Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Temas 1 y 2 Instrumentos Financieros CEU English
Temas 1 y 2 Instrumentos Financieros CEU English
Table of Contents
I. The Risk/Return Framework.
0. Mathematical Review
1) What is a time series?
2) When dealing with financial time series do we use prices or returns? Why?
3) How do we measure the average return of a financial time series?
4) How do we measure the dispersion of returns in a financial time series?
5) What is volatility?
6) Can Volatility be negative?
7) Do we use the Variance or the Standard deviation as a final statistic? Why?
8) How do we measure the degree of linear relationship between two time series?
9) Is Covariance a good statistic to measure linear relationships? Why?
10) What is the difference between Covariance and the Correlation Coefficient?
11) What are the maximum and minimum values (range) of Covariance?
12) What are the maximum and minimum values (range) of Correlation?
13) Why the Pearson Correlation Coefficient is so important when dealing with diversification?
14) How do we multiply Matrices?
15) What is a Symmetrical Matrix?
16) What is the Correlation Coefficient Matrix?
17) What is the Variance and Covariance Matrix?
18) Are both Matrices symmetrical? Why?
Imbalance
Current Income < Consumption Need to borrow the difference
Investment
Current Income > Consumption Save the excess
Investment
The imbalance between agents who need to borrow money and agents who
have money to invest creates a market. Instead of putting their savings under
their mattresses, individuals can give up immediate possession of their savings
for a higher level of future consumption by lending their saving. This is called
investment.
Risk-Free Rate
1 + RFR Nominal
1 + RFR Real =
1 + Inflation
Return
Implicit Capital Gain / Capital Loss
HPR (2)
Pt−1 Pt + Dt
Dt + Pt − Pt−1
R t−1,t =
Pt−1
t−1 t
HPR (3)
t−τ
Dτ 1 + R∗τ,t + Pt − Pt−1
R t−1,t = Pt−1
Pt−1 Dt Pt
Pt t−1 τ t
Dτ + Pt − Pt−1
Pτ
R t−1,t =
Pt−1
R∗τ,t = Annualized Reinvestment Rate (e. g. RFR)
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
8
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
d) Determine the HPR if the company pays a 7€ dividend at t = 0,75, that is, at the end
of the third quarter. Suppose the investor reinvest this dividend in stocks of the
same company. The price of the stock at the end of the third quarter is 155€.
175
175 + 7 ∙ − 150
R 0,1 = 155 = 0,2193 = 21,93%
150
T
(a) 1 (g) T
R 0,T = ∙ R t−1,t versus R 0,T = 1 + R 0,1 1 + R1,2 ⋯ 1 + R T−1,T − 1
T
t=1
R t−1,t = HPRs.
T = Number of compounding periods in the holding period.
0 1 2 T−1 T
(g) T
1 + R 0,T
a) Determine the arithmetic mean of these three stocks. ¿does it represent the real
average return during the holding period (2 years)?
b) Determine the geometric mean of these three stocks. ¿does it represent the real
average return during the holding period (2 years)?
(g)
A: R 0,2 = 1 + 0,10 1 + 0,10 − 1 = 10%
(g)
B: R 0,2 = 1 + 0,50 1 − 0,193 − 1 = 10%
(g)
C: R 0,2 = 1 + 1 1 − 0,395 − 1 = 10%
Capitalization Factor
1
(1 + i)
Holding Period
Capitalization Factor
Pt = Pt−1 ∙ (1 + R t−1,t )
Discounting Factor
1
Pt−1 = Pt ∙
1 + R t−1,t
Holding Period
Compounding Interest
Compounding Period
τ/360
1 + R 0,τ = 1 + R 0,1
Imagine you buy a stock at t = 0 at 100€, and the price of that stock after 1 year (t= 1),
is 105€. During that year, the company pays a 2,5€ dividend at the end of all four
quarters. These dividends are reinvested a 5% annual RFR. Determine the return of this
investment.
2,5 1,05 270/360 2,5 1,05 180/360 2,5 1,05 90/360 2,5 1,05 0
105 − 100
R 0,1 = + + + + = 15,18%
100 100 100 100 100
eln x = x = ln ex
I. The Risk/Return Framework
Return and measures of return
Rnom
m Reff
0,1 = Annual Effective Rate (TAE).
0,1
1 + Reff = 1+ Rnom
0,1 = Annual Nominal Rate (TIN).
0,1
m
Rnom
0,1
= Period Effective Rate.
m
m = 2 ; Rnom eff
0,1 = 10% ; R 0,1 = 10,25%. m
Rnom
0,1
m = 3 ; Rnom eff 1+ Reff = lim 1+ = er
0,1 = 10% ; R 0,1 = 10,34%.
0,1
m→∞ m
m = 4 ; Rnom eff
0,1 = 10% ; R 0,1 = 10,38%.
m = 12 ; Rnom eff
0,1 = 10% ; R 0,1 = 10,47%. r = ln 1 + Reff
0,1
Reff
0,1 = 10% ; r = ln 1,1 = 9,53%.
Reff
0,1 = 50% ; r = ln 1,5 = 40,55%.
Expected value of all possible outcomes. It is the sum of all the possible
outcomes weighted by their respective probabilities.
Measures of
Median
Central Tendency
It is the value separating the higher half of a data sample, a population, or a
probability distribution, from the lower half.
Mode
It is the observation that appears the most frequently (there can be serveral modes).
Range
Measures of
Difference between the maximum value and the minimum value.
Dispersion
Standard Deviation
It equals 0 in a symmetrical
Var(R) = pi ∙ R i − E(R) distribution
2 Var is a dimensional
Var(R) = pi ∙ R i − E R variable
σR
CV =
E(R) Standard deviation is an
σi = Var(R) undimensional variable
Mean = Mode = Median Mode < Median < Mean Mean < Median < Mode
The second investment is riskier than the first one, because the expected returns are spread wider around the mean.
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
23
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
Ex-ante Data 2
σ = pi ∙ R i − E R
2
σxx = E R x − E(R x ) R x − E(R x ) = E Rx − E Rx = σ2x
σxx σ2x
ρxx = = =1
σx σx σ2x
Stocks
II. Portfolio Theory
Bonds
Diversification and portfolio risk Security
Commodities
Currencies
Portfolio
n n
R p = wi ∙ R i E(R p ) = wi ∙ E(R i )
i=1 i=1
σ11 ⋯ σ1n w1
Var(R p ) = w1 ⋯ wn ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ ⋮ σp = Var(R p )
σn1 ⋯ σnn wn
n n n n
σij
wi = weight of security i in the portfolio. ρij =
σi σj
σij = covariance between security i and security j.
σi = volatility of security i. σij = σji
ρij = correlation coefficient between security i and security j.
σp = portfolio volatility. σii = σ2i
σ12 ⋯ σ1n
VarCov Matrix = ⋮ ⋱ ⋮
σn1 ⋯ σ2n
Determine the risk and return of a portfolio made up of two securities. Returns of
securities 1 and 2 are 10% and 15%, respectively. Volatilities of securities 1 and 2 are
20% and 30%, respectively, and the correlation coefficient between both securities is -
0,45. The weight of security 1 is two times the weight of security 2.
w1 = 2w2 2 1
3w2 = 1 w1 = w2 =
w1 + w2 = 1 3 3
2 1
R p = w1 R1 + w2 R 2 = 10% + 15% = 11,67%
3 3
2 2
2 1 0,20 −0,027 2/3 2 2
1 2 1
Var R p = = 0,20 + 0,302 + 2 0,20 ∙ 0,30 ∙ −0,45 = 0,01578
3 3 −0,027 0,30 1/3 3 3 3 3
Risk Aversion
Risk Premium
The concept of
Dominance
σ PA > σ PB E R PA = E R PB Portfolio B
Suppose we have two portfolios valued at dates t=0 and t=1. Which one is prefered?
Portfolio A is preferred because it offers a lower risk than portfolio B, being both returns identical.
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
33
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY Definición
U = E R − λ ∙ σ2
U = utility level.
λ = risk aversion coefficient. The higher the coefficient,
the more risk averse the investor.
They are upward slopping due to the dominance principle. An increase of risk should
be rewarded by an increase of expected return if the investor is risk-averse.
Curves located further in the northwest direction (upper left corner) correspond to
higher levels of utility (I1 > I2 > I3).
Curves are convex due to the risk-aversion of investors. As the level of risk increases,
investors demand a higher level of return.
I1
E(R)
I2
I3
A
B
C
A is preferred to B, and B is preferred to C.
As we increase risk, investor 1 needs a higher increase in return to maintain the same level of utility.
Therefore, investor 1 is more risk averse than investor 2.
Investor 1
E(R)
∆E(R1 )
Investor 2
∆E(R 2 )
σ
∆σ
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
36
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
∆ 0,8%
∆ 1,3%
∆ 1,5%
D
C
Q
σ
Feasible Set → Efficient Frontier
I5
I4
I3
I2
I1
I4
I3
I2
I1
E(R)
E R p − E(R 2 )
w1 =
E R1 − E(R 2 )
E(R p ) = w1 R1 + 1 − w1 R 2
E Rp − E R2 E R1 − E(R p )
w2 = 1 − =
σ2p = w12 σ12 + w22 σ22 + 2w1 w2 σ12 E R1 − E R 2 E R1 − E(R 2 )
2 2
E Rp − E R2 E R1 − E R p E R p − E(R 2 ) E R1 − E(R p )
σ2p = σ12 + σ22 + 2 σ
E R1 − E R 2 E R1 − E R 2 E R1 − E(R 2 ) E R1 − E(R 2 ) 12
2
We leave the equation as a function of E R p and E R p
2 2
σ12 + σ22 − 2σ12 2 σ12 E(R 2 ) + σ22 E(R1 ) − σ12 E R1 + E(R 2 ) σ12 E R 2 + σ22 E R1 − 2σ12 E R1 E(R 2 )
σ2p = 2 E(R p ) −2 2 E(R p ) + 2
E R1 − E R 2 E R1 − E R 2 E R1 − E R 2
2
σ2p = A ∙ E R p + B ∙ E(R p ) + C y = A ∙ x2 + B ∙ x + C
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es). (Equation of a parabola)
40
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
y = A ∙ x2 + B ∙ x + C
2
σ2p = A ∙ E R p + B ∙ E(R p ) + C
E(R)
σ22 − σ12
dσ2p w1 =
= 2 ∙ A ∙ E Rp + B = 0 σ12 − 2σ12 + σ22
dE(R p )
σ12 + σ22 − 2σ12
B A= 2
E R∗p = − E R1 − E R 2
2A
σ12 E(R 2 ) + σ22 E(R1 ) − σ12 E R1 + E(R 2 )
B= 2
B E R1 − E R 2
E R∗p =− = w1 E R1 + w2 E(R 2 )
2A
w2 = 1 − w1
2 2
σ12 E R 2 + σ22 E R1 − 2σ12 E R1 E(R 2 )
C= 2
E R1 − E R 2
2 2
σ2p = 0,443 ∙ E R p + 0,138 ∙ E(R p ) + 0,011C ≅ 0,665 ∙ E R p + 0,104
B 0,665
E R∗p = − =− = −15,6%
2A 0,104
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
43
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
2 2
σ12 E R 2 + σ22 E R1 − 2σ12 E R1 E(R 2 )
C= 2
E R1 − E R 2
2
σ2p = 3,181 ∙ E R p − 0,807 ∙ E(R p ) + 0,051
B
E R∗p = − = 12,7%
2A
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
45
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
2 2
σ12 E R 2 + σ22 E R1 − 2σ12 E R1 E(R 2 )
C= 2
E R1 − E R 2
2
σ2p = 2,145 ∙ E R p − 0,449 ∙ E(R p ) + 0,036
B 2
E R∗p = − = 10,47% σp = 2,145 ∙ E R p − 0,449 ∙ E R p + 0,036 = 11,18%
2A
σ
Total Risk
Idiosyncratic
Risk
Systematic
Risk
3 Determining the efficient frontier taking data from step 2. If a RFR is used, the
efficient frontier is a line, otherwise, it will be a curve.
1 All investors are mean-variance optimizers, so they select their portfolios according to the MPT
All investors have access to the same return matrices and Var&Cov matrices.
EMH: All investors receive instantaneously all relevant information.
σp
wR =
σR
σp E R R − RFR
𝐂𝐀𝐋 E Rp =
σR
∙ E R R + 1 − wR ∙ RFR = RFR +
σR
σP
CAL Slope
3 R (wR = 1).
RFR
R is the point where the investor invest all his
money in the risky asset (100%).
If we have n risky asset, the final choice will be a line starting at the RFR and tangent to the efficient frontier
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
53
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY Definition
M
E(R M )
E R M − RFR
= Price of one unit of risk
σM
RFR
σM σp
(SML)
CML: Nonefficient portfolios and individual securities.
MPT: Portfolio risk depends on the risks and correlations from individual assets.
The risky portfolio hold by all investors is the market portfolio (M). Therefore, the risk and correlation from
each individual assets should be measured in terms of its contribution to the market portfolio.
Portfolio p invest in both the market portfolio (alpha) and a risky (i).
E R p = α ∙ E R M + 1 − α ∙ E(R i )
𝜕E R p E R m − RFR
Efficient Frontier Slope with α = 1 = = = CML Slope
𝜕σp σm
𝜕E R p
𝜕E R p = E R m − E(R i )
𝜕α
𝜕E R p
= 𝜕α
𝜕σp 𝜕σp
𝜕σ2p 𝜕σp
𝜕α = 2σp = 2ασ2m − 2 1 − α σ2i + 2σim 1 − 2α
𝜕α 𝜕α
𝜕σ2p 𝜕σp
α=1 = 2σp = 2σ2m − 2σim
𝜕α 𝜕α
E R m − E(R i ) σm E R m − RFR
=
σ2m − σim σm
σim
E R i = RFR + E R m − RFR ∙ βi βi =
σ2m
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
58
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
1 β>1 Aggressive assets. Individual asset returns are more volatile than market portfolio returns.
2 β<1 Defensive assets. Individual asset returns are less volatile than market portfolio returns.
4 β<0 Hedging assets (In the real world there are no negative betas).
Portfolio Beta βp = βi w i
B
Graphical representation of the SML
E(R p )
M
E(R M )
“Risky Stock” Risk Premium
A
Market Risk Premium
RFR
βm = 1 βi
Expected returns of an individual asset as a Expected returns of the efficient portfolios as a function
function of its sensitivity to market fluctuations. of their volatility measured by the standard deviation.
¿Are all equilibrium portfolios located ¿ Are all efficient portfolios located on
on the SML also located on the CML? the CML also located on the SML?
NO YES
ρpm σm σp
SML E R i = RFR + E R m − RFR ∙
σ2m
σp
E R i = RFR + E R m − RFR ∙
σm
E R m − RFR
CML E R i = RFR + ∙ σp
σm
E(R p )
A (Undervalued Security)
αi = E R i − ECAPM (R i )
α𝐴 > 0
αi = E R i − RFR + E R m − RFR ∙ βi
αB < 0
RFR
B (Overvalued Security)
βi
590 − 460
E Ri = = 28,3%
460
XYZ is undervalued.
Recommendation: Buy.
Interest Rates
Business Cycle
…………
Currency Rates
SLRM Ri
R i = αi + βi ∙ R m + εi
βi
SLRM (time series)
R it = αi + βi ∙ R mt + εit 1
Mathematical Expectancy αi
E(R i ) = αi + βi ∙ E(R m )
Rm
1 E εi = 0 y E ε2i = σ2εi
Idiosyncratic returns have zero expected value.
Idiosyncratic returns have constant variance for all observations.
2 σε i ε j = 0 ∀i ≠ j
Idiosyncratic returns are statistically independent across firms (zero covariance).
What is common to all assets is their sensitivity to the variations in the market return and everything
else is absolutely specific to each individual asset.
3 εi ~Normal
Idiosyncratic returns are normally distributed. Therefore, they are independent of the market returns,
and so, uncorrelated with the market returns. This means that:
Cov εi , R m = E εi − E εi Rm − E Rm = E εi R m − E R m =0
R it = αi + βi ∙ R mt + εit
Component of the return that is explained by the regression model: αi + βi ∙ R mt
Component of the return that is not explained by the regression model : εit
R it βi
Actual Value = αi + βi R mt + εt
εt
Predicted Value = αi + βi R mt
αi
R mt
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
68
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
1) The expected value of a sum of random variables is the sum of the expected values.
2) Becasue alpha and beta are constants: E(αi ) = αi y E βi = βi
3) E εi = 0
E(R i ) = αi + βi ∙ E(R m )
1) Var(x) = E x − E(x) 2
2) E(R i ) = αi + βi ∙ E(R m )
2
σ2i = E R i − E(R i ) 2
= E αi + βi R m + εi − αi − βi E(R m ) 2
= E βi ∙ R m − E R m + εi
2
σ2i = β2i ∙ E R m − E R m + 2 ∙ βi ∙ E εi ∙ R m − E R m + E ε2i
σ2i = β2i ∙ E R m − E R m
2
+ E ε2i σ2i = β2i ∙ σ2m + σ2𝜀𝑖
1) R it = αi + βi ∙ R mt + εit
2) E(R i ) = αi + βi ∙ E(R m )
2
σij = βi ∙ βj ∙ E( R mt − E R m + βj ∙ E εi ∙ R m − E(R m ) + βi ∙ E εj ∙ R m − E(R m ) + E εi ∙ εj
1) E εj ∙ R m − E(R m ) =0
2) E εi ∙ εj = 0
2
σij = βi ∙ βj ∙ E( R mt − E R m σij = βi ∙ βj ∙ σ2m
b) Determine the covariance and the correlation coefficient across Carrefour and
Danone.
σC,D = βC ∙ βD ∙ σ2m = 1,25 ∙ 1,15 ∙ 0,03752 = 0,002021
σC,D 0,002021
ρC,D = = = 0,4332
σC ∙ σD 0,0584 ∙ 0,0799
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
71
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
1) R p = αp + βp ∙ R m + εp
2) R p = σ wi R i
3) βp = σ wi βi
2
n n
As the individual residuals ( σ2εi ) are not correlated, the portfolio residual
variance (σ2𝑝 ) tends to zero.
∆n
As the porfolio beta is a linear combination of the individual betas, an increase
of n does not imply a reduction in the portfolio variance.
Explained Variance in R i
R2 =
Total Variance in R i
Hypothesis: Asset returns are linearly related to the market returns.
Variation in R i that can be explained by variations in R m .
R2 ∈ 0,1
R2 = 0,40 means that 60% of the return cannot be explained by the model.
2
β2i ∙ σ2m β2i ∙ σ2m σim βi ∙ βm ∙ σ2m βi ∙ σm
R = = 2 2 ρim = = = = R2 ρ2im = R2
σ2i βi ∙ σm + σ2εi σi ∙ σm σi ∙ σm σi
2
Nonexplained Variance in R i 2
σ2εi
R =1− R =1−
Total Variance in R i σ2i
In practice, the market model performs poorly on individual assets; typically, the variation in the
returns on the market index explains less than half of the variation in the returns on an individual
asset (i.e., R2 < 50%). The performance of the market model is far more satisfactory for well
diversified portfolios where the model accounts for a major part of the variation in returns.
Cov(R i , R m )
Cov R i , R m = Cov αi + βi R m + εi , R m = βi Cov R m , R m + Cov(εi , R m ) β𝑖 =
Var(R m )
1) Market Model Hypothesis: Cov εi , R m = 0.
Market Model
Cov(R i , R m )
βi =
Var(R m )
Suppose we have 30 returns from a stock Market index (m) and from a portfolio (i).
𝟑𝟎 𝟑𝟎
𝟐
𝐄(𝐑 𝐦 ) 𝐄(𝐑 𝐢 ) 𝐑 𝐢𝐭 − 𝐄(𝐑 𝐢 ) 𝐑 𝐦𝐭 − 𝐄(𝐑 𝐦 ) 𝐑 𝐦𝐭 − 𝐄 𝐑 𝐦
𝐭=𝟏 𝐭=𝟏
σim σ30
t=1 R it − E(R i ) R mt − E(R m ) 4,5061%
βi = 2 = 2 = = 1,60
σm σ30 2,8155%
t=1 R mt − E R m
Markowitz Market
n
Model Model
1 2 4
2 5 7
3 9 10
4 14 13
5 20 16
10 65 31
50 1.325 151
100 5.150 301 Considerable improvement over the original Markowitz model
1000 501.500 3.001 because the number of data needed to calculate the efficient
5000 12.507.500 15.001 frontier is significatively reduced
Skewness
Kurtosis
Shortfall Probability
Covariance
Correlation Coefficient
Relative
Tracking Error σ2
Tracking Error σ
Sharpe Ratio
Treynor Ratio
Jensen’s Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Information Ratio
Absolute Risk
Downside Risk
Relative Risk
n n
1 2 1 2
σ2p = ∙ rp,t − rഥp σp = ∙ rp,t − rഥp
n−1 n−1
t=1 t=1
Both statistics measure the return dispersion around the mean return.
It is an ex-post risk measure.
It is the second central moment in relation to the mean.
A higher level of dispersion is considered as investors as a higher level of risk.
We use the standard deviation because it is an undimensional variable (% terms).
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Portfolio 0,82% 0,54% 1,35% -0,54% -0,24% 0,69% 0,13% -0,99% 1,20% 0,84%
Benchmark 0,65% 0,87% 1,00% -0,24% 0,23% 0,58% 0,54% -0,52% -0,12% 0,54%
1 2 2 2
σp = ∙ 0,82 − 0,38 + 0,54 − 0,38 + ⋯ + 0,84 − 0,38 = 0,77%
9
1 2 2 2
σb = ∙ 0,65 − 0,35 + 0,87 − 0,35 + ⋯ + 1,00 − 0,35 = 0,50%
9
=DESVEST.M()
Both statistics measure the linear relationship between two random variables.
While covariance is dimensional −∞, +∞ the correlation coefficient is undimensional −1, +1 .
Correlation Coefficient = +1. Positive and Perfect linear relationship.
Correlation Coefficient = -1. Negative and Perfect linear relationship.
Correlation Coefficient = 0. There is no linear relationship.
1 2 2 2
σp = ∙ 0,82 − 0,38 + 0,54 − 0,38 + ⋯ + 0,84 − 0,38 = 0,77%
9
1 2 2 2
σb = ∙ 0,65 − 0,35 + 0,87 − 0,35 + ⋯ + 1,00 − 0,35 = 0,50%
9
1
σrp,rb = 0,82 − 0,38 0,65 − 0,35 + 0,54 − 0,38 0,87 − 0,35 + ⋯ + 0,84 − 0,38 0,54 − 0,35 = 0,0000265
9
σrp ,rb 0,0000265
ρrp ,rb = = = 0,687
σrp ∙ σrb 0,0077 ∙ 0,005
Sharpe Ratio
V. Measuring Risk and Performance
Performance Measures
rഥp − RFR
Sharpe =
σp
It measures the excess return over the RFR per unit of total risk.
It is a reward-to-risk ratio based on the CAPM.
It is a ratio based on absolute risk because it uses the standard deviation as the measure of risk.
As it considers the total risk of investment portfolios is an appropriate statistic to use if the portfolios are
compared as being total investment portfolios not considered to be merged with other investments.
Treynor Ratio
V. Measuring Risk and Performance
Performance Measures
It measures the excess return over the RFR per unit of systematic risk.
It is a risk-to-return ratio based on the CAPM.
It is a ratio based on absolute risk because it uses the systematic risk as the measure of risk.
It is an appropriate ratio when portfolios are well diversified with a unique relevant risk, the systematic
risk.
Jensen’s Alpha
V. Measuring Risk and Performance
Performance Measures
Portfolio manager contribution: Contribution due to the security selection + Contribution due to
the Market Risk assumed.
It is a reward-to-risk ratio based on the CAPM.
rഥp − RFR
Sharpe =
V. Measuring Risk and Performance σp
Performance Measures
Imagine we gathered the following annual data concerning three portfolios and their benchmark (market). Additionally,
we know that the risk-free rate is 2%, and also that the threshold return is 3%.
a) ¿Which one of the following portfolios is preferred according to the Sharpe ratio?
4% − 2%
SharpeA = = 2,00
1%
15% − 2%
SharpeB = = 1,30
10%
20% − 2%
SharpeC = = 0,72
25%
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
89
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe
1 & 2. PORTFOLIO THEORY
rഥp − RFR
Treynor =
IV. Midiendo el Riesgo βp
Performance Measures
Imagine we gathered the following annual data concerning three portfolios and their benchmark (market). Additionally,
we know that the risk-free rate is 2%, and also that the threshold return is 3%.
b) ¿Which one of the following portfolios is preferred according to the Treynor ratio?
4% − 2%
TreynorA = = 4%
0,54
15% − 2%
TreynorB = = 10%
1,35
20% − 2%
TreynorC = = 9%
1,90
Alexey De La Loma Jiménez (alexey.delalomajimenez@ceu.es).
90
CFA, CMT, CAIA, FRM, EFA, CFTe