Building & Dwelling: Ethics for the City

Chapter 4: Klee’s Angel Leaves Europe

Reading Response
By: Radha Sahdev

The essay effectively conveys the fascinating urban setting of Nehru Place, a bustling
market tucked away in the center of Delhi, India. This thriving neighborhood is a striking
illustration of how informality and urban planning can coexist; here, a flourishing informal
sector flourishes against a backdrop of precisely planned infrastructure. When Nehru Place
was first built in the 1970s to alleviate Delhi's severe office space crisis, it was constructed
on top of an underground parking garage. Today, Nehru Place is a swarming business
centre. This bustling market is the hub for software companies, computer repair
businesses, and a diverse assortment of retail stalls selling a range of goods, from those
that are legal to those who operate in the murky "grey market." It is an area distinguished
by its vibrancy and activity, where people from various socioeconomic levels gather to
communicate and conduct business, forming a microcosm of the larger metropolis.

The marketplace is a perfect example of how informal features may be seamlessly

incorporated into a properly planned urban environment because it has its very own metro
station and a well-organized bus terminal. Nehru Place's hybrid design captures the
essence of many impromptu urban spaces, which are frequently created through the
adaptive reuse of previously built structures that were initially used for functions like truck
storage or manufacturing facilities. These areas were eventually left vacant and used for
impromptu businesses, illustrating the ever changing and dynamic nature of urban
landscapes around the world.

To comprehend the change in usability of the built environment at Nehru Place, it was
essential to understand the four informality characteristics that the text identified.

Economic Informality
Due to the fact that enterprises frequently operate outside of the formal economy
of India's governmental restrictions, economic informality flourishes in Nehru Place
Market. Unregistered companies, cash transactions, adaptable work schedules, and
a preference for trust-based agreements over formal contracts are characteristics of
this informality. Since informal lending networks are frequently used to obtain
credit, enterprises in this industry are extremely susceptible to changes in
governmental rules. Because of the intense competition, informal networks are
essential for finding products and navigating this market. Although economic
informality gives entrepreneurs flexibility, it also comes with difficulties, such as
limited access to formal benefits and financial stability.
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

Legal Informality
Due to the trading in "grey goods," which includes products frequently obtained
through unlawful ways like theft or diverting from factories, legal informality is
common in Nehru Place Market. These products avoid official regulatory processes
and are not taxed, which results in a huge loss of revenue for the government. For
instance, this market commonly sells stolen electronic equipment like smartphones
and computers. These products are appealing to customers because they frequently
have a lower price and lack sufficient documentation. However, their provenance
and legitimacy are in doubt, and purchasers are unwittingly taking part in unlawful
business. Given the ubiquity of such operations, it is clear how difficult it is for law
enforcement to stop unlawful trading in places like Nehru Place.

Political Informality
The complicated power dynamics and governance challenges present in this
metropolitan environment are reflected in this informal dynamic. For instance, a lot
of street sellers operate without formal permissions, making their business
practices unlawful. To avoid eviction or harassment, street vendors may occasionally
pay modest bribes or fees to municipal authorities. The hazy boundaries of
authority and control at Nehru Place are highlighted by this informal negotiation
between merchants and the police. Additionally, it demonstrates how political
factors may affect how laws are implemented, making the government of the urban
environment both more adaptive and unpredictable.

Social Informality
The market is characterized by the ongoing opening, closing, relocating, and
changing of businesses, stalls, and offices. This fluidity gives the market an
ambiguous sense of time and space. For instance, a vendor selling mobile phones
might open shop one day, only to be displaced by another vendor selling electrical
accessories the next. This ongoing change in enterprises and unofficial trade
agreements illustrates the social sloppiness that characterizes Nehru Place. People
create transient social bonds based on common wants or interests as they quickly
adjust to the shifting environment. The traditional ideas of stability and permanence
in urban areas are challenged by the flexible and frequently transient social
relationships and networks that are fostered by this dynamic environment.

The text emphasizes similarities between Nehru Place and numerous unofficial urban
settings around the world. It speaks of locations like souks in the Middle East, parking lots
in Lagos, and ancient Italian squares. The chance to actively negotiate pricing rather than
following set rates is what unites them and makes them stand out from other
marketplaces. These areas are filled with a dynamic sense of economic theater as a result
of the habit of haggling, where each transaction is treated as a performance. Consider the
crowded souks in the Middle East, where clients and vendors barter ferociously to make

2
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

each sale a dynamic exchange. Similar to this, in Lagos, Nigeria, unofficial parking spaces
serve as forums for price haggling, promoting in-person encounters and maintaining a
vibrant economic environment. Even in ancient Italian squares, bartering is still common,
turning the act of purchasing items into a social and financial spectacle. These instances
highlight how informal, negotiable transactions have a global appeal for bringing life and a
sense of connection to urban settings while bridging cultural and geographic divides.

The author describes a personal meeting with Mr. Sudhir, a businessman with a store on
the open-air plateau, that occurred when he went to Nehru Place to repair an iPhone. The
author is initially sold a damaged phone but eventually receives a replacement after some
haggling and a wholesale price. It is explained how Mr. Sudhir changed from reselling
stolen things in the parking garage to creating a lawful presence on the plateau by sharing
his history and journey to Nehru Place. The life narrative of Mr. Sudhir demonstrates the
difficulties of squalid urban existence. He has been living in his home illegally for fourteen
years, and like many others in similar circumstances, he is trying to make his tenancy
legitimate by making little changes to his residence. Even if it means engaging in dubious
acts, his motivation is to provide for his family and uphold his dignity. The author of the
text acknowledges the uneasiness on a moral level when such virtuous family ideals
interact with criminal activity.

Consequently, the text explores the idea of formal urban growth, highlighting its link to the
justification of authority. Rapid urbanization, spurred by causes like rural-to-urban
migration, is a defining characteristic of many emerging world cities like Delhi. Similar
trends can be observed in Western cities, where immigration has frequently been the main
driver of expansion. For example, New York City, which, like Delhi, saw significant
population increases as a result of immigration, developed a global identity. There are,
nevertheless, some important differences. Delhi's population has grown extremely quickly,
outpacing several Western peers by a wide margin. The effects are clearly seen in the
strains on the environment, the housing crisis, and the infrastructure. Western cities have
experienced growth as well, but it has often been more planned and regulated, leading to
better living and infrastructure conditions.

The absence of possibilities in rural areas is mentioned as one reason why many migrants
to Delhi move there voluntarily. This stands in stark contrast to Western cities where
immigrants frequently migrate in search of better job chances or educational options. For
instance, the promise of the technology sector has drawn smart people from all over the
world to Silicon Valley in the United States. Given the ad hoc and unstable nature of
employment, migrants frequently view Delhi as a transitory labor location. Western cities,
on the other hand, have historically witnessed immigrants setting down roots and
assimilating over decades. For instance, immigrant populations in prosperous cities like
London and Toronto are now essential to the city's cultural and economic vitality.

3
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

The paragraph effectively highlights the reality that density and size aren't necessarily
correlated. Due to its large population, Delhi has a high density, however this does not
always equate to better services or a higher standard of living. Cities in the West have done
a better job of striking a balance between size and services. For instance, despite their high
population densities, cities like Paris and Tokyo have well-designed infrastructure and
services that raise the standard of living for its citizens.

Two important ideas are introduced in the text: opportunity investing and core investment,
which provide insight into how international investors view and interact with cities as
potential sources of profit.

Opportunity Investing
According to this perspective, cities are untapped sources of future growth and
financial gain. Global investors frequently look for undervalued or areas within cities
with strong development potential in order to increase their returns. They then
inject funds into these sectors, frequently concentrating on business, infrastructure,
or real estate development. As the area changes or becomes more desirable to
people and businesses, the goal is to profit from the projected increase in property
values, rental income, or business profits.

High Line Park, New York City: The High Line Park in Manhattan is a fantastic
illustration of opportunity investing. It was formerly an abandoned railway
line that, according to a community-led initiative, was turned into a lush park.
Investors spotted the region's potential and the chance to develop a special
urban green space. The neighborhood was not only revitalized by this
investment, but it also markedly gentrified, raising property values and luring
upmarket companies.

The Pearl, Doha: The Pearl is a man-made island located in the middle of the
Qatari capital designed to offer opportunities for luxury living and
investment. An upscale residential and commercial hub was established in
the Persian Gulf as international real estate developers recognized its
potential. A once-quiet coastal location was transformed into a vibrant
metropolitan center as a result of this development's attraction of wealthy
inhabitants and businesses.

Core Investing
Core investing, on the other hand, concentrates on established, reliable, and
prosperous urban neighborhoods. Due to their lower risk profile and reliable profits,
these "core" industries are attractive to investors. They frequently make
investments in premium, profit-generating properties like office buildings, malls, or
apartment complexes. Rather than taking big risks for potentially higher returns, the
objective is to protect and develop wealth.

4
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

Financial District, London: The Financial District of London, sometimes known

as "Canary Wharf," is an illustration of core investing. For generations, this
neighborhood has served as the city's financial hub. This area is a key
investment site because it is home to numerous international financial
institutions. The city makes ongoing investments in infrastructure upkeep to
guarantee the financial sector's efficient operation.

Pudong, Shanghai: An illustration of core investing may be found in Pudong,

which is situated on the Huangpu River's east bank. The Chinese government
identified Pudong as a central business and financial district in the 1990s.
Pudong became a worldwide financial powerhouse over time, luring
international firms and financial institutions with massive expenditures in
skyscrapers, transit systems, and commercial facilities.

These investment plans may have a significant impact on urban regions.

When wealthier people and companies move into regenerated districts, gentrification, a
frequent effect of both opportunity and core investments, frequently results in the
displacement of lower-income inhabitants, raising property values and rents and changing
the neighborhood's character.
These investments can simultaneously ignite urban development by revitalizing run-down
regions, boosting infrastructure, and raising inhabitants' standard of living. But this change
would be expensive, possibly eroding the neighborhood's historical and cultural fiber.
Additionally, investing in cities has the potential to have a significant economic impact,
promoting expansion, the creation of jobs, and an increase in tax revenue for both
investors and local governments. A crucial difficulty is finding a precise balance between
luring foreign investment and making sure that all citizens receive fair rewards. It poses
difficult issues related to diversity, community preservation, and the probable eviction of
long-term residents. Therefore, balancing economic expansion with social and cultural
issues is a challenging task for urban planners and legislators.

The idea of an "octopus city" eloquently demonstrates the issue of uneven urban
development, in which new growth and projects spread out like the tentacles of an
octopus, linking with one another but frequently ignoring or bypassing marginalized or
underprivileged regions. In many cities throughout the world, this spatial pattern of urban
expansion can be seen, and it has a substantial impact on the general health and inclusion
of metropolitan regions.

For instance, take the American metropolis of Detroit. Detroit quickly industrialized and
prospered in the middle of the 20th century, earning the nickname "Arsenal of Democracy"
for its contribution to wartime production. However, the city saw a sharp divide in
development as industries decreased. The redevelopment and gentrification of the
downtown area and certain affluent districts attracted businesses and investment. While

5
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

this was going on, many other neighborhoods, notably those where minorities made up the
majority, suffered from underinvestment, blight, and a lack of basic amenities. This pattern
of development, which is an example of the octopus city phenomenon, clearly separated
prospering from neglected parts.

Similarly, Johannesburg in South Africa offers another painful example. Apartheid policies
left behind a starkly segregated metropolitan environment. The wealthy northern suburbs
of the city benefited from contemporary amenities, infrastructure, and economic
prospects, but the southern townships, where black citizens had been forcibly transferred,
suffered from acute neglect and underdevelopment. The octopus city paradigm is reflected
in this geographical mismatch, where certain parts are interconnected and prosper while
others are left out.

The model of the octopus city has broad repercussions. Poor and unequal communities
frequently lack access to good healthcare, public transit, and basic amenities, which feeds
the cycles of poverty and inequality. Additionally, this dispersed approach to growth can
undermine social harmony and worsen urban problems like crime and unrest. Cities are
adopting inclusive and comprehensive planning strategies more frequently to solve these
problems and encourage urban growth that is more equal. By bridging the gaps between
prospering and neglected regions, these strategies support a more linked and durable
urban fabric. Examples include programs to increase the accessibility of public
transportation to underserved areas, investments in affordable housing, and measures to
revitalize underutilized urban centres.

The book highlights an important facet of economic progress in nations like China and
India, where rapid economic expansion has resulted in notable decreases in poverty levels.
However, it correctly notes that despite this advancement, problems with economic
instability and inequality continue to exist. For instance, hundreds of millions of people in
China have been pulled out of poverty as a result of the nation's tremendous economic
change. This growth has been unequal, too, with coastal areas and metropolitan centers
seeing greater economic gains than rural areas. As a result, there is a clear urban-rural gap,
and people in rural areas frequently do not have access to the same opportunities and
social services as people in urban areas. This disparity illustrates how a nation's economic
development may make inequality worse. In a similar vein, economic prosperity in India
has increased the size of the middle class and raised many people's level of living. However,
there is still a big problem with income disparity. While a sizeable segment of the
population continues to struggle with poverty and lack of access to essential services like
healthcare, education, and amenities, a small minority of people enjoy significant wealth.
Luxury gated enclaves and expansive slums coexist in urban regions, revealing the
persisting inequities despite general economic development. A significant section of the
workforce in both China and India works in low-wage, unstable occupations with little job
security or social safeguards. This presents problems for both countries. Even though the
economies of the countries are expanding generally, these employees, who frequently

6
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

labor in the unorganized sector, endure economic uncertainty and vulnerability. While
nations like India and China have achieved great advances in eradicating poverty through
economic growth, the text underlines that inequality and economic insecurity still pose
difficult obstacles. The examples from these two countries highlight the necessity for
comprehensive plans that stress inclusivity, social safety, and an equitable distribution of
opportunities in addition to encouraging economic progress in order to guarantee that the
advantages of development are felt by all facets of society.

The author's narrative gives us access to yet another experience about Madame Q,
antiquated for an anonymous individual young adult woman architect, who was crucial to
Shanghai's change and provides a complex viewpoint on urban growth. Madame Q's
experiences and observations are best understood against the backdrop of Shanghai's
transformation from a place scarred by the Cultural Revolution to a magnet of global trade
and innovation.

Shanghai's amazing transformation from ruin to vitality is proof of China's quick

modernisation efforts. After the reforms of Deng Xiaoping, the city went on a building
frenzy that altered its skyline. Skyscrapers and architectural designs fusing Shanghai and
Parisian influences started to rule the urban environment. These improvements were
greatly influenced by the Shanghai Communist Party, demonstrating the importance of
political power in urban growth. Due to this unified strategy, numerous historic buildings
were demolished and replaced with more contemporary ones. The societal repercussions
of this transition are emphasized in the essay. Shanghai's recent construction projects not
only displayed amazing construction quality, but they also created societal problems. Living
in high-rise buildings frequently led to social isolation, the neglect of senior citizens, and an
increase in mental health problems. This illuminates the intricate connection between
urban planning and social wellbeing and highlights the urban development's human
components.

It's interesting to consider Madame Q's viewpoint on how Western urban planning ideas
don't correspond with China's actual circumstances. Her fondness for Lewis Mumford's
logical integration of functions emphasizes the conflict between upholding tradition and
allowing for rapid change. Shikumen housing has been discussed in relation to how it has
been transformed into themed communities like Thames Town and Holland Village, which
serves as an example of how nostalgia and a sense of the past have become important in
Shanghai's evolving urban landscape.

The concept of "shikumen" in Shanghai represents a fascinating social space set against the
dynamic urban backdrop of the city. Shikumen, traditional Chinese housing characterized
by stone-framed gateways leading into shared courtyards, served as more than just
architectural structures; they embodied a collective way of life. These interconnected
residential complexes encouraged social interaction, fostering a sense of community
among residents who shared common spaces and courtyards. Amidst the rapid

7
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

urbanization and modernization of Shanghai, these shikumen neighborhoods became

symbolic of an era gone by, where generations of families lived and interacted closely.
However, as gentrification and urban renewal efforts swept through Shanghai, many of
these historic shikumen were renovated or demolished, displacing long-time residents and
disrupting the close-knit social fabric they once represented. This transformation highlights
the tension between preserving the city's history and accommodating its modern needs,
revealing the intricate relationship between urban development and social spaces in
Shanghai's evolving landscape.

Some inferences can be drawn between the traditional shikumen courtyards in Shanghai
and the residential courtyards of Chandni Chowk in Old Delhi. Both architectural concepts
emphasize the significance of shared spaces within the urban fabric. In Shanghai, shikumen
courtyards served as communal hubs, where families interacted and formed tight-knit
communities. Similarly, in Chandni Chowk, the residential courtyards, often found within
havelis or traditional Indian mansions, functioned as central gathering areas for extended
families and neighbors. These courtyards played a vital role in fostering social bonds,
hosting celebrations, and serving as places for everyday interactions. However, as
urbanization and development pressures have encroached upon both Shanghai and Old
Delhi, there has been a trend of renovating or repurposing these historic spaces.
Gentrification and modernization efforts have disrupted the traditional social dynamics
associated with these courtyards, raising questions about the preservation of cultural
heritage in the face of rapid urban change.

Madame Q's contempt for historical appropriations made for profit makes one question
the veracity of preservation attempts. The debate is made more complex by the conflict
between fixed model and vernacular urbanism in historic restoration. The restoration of
the Bund serves as an illustration of the difficulties in striking a balance between visitor
expectations and historical accuracy, which raises concerns about how history is portrayed
in urban settings. The trip of Madame Q across Shanghai captures the intricacies of urban
development, from the influence of governmental power to the social and cultural
repercussions of fast change. This story is a miniature representation of larger discussions
about urbanization, authenticity, and the preservation of the past in developing cities like
Shanghai.

The restoration of the Bund serves as an illustration of the difficulties in striking a balance
between visitor expectations and historical accuracy, which raises concerns about how
history is portrayed in urban settings. The trip of Madame Q across Shanghai captures the
intricacies of urban development, from the influence of governmental power to the social
and cultural repercussions of fast change. This story is a miniature representation of larger
discussions about urbanization, authenticity, and the preservation of the past in developing
cities like Shanghai.

8
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

The text also references Benjamin's experiences in Moscow in the winter of 1926-1927,
where he observed the challenges of implementing communism. Benjamin observed the
continuation of informal economies, like as open-air marketplaces, where people met their
fundamental requirements because of shortages in official shops, despite the official
ideology propelling progress and modernization. He also went to a factory where, in the
absence of replacement parts, cutting-edge machinery coexisted with older manual
techniques. The poem implies that marginalized individuals in Delhi struggle to find their
place in a metropolis that frequently excludes them in the backdrop of contemporary cities
like Delhi and Shanghai. Some urbanists and residents of Shanghai, on the other hand, are
dissatisfied with the city's rapid transition and are seeking a deeper understanding of the
past.

The title "Klee's Angel Leaves Europe" holds several layers of significance. Firstly, it refers to
the artwork "Angelus Novus" by the Swiss-German artist Paul Klee, which plays a central
role in the essay. This painting, depicting an angel-like figure in a state of distress, serves as
a symbol for the troubled history and tumultuous events of Europe during the early 20th
century. The angel's departure from Europe may symbolize the profound changes and
upheavals occurring on the continent during that time, including political revolutions, world
wars, and ideological shifts. Secondly, the title hints at the departure of Walter Benjamin,
the essay's author, from Europe. Benjamin, a Jewish intellectual and writer, was deeply
affected by the political turmoil of his era, particularly the rise of Nazism. He eventually fled
Europe in an attempt to escape persecution but tragically took his own life in Portbou,
Spain, while attempting to cross the border. The title could be seen as a reference to
Benjamin's personal journey and the sense of exile and displacement experienced by many
during that period.

Netaji Subhash Place

With its diverse experience of business, culture, and society, the Netaji Subhash Place
District Centre, located in the center of North Delhi, is a tribute to the city's urban planning
and design.

Urban planning and design in the district center successfully combine practicality and
aesthetic quality. The architecture in this region is contemporary, with soaring office
buildings, retail establishments, and thoughtfully planned public spaces. Wide walkways,
green areas, and thoughtfully arranged seats make the area extremely pedestrian-friendly.
With an effective transportation system and easy access from its own metro station, Netaji
Subhash Place further solidifies its position as a commercial and business hub. The district
center's design stands out for its successful fusion of form and function. The contemporary
architectural designs and modern towers highlight Delhi's drive for growth and prosperity.
The thoughtful blending of green areas into the urban environment offers a peaceful
element. Furthermore, the existence of well-kept streets and infrastructure demonstrates
the city's dedication to establishing a setting that meets the demands of both its citizens
and visitors.

9
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

The district centre is home to a wide array of businesses, ranging from multinational
corporations to small-scale enterprises. It has developed a reputation as a significant
business district, luring businesspeople, experts, and dealers from numerous industries.
The shopping center offers a comprehensive selection of stores, boutiques, eateries, and
coffee shops to suit the varied tastes and preferences of its patrons. Incomparable
shopping opportunities can be found on Netaji Subhash Place. Visitors can browse a wide
variety of goods, including clothing, gadgets, books, and handmade items. The district
center's busy street markets and food booths, where local sellers offer a mouthwatering
variety of snacks and street cuisine, further highlight the area's commercial prowess. A
distinctive and alluring shopping atmosphere is produced by the fusion of contemporary
retail locations and conventional street markets.

In the development of Netaji Subhash Place (NSP) in Delhi, examples of both opportunity
investing and core investing can be observed. Opportunity Investing: When NSP was
initially planned and developed as a commercial district center, it presented an opportunity
for investors to tap into a growing market for office spaces and retail outlets in North Delhi.
Investors saw the potential for profit in creating a vibrant business hub in this area. They
took advantage of the relatively lower land prices at the time and invested in constructing
office complexes, shopping malls, and commercial spaces. This opportunity-driven
investment transformed NSP into a bustling commercial and financial center, attracting
businesses and consumers alike. Core Investing: Over time, as NSP continued to grow and
establish itself as a key business district, core investing became evident. Core investors
recognized the stability and long-term potential of NSP as a prime location for commercial
activities. They focused on maintaining and upgrading the existing infrastructure, ensuring
that the area remained attractive and competitive. Core investing involved not only physical
development but also efforts to create a sense of community and identity within NSP,
fostering a conducive environment for businesses and residents.

Numerous cultural activities and events are held there that showcase Delhi's diverse
culture and modern energy. The district center routinely hosts art exhibits, musical
performances, and cultural festivals, giving regional performers and artists a stage on
which to display their abilities. Both locals and visitors are drawn to these events, which
promote a sense of community and cross-cultural interaction. It acts as a focal point for
North Delhi people, providing chances for social interactions and recreational pursuits. The
district center is a popular destination for families and friends to spend quality time
together while taking use of the open spaces, parks, and recreational amenities.

Netaji Subhash Place District Centre (NSP) and Nehru Place, both located in Delhi, share
some commonalities while also showcasing distinct characteristics. NSP, primarily a
commercial and business hub, offers a modern, organized, and planned urban
environment. In contrast, Nehru Place is known for its informality, bustling markets, and a
mix of legal and "grey market" activities. While NSP represents a well-planned urban center

10
 Reading Response | Radha Sahdev

with structured office complexes, retail spaces, and entertainment options, Nehru Place
thrives on spontaneity and the adaptability of informal businesses.

However, both areas are central to Delhi's urban landscape and are essential nodes for
commerce, technology, and trade. They serve as significant employment centers and
attract a diverse population of professionals, entrepreneurs, and visitors. These contrasting
urban spaces illustrate the multifaceted nature of Delhi, where formal and informal
elements coexist and cater to the diverse needs of the city's residents and businesses.
While NSP symbolizes Delhi's aspirations for modernity and structured development,
Nehru Place represents the city's dynamic and entrepreneurial spirit, reflecting the
complex interplay of formality and informality in urban India.

The district center of Netaji Subhash Place serves as a microcosm of Delhi's urban vibrancy.
Its urban planning and design demonstrate a dedication to establishing a setting that is
both aesthetically beautiful and useful. It is a lively and diversified destination because of
the wide variety of commercial activities, in addition to cultural events and community
involvement. This district center is a crucial component of Delhi's urban structure and is
constantly altering to meet the city's evolving requirements and goals.

11