needed. However, if we do the integer search, we can only
get 1 change of sign. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the
real solution but more easily. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save
for later Last updated 23 November 2023 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16
reviews Not the right resource. See other similar resources ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less
accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many
decimal places as needed. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it
repeats. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet
To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it
Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. To do this, we need to find
the gradient at that point. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even
have to work out the gradient function. Consequently, we would be unlikely to seach further in the
intervals. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. To work out X 1 I will use the
formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a
table. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and this process is repeated to
converge on the root. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and
then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. If we take a look at the Newton
Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). Also, using change of signs
method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it takes a bit longer
than other methods, though. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 20% A bundle is a
package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place.
This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use
of the formula. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework
For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level
Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical
methods.
But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an
equation after entering the formula in. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the
values of y when you sub in the x values. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in
the failure of the graph. This makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of the method and
makes the speed of convergence much faster. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely
method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start
the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away. The Decimal search
method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real solution but more easily. Hope this
helps! 2 Report Reply Reply 3 5 years ago Chemicist OP 13 Original post by MayoJack What
Chewing said is wrong. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of
finding the roots of an equation. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually
are harder and more complex. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge
on the root to the required level of accuracy. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry
out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal
search. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of
convergence than the other two methods. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x
value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). Chewings method is known as the
further iterations method. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will
be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again
less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as
many decimal places as needed. All powerpoints include in-depth information and diagrams with
lesson activities. C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations. It is shown that the root
lies between -1.53407035 and -1.53407025. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use
Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs method. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be
to 5 decimal places. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that
is an impossible fraction. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. What you have
to for these questions is take the 2 outermost numbers that round to your value - eg if your value is
1.465 you would take 1.4645 and 1.4655 (which both round to 1.465 essentially - technically 1.4655
doesn't but you're just looking at the values in between). A change of sign will always indicate a root
if the function is continuous. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good
to leave some feedback. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. The iterations are
also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Detailed PowerPoint resources for AS and
A2 Mathematics,C1,2,3 and 4. Ah ok, that makes sense, sorry. 0 Report Reply Reply 8 5 years ago
lolokmatewe 9 Original post by MayoJack Ah ok, that makes sense, sorry.
Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various
points of x. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. Regarding the speed
the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails
the least out of the three different methods. Consequently, we would be unlikely to seach further in
the intervals. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. So using
the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. This method is
slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas
are introduced. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very
easy to enter all the information into Excel. A Level Maths Modules Best textbook to self teach A
level maths from My journey to 3A's blog A level maths help. This makes it even easier than excel
but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to
as many decimal places as needed. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001.
But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated and
requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. All powerpoints include in-
depth information and diagrams with lesson activities. When the line met the curve, a tangent is
drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 4, which is
equal to -3.5273. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of
rearrangements fail. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. See other similar
resources ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away.
This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal
places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. Writing the formula in
a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. This is not
accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. If so, I think that the decimal search will be
the simplest way to find the roots. However, if we do the integer search, we can only get 1 change of
sign. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be
worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. Then we look at where the tangent
crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. Bundle As and
A2 Mathematics resources for all topics C1, C2, C3 and C4. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-
level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as
useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print
Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. This will mean that
the gradient function will equal to zero. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a
much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods. Write a review Update existing
review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. Despite this, it is
a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many
decimal places if the right software is used. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will
always indicate a root. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be
the new x value on the graph for a tangent. Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between
-2 and -1. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at
between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such.
Help with ENIC How to revise a GCSE in one day A level study Has your school taught you all the
topics yet. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. The
downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a
chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the
root but it will diverge away. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is
the gradient function of f(x). Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are
harder and more complex. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Report this
Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100%
found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework
Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical methods. If the
gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction.
As for the speed of convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time
needed to re-arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. This resource hasn't been
reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can
review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer
service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 17 January 2017
Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook
Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews Not the right resource. What you have to
for these questions is take the 2 outermost numbers that round to your value - eg if your value is
1.465 you would take 1.4645 and 1.4655 (which both round to 1.465 essentially - technically 1.4655
doesn't but you're just looking at the values in between). Compared to the change of sign method
both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and
simple to do the iterations many times. Also, if the too roots are too close together, we might miss the
other two a fter finding the first one. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal
places. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the
root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. With the use of excel, it can
be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub in the x values. After 19 iterations, I found
the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson
method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods. Our customer service
team will review your report and will be in touch. ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 23 November 2023 Share
this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share
through pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16 reviews Not the right resource. A change of sign
will always indicate a root if the function is continuous. Ah ok, that makes sense, sorry. 0 Report
Reply Reply 8 5 years ago lolokmatewe 9 Original post by MayoJack Ah ok, that makes sense, sorry.
This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level
of accuracy. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero.
But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely automated and
requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. Both make good use of
Autograph software visually interpret equations before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the
calculations to find each root. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier
to use it. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. The fact that the solution lies
between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved
in the formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel. C3 Coursework - different
methods of solving equations. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure
of the graph. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as
there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will
not converge to the root but it will diverge away. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation
as from then on, it repeats. What you have to for these questions is take the 2 outermost numbers that
round to your value - eg if your value is 1.465 you would take 1.4645 and 1.4655 (which both round
to 1.465 essentially - technically 1.4655 doesn't but you're just looking at the values in between). So
when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the
following results. A change of sign will always indicate a root if the function is continuous. Care
must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. This
reason is that the two points are too close to each other. As for the speed of convergence, it would be
slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-arrange the equation but it is
faster than Decimal search. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the
gradient function of f(x). However the need for much manual computation can make the process
quite laborious and time consuming. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001.
The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Despite this, it is a very
effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many
decimal places if the right software is used. This makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of
the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. This will mean that the gradient
function will equal to zero. However, if we do the integer search, we can only get 1 change of sign.
Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the point where the
signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to many places. Using Autograph is much,
much simpler as you have the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on
the X-axis, and can do so to many places. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the
first one. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Chewings method is known as the
further iterations method.