Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Integrated Process For Iron Recovery and Binder Production From Bauxite
An Integrated Process For Iron Recovery and Binder Production From Bauxite
An Integrated Process For Iron Recovery and Binder Production From Bauxite
An integrated process for iron recovery and binder production from bauxite
residue (red mud)
Tobias Hertel, Amy Van den Bulck, Bart Blanpain, Yiannis Pontikes
PII: S0167-577X(19)31905-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127273
Reference: MLBLUE 127273
Please cite this article as: T. Hertel, A. Van den Bulck, B. Blanpain, Y. Pontikes, An integrated process for iron
recovery and binder production from bauxite residue (red mud), Materials Letters (2019), doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127273
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will
undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing
this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Tobias Hertel*, Amy Van den Bulck, Bart Blanpain, Yiannis Pontikes
Belgium
Abstract
Bauxite residue, the waste product from the Bayer process, typically consists of approximately
40 wt% Fe2O3, which makes it a potential resource for Fe. This study presents an integrated
residue towards alkali-activated binders. About 75 wt% of residue was melted with the addition
of C, B2O3 and SiO2 at 1250 °C. During this treatment, and after water quenching, a significant
amount of Fe was formed as well as an almost fully vitrified slag. The slag was used to produce
inorganic polymers with satisfactory compressive strengths. However, tincalconite, a boron salt
Keywords
Boron oxide; bauxite residue; red mud; iron recovery; inorganic polymer; geopolymer
1. Introduction
The global move toward more sustainable management of industrial residues creates an
opportunity for bauxite residue (BR) generated during alumina production to be utilised in
various processes. As the residue’s chemistry is dominated by Fe2O3, recovery of Fe has been
1
the focus of much research programmes and is reviewed elsewhere [1]. In most studies,
energy-intensive reductive smelting, usually at a temperature above 1500 °C, was applied in
combination with suitable fluxes, such as silica and lime. This high smelting temperature and
fluxing leads to a low viscosity melt and satisfactory metal-slag separation. The remaining
material can be used for other processes, e.g. alkali-activated inorganic polymers (IP) [2].
remaining fraction is relatively unreactive for use as binder precursor. Kavas et al. [3]
demonstrated the vitrification potential of using boron-containing wastes as fluxes for the
production of fired BR-derived bricks. The firing temperature was decreased significantly and
mechanical properties increased with higher boron content. Boron is known to be a powerful
glass former and an effective flux in glass making [4]. Previous works demonstrate the
incorporation of B into alkali-activated binders, e.g. made from borosilicate glass [5], silica fume-
borax-NaOH IPs [6], or IPs made from fly ash and borax additions to the Na-silicate activator
[7]. Trigonal boron was shown to transform into fourfold-coordinated B, and so incorporated in
Here, we use B2O3 with C and SiO2 as fluxes for BR in an integrated process at a treatment
temperature of 1250 °C. The aim is the recovery of Fe and the production of IPs from the
2. Experimental Methods
BR (Rusal Aughinish) was used as raw material that consisted of 43.4 wt% Fe2O3, 19.5 wt%
Al2O3, 11.8 wt% SiO2, 5.2 wt% CaO, 9.0 wt% TiO2 and 8.8 wt% Na2O. The loss-on-ignition
The composition and loss-on-ignition were used as input for thermodynamic calculations
additions to BR at 1250 °C. The aim was to identify the optimum additions for a maximal Fe-
recovery and iron-depleted melt formation, and to use over 70 wt% BR. A constant silica
addition of 13.2 wt% was used, as previous work demonstrates its suitability as a flux [8].
2
The slag was produced as described elsewhere [9], but at a temperature of 1250 °C. The
resulting material was crushed by a hammer, sieved and manually separated. The material was
then ground to ~10 mm, sieved and separated magnetically. The different fractions were
weighed to determine the recovery rate of iron. The non-magnetic fraction (i.e. slag) was milled
to a surface area of 5000 cm2/g (EN 196-6). The crystallinity of the slag was investigated using
quantitative X-ray diffraction and the bond structure of the material was investigated with
The chemical composition of slag and metal fragments was determined using an electron probe
IP pastes were prepared by mixing Na-silicate solution (molar ratio SiO2/Na2O=2.0, H2O
content=65 wt%) to a liquid-to-solid ratio of 0.5. The samples were cured at 20±2 °C for 28 d.
The hardened pastes were used for EPMA and FTIR analyses and compared to the slag. The
hydrolytic stability of the pastes was assessed by immersing 1 g of ground IP for 24 h in 100 ml
of water. After filtration, the leachate was analysed using an ICP-OES (Varian 720 ES). Solids
Mortar samples were prepared on the basis of the EN197-1. The Na-silicate solution was used
with a liquid-to-slag ratio of 0.56 in order to achieve workability. The mortars were wrapped with
film and cured at 20±2 °C until the day of strength testing on 4x4x16 cm³ prisms.
(with constant addition of 13.4 wt% silica) lead to a considerable increase in iron-depleted melt
and the formation of metallic Fe(s) (Figure 1). Based on these results, BR was mixed with
additions of 13.2 wt% SiO2, 12.1 wt% B2O3 and 8.7 wt% C (all based on 100 wt% BR).
3
Figure 1: Thermodynamic calculations; BR+SiO2+additions, modelled amount of a) melt, b)
Experimentally, a mass fraction of 77.7 wt% slag and 22.3 wt% Fe(s) was obtained. This result
was close to the modelled proportions (Figure 1). A recovery of approximately 92 wt% of Fe was
achieved. The slag was almost fully vitrified with 1 wt% anorthite, 1 wt% spinel and <1 wt% Fe
(Figure S1). The composition of the amorphous phase, determined by EMPA-WDX, was 27.2
wt% SiO2, 24.8 wt% Al2O3, 10.1 wt% TiO2, 7.2 wt% Na2O, 17.7 wt% B2O3, 6.9 wt% CaO and 6.1
wt% FeO. FTIR analysis indicated the presence of BO3 units (1200-1500 cm-1) as well as BO4
units (850-1200 cm-1) [10], the latter overlapping with the signal of Si-O bonds [11]. No boron
was detected in the metallic fraction that was dominated by Fe (95.7-100 wt%), with some Cr
(≤4.3 wt%) and Ni (≤0.4 wt%), a composition that might be interesting for steelmaking.
The compressive strength of the mortars was satisfactory, with 2 d strength of 35 MPa and 28 d
4
Figure 2: Strengths of mortars.
FTIR results of the IP pastes showed an increase in the intensity of the band at 850-1200 cm-1
compared to the slag, and a reduction of the bands located between 1200-1500 cm-1, which can
be interpreted as a partial transformation of BO3 towards BO4 units in the IP and thus
incorporation in the binder (Figure S2). However, a definitive interpretation is difficult as addition
of the silicate activator produces a simultaneous increase in the Si-O band and overlap in this
area.
About 95 mg/L of B was detected from the paste specimen in the leach solutions after the
hydrolytic stability test. This result was also in line with EPMA-WDX analyses conducted on the
IPs, in which lower B contents were determined in the binder compared to the slag (Figure 3).
The samples thus released boron and sodium, but did not disintegrate.
5
Figure 3: EPMA-WDX maps of the IP sample. The intensity of B2O3 is given as the background
was not considered in mapping analysis, which is important for quantification, particularly for
6
During the leaching test, white precipitates were observed in the leachate. After drying, XRD
analysis revealed the formation of tincalconite (Na2(B4O7)·5H2O) (Figure S3), the dehydration
product of borax (Na2(B4O5)(OH)4·8H2O), most likely formed from released Na and tetraborate
ions.
In contrast to previous works [5,6], the results demonstrated that boron was not, or at least not
fully, incorporated in the IP. Williams et al. [6] also detected the formation of hydrated borax as
a reaction product that might dissolve in contact with water and leach out. Additional research
on the mix design of the IP is needed: different dosage and type of activator may lead to
Apart from IP, other options for use of the slag, and an integrated near-zero-waste process,
exist. For instance, as the content of B and other fluxing elements is relatively high, the slag
could be used as flux in metallurgical processes, including the one herein. The slag is also a
potential raw material for glass ceramics. The migration of water soluble salts (efflorescence) to
the surface upon drying will produce a glazed outer surface upon firing, a process known as
self-glazing or salt glazing [12]. Finally, the IPs produced herein could also lead to glazed glass-
ceramics upon firing, in a process resembling the one described elsewhere [13].
4. Conclusion
This study presented an integrated process in which Fe recovery was followed by valorisation of
the remaining residue towards an inorganic polymer. A blend consisting of 75 wt% of the
residue combined with C, B2O3 and SiO2 was melted 1250 °C and then water-quenched.
Approximately 22 wt% of Fe, i.e. a recovery rate of 92 % Fe, and 78 wt% of almost fully vitrified
slag were obtained. Inorganic polymers with 28 d strengths exceeding 50 MPa were reached.
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s
Horizon 2020 Programme ([H2020/2014-2019]) under Grant Agreement no. 636876 (MSCA-
7
ETN REDMUD). This publication reflects only the authors' views, exempting the Community
References
[1] C.R. Borra, B. Blanpain, Y. Pontikes, K. Binnemans, T. Van Gerven, Recovery of Rare
Earths and Other Valuable Metals From Bauxite Residue (Red Mud), J. Sustain. Metall. 2
(2016) 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-016-0068-2.
[2] T. Hertel, B. Xakalashe, B. Friedrich, Y. Pontikes, Synthesis of inorganic polymers from
vitreous slags produced by EAF smelting of bauxite residue, in: A. Malfliet et al. (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 6th International Slag Valorisation Symposium, 2019, pp. 423–426.
[3] T. Kavas, Use of boron waste as a fluxing agent in production of red mud brick, Building
and Environment 41 (2006) 1779–1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.019.
[4] R.A. Smith, Boron in glass and glass making, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 84 (1986)
421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(86)90805-7.
[5] G. Taveri, J. Tousek, E. Bernardo, N. Toniolo, A.R. Boccaccini, I. Dlouhy, Proving the role
of boron in the structure of fly-ash/borosilicate glass based geopolymers, Materials Letters
200 (2017) 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.107.
[6] R.P. Williams, A. Van Riessen, Development of alkali activated borosilicate inorganic
polymers (AABSIP), Journal of the European Ceramic Society 31 (2011) 1513–1516.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.02.021.
[7] C.L. Nicholson, R.A. Fletcher, Geopolymers and methods for their production,
WO2005019130A1 (2005).
[8] T. Hertel, B. Blanpain, Y. Pontikes, A Proposal for a 100 % Use of Bauxite Residue
Towards Inorganic Polymer Mortar, J. Sustain. Metall. 2 (2016) 394–404.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-016-0080-6.
[9] T. Hertel, R.M. Novais, R. Murillo Alarcón, J.A. Labrincha, Y. Pontikes, Use of modified
bauxite residue-based porous inorganic polymer monoliths as adsorbents of methylene
blue, Journal of Cleaner Production 227 (2019) 877–889.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.084.
[10] E.I. Kamitsos, M.A. Karakassides, G.D. Chryssikos, Vibrational spectra of magnesium-
sodium-borate glasses. 2. Raman and mid-infrared investigation of the network structure,
J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100289a014.
[11] F. Gervais, A. Blin, D. Massiot, J.P. Coutures, M.H. Chopinet, F. Naudin, Infrared
reflectivity spectroscopy of silicate glasses, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 89 (1987)
384–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(87)80280-6.
[12] T. Kavas, A. Christogerou, Y. Pontikes, G.N. Angelopoulos, Valorisation of different types
of boron-containing wastes for the production of lightweight aggregates, Journal of
hazardous materials 185 (2011) 1381–1389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.059.
[13] M. Marangoni, L. Arnout, L. Machiels, L. Pandelaers, E. Bernardo, P. Colombo, Y.
Pontikes, C. Jantzen, Porous, Sintered Glass-Ceramics from Inorganic Polymers Based on
Fayalite Slag, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99 (2016) 1985–1991.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14224.
8
9
An integrated process for iron recovery and
10
Tobias Hertel*, Amy Van den Bulck, Bart Blanpain, Yiannis Pontikes
Belgium
Highlights
- Integrated valorisation process for bauxite residue using boron oxide as flux
11