Writing coursework can be a challenging and time-consuming task, often requiring a deep

understanding of the subject matter, strong analytical skills, and effective research abilities. The
difficulty is amplified when dealing with specific topics such as C3 Coursework UMS (Uniform
Mark Scale), which might involve complex mathematical concepts and rigorous analysis.

Here are some reasons why writing coursework on topics like C3 Coursework UMS can be
challenging:

1. Complexity of the Topic: C3 Coursework UMS likely involves intricate mathematical

calculations and statistical analysis, which can be daunting for students who are not well-
versed in the subject matter.
2. Research Requirements: Crafting a coursework requires thorough research to gather
relevant data and information. For topics like C3 Coursework UMS, finding accurate and
reliable sources might be particularly challenging.
3. Time-Consuming Nature: Writing coursework demands a significant investment of time.
Understanding the topic, conducting research, and compiling the information can be time-
consuming, especially when dealing with technical subjects.
4. Analytical Skills: Courses like C3 Coursework UMS often require a high level of analytical
skills. Students need to interpret data, draw meaningful conclusions, and present findings in a
clear and structured manner.

To alleviate the stress and pressure associated with coursework, some individuals may consider
seeking assistance. If you find yourself struggling with the complexities of C3 Coursework UMS or
any other challenging topic, it's essential to explore reliable options for support.

One recommended platform is ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔. They offer professional writing services with
experienced writers who can help you navigate through the intricacies of your coursework. These
services can provide personalized assistance, ensuring that your coursework meets the required
standards and is delivered within the specified time frame.

Remember to approach such services responsibly, using them as a tool for learning and understanding
rather than a shortcut. Seek help when needed, but also make an effort to engage with the material to
enhance your own comprehension and skills.
However, if we do the integer search, we can only get 1 change of sign. A decimal search, in
contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer. The value of g'(x) at
this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. To start the process, we have to
select two points on the graph visual basis. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the
ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to
many places. So when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation,
I get the following results. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0
and that is an impossible fraction. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually
are harder and more complex. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find
the roots. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will
use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. It must be word processed and may be
illustrated with screen shots or screenplay extracts. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn
and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal
to -3.5566. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real
solution but more easily. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. This is not accurate
enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. This method is slightly complex even on easy formulas,
but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced. C3 Coursework - different
methods of solving equations. If I only had a scientific calculator, Newton Raphson will be the
fastest way to find the roots. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can
cause the method to fail. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the
rest of the change of signs method. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially
if you do not have software to automate the iterations. The downside of the method is that it is the
most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an
equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away.
Consequently, we would be unlikely to seach further in the intervals. So I used the formula to work
out the values in excel. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. With the use of
excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub in the x values. Students are
required to create an individual production consisting of either: Either (i) a short film between 4 - 5
mins which includes one of the following. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it
even easier to use it. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel ed05
8 years ago report 4 Just what I needed. The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the
point as well.
The reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. When the line
met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the
x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very
close approximate to the real solution but more easily. Out of the three, some are faster at converging
to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology
made available to everyone. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is
the gradient function of f(x). This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). C3 Coursework - different methods of
solving equations. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the
method to fail. Thank you for the whole set, it was just what I was looking for. So I used the formula
to work out the values in excel. This reason is that the two points are too close to each other. The
screenplay must be accompanied by a digitally photographed storyboard of a key section of the
screenplay (approximately two minutes screen time, corresponding to approximately two pages of
screenplay and to approximately 20 storyboard shots). This is because the tangent crosses the
asymptote, as shown below. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not
completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive.
This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal
places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. Screenplay extracts
used to illustrate the evaluative analysis are excluded from the word count of 1600 - 1800 words. So
when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the
following results. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then
I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. See other similar resources ?0.00 4.70 7
reviews Download Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Share to Twitter Share to
Facebook Share to Pinterest. But among the three methods, I think change of signs method should
be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the
ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to
many places. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very
simple with the use of the formula. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values
of y when you sub in the x values. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this
range at the root which is found. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. If that g’(x)
1, then we know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. After finding
the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs method.
It must be word processed and may be illustrated with screen shots or screenplay extracts. So using
the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. This is because the
tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to
Pinterest. This method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated
when harder formulas are introduced. It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just involves one
step. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to find
a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations,
which can easily be done using a computer. The screenplay must be accompanied by a digitally
photographed storyboard of a key section of the screenplay (approximately two minutes screen time,
corresponding to approximately two pages of screenplay and to approximately 20 storyboard shots).
With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the
gradient function. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. I am going to
use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the
root out to more decimal places. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator
is the gradient function of f(x). Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to
calculate the y values for various points of x. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use,
especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations. This makes it very easy to work out
the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. It must be word
processed and may be illustrated with screen shots or screenplay extracts. To do this, we need to find
the gradient at that point. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it
repeats. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail.
There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very easy to enter all
the information into Excel. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. But with
Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. Similarly to before, I used
excel to work out the value of f(x). Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to
converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three different methods.
So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between
which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such. If the
gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction.
With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and
dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use.
This reason is that the two points are too close to each other. C3 Coursework - different methods of
solving equations.
It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. So when I
substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following
results. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. The Decimal
search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real solution but more easily. It
must be word processed and may be illustrated with screen shots or screenplay extracts. Also, using
change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it
takes a bit longer than other methods, though. This repeats until we find the root of the equation,
(when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). As for the speed of
convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-
arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. The downside of the method is that it is the
most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an
equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away. To do
this, we need to find the gradient at that point. Our customer service team will review your report
and will be in touch. ?0.00 4.70 7 reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 4.70 7 reviews Download
Save for later Last updated 14 February 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter
Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Z Shaikh's Shop 4.74 457
reviews Not the right resource. Evaluative analysis: Students must complete an evaluative analysis of
their production of between 1600- 1800 words and make reference to all short films selected for
study from the compilation set by WJEC (at least 3 short films totalling a minimum of 80 minutes).
Students are required to create an individual production consisting of either: Either (i) a short film
between 4 - 5 mins which includes one of the following. This is the only hard part of the method as
the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. If that g’(x) 1, then we
know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. It’s very easy for us to
use autograph and it just involves one step. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of
0.00001. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. This reason
is that the two points are too close to each other. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can
also be seen in the graph. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not
completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive.
This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal
places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. With the use of excel,
it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as many
cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. When the line met the curve,
a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called
X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. It must be word processed and may be illustrated with screen shots
or screenplay extracts. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to
leave some feedback. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. However, if we do
the integer search, we can only get 1 change of sign. Students are required to create an individual
production consisting of either: Either (i) a short film between 4 - 5 mins which includes one of the
following. But among the three methods, I think change of signs method should be chosen as the
easiest and quickest one.
Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Most of the mistakes are made in this
stage by humans. Students are required to create an individual production consisting of either: Either
(i) a short film between 4 - 5 mins which includes one of the following. In some cases you may not
be able to differentiate f(x). Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
?0.00 4.70 7 reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 4.70 7 reviews Download Save for later Last
updated 14 February 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Z Shaikh's Shop 4.74 457 reviews Not the
right resource. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is -
1.961703555. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x
value on the graph for a tangent. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even
easier to use it. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. The fact that the solution lies
between -3 and -4 can also be seen in the graph. This repeats until we find the root of the equation,
(when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). With the use of excel, it is every
easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you
wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use. But among the three methods, I think
change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. If that g’(x) 1, then we
know that the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. This method is slightly
complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are
introduced. To work out X 1 I will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it
to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table. So the only human interaction needed is to look at
the results and manually looking at between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then
setting the new limits as such. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. Otherwise,
it is possible for us to miss the other roots. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is
within this range at the root which is found. Evaluative analysis: Students must complete an
evaluative analysis of their production of between 1600- 1800 words and make reference to all short
films selected for study from the compilation set by WJEC (at least 3 short films totalling a
minimum of 80 minutes). The screenplay must be accompanied by a digitally photographed
storyboard of a key section of the screenplay (approximately two minutes screen time, corresponding
to approximately two pages of screenplay and to approximately 20 storyboard shots). Empty reply
does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel ed05 8 years ago report 4 Just what I
needed. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. After 19 iterations, I found the root of
the equation as from then on, it repeats. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. If we
take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). Write a
review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The
iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Care must be taken when
choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail.
If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible
fraction. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. Share to Twitter Share to
Facebook Share to Pinterest. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply
Cancel ed05 8 years ago report 4 Just what I needed. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you
have the ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can
do so to many places. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is
very simple with the use of the formula. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. But
with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an equation
after entering the formula in. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is
the gradient function of f(x). The screenplay must be accompanied by a digitally photographed
storyboard of a key section of the screenplay (approximately two minutes screen time, corresponding
to approximately two pages of screenplay and to approximately 20 storyboard shots). It must be
word processed and may be illustrated with screen shots or screenplay extracts. To work out X 1 I
will use the formula above to work out X 1 in steps and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and
summarise in a table. To do this, we need to find the gradient at that point. Otherwise, it is possible
for us to miss the other roots. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). After 19
iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Out of the three, some are
faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the
recent technology made available to everyone. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the
simplest way to find the roots. The reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to
calculate them. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. C3 Coursework -
different methods of solving equations. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). After
finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs
method. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached
enough significant levels). But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not
completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive.
Students are required to create an individual production consisting of either: Either (i) a short film
between 4 - 5 mins which includes one of the following. So when I substitute the incremented values
of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following results. It’s very easy for us to use
autograph and it just involves one step. Students are required to create an individual production
consisting of either: Either (i) a short film between 4 - 5 mins which includes one of the following.
Evaluative analysis: Students must complete an evaluative analysis of their production of between
1600- 1800 words and make reference to all short films selected for study from the compilation set
by WJEC (at least 3 short films totalling a minimum of 80 minutes).